Australia in South Africa 2011-12 November 22, 2011

Amla and Philander finish top of the class

Marks out of ten for South Africa following the 2011-12 tour of South Africa
13

South Africa failed to realise their long-running dream of beating Australia at home, but came agonisingly close to finishing with a 2-0 scoreline. New heroes emerged, while some experienced names floundered under the pressure of an extraordinary duel. ESPNcricinfo runs the rule over the players they used during the series.

9

Hashim Amla

Two centuries in two matches are signs enough that Amla's rich vein of form is continuing. In this series, he was the spine, the pulmonary artery, the lungs and the heart of the South African line-up. With the openers not adding 40 in any of the four innings, the team needed stability from Amla at No. 3, and he provided that on two occasions. He had luck on his side at times, but played with the self-assuredness that has become synonymous with him. He won the first Test alongside Graeme Smith, and his partnership with AB de Villiers allowed South Africa to set a challenging target in Johannesburg.

Vernon Philander

Philander arrived on the scene with an explosive debut series that brought him 14 wickets at an average of 13.92, rightfully claiming the Man-of-the-Series award and proving doubters wrong every step of the way. He showed the importance of first-class experience and took to his role like an old hand. Philander bowled with exceptional control, made use of seam movement and exploited everything he could from the pitch. At Newlands, his home ground, he was the architect of Australia crashing to 47 all out. He had not played at the Wanderers since 2005 but adjusted immediately and became Graeme Smith's go-to man whenever a wicket was needed in the second Test. He broke the bloated partnership between Shane Watson and Phil Hughes in the first innings in Johannesburg, sent the pair back early in the second innings and removed danger-men Michael Clarke and Michael Hussey. His future in Test cricket looks bright and the challenge for him will be to maintain his consistency.

7.5

Dale Steyn

He started the series with a fiery four-for in Cape Town, claiming that his rhythm simply clicked. After taking six wickets in that match and five in the next, Steyn reinforced his status as the spearhead of the attack. There were periods were he was wayward and out of sorts, and he appeared to take more than two spells to properly hit his stride. Nonetheless, he combined well with Philander, his latest new-ball partner, and swung the ball throughout the series. Steyn dismissed Ricky Ponting lbw twice, a sign that he is able to work on specific game plans for specific players and then execute them perfectly. Steyn's batting should not be under-rated either. During the Wanderers Test he scored an unbeaten 15, and 41 off 64 balls to help South Africa overcome a mini-collapse.

7

Graeme Smith

Redemption will be how Graeme Smith remembers November 2011. It was the month in which he salvaged his steadily slipping reputation with the South African public. Smith's critics have not always been fair and have often mixed his flagging one-day form and occasionally brash personality with his prowess as Test captain. In this series, he reminded them of it.

Although Smith had three scores below 40, he had one gutsy century, which played a massive part in South Africa winning the first Test. It showed that he still has the mindset and the technique, to excel at the highest level. He grafted and grovelled his way to a century on a pitch that had yielded 23 wickets on a single day. As a captain, he made clever decisions in rotating his bowlers, especially in using Dale Steyn, who only came to the fore in later spells.

Morne Morkel

Having to change roles is never easy, but Morkel was made to do it in this series. After Philander was tasked with partnering Steyn, Morkel had to adjust to coming on first-change. It was a tricky task, which involved keeping the pressure on, and Morkel performed fairly admirably. There were times when the dual task became too much for him and he slipped into previous bad habits, such as overusing the bouncer and over-stepping frequently. He still finished as the third-highest wicket-taker in the series and maintained an average under 25.

6

AB de Villiers

de Villiers came into the series cold because of an injury to his hand, and failed in his only innings in the first Test. As a result, he was just as undercooked when he got to Johannesburg. To score two half-centuies and form crucial partnerships with Ashwell Prince and Hashim Amla showed his ability and his maturity. de Villiers also played a key leadership role, in his first series as Test vice-captain. He was involved in many of the on-field discussions surrounding umpiring reviews, and was often seen chatting to the bowlers. He also fielded in the slips and took a blinder of a catch to dismiss Phil Hughes for 88 at the Wanderers.

