2011 Review

There'll always be Hobart

New Zealand have looked a more confident unit since John Wright took charge at the beginning of 2011, and they had one standout success

Andrew Alderson

December 26, 2011

Comments: 9 | Text size: A | A

New Zealand celebrate their first Test win in Australia in 26 years, Australia v New Zealand, 2nd Test, Hobart, 4th day, December 12 2011
The win against Australia: look, no Vettori © AFP
Enlarge
Related Links

Some will call it coincidence but new coach John Wright has instilled a sense of self-belief in the New Zealand team in 2011 that bodes well for the future. Wright lived up to his reputation as a coaching physician, coming to the role with the responsibility of curing ills and restoring pride in a dishevelled outfit. His team has work to do, but as World Cup semi-finalists and with a first Test win over Australia in 18 years, the evidence suggests New Zealand have progressed.

Wright looks to empower with positive thoughts rather than harsh words. Some comparisons have been stark. A team that won just a single one-dayer out of 12 on the subcontinent last year made the top four of the World Cup with "the locals" - Sri Lanka, India and Pakistan - for the first time in that part of the world. However, inconsistencies remain. New Zealand eased past Pakistan and South Africa but stumbled against Australia and Sri Lanka (twice).

In Tests, the win against Australia in Hobart broke a hoodoo and the team justifiably celebrated. Wright acknowledged there is more to do, but the result must have come with a dollop of satisfaction. Ross Taylor's bold declaration against Zimbabwe in Bulawayo also deserves praise. New Zealand won the Test by 34 runs thanks to a match-winning spell (5 for 85) by Doug Bracewell in the second innings. In contrast, Wright's first Test series with the team, a 0-1 loss against Pakistan in January, is best forgotten.

Wright has presented a genial yet calculated approach in his first year. Non-believers, who perceived him as dithering, have been forced to reconsider his method of hammering players with simple messages. Key examples are his limited-overs and Test batting plans. In one-dayers the aim is to be no more than three wickets down after 35 overs. At the World Cup against Pakistan (141 for 4) and South Africa (139 for 3) it worked. In Tests, Wright wants New Zealand to bat a minimum of four sessions per innings, preferably only using the top six to do so. New Zealand have managed that twice in ten innings on his watch.

Five Tests into his tenure the top six batsmen have made just 64% of the runs. That figure is accentuated by Daniel Vettori's prodigious run-scoring in the lower order. Compare those figures to world No. 1 England, where the top six have made 75% of the runs in 12 Tests since the start of the Ashes in November 2010. Further details indicate the consistency of England compared to New Zealand in that period. England had a batsman score a century in 13 of 17 innings (76%); New Zealand's figure was five in 16 (31%).

The absence of any cricket during the winter for New Zealand was probably a blessing, allowing most players to refresh or make a decent living from the Indian Premier League or at English counties.

New kid on the block
No batsman since Martin Crowe has excited New Zealand fans as much as Kane Williamson in the fledgling stages of his career. At 21 he already looks like Taylor's successor as captain. It is reassuring to watch a technique that doesn't leave you wanting to hide behind the sofa, peeping out to check for further scoreboard damage for New Zealand. Williamson's forward defence is immaculate and his back-foot work gifted, especially in milking ones and twos through the covers. Expect his Test average of 32.53 to rise closer to his first-class average of 42.92 this year. Williamson's 284 not out for Northern Districts against Wellington further demonstrated his application, and a season at Gloucestershire eased him into a professional rhythm. Some have questioned his ability to adapt to limited-overs cricket, but 38 not out off 41 balls in the World Cup quarter-final win over South Africa, 100 off 69 balls in Zimbabwe, and lithe fielding have highlighted his value.

High point
The Test win over Australia was the most significant in purist terms. They are an opponent New Zealand failed to beat in 18 years (26 years in Australia). It was a weak Australian side but so was the one New Zealand beat in Brisbane and Perth in 1985. Any win against arguably the most powerful country in the history of the game is significant. The seven-run victory was outstanding on several levels, especially considering it was achieved without the services of talisman Vettori. Bracewell, with match figures of 9 for 60, and Dean Brownlie, with a gutsy 56 in the first innings, shone as players of mental strength. The presence of youthful talent such as Williamson, Tim Southee and Martin Guptill suggests a Test boost from eighth in the world rankings is possible over the next year.


Kane Williamson crashes one through the covers, Australia v New Zealand, second Test, Hobart, 2nd day, December 10, 2011
Kane Williamson is expected to strengthen New Zealand's middle order considerably © Getty Images
Enlarge

Low point
The capitulation to Australia at the World Cup in the wake of the February 22 Christchurch earthquake. The seven-wicket defeat began with a negative team selection that saw top-order batsman Jamie How inserted at No. 7 - as a buffer against Australia doing early damage. Having allowed the danger to enter their subconscious, New Zealand set about proving the threat was real when the top six made 58 in a total of 206. The bowling attack, with so few runs to defend, was hammered. Balls were sprayed down the leg side, overpitched, or dropped too short. There were 29 runs from wides. In the aftermath the team showed courage to fight back with memorable wins over Pakistan in pool play and South Africa in the quarter-finals.

