South Africa v Australia, 2nd Test, Port Elizabeth February 19, 2014

Air of discontent around South Africa

It has been a tricky few days for South African cricket, and not just because of Mitchell Johnson. They have come from behind many times to draw or win Test series and, on what promises to be a lively pitch, must do so again

There is something heavy in the Port Elizabeth air and it is not just the humidity. Although the mugginess has reached levels around 85% since the beginning of the week, it is the atmosphere around the South African camp that is loaded with concerns ahead of a Test match they must win if they are to become the first team since readmission to win a series against Australia at home.

That burden would be tough enough to bear on its own and South Africa have not got that lucky. Apart from a lack of competitive cricket ahead of the series, which Graeme Smith once again lamented in his pre-match press conference, this week has been particularly wearing for them. It has been riddled with miscommunication over the availability of their new No.7, bad news for two other members of their current squad who discovered mid-series they are no longer centrally contracted and hype over the Port Elizabeth pitch, which up until yesterday had so much grass on it, it scared its own groundsman. And that is before even thinking of Mitchell Johnson.

All that sounds like a tangled knot so let us unscramble it from the first loose end. Ryan McLaren was hit on the head on Saturday. He spent Sunday night in hospital and it then became apparent that he would not be available for the second Test. On Monday, national coach Russell Domingo and convener of selectors Andrew Hudson announced the World Twenty20 squad in Johannesburg and Hudson was specifically questions about the Test team's performance.

Although Hudson confirmed the No.7 spot was still a point of debate, he did not in any way suggest McLaren could not be considered. In fact, the impression created was that McLaren was as much in contention as any other player. It was only early on Tuesday morning that McLaren was officially ruled out, narrowing the choice to Wayne Parnell, Dean Elgar, Rory Kleinveldt or Thami Tsolekile.

McLaren, at least, got luckier than either Elgar or Tsolekile who found out mid-series that their national contracts will not be renewed for the 2014-15 season. While Tsolekile has not played a game for South Africa since being contracted two seasons ago as the successor to Mark Boucher and has now lost ground to Quinton de Kock in that department, Elgar, who is the only spare specialist batsman in the current Test squad, could be on the verge of a recall.

Given Elgar bagged a pair on Test debut in Perth and dropped David Warner, who went on to score a hundred, when on as a substitute fielder in Centurion, Elgar's confidence against Australia is not exactly soaring. This could only add to it.

Contracts are usually announced around this time in February but it may have been wiser for CSA to wait until South Africa were in a better position in the series or finished with it completely. Smith admitted the timing was not ideal and the players involved will have to be treated with a little more care from him.

"It's obviously tough. I guess my role is just to help keep them focused on what is important and that is tomorrow," he said. "If they get the opportunity to play then that's a chance for them to put that right and to show people that they're worthy. So my job is to help keep them focused. It's obviously another curveball that's tough to deal with, but we've just got to find a way really."

For Tsolekile and Elgar the news is not good but for others, especially those who may have been concerned about keeping their spots, the contract list will come as some relief. Robin Peterson could be one of them, as could Alviro Petersen.

Petersen's middling form has increased calls for South Africa to look for another partner for Smith but it seems that they have had to put that on the backburner for now. Smith said it was "unlikely," he would walk out to bat with someone else at St George's Park. "Alviro had a decent Indian tour on tough wickets," he said, referring to the two half-centuries Petersen raised his bat to in December. "He has been around for a period of time and he knows his game. I expect him to bounce back."

Smith expects that from all of his players and for them to do that he believes they need to treat this match the way other captains may tell their team to approach an away game: by adapting to conditions. South Africa, deserved No.1s that they are, should be able to play on all their home grounds like they own them yet they still talk about them as though they are property of someone else and it seems that is because they are.

Even though groundsman Adrian Carter said he would wait for instruction from Domingo and the South African camp before deciding how much grass to take off the pitch, Smith indicated the home side had minimal influence on the type of surface this match will be played on. "I find that when you ask for things you generally don't get them," he said.

Carter gave the pitch a mow mid-morning on Wednesday and may yet take more grass off it before the match. Whether he will do so on South Africa's request or his knowledge of whether he needs a covering to avoid having it break up too early is not known but Smith hinted it would be the latter. "He knows this pitch better than anyone else."

And South Africa know who they will have to face on it. Johnson winded them in a way no one has done since the last time he did it himself five years ago and in between wading through these other issues they have had to think about a plan for a counterattack. That is where Smith believes they could be at their best, because he has seen them bounce back from slow starts in the past.

"Maybe we just don't like to throw the first punch," he said. "We've got to know how to respond and that's where experience plays a big role. This week is about not carrying too much baggage from Centurion."

