SA v Australia, 3rd Test, Cape Town, 1st day March 1, 2014

South Africa left feeling exposed minus Steyn

South Africa are still looking for someone to bowl the overs Jacques Kallis used to so well for them, and the intermittent absence of Dale Steyn of late has only amplified that issue
  shares 31

The first law of cricket stipulates that it is an 11-a-side sport, so you'd forgive Graeme Smith for wondering why he has had to play this series with just 10. For the third time in the three-match rubber, South Africa are a man down, and for the second time it has been one of their most important men: Dale Steyn.

As South Africa saw when Steyn was off the field for significant periods of the first Test with an upset stomach, and as they have seen when he has been off the boil in the past, their attack without him is what the backdrop to Newlands would look like without Table Mountain. It lacks it's most striking feature, which only serves to heighten the pressure on the rest of the pack.

Morne Morkel has started to show he is capable of responding to that. He did it in Port Elizabeth, when he bowled the spell that Steyn said inspired the second-innings collapse and he almost did it here. After Steyn had left the field, Morkel set to work on Michael Clarke. But his encounter with the Australian captain resulted in bruises, not breakthroughs. More importantly, he lacked back-up.

On a belter of a pitch perhaps no-one could expect a different outcome from the first day, but that doesn't mean an examination of the efforts isn't warranted. In particular, an examination of the fringe elements of the attack has to take place, because it is in the area of the fourth seamer and the spin department that South Africa have lacked in this series.

In the three matches, they've tried three different people to bowl what used to be called the Jacques Kallis overs. They're a balance between overs which keep the run-rate under control while allowing the three front-liners a breather and overs which are sent down when none of them can break through. Ryan McLaren looks the likeliest to fill that role, but he has not been given an extended opportunity.

After concussion kept him out of the second Test, he may have fancied himself for a recall with Wayne Parnell being injured for this one, but South Africa decided to play what some would consider a stronger hand. Kyle Abbott is a swing bowler who has had success on the domestic circuit over the last two seasons. One of the problems was that, particularly in the morning session, there was not much swing to be found.

Similarly, there wasn't much in the way of seam movement and that frustrated Philander, who found himself under attack on his own turf. David Warner has already made known how little he thinks of Vernon Philander. He questioned the man Steyn calls the King of Newlands' ability to bowl on pitches were there is little assistance after Philander pulled out of the Adelaide Test in November 2012 with a bad back and was bowling in the nets a couple of days later. Warner showed his disdain for him again today.

While Philander was guilty of bowling too full, Warner went after him before any of the South Africans could get around to telling the opening what they thought of his accusation about their swing tactics in Port Elizabeth. The start Warner got off to is typical of his aggressive style of play, and it's impact was obvious.

Smith had to bring on spin, in the form of JP Duminy, who Shane Warne reminded the press is only a "part-time spinner", in the 10th over. It wasn't long after that that he had to spread the field and defend rather than concentrate on taking wickets. For the second half of Warner's century, he was scoring at almost a run a ball in singles because of the space he was afforded.

Donald said it became like bowling to Brian Lara because the South Africans knew any slight error in line or length would be punished and even the acceptable deliveries would be milked. They were soon on the receiving end of both. Their lengths remained too full, except for Morkel who did not offer a single pitched up ball in the spell he bowled to Clarke. Their two spinners were unable to contain and, perhaps as a result, unable to force an error.

Between them, Duminy and Elgar conceded exactly 100 runs in the 24 overs they bowled. They allowed Australia to proceed at a comfortable rate of over four runs to the over and did not threaten a touch, apart from one ball when Elgar should have had Clarke caught at slip. They showed that South Africa probably need to rethink whether they will use a specialist spinner in future. Even though the pickings are slim, someone like Simon Harmer should be kept in mind because it seems South Africa cannot go without for too much longer.

For now, their concern is responding immediately and Donald knows that can only be done with a change in mindset. "We have to come out with a brand new attitude tomorrow," he said. "We have to have a lot of attitude and discipline and skill."

If they don't, they will end up with more days like today and more reasons to question why they haven't started planning for life without Steyn sooner. This is not a suggestion Steyn, who admitted to only having "three or four Newlands Tests left", is close to the end. It is a reminder that all things end at some stage and that Steyn has not had an easy last few months. He picked up a rib injury during the India series earlier in the summer and had to take an extended break to facilitate a full recovery. He did not feature in the domestic 20-overs competition as a result.

He started this series unwell in Centurion and looks likely to end it injured in Cape Town. Sandwiched between that he produced one of it's most memorable spells in Port Elizabeth. What South Africa have to learn from all of that is they cannot continue to rely so heavily on one man alone because when they do, the biggest disservice they do is to themselves.

