South Africa v Australia, 2nd Test, Johannesburg, 5th day November 21, 2011

The highest chase in Johannesburg and Philander's feat

Stats highlights from an absolutely riveting day of Test cricket at the Wanderers
13

  • Australia's score of 310 is the highest in a successful chase at the Wanderers, and the fourth-highest in South Africa. Australia have been the winning team on three of those four occasions.

  • Ricky Ponting's 62 is his highest Test score in more than a year. During this period, he has averaged 20.46 in 16 innings, with only two fifties. Before this knock, he had gone 13 innings without a half-century.

  • Similarly, Brad Haddin and Mitchell Johnson saved their best for this key day as well. Haddin played 106 balls for his 55 - it was the first time he'd faced more than 100 deliveries in a Test innings in 17 innings, extending over almost a year. Johnson had a poor game with the ball, but as a batsman he made significant contributions in both innings, remaining unbeaten on 38 and 40. His match aggregate of 78 runs was his highest since March 2009, when he'd scored 35 and 123 not out in Cape Town. This was his 26th Test since that game.

  • For South Africa, Vernon Philander was the undoubted star of the series. He finished with 5 for 70 in the second innings, and thus has two five-fors in his first two Tests. The last two bowlers to achieve this were Fidel Edwards and Richard Johnson, both in 2003. Before that, it was Narendra Hirwani way back in 1988. Philander is also the fourth South African to achieve this. The others - Peter Heine, Lindsay Tuckett and Norman Gordon - all achieved it before 1956.

  • The result will hurt South Africa's aspirations to take the top spot in the ICC Test rankings. The defeat pushes South Africa down to 115 points, well behind England's 125. Had South Africa won, they'd have moved up to second place with 120. Had they then beaten Sri Lanka 3-0 in the home series to follow, they'd have moved to No.1 with 126 points. Even if they achieve that margin against Sri Lanka now, they'll only have 119 points.

With inputs from Travis Basevi.

S Rajesh is stats editor of ESPNcricinfo. Follow him on Twitter

Comments have now been closed for this article

  • Humdingers on November 22, 2011, 6:38 GMT

    @DaveBrown - mate check your stats before writing gibberish. Have a look when the last time India lost at home! They got to no.1 for a reason - not by chance. The same way as England's temporary reign at No.1 - they played good cricket over a period of time. The litmus test for England is that they have to win in ALL CONDITIONS - not just in their backyard. The great team of the WI's and AUS did it. Until this England team can claim that, there is no way they can be branded as great.

  • Amol_Gh on November 22, 2011, 4:28 GMT

    As an SA fan, it's frustrating to watch Mitchell Johnson. I can't figure out whether he is in there for bowling or for batting. As bowler he makes me happy but as a batsman he is irritating.

  • Meety on November 22, 2011, 2:19 GMT

    @Dave Brown - neither assignment in the middle east/asia against Pakistan & SL will be easy, particularly Pakistan are on the rise & have done well recently in the UAE. Sri Lanka at home will be a tough gig! Success in those countries will confirm England's #1 position. Since the fall of the last dynasty - the issue is to actually keep the #1 position for an extended period. Failure to win both series, sets up the need to beat India in India to stay #1, & THAT will be tough! @TheAbacus - very true - but you forgot about a large section of the Indian cricket fans too, who not only have bagged other countries once they got to #1 (particulalrly sticking it to SL fans) - but have since been in denial once losing the top spot! Not to mention the far too unhealthy worship of a certain batsmen searching for a landmark 100!!!!!!!

  • sawifan on November 22, 2011, 1:01 GMT

    @OhhhhMattyMatty... i too think ENG are a better side and will beat SAF in ENG, but dont u think comparing a 2 match series to a 5 match series is stupid?!?! After 2 matches in the last Ashes it was 1-0 to ENG, and after 3 matches (the usual length of a AUS v SAF series) the Ashes was 1-1... Stupid comparison! If it was a 5 match series, SAF could've possibly (tho unlikely) won this series 4-1...

  • Wefinishthis on November 22, 2011, 0:27 GMT

    Why is there no talk of dropping Siddle? For good this time. He is just as inconsistent and incompetent as Johnson and his stats are even worse. When you have players like Copeland, Cutting, Butterworth, Faulkner, Coulter-Nile and Pattinson amongst others who are demanding to be given a fair go, we simply should not be tolerating continuously poor performances from our fast bowlers. O'Keefe should be no.1 followed by Lyon and Haurtiz as well but that is a different story. Harris, Cummins, Copeland, O'Keefe should be the bowlers with Cutting and Butterworth the next in line should any of those not perform.

  • TheAbacus on November 21, 2011, 23:49 GMT

    Fascinating to see English fans sounding exactly like Aussie fans from a few years ago. Cricket is a great leveler kids.. let's see how long Cook and his men live up to their newly earned reputation as champions.