He is right about that. South Africa cannot afford excess at all; their load is heavy enough already.

Firdose Moonda is ESPNcricinfo's South Africa correspondent

Comments have now been closed for this article

  • Duidelik on February 20, 2014, 7:50 GMT

    Strange as it sounds, SA has a better away record than home record these days due to them not ''owning'' their own pitches. We have surfaces in SA that can be compared to any other country in world cricket. Centurion = WACA Newslands = Lords St Georges Park = Eden Gardens Buffalo Park = Basin Reserve, etc. This means that they are sometimes confused coz they are playing in different conditions in their own country! There's also the ''climate change'' / unseasonal weather factor that affects the pitches.

  • android_user on February 20, 2014, 7:32 GMT

    Jagger - I am a SA supporter. While I agree that Aus have been playing like the No 1 team for the last few months, the rankings are based on consistency. SA have been by far the most consistent team over the last 5 years while Aus have struggled at times. Hence the ranking positions. Don't get me wrong, Aus have been brilliant since they toured Ind, but rankings are not based on a series by series performance. Good luck to both teams today.

  • disco_bob on February 20, 2014, 7:13 GMT

    Had it not rained at the Gabba and Pattinson broken down we'd have been the number one team in the world. Would we have deserved to call ourselves the number one team? Not a chance, we would have deserved to win the series but we were a long way off from being a number one team. SA got there but a real no 1 team needs to remain at the top for 3 years minimum otherwise they are just no. 1 by default.

  • disco_bob on February 20, 2014, 7:10 GMT

    @TheBigBoodha, I don't care that overseas teams doctor pitches, as long as we don't. We'll get them eventually and when we do the victory is sweeter. Of course that doesn't mean we don't continually get accused of doctoring pitches that remain the same for a 100 years.

  • Andre117 on February 20, 2014, 6:30 GMT

    If we want to win this series, we only need to do one thing: blunt Mitchell "the grim reaper" Johnson's scythe. If we can prevent him from rolling us over again and let the Aussies bowl more than 100 overs in an innings then we can win. Johnson's exploits demoralized the entire team and affected the bowlers as well. Learn to handle Johnson and we'll win. My advice: put on some extra padding around your middle and keep the bat away from that short ball.

  • RedDirt on February 20, 2014, 6:24 GMT

    The point should be made that for the past week, Australia has looked the undisputed number 1 ranked team and South Africa in complete disarray. The week before they were telling us it was the other way around. It's exactly as it was before The Ashes, recently completed.

    May I state categorically, the ICC rankings are a load of nonsense as soon as a team makes a significant change in personnel. I don't know why, but evidently there are people who can't comprehend that simple fact. I don't believe George Bailey is a better t20 batsman than Chris Gayle for one minute and I certainly do not believe Peter Siddle is as high as the 6th-best Test bowler in the world! With hindsight, Australia has not been ranked as low as 3rd in Test Match cricket since Boof took over.

    If South Africa and England had been listening instead of talking, then maybe, just maybe, they'd get some kudos from us. Instead it all looks so ridiculously jingoistic from where I'm standing. Get a clue, fellas.

  • dummy4fb on February 20, 2014, 6:24 GMT

    The series will be won by mighty Aussies by the stumps of the first day!

  • MaruthuDelft on February 20, 2014, 6:02 GMT

    @Ram, You and Indian fans must have some patience. First India should deliver some performances in Eng, Aus and SA before you start comparing and saying things like every team is good at home bad away or every batsman would have problems with 150 kay shorters. They are true to some extent but that doesn't make India equal to SA, Aus or Eng. India has never been a quality side for lack of good fast bowlers. You fill that first before contending with SA, Aus and Eng fans else it is just silly.

  • yoohoo on February 20, 2014, 5:52 GMT

    @ GermanPlayer - Nothing wrong in what Ram said. This is the same Aus, India beat at home 4 - 0, to which SA is losing to at home!! Atleast India can claim they have a new batting line up, most of whom had played less than 10 tests when they toured SA. And anyway, the reason India lost in SA and NZ is their bowlers, not their batsman! You might want to go look at the scorecards of the first Test in Johanesburg where Faf had to save SA as usual on the final day!

    SA has been the most over-rated no.1 for quite some time. And it is just becoming obvious now.

  • cricfan02291228 on February 20, 2014, 4:51 GMT

    So MJ is only effective against the tail? I guess SA's batting line up is night watchman, night watchman, Amla, pretender, AB, tailenders! Because only Amla and AB have a clue against MJ. And it will be the same in PE

  • No featured comments at the moment.