Firdose Moonda is ESPNcricinfo's South Africa correspondent

Comments have now been closed for this article

  • on March 3, 2014, 5:46 GMT

    For once I agree with Firdoose - we have fielded 10 players in every game and we are exposed with dalo -- and Firdoose thanks for you and Telford joining us on the Waving The Flag Floral shirt grass embankment!!! yesterday..

  • stormy16 on March 2, 2014, 16:32 GMT

    Obviously any team would struggle at the loss of the number 1 bowler in the world but I really expected more from SA. Yes Morkel was great bouncing Clark but at the end of the day it got SA no where with Aus in a totally dominant position.I thought the most effective bowler was Elga and Duminy and amoungst seamers, Abbot looked most likely to get a wicket. Morket and Vern were dissappointing for me and understand the conditions were tought but with the series on the line, they hardly made an impact.

  • John-Orford on March 2, 2014, 14:45 GMT

    Morkel's over-usage of the short ball is reminiscent of Broad a few years ago. He bowled too short for whole overs at a time and so got hammered . Strauss just stood there and said nothing. Did Smith not make any suggestions to him? What are captains for? And Donald? His little finger has forgotten more about bowling than I shall ever know. Has he suggested anything to Morkel or is it being forgotten? You've got a fine bowler there, but he needs advice.

  • on March 2, 2014, 10:07 GMT

    Brilliant cricket watching Clarke face Morkel. He roughed it out and it's now set for a big hundred. He's making "ugly" runs which is good to see. Steyn may be out, but SA still have three frontline pacers so don't make too many excuses yet.

  • on March 2, 2014, 6:53 GMT

    A riverting article this. Well written Firdose, hoping SA gets on top of the situation today.

  • SLSup on March 2, 2014, 6:43 GMT

    ...reacting to BradmanBestEver: Dude. The only obvious comment you made is perhaps your username! When you say SA batting line up is only MARGINALLY better than others it should be backed up with stats. Also, you don't need a spinner as long as you have bowlers with a decent strike-rate at a reasonable average to dismiss an opposition soon enough to turn out a win. SA has done so more often than others in the recent past to pose an imposing lead at the rankings to the 2nd best. And NO TEAM relies on any one bowler through all teams have at least one strike bowler (who doesn't take all 20 wickets)!

    AND, did you really say "...it is interesting that opposing teams have not..." exploited SA's weaknesses? : ) Laughable. But you made my day indoors. Outside it's pouring rain!

  • on March 2, 2014, 6:41 GMT

    I heard Steyn did not bowl at all since the PE Test. Did that contribute to his hamstring trouble? South Africa should clearly look at how they approach a very important test match with their best fast bowler. If Steyn had had a few bowls before the test, maybe he would have been more effective in the opportunity that he got on the first day morning. Having said that, Australia are in the driving seat and the variable bounce augurs well for Johnson and Lyon.

  • Protears on March 2, 2014, 6:40 GMT

    I like the idea of grooming players with the upcoming West Indies tour here after the WC. I would rest AB and Steyn, send Morkel to play and learn skills on the County circuit or in Australia as to me Morkel can bowl well and not take wickets, a lot is down to his nature of bowling. Groom, Elgar, De Kock, Van Zyl, De Lange, Harmer, Abbott etc. We cannot fall into the trap that Australia, India and England did by not planning to improve the squads weaknesses or having greats retire at once.

  • cheguramana on March 2, 2014, 6:22 GMT

    Surprised at how docile the track seems to be. Maybe fear of MJ induced such a pitch ? If so, the deciding factor may be who will bat better. SA batting is by no means weak. But al ready it looks like this May be a hard fought draw. For a top ranked Test nation, it has produced hardly any spinner worth the name....surely it el be difficult to sustain dominance with such a mix ?

  • Blackholesun on March 2, 2014, 6:20 GMT

    With Styen Gun Jammed Advantage Australia ! Warner, Clarke and Smith have put Australia on Top. Unless SA bat's well in their first innings, they are going down the well. The pressure is on SA clearly.

  • on March 3, 2014, 5:46 GMT

    For once I agree with Firdoose - we have fielded 10 players in every game and we are exposed with dalo -- and Firdoose thanks for you and Telford joining us on the Waving The Flag Floral shirt grass embankment!!! yesterday..

  • stormy16 on March 2, 2014, 16:32 GMT

    Obviously any team would struggle at the loss of the number 1 bowler in the world but I really expected more from SA. Yes Morkel was great bouncing Clark but at the end of the day it got SA no where with Aus in a totally dominant position.I thought the most effective bowler was Elga and Duminy and amoungst seamers, Abbot looked most likely to get a wicket. Morket and Vern were dissappointing for me and understand the conditions were tought but with the series on the line, they hardly made an impact.