  • MinusZero on November 21, 2011, 23:44 GMT

    Despite Ponting and Johnsons batting. They must both be dropped. Ponting should step down before being pushed. Johnson's bowling is no where near a high enough standard for an opening bowler.

  • Don_The_Green on November 21, 2011, 23:17 GMT

    It's a surprise that Philander has taken this long to debut. With 200+ first class wickets at a tad under 20, he has the performances to warrant his spot. I wish him all the best in his career, and combined with Steyn & Morkel, they could be an attack to rival some of the greats. South Africa will definitely rise further in the Test rankings, but its just a matter of how high!?!

  • orangtan on November 21, 2011, 22:40 GMT

    @Dave Brown, regarding your carping remarks against India, England's pretensions will soon be laid bare, pakistan are very consisitent now and will easily win the series in the UAE while the Sri lankans will take steps to buck up and defeat the old enemy. So, by the time the South africans arrive next year England will already be on the skids.

  • mathematicised on November 21, 2011, 21:15 GMT

    Let's just wait on the English. Wait for them to win on sub-continent wickets. They came close last time and were walloped in the recent ODI series. Granted that Tests are a completely different ball-game, but it's a little too soon to go ga-ga over these guys just yet. India learned the hard way. England, beware!

  • Humdingers on November 22, 2011, 6:38 GMT

    @DaveBrown - mate check your stats before writing gibberish. Have a look when the last time India lost at home! They got to no.1 for a reason - not by chance. The same way as England's temporary reign at No.1 - they played good cricket over a period of time. The litmus test for England is that they have to win in ALL CONDITIONS - not just in their backyard. The great team of the WI's and AUS did it. Until this England team can claim that, there is no way they can be branded as great.

  • Amol_Gh on November 22, 2011, 4:28 GMT

    As an SA fan, it's frustrating to watch Mitchell Johnson. I can't figure out whether he is in there for bowling or for batting. As bowler he makes me happy but as a batsman he is irritating.

  • Meety on November 22, 2011, 2:19 GMT

    @Dave Brown - neither assignment in the middle east/asia against Pakistan & SL will be easy, particularly Pakistan are on the rise & have done well recently in the UAE. Sri Lanka at home will be a tough gig! Success in those countries will confirm England's #1 position. Since the fall of the last dynasty - the issue is to actually keep the #1 position for an extended period. Failure to win both series, sets up the need to beat India in India to stay #1, & THAT will be tough! @TheAbacus - very true - but you forgot about a large section of the Indian cricket fans too, who not only have bagged other countries once they got to #1 (particulalrly sticking it to SL fans) - but have since been in denial once losing the top spot! Not to mention the far too unhealthy worship of a certain batsmen searching for a landmark 100!!!!!!!

  • sawifan on November 22, 2011, 1:01 GMT

    @OhhhhMattyMatty... i too think ENG are a better side and will beat SAF in ENG, but dont u think comparing a 2 match series to a 5 match series is stupid?!?! After 2 matches in the last Ashes it was 1-0 to ENG, and after 3 matches (the usual length of a AUS v SAF series) the Ashes was 1-1... Stupid comparison! If it was a 5 match series, SAF could've possibly (tho unlikely) won this series 4-1...

  • Wefinishthis on November 22, 2011, 0:27 GMT

    Why is there no talk of dropping Siddle? For good this time. He is just as inconsistent and incompetent as Johnson and his stats are even worse. When you have players like Copeland, Cutting, Butterworth, Faulkner, Coulter-Nile and Pattinson amongst others who are demanding to be given a fair go, we simply should not be tolerating continuously poor performances from our fast bowlers. O'Keefe should be no.1 followed by Lyon and Haurtiz as well but that is a different story. Harris, Cummins, Copeland, O'Keefe should be the bowlers with Cutting and Butterworth the next in line should any of those not perform.

  • TheAbacus on November 21, 2011, 23:49 GMT

    Fascinating to see English fans sounding exactly like Aussie fans from a few years ago. Cricket is a great leveler kids.. let's see how long Cook and his men live up to their newly earned reputation as champions.

  • MinusZero on November 21, 2011, 23:44 GMT

    Despite Ponting and Johnsons batting. They must both be dropped. Ponting should step down before being pushed. Johnson's bowling is no where near a high enough standard for an opening bowler.

  • Don_The_Green on November 21, 2011, 23:17 GMT

    It's a surprise that Philander has taken this long to debut. With 200+ first class wickets at a tad under 20, he has the performances to warrant his spot. I wish him all the best in his career, and combined with Steyn & Morkel, they could be an attack to rival some of the greats. South Africa will definitely rise further in the Test rankings, but its just a matter of how high!?!

  • orangtan on November 21, 2011, 22:40 GMT

    @Dave Brown, regarding your carping remarks against India, England's pretensions will soon be laid bare, pakistan are very consisitent now and will easily win the series in the UAE while the Sri lankans will take steps to buck up and defeat the old enemy. So, by the time the South africans arrive next year England will already be on the skids.