Ashwell Prince

Calls for his head have become regular chatter for Prince, whose role in the side has always been underestimated. He had a forgettable first Test, with a duck in the first innings to form part of Shane Watson's five-for. When he had the opportunity to do what he does best in the second Test he did. He was the steadying hand in the century stand with AB de Villiers. A needless run-out in the second innings capped an underwhelming series for Prince, who will yet again stare at question marks over his role in the team. While he should have scored more runs, Prince's ability to be the sponge in the side and absorb criticism and negativity, while never reflecting it, is an important one.

Imran Tahir

Making his Test debut in seamer-friendly conditions was always going to be Imran Tahir's biggest test and he did not fare too badly. At Newlands, he only bowled 10 overs so his assessment is largely based on his performance at the Wanderers. It took Tahir a while to get his first strike in, but when he did, he cleaned up the Australian tail in the space of six overs, something South Africa have struggled with in the past. His googly proved especially dangerous. The pitch did no wear as much he would have liked in the second innings and he was often used in short spells and did not make too much of an impact. Tahir showed that his fielding had improved when he took two important catches. He has not had a Philander-esque entrance into the international game, but given how long South Africa have been without an attacking spinner, both he and the team will need time to work out how best to use him.

5.5

Jacques Kallis

Kallis brought up 12,000 Test runs, but it was a quiet series otherwise. His scores of 0, 2, 54 and 0 were underwhelming to say the least. Of particular concern was the way he was roughed up by Patrick Cummins in the second innings at the Wanderers, where Kallis was clearly at sea against enthusiastic bounce. He was expensive with the ball in the first innings at Newlands, creating a worry for South Africa, who needed him for a containing job because of the new make-up of the attack.

5

Jacques Rudolph

Expectation was heavy on the comeback man, especially after sensational stints at Yorkshire and in the last two seasons of SuperSport Series, but he did not quite deliver. When at the crease, Rudolph showed confidence that few thought he possessed. He drove particularly well and had the right intent but could not carry on. Rudolph gave the impression that his job was to attack, especially in Johannesburg, where he was dismissed after top-edging a pull in the second innings. He has certainly showed the potential to forge a solid partnership with Smith.

4

Mark Boucher

It was a dismal outing for Boucher as he nears the twilight of his career. He entered double figures once but under-performed with the bat, an area where he needs to be firing. He is the gate to the South African tail, but in this series, he opened it without hanging around long enough. Boucher was a victim of rash, unthinking shots and made South Africa's lower middle order weaker than it should have been. Although his wicket-keeping remained good - and he brought up 500 catches in Test cricket - his failure as batsman was the more concerning one. Of even greater worry, is that South Africa have not groomed a keeper to take over and may be in a spot of bother soon.

Firdose Moonda is ESPNcricinfo's South Africa correspondent

Comments have now been closed for this article

  • Marktc on November 25, 2011, 9:34 GMT

    The momentum swung one way then the next and quickly when it did. I think 1-1 is a fair reflection of the series. I do think SA players should judged after the Sri Lanka tour. That in fact should have been the tour to warm them up for the important Oz series, but administrators sometimes blunder. Sulli- bit harsh to blame Steyn for the loss. Granted he did not bowl well after tea- but then the whole SA bowling unit come from tea miss-firing. SA were well positioned and then after tea both Steyn's and Philander's overs proved expensive and that is where the game swung into the Aussies lap. Also, with time, our new coaching unit should change SA's fortunes. Just like the OZ team, SA will improve and regain the number one spot. And Boodah-all the batsman's scores were riddled with edges, nicks etc. Even Clark's 150. It was the nature of the bowling and the pitch.

