Mumbai v Saurashtra, Ranji Trophy, final, 2nd day January 27, 2013

Jaffer gives Mumbai a healthy lead

  shares 14

Mumbai 287 for 6 (Jaffer 132) lead Saurashtra 148 (Kulkarni 4-24) by 139 runs
Scorecard and ball-by-ball details

Wasim Jaffer's record-breaking century confirmed the first-innings lead for Mumbai but the widely expected barrage of runs didn't arrive from the home side, allowing a spirited Saurashtra a sliver of a chance to come back in the Ranji final. Mumbai are still in charge though not as emphatically as they would have liked.

Saurashtra showed the sort of fighting attitude that has lifted the low-profile team to the finals. This was highlighted in the 34th over when despite several close calls for the batsmen in the morning session, Saurashtra were still looking for the first breakthrough. Jaffer had just struck three successive fours in the previous over to take Mumbai to 75 for 0. There was no wilting under the strain, though, and when Rahul Dave made a diving stop at cover, as many as six fielders ran up to him to give a congratulatory pat. Two balls later, Siddharth Trivedi had the opener Kaustubh Pawar caught and bowled.

Aditya Tare, another heavy scorer this season, followed soon after, rousing the Sunday crowd from the stupor of a session of slow-going cricket. The man most of the fans were in to see, Sachin Tendulkar, walked out to the familiar chants of "Sachin, Sachin." Tendulkar's record in Ranji finals is as fearsome as Mumbai's, and once he survived a few anxious minutes early on, Saurashtra looked set for a long haul as Jaffer was also looking fluent and settled.

Tendulkar got going with an effortless off drive between the non-striker and mid-off and a disdainful flick through midwicket next ball. When he paddle-swept Kamlesh Makvana's first ball in the next over, the crowd was at its most vocal.

They were silenced not long after, though. You'd think over the course of a 25-season career, there would be few 'firsts' left for Tendulkar. Till today, though, he had never been run-out in a Ranji match. He was sent back by Jaffer after he had pushed the ball towards point but couldn't beat the throw from Makvana.

That was the one low point in a day to savour for Jaffer. He claimed two prestigious Ranji Trophy records - most runs and hundreds in the tournament - and also went past 16,000 first-class runs. With most of the other specialist batsmen not contributing anything substantial, Jaffer's hundred was the cornerstone of Mumbai's innings. It will help Jaffer put aside the disappointment of making just one run in Mumbai's two knock-out matches last season when their campaign ground to a halt in the semi-finals. Even more praiseworthy is that Jaffer's recent run of three centuries in four matches have come despite the fact that his father is in hospital following a heart attack.

It wasn't Jaffer at his best of his innings, though. He survived a close lbw call on his first delivery and was reprieved after a loud caught-behind appeal early on the second morning. There was another life for him when the wicketkeeper Sagar Jogiyani broke the stumps before the ball had arrived, with Jaffer out of his ground.

However, there were some glorious strokes as well. He took on the gentle left-arm spin of Dharmendrasinh Jadeja in the morning after being patient for close to two hours, getting to fifty with a nonchalant six over long-on. There was also a classic drive past extra cover off Saurya Sanandiya to bring up Mumbai's hundred. He looked more and more difficult to dislodge as his innings progressed and when he was finally dismissed for 132, it was through a poor lbw decision when the ball looked to be sliding down.

Abhishek Nayar had provided Jaffer company for a while, using the sweep repeatedly to race to 26 off 35 before he swung a harmless Makvana delivery to midwicket. Ajit Agarkar was also dismissed cheaply and with Mumbai at 237 for 6, Saurashtra were dreaming of a comeback.

Mumbai, as usual, found a player to ease their nerves. Hiken Shah stuck around for more than an hour to make an unbeaten 41, and put on an unbroken 50-run stand with the first day's hero Dhawal Kulkarni. Saurashtra didn't help their cause by delaying taking the new ball till the 88th over instead of going for the kill earlier itself. That allowed the lead to swell to 139, and left the Mumbai dressing room a more relaxed place.

Siddarth Ravindran is a senior sub-editor at ESPNcricinfo

Comments have now been closed for this article

  • POSTED BY shwet14 on | January 28, 2013, 3:45 GMT

    Wasim Jaffer is class and grace personified with a bat in hand. This effort, though it has come against not a strong attack, and had luck going his way a few times; must be recognized by the selectors. If the nations top first class tournament cannot give milage to a player then wonder what will? Probably IPL has proven to be the new gate to the national team, which is very sad. With Sehwag & Gambhir totally out of touch, Jaffer must get a chance. I cannot forget the double he hit in Kolkata aginst Pak- Shoaib, Sami, Kaneria. That was a classy knock. India need a solid opener for the series in SA & England in 2014. Jaffer cannot do worse than GG & Viru.I was aghast to see Gambhir included in yesterdays ODI despite releated failures. What did Dhoni achive by benching Pujara once again, that too in a dead rubber game?