  • mathematicised on November 21, 2011, 21:15 GMT

    Let's just wait on the English. Wait for them to win on sub-continent wickets. They came close last time and were walloped in the recent ODI series. Granted that Tests are a completely different ball-game, but it's a little too soon to go ga-ga over these guys just yet. India learned the hard way. England, beware!

  • on November 21, 2011, 20:40 GMT

    India clearly showed they were the great pretneders of cricket with their number one ranking. The 'fans' favourites have failed to win at home since 2008 and could have been beaten two nil (admittedly they could have won two nil) by a mediocre Aussie team going through (a seemingly never ending) transition (a bit like England throughout the 80's, 90's and early 00's!). Maybe it is time People started to acknowledge England are the best in the business at the moment. A favourable result against a poor Sri Lanka and an inconsistent Pakistan will see at the top nicely. La la la England!

  • OhhhhMattyMatty on November 21, 2011, 19:45 GMT

    What a great day for English cricket. All these fans saying we won't beat South Africa! LOL! We beat Australia 3-1 with 3 innings victories!!! SA can't even beat Australia at home!!!

  • kiranphy on November 21, 2011, 19:19 GMT

    Sa is at 3rd poasition not at 12nd. they have 116 points and india with 117 is at 2nd position

  • No featured comments at the moment.

  • kiranphy on November 21, 2011, 19:19 GMT

    Sa is at 3rd poasition not at 12nd. they have 116 points and india with 117 is at 2nd position

  • OhhhhMattyMatty on November 21, 2011, 19:45 GMT

    What a great day for English cricket. All these fans saying we won't beat South Africa! LOL! We beat Australia 3-1 with 3 innings victories!!! SA can't even beat Australia at home!!!

  • on November 21, 2011, 20:40 GMT

    India clearly showed they were the great pretneders of cricket with their number one ranking. The 'fans' favourites have failed to win at home since 2008 and could have been beaten two nil (admittedly they could have won two nil) by a mediocre Aussie team going through (a seemingly never ending) transition (a bit like England throughout the 80's, 90's and early 00's!). Maybe it is time People started to acknowledge England are the best in the business at the moment. A favourable result against a poor Sri Lanka and an inconsistent Pakistan will see at the top nicely. La la la England!

  • mathematicised on November 21, 2011, 21:15 GMT

    Let's just wait on the English. Wait for them to win on sub-continent wickets. They came close last time and were walloped in the recent ODI series. Granted that Tests are a completely different ball-game, but it's a little too soon to go ga-ga over these guys just yet. India learned the hard way. England, beware!

  • orangtan on November 21, 2011, 22:40 GMT

    @Dave Brown, regarding your carping remarks against India, England's pretensions will soon be laid bare, pakistan are very consisitent now and will easily win the series in the UAE while the Sri lankans will take steps to buck up and defeat the old enemy. So, by the time the South africans arrive next year England will already be on the skids.

  • Don_The_Green on November 21, 2011, 23:17 GMT

    It's a surprise that Philander has taken this long to debut. With 200+ first class wickets at a tad under 20, he has the performances to warrant his spot. I wish him all the best in his career, and combined with Steyn & Morkel, they could be an attack to rival some of the greats. South Africa will definitely rise further in the Test rankings, but its just a matter of how high!?!

  • MinusZero on November 21, 2011, 23:44 GMT

    Despite Ponting and Johnsons batting. They must both be dropped. Ponting should step down before being pushed. Johnson's bowling is no where near a high enough standard for an opening bowler.

  • TheAbacus on November 21, 2011, 23:49 GMT

    Fascinating to see English fans sounding exactly like Aussie fans from a few years ago. Cricket is a great leveler kids.. let's see how long Cook and his men live up to their newly earned reputation as champions.

  • Wefinishthis on November 22, 2011, 0:27 GMT

    Why is there no talk of dropping Siddle? For good this time. He is just as inconsistent and incompetent as Johnson and his stats are even worse. When you have players like Copeland, Cutting, Butterworth, Faulkner, Coulter-Nile and Pattinson amongst others who are demanding to be given a fair go, we simply should not be tolerating continuously poor performances from our fast bowlers. O'Keefe should be no.1 followed by Lyon and Haurtiz as well but that is a different story. Harris, Cummins, Copeland, O'Keefe should be the bowlers with Cutting and Butterworth the next in line should any of those not perform.

  • sawifan on November 22, 2011, 1:01 GMT

    @OhhhhMattyMatty... i too think ENG are a better side and will beat SAF in ENG, but dont u think comparing a 2 match series to a 5 match series is stupid?!?! After 2 matches in the last Ashes it was 1-0 to ENG, and after 3 matches (the usual length of a AUS v SAF series) the Ashes was 1-1... Stupid comparison! If it was a 5 match series, SAF could've possibly (tho unlikely) won this series 4-1...