  • stuartk319 on November 24, 2011, 19:30 GMT

    JB77 brilliantly said. IMHO I'm surprised no-one's scrutinised Rudolph much; averages low-mid 20s against the stronger test nations; sorry, I don't think he'll last. SAf need to decide who their best young opener is and give them a run, as they can't have Amla save the openers hides forever.

  • landl47 on November 24, 2011, 3:58 GMT

    Kallis got the same free ride for SA that Ponting got for Aus. He had a dreadful series and should have been no more than a 4. I thought the biggest disappointment was Tahir. A legspinner on a 5th-day wicket should have been able to do much better than 1-63. He also leaked runs at 4 per over in both innings. 3 of his 4 wickets were tailenders. Basically he showed why he hasn't played test cricket before and at 32 he isn't going to get much better. 4 would have been generous for him. He'll be murdered in England if he's still in the side (think Mishra's 0-170). Steyn also had a very bad day on day 5 of the last test; 1-98 with an economy rate of 4.26 isn't what is expected of the world's best bowler. Philander, on the other hand, bowled well and deserved his rating (Cummins only rated lower because he didn't play in the first test). Generally speaking, the ratings on both sides are too high. This was an exciting series, but some bad cricket was played by both sides.

  • RandyOZ on November 23, 2011, 11:34 GMT

    4 for boucher? Are you joking, him and haddin proved how NOT to keep and bat!

  • Sirchris on November 23, 2011, 11:22 GMT

    @Meety. I think that the final score line perfectly represented how well these two teams are currnetly playing. If SA had taken a couple of extra quick wickets on the final afternoon, it could quite easily have been 2-0 to SA!

  • IPLisdull on November 23, 2011, 6:45 GMT

    A 6 for Ashwell Prince, would seem overly generous? I still find it hard to believe that Prince could be picked in front of Duminy, surely that could not happen for much longer!

  • johnathonjosephs on November 23, 2011, 5:42 GMT

    Only people worth mentioning for 9's in the series are Philander and Cummins (though CUmmins played only one test...) I wish cricinfo did these "marks out of ten" articles more... Simply love them Laughed when the author said prince's job in the side is to absorb criticism without getting angry LOL

  • Sulli001 on November 23, 2011, 5:26 GMT

    Steyns preformance in the 2nd inings is what cost SA the match, did not back up all the good work Philander was doing, and some lazy fielding from Smith contribution to an average fielding effort

  • Meety on November 23, 2011, 2:22 GMT

    I think these ratings are a little inflated, given this side conceded a record run-chase & were bowled out for 96, the series (minus one insane hour), could easily have been 2nil Oz. Amla was the best batsmen on both sides, but he should of been behind Philander, & Tahir was easily a 5. Anyways - its all subjective.

  • JB77 on November 23, 2011, 0:36 GMT

    'Prince's ability to be the sponge in the side and absorb criticism and negativity, while never reflecting it, is an important one.' That comment is almost as ridiculous as Prince's score of 6. Is his role in the team to be mediocre but not get too upset when people call him mediocre? If that's an important ability then Haddin and Johnson should have scored 9's. Crazy.

  • Marktc on November 25, 2011, 9:34 GMT

    The momentum swung one way then the next and quickly when it did. I think 1-1 is a fair reflection of the series. I do think SA players should judged after the Sri Lanka tour. That in fact should have been the tour to warm them up for the important Oz series, but administrators sometimes blunder. Sulli- bit harsh to blame Steyn for the loss. Granted he did not bowl well after tea- but then the whole SA bowling unit come from tea miss-firing. SA were well positioned and then after tea both Steyn's and Philander's overs proved expensive and that is where the game swung into the Aussies lap. Also, with time, our new coaching unit should change SA's fortunes. Just like the OZ team, SA will improve and regain the number one spot. And Boodah-all the batsman's scores were riddled with edges, nicks etc. Even Clark's 150. It was the nature of the bowling and the pitch.