  • POSTED BY Sudarshanj on | January 28, 2013, 11:33 GMT

    Am i the only one to be worried about overall quality of our first class cricket? The team enters the final of ranji trophy only to be exposed by slightest amount of help for bowlers and is blown away inside three days. Signs not good for indian cricket... Next time BCCI should take pitches in its hands and make sure there are no featherbeds like rajkot or pune.

  • POSTED BY Sudarshanj on | January 28, 2013, 11:23 GMT

    Tony: This particular habit of us indians is cause for our downfall in recent times. Instead of plainly accepting that we were not upto the mark, we search for excuses like injury, pitches etc... Accept mate, Sau were not upto the mark hence lost. Nothing to do with pujara or jadeja...

  • POSTED BY tony122 on | January 28, 2013, 10:39 GMT

    Congrats Mumbai. And Mumbai should thank Dhoni to a large extent. He refused to release Pujara for Ranji final and preferred to sit him on the bench and watch the meaningless last match against England. Dhoni should be given Man of the Final.

  • POSTED BY _Sid on | January 28, 2013, 10:09 GMT

    Congrats Wasim............ Take a bow!!!!!

  • POSTED BY PointFielder on | January 28, 2013, 7:42 GMT

    Mumbai has a chance to win the 40th title with an innings margin. Good to see prolific Wasim back in form.

  • POSTED BY Dhanno on | January 27, 2013, 23:10 GMT

    This is far from over. If Saurashtra keeps the lead to 150-175 and comes to bat with intent then they are better equipped to defend a low score bowling 4th. 2nd day of Ranji final was always going to important, given the best batting conditions available. Hopefully this still turns out to be a good contest and better team wins it.

  • POSTED BY Al_Bundy1 on | January 27, 2013, 21:04 GMT

    It's strange that Sehwag and Gambhir have been running a flop show for the past 2 years but they get selected again and again. Jaffer had one poor series against Australia and he was dropped forever. Jaffer is still a much better opener than Sehwag or Gambhir, especially for tests.

  • POSTED BY fod-c8w on | January 27, 2013, 20:48 GMT

    One cant (and shouldnt) compare Jaffer to Ajay Sharma (0 fifties), or Kanitkar (0 fifties) or even Brijesh Patel (1 century) and Ashok Mankad (0 centuries). Jaffer, despite being treated scurvily by the selectors, ended up with 5 test centuries (2 test double centuries) and almost 2000 test runs for India, with 3 test tons (including 1 double) abroad. India has made 5 tours of South Africa (over 22 years) - yet Jaffer remains the only Indian opener ever to score a century on South African soil (vs an attack of Steyn, Ntini, Pollock and Kallis, no less).

    Being dropped for Sehwag and Gambhir was one thing - both were excellent bats for India. But what was always unforgivable was the Srikkant-led committee wasting 12 tests on M.Vijay (1 ton, 2 fifties - all at home; avg 19 abroad) and 5 tests on Mukund (1 fifty) at opener, all while Jaffer was fit, available, piling up runs - and being ignored. Heck, Suresh Raina (he of the 41 fc average) has played 17 tests for India recently!

    c8w

  • POSTED BY BnH1985Fan on | January 27, 2013, 17:01 GMT

    Some batsmen are meant only to play well on the national circuit. Of the top century scorers in Ranji, only VVS stands out (but he is low on that list). People like Jaffer, Ajay Sharma, Kanitkar etc. are like Ashok Mankad and Brijesh Patel -- lions on the national circuits, but barely whimper on the international scene where it matters. That being said, Jaffer should get another chance given repeated failures by Sehwag and Gambhir -- he can't be any worse. And he may be "hungry" for life at the international scene.

  • POSTED BY shwet14 on | January 28, 2013, 3:45 GMT

    Wasim Jaffer is class and grace personified with a bat in hand. This effort, though it has come against not a strong attack, and had luck going his way a few times; must be recognized by the selectors. If the nations top first class tournament cannot give milage to a player then wonder what will? Probably IPL has proven to be the new gate to the national team, which is very sad. With Sehwag & Gambhir totally out of touch, Jaffer must get a chance. I cannot forget the double he hit in Kolkata aginst Pak- Shoaib, Sami, Kaneria. That was a classy knock. India need a solid opener for the series in SA & England in 2014. Jaffer cannot do worse than GG & Viru.I was aghast to see Gambhir included in yesterdays ODI despite releated failures. What did Dhoni achive by benching Pujara once again, that too in a dead rubber game?