What 2012 holds
From here the recipe is simple. Mix the John Wright coaching regime with a group of open-minded, tenacious players and an attitude of controlled aggression. That is the simplest way to return New Zealand to another successful era and eradicate public apathy.

In the next 13 months New Zealand are scheduled to play 14 Tests, 19 one-dayers and 10 T20s. This team, with its youthful core, can further establish itself on the international stage at home against Zimbabwe and South Africa before travelling to the West Indies, India, Sri Lanka and South Africa.

Otago left-arm pace bowler Neil Wagner adds another option to the fast-bowling equation when he qualifies via residency in April. Shane Bond apart, pace bowling has long been a weakness for New Zealand, but it could soon turn into a strength, even when 37-year-old Chris Martin bows out. Tim Southee, Trent Boult, Bracewell, Hamish Bennett and Wagner look capable of producing useful Test careers.

Andrew Alderson is cricket writer at New Zealand's Herald on Sunday

RSS Feeds: Andrew Alderson

© ESPN Sports Media Ltd.

Posted by   on (December 29, 2011, 16:30 GMT)

Good article. I would like to hear more about youngsters like Adam Milne and Matt Henry. Australia, Pakistan, etc seem to have a policy that if you're good enough you're old enough. New Zealand has on occasion done this with mixed success (see the introduction of Daniel Vettori vs that of Ken Rutherford, to name one case). But cricket tests are won by teams which can take 20 wickets. And New Zealand seems on the way of having a nice battery of decent bowlers. The first time in a generation. O hope the likes of Milne and Henry continue to succed, and get a chance alongside Bracewall and Boult.

Posted by thefountain on (December 28, 2011, 7:19 GMT)

Good article! I want to see the Black Caps do well. It's time to get more of the population base playing the game. Heavy focus on marketing to islander and maori kids. Dan Vettori can't be the pin up guy for NZ cricket. NZ cricket has to get those athletes.

Posted by Dr_Van_Nostrand on (December 27, 2011, 15:08 GMT)

I really hope we don't throw Wagner in straight away when he qualifies. It would be such a backward move when he finally have some good, young, local bowlers coming through. Grant Elliot getting a game straight away was bad enough, but to throw all our bowling eggs on another fresh SA import would be dissappointing, for me anyway.

Posted by Deepak on (December 27, 2011, 2:37 GMT)

In spite of being from India, I have always wanted the Black Caps to do well. Was ecstatic as they beat Aussies at Hobart and also when they made the Semis at the WC. The new kid Williamson sure looks good, but I think their other batsmen need to start shouldering a bit more responsibility. Ryder, Taylor and McCullum are the seniors and need to show the way (just as Taylor did in the second inning in Hobart). I think a better and consistent performance by Kiwis in Tests will be good for cricket.

Posted by   on (December 26, 2011, 19:37 GMT)

I wonder if it may take another year for some of the newer players to find their feet at test level as a unit and perform consistently. They are young enough that this has the makings of a very good team for some time to come

Posted by   on (December 26, 2011, 11:27 GMT)

Hmmmmm nah not buying it sorry.

Posted by Mattyblackcapsfan on (December 26, 2011, 8:34 GMT)

great article not enough is spoken off about nz in world cricket but this was a great read,i sincerly hope this becomes reality and we do rise up the rankings theres still some things that need work but i think those will b sorted quickly i look forward to seeing my black caps become a somebody in test cricket again go u black caps

Posted by kushal_masand on (December 26, 2011, 3:46 GMT)

Wonderful article and incisive dissection of Black Caps.

Posted by NanoTechnology on (December 26, 2011, 3:28 GMT)

Kiwi fans learn to not get their hopes up. I can already feel myself thinking "yes, but Williamson looked brittle against spin," "Bennett doesn't have enough to challenge top batsmen," "Southee hasn't progressed," and "what's up with Ryder?"

But... for once its easy to stop and have a little faith. Vettori has been removed from his odd position, and can hopefully now focus on some wickets and continuing his excellent batting form. Wright doesn't seem like someone to panic (the Australian ODI aside) and one suspects there are ideas and plans for all that troubles the fans about this team.

For once its a talented team underperforming. What a position! While there is every possibility that next year's review will say "What happened?", there's a real chance of it saying "Unquestionably a year to savour for New Zealand cricket".

Comments have now been closed for this article

TopTop
Email Feedback Print
Share
E-mail
Feedback
Print
Andrew AldersonClose

More in 2011 review

News | Features Last 3 days
News | Features Last 3 days