  • stuartk319 on November 24, 2011, 19:30 GMT

    JB77 brilliantly said. IMHO I'm surprised no-one's scrutinised Rudolph much; averages low-mid 20s against the stronger test nations; sorry, I don't think he'll last. SAf need to decide who their best young opener is and give them a run, as they can't have Amla save the openers hides forever.

  • landl47 on November 24, 2011, 3:58 GMT

    Kallis got the same free ride for SA that Ponting got for Aus. He had a dreadful series and should have been no more than a 4. I thought the biggest disappointment was Tahir. A legspinner on a 5th-day wicket should have been able to do much better than 1-63. He also leaked runs at 4 per over in both innings. 3 of his 4 wickets were tailenders. Basically he showed why he hasn't played test cricket before and at 32 he isn't going to get much better. 4 would have been generous for him. He'll be murdered in England if he's still in the side (think Mishra's 0-170). Steyn also had a very bad day on day 5 of the last test; 1-98 with an economy rate of 4.26 isn't what is expected of the world's best bowler. Philander, on the other hand, bowled well and deserved his rating (Cummins only rated lower because he didn't play in the first test). Generally speaking, the ratings on both sides are too high. This was an exciting series, but some bad cricket was played by both sides.

  • RandyOZ on November 23, 2011, 11:34 GMT

    4 for boucher? Are you joking, him and haddin proved how NOT to keep and bat!

  • Sirchris on November 23, 2011, 11:22 GMT

    @Meety. I think that the final score line perfectly represented how well these two teams are currnetly playing. If SA had taken a couple of extra quick wickets on the final afternoon, it could quite easily have been 2-0 to SA!

  • IPLisdull on November 23, 2011, 6:45 GMT

    A 6 for Ashwell Prince, would seem overly generous? I still find it hard to believe that Prince could be picked in front of Duminy, surely that could not happen for much longer!

  • johnathonjosephs on November 23, 2011, 5:42 GMT

    Only people worth mentioning for 9's in the series are Philander and Cummins (though CUmmins played only one test...) I wish cricinfo did these "marks out of ten" articles more... Simply love them Laughed when the author said prince's job in the side is to absorb criticism without getting angry LOL

  • Sulli001 on November 23, 2011, 5:26 GMT

    Steyns preformance in the 2nd inings is what cost SA the match, did not back up all the good work Philander was doing, and some lazy fielding from Smith contribution to an average fielding effort

  • Meety on November 23, 2011, 2:22 GMT

    I think these ratings are a little inflated, given this side conceded a record run-chase & were bowled out for 96, the series (minus one insane hour), could easily have been 2nil Oz. Amla was the best batsmen on both sides, but he should of been behind Philander, & Tahir was easily a 5. Anyways - its all subjective.

  • JB77 on November 23, 2011, 0:36 GMT

    'Prince's ability to be the sponge in the side and absorb criticism and negativity, while never reflecting it, is an important one.' That comment is almost as ridiculous as Prince's score of 6. Is his role in the team to be mediocre but not get too upset when people call him mediocre? If that's an important ability then Haddin and Johnson should have scored 9's. Crazy.

  • Boodah on November 23, 2011, 0:00 GMT

    boucher is definitely a problem. i didn't think his keeping was that good...on the last day he missed an edge of tahir's bowling and i thought that he and the slips were standing too far back - its the keepers call to judge. on the 5th day, he was taking things awkwardly below waist height. he's not the force he used to be.

    smith worries. although i'm a huge fan, his form was poor, and that hundred was riddled with edges, inside edges, and thick edges for 4. he got out to spin when the pitch wasnt even turning. kallis was also a big dissapointment. getting out the way he did on 54 was irresponsible. he leaked a lot of runs with the ball as well. less time on the hair, more time in the nets.

    tahir running on the pitch was not good. what is donald doing as bowling coach, did he not see this happening at the nets? oh wait, he only knows how to bowl bouncers and drop his bat... i think pollock would be a better bowling coach.

    sri lanka will give us nightmares with spin...