  • POSTED BY Sudarshanj on | January 28, 2013, 11:33 GMT

    Am i the only one to be worried about overall quality of our first class cricket? The team enters the final of ranji trophy only to be exposed by slightest amount of help for bowlers and is blown away inside three days. Signs not good for indian cricket... Next time BCCI should take pitches in its hands and make sure there are no featherbeds like rajkot or pune.

  • POSTED BY Sudarshanj on | January 28, 2013, 11:23 GMT

    Tony: This particular habit of us indians is cause for our downfall in recent times. Instead of plainly accepting that we were not upto the mark, we search for excuses like injury, pitches etc... Accept mate, Sau were not upto the mark hence lost. Nothing to do with pujara or jadeja...

  • POSTED BY tony122 on | January 28, 2013, 10:39 GMT

    Congrats Mumbai. And Mumbai should thank Dhoni to a large extent. He refused to release Pujara for Ranji final and preferred to sit him on the bench and watch the meaningless last match against England. Dhoni should be given Man of the Final.

  • POSTED BY _Sid on | January 28, 2013, 10:09 GMT

    Congrats Wasim............ Take a bow!!!!!

  • POSTED BY PointFielder on | January 28, 2013, 7:42 GMT

    Mumbai has a chance to win the 40th title with an innings margin. Good to see prolific Wasim back in form.

  • POSTED BY Dhanno on | January 27, 2013, 23:10 GMT

    This is far from over. If Saurashtra keeps the lead to 150-175 and comes to bat with intent then they are better equipped to defend a low score bowling 4th. 2nd day of Ranji final was always going to important, given the best batting conditions available. Hopefully this still turns out to be a good contest and better team wins it.

  • POSTED BY Al_Bundy1 on | January 27, 2013, 21:04 GMT

    It's strange that Sehwag and Gambhir have been running a flop show for the past 2 years but they get selected again and again. Jaffer had one poor series against Australia and he was dropped forever. Jaffer is still a much better opener than Sehwag or Gambhir, especially for tests.

  • POSTED BY fod-c8w on | January 27, 2013, 20:48 GMT

    One cant (and shouldnt) compare Jaffer to Ajay Sharma (0 fifties), or Kanitkar (0 fifties) or even Brijesh Patel (1 century) and Ashok Mankad (0 centuries). Jaffer, despite being treated scurvily by the selectors, ended up with 5 test centuries (2 test double centuries) and almost 2000 test runs for India, with 3 test tons (including 1 double) abroad. India has made 5 tours of South Africa (over 22 years) - yet Jaffer remains the only Indian opener ever to score a century on South African soil (vs an attack of Steyn, Ntini, Pollock and Kallis, no less).

    Being dropped for Sehwag and Gambhir was one thing - both were excellent bats for India. But what was always unforgivable was the Srikkant-led committee wasting 12 tests on M.Vijay (1 ton, 2 fifties - all at home; avg 19 abroad) and 5 tests on Mukund (1 fifty) at opener, all while Jaffer was fit, available, piling up runs - and being ignored. Heck, Suresh Raina (he of the 41 fc average) has played 17 tests for India recently!

    c8w

  • POSTED BY BnH1985Fan on | January 27, 2013, 17:01 GMT

    Some batsmen are meant only to play well on the national circuit. Of the top century scorers in Ranji, only VVS stands out (but he is low on that list). People like Jaffer, Ajay Sharma, Kanitkar etc. are like Ashok Mankad and Brijesh Patel -- lions on the national circuits, but barely whimper on the international scene where it matters. That being said, Jaffer should get another chance given repeated failures by Sehwag and Gambhir -- he can't be any worse. And he may be "hungry" for life at the international scene.

  • POSTED BY Nampally on | January 27, 2013, 15:29 GMT

    What happened to Joshi, the hero of the semi Final for Saurashtra? I was expecting him to be the trump card of the Saurashtra Bowling! Was he the spinner left out to provide room for a seamer? If he was, it was the wrong spinner dropped. Of course Pujara is missed badly, especially when he was benched for all 4 ODI's.How much childish glee does Dhoni get by benching the best batsman in India today?

  • POSTED BY on | January 27, 2013, 15:13 GMT

    Given the present lack of quality openers, instead of bestowing a walking-wicket in the form of Gambhir, the selectors would do well to look at Jaffer as an interim solution. He has played 31 Tests and has a decent record with 5 centuries and 11 50s. Another person to look at would be Mohammad Kaif for some middle order solidity. Of course I am realistic enough to accept that in the reign of Captain Dhoni where the Rainas, Gambhirs, Yuvrrajs, Rohits etc continue thrive in spite of repeated failures or mediocre performances, this is not likely to happen.