  • CricketChat on November 22, 2011, 23:32 GMT

    SA selectors will be thinking hard on Mark Boucher's place in the team. No longer a first choice for either ODIs or T20s, I am afraid his time is up. SA must look forward to future just like Aussies should about Ricky Ponting. Their recent form should be no reflection of their enormous talent and achievements in their countries cricket history. Legends both!.

  • jonesy2 on November 22, 2011, 18:24 GMT

    hahahahahahaha ashwell prince and rudolph. they were 2's. along with morkel, tahir and kallis. amla a 9? please.

  • No featured comments at the moment.

  • jonesy2 on November 22, 2011, 18:24 GMT

    hahahahahahaha ashwell prince and rudolph. they were 2's. along with morkel, tahir and kallis. amla a 9? please.

  • CricketChat on November 22, 2011, 23:32 GMT

    SA selectors will be thinking hard on Mark Boucher's place in the team. No longer a first choice for either ODIs or T20s, I am afraid his time is up. SA must look forward to future just like Aussies should about Ricky Ponting. Their recent form should be no reflection of their enormous talent and achievements in their countries cricket history. Legends both!.

  • Boodah on November 23, 2011, 0:00 GMT

    boucher is definitely a problem. i didn't think his keeping was that good...on the last day he missed an edge of tahir's bowling and i thought that he and the slips were standing too far back - its the keepers call to judge. on the 5th day, he was taking things awkwardly below waist height. he's not the force he used to be.

    smith worries. although i'm a huge fan, his form was poor, and that hundred was riddled with edges, inside edges, and thick edges for 4. he got out to spin when the pitch wasnt even turning. kallis was also a big dissapointment. getting out the way he did on 54 was irresponsible. he leaked a lot of runs with the ball as well. less time on the hair, more time in the nets.

    tahir running on the pitch was not good. what is donald doing as bowling coach, did he not see this happening at the nets? oh wait, he only knows how to bowl bouncers and drop his bat... i think pollock would be a better bowling coach.

    sri lanka will give us nightmares with spin...

  • JB77 on November 23, 2011, 0:36 GMT

    'Prince's ability to be the sponge in the side and absorb criticism and negativity, while never reflecting it, is an important one.' That comment is almost as ridiculous as Prince's score of 6. Is his role in the team to be mediocre but not get too upset when people call him mediocre? If that's an important ability then Haddin and Johnson should have scored 9's. Crazy.

  • Meety on November 23, 2011, 2:22 GMT

    I think these ratings are a little inflated, given this side conceded a record run-chase & were bowled out for 96, the series (minus one insane hour), could easily have been 2nil Oz. Amla was the best batsmen on both sides, but he should of been behind Philander, & Tahir was easily a 5. Anyways - its all subjective.

  • Sulli001 on November 23, 2011, 5:26 GMT

    Steyns preformance in the 2nd inings is what cost SA the match, did not back up all the good work Philander was doing, and some lazy fielding from Smith contribution to an average fielding effort

  • johnathonjosephs on November 23, 2011, 5:42 GMT

    Only people worth mentioning for 9's in the series are Philander and Cummins (though CUmmins played only one test...) I wish cricinfo did these "marks out of ten" articles more... Simply love them Laughed when the author said prince's job in the side is to absorb criticism without getting angry LOL

  • IPLisdull on November 23, 2011, 6:45 GMT

    A 6 for Ashwell Prince, would seem overly generous? I still find it hard to believe that Prince could be picked in front of Duminy, surely that could not happen for much longer!

  • Sirchris on November 23, 2011, 11:22 GMT

    @Meety. I think that the final score line perfectly represented how well these two teams are currnetly playing. If SA had taken a couple of extra quick wickets on the final afternoon, it could quite easily have been 2-0 to SA!

  • RandyOZ on November 23, 2011, 11:34 GMT

    4 for boucher? Are you joking, him and haddin proved how NOT to keep and bat!