  • POSTED BY Al_Bundy1 on | January 27, 2013, 14:26 GMT

    Wasim Jaffer should open for India in tests. Sehwag and Gambhir are completely out of form. They should make way for in form batsmen like Jaffer and Dhawan.

  • POSTED BY on | January 27, 2013, 14:09 GMT

    Well done Jaffer,You have proved once again that you are technically sound,mentally strong with dedication and positive approach.National Selectors should give him a chance in Test Squad.

  • POSTED BY on | January 27, 2013, 14:09 GMT

    Well done Jaffer,You have proved once again that you are technically sound,mentally strong with dedication and positive approach.National Selectors should give him a chance in Test Squad.

  • POSTED BY Al_Bundy1 on | January 27, 2013, 14:26 GMT

    Wasim Jaffer should open for India in tests. Sehwag and Gambhir are completely out of form. They should make way for in form batsmen like Jaffer and Dhawan.

  • POSTED BY on | January 27, 2013, 15:13 GMT

    Given the present lack of quality openers, instead of bestowing a walking-wicket in the form of Gambhir, the selectors would do well to look at Jaffer as an interim solution. He has played 31 Tests and has a decent record with 5 centuries and 11 50s. Another person to look at would be Mohammad Kaif for some middle order solidity. Of course I am realistic enough to accept that in the reign of Captain Dhoni where the Rainas, Gambhirs, Yuvrrajs, Rohits etc continue thrive in spite of repeated failures or mediocre performances, this is not likely to happen.

  • POSTED BY Nampally on | January 27, 2013, 15:29 GMT

    What happened to Joshi, the hero of the semi Final for Saurashtra? I was expecting him to be the trump card of the Saurashtra Bowling! Was he the spinner left out to provide room for a seamer? If he was, it was the wrong spinner dropped. Of course Pujara is missed badly, especially when he was benched for all 4 ODI's.How much childish glee does Dhoni get by benching the best batsman in India today?

  • POSTED BY BnH1985Fan on | January 27, 2013, 17:01 GMT

    Some batsmen are meant only to play well on the national circuit. Of the top century scorers in Ranji, only VVS stands out (but he is low on that list). People like Jaffer, Ajay Sharma, Kanitkar etc. are like Ashok Mankad and Brijesh Patel -- lions on the national circuits, but barely whimper on the international scene where it matters. That being said, Jaffer should get another chance given repeated failures by Sehwag and Gambhir -- he can't be any worse. And he may be "hungry" for life at the international scene.

  • POSTED BY fod-c8w on | January 27, 2013, 20:48 GMT

    One cant (and shouldnt) compare Jaffer to Ajay Sharma (0 fifties), or Kanitkar (0 fifties) or even Brijesh Patel (1 century) and Ashok Mankad (0 centuries). Jaffer, despite being treated scurvily by the selectors, ended up with 5 test centuries (2 test double centuries) and almost 2000 test runs for India, with 3 test tons (including 1 double) abroad. India has made 5 tours of South Africa (over 22 years) - yet Jaffer remains the only Indian opener ever to score a century on South African soil (vs an attack of Steyn, Ntini, Pollock and Kallis, no less).

    Being dropped for Sehwag and Gambhir was one thing - both were excellent bats for India. But what was always unforgivable was the Srikkant-led committee wasting 12 tests on M.Vijay (1 ton, 2 fifties - all at home; avg 19 abroad) and 5 tests on Mukund (1 fifty) at opener, all while Jaffer was fit, available, piling up runs - and being ignored. Heck, Suresh Raina (he of the 41 fc average) has played 17 tests for India recently!

    c8w

  • POSTED BY Al_Bundy1 on | January 27, 2013, 21:04 GMT

    It's strange that Sehwag and Gambhir have been running a flop show for the past 2 years but they get selected again and again. Jaffer had one poor series against Australia and he was dropped forever. Jaffer is still a much better opener than Sehwag or Gambhir, especially for tests.

  • POSTED BY Dhanno on | January 27, 2013, 23:10 GMT

    This is far from over. If Saurashtra keeps the lead to 150-175 and comes to bat with intent then they are better equipped to defend a low score bowling 4th. 2nd day of Ranji final was always going to important, given the best batting conditions available. Hopefully this still turns out to be a good contest and better team wins it.

  • POSTED BY PointFielder on | January 28, 2013, 7:42 GMT

    Mumbai has a chance to win the 40th title with an innings margin. Good to see prolific Wasim back in form.

  • POSTED BY _Sid on | January 28, 2013, 10:09 GMT

    Congrats Wasim............ Take a bow!!!!!