  • John-Orford on March 2, 2014, 14:45 GMT

    Morkel's over-usage of the short ball is reminiscent of Broad a few years ago. He bowled too short for whole overs at a time and so got hammered . Strauss just stood there and said nothing. Did Smith not make any suggestions to him? What are captains for? And Donald? His little finger has forgotten more about bowling than I shall ever know. Has he suggested anything to Morkel or is it being forgotten? You've got a fine bowler there, but he needs advice.

  • on March 2, 2014, 10:07 GMT

    Brilliant cricket watching Clarke face Morkel. He roughed it out and it's now set for a big hundred. He's making "ugly" runs which is good to see. Steyn may be out, but SA still have three frontline pacers so don't make too many excuses yet.

  • on March 2, 2014, 6:53 GMT

    A riverting article this. Well written Firdose, hoping SA gets on top of the situation today.

  • SLSup on March 2, 2014, 6:43 GMT

    ...reacting to BradmanBestEver: Dude. The only obvious comment you made is perhaps your username! When you say SA batting line up is only MARGINALLY better than others it should be backed up with stats. Also, you don't need a spinner as long as you have bowlers with a decent strike-rate at a reasonable average to dismiss an opposition soon enough to turn out a win. SA has done so more often than others in the recent past to pose an imposing lead at the rankings to the 2nd best. And NO TEAM relies on any one bowler through all teams have at least one strike bowler (who doesn't take all 20 wickets)!

    AND, did you really say "...it is interesting that opposing teams have not..." exploited SA's weaknesses? : ) Laughable. But you made my day indoors. Outside it's pouring rain!

  • on March 2, 2014, 6:41 GMT

    I heard Steyn did not bowl at all since the PE Test. Did that contribute to his hamstring trouble? South Africa should clearly look at how they approach a very important test match with their best fast bowler. If Steyn had had a few bowls before the test, maybe he would have been more effective in the opportunity that he got on the first day morning. Having said that, Australia are in the driving seat and the variable bounce augurs well for Johnson and Lyon.

  • Protears on March 2, 2014, 6:40 GMT

    I like the idea of grooming players with the upcoming West Indies tour here after the WC. I would rest AB and Steyn, send Morkel to play and learn skills on the County circuit or in Australia as to me Morkel can bowl well and not take wickets, a lot is down to his nature of bowling. Groom, Elgar, De Kock, Van Zyl, De Lange, Harmer, Abbott etc. We cannot fall into the trap that Australia, India and England did by not planning to improve the squads weaknesses or having greats retire at once.

  • cheguramana on March 2, 2014, 6:22 GMT

    Surprised at how docile the track seems to be. Maybe fear of MJ induced such a pitch ? If so, the deciding factor may be who will bat better. SA batting is by no means weak. But al ready it looks like this May be a hard fought draw. For a top ranked Test nation, it has produced hardly any spinner worth the name....surely it el be difficult to sustain dominance with such a mix ?

  • Blackholesun on March 2, 2014, 6:20 GMT

    With Styen Gun Jammed Advantage Australia ! Warner, Clarke and Smith have put Australia on Top. Unless SA bat's well in their first innings, they are going down the well. The pressure is on SA clearly.

  • ThreePIllarTales on March 2, 2014, 6:05 GMT

    Steyn is pure heart and class in the mould of Donald ! Lucky safas. But the end is nigh....time waits for no man.

  • BradmanBestEver on March 2, 2014, 5:51 GMT

    SA are No.1 by good fortune more than anything else.

    They have the best batting line up by a small margin, but they have no spinner and rely heavily on 1 fast bowler and their own conditions to help their other fast bowlers.

    It is up to to the other teams to exploit SAs obvious weaknesses and it is interesting that opposing teams have not done that in recent times

  • on March 2, 2014, 5:25 GMT

    It's a concern for SA if Donald is praising Morkel's spell. Aside from the theatre pitching every ball in your half is not great bowling. Not taking anything away from courage shown by Clarke he was able to confidently get on the back foot knowing it was invariably going to be short.. That's where Johnson has been better lately, using the short intimately ball to push the batsmen back and then using well directed length balls to great effect.

  • the_blue_android on March 2, 2014, 4:48 GMT

    Kudos to Warner for showing Philander what he truly is. A trundler. Wait till 'Big' Vern leaves the shores of his backyard to learn what real test cricket is.

  • kensohatter on March 2, 2014, 4:11 GMT

    I disagree with this article to a certain point. There is no doubt Morkel was hostile and tested the Australian captain on certain occasions but unlike Johnsons hostility he did not take wickets. In Morkels defence he had almost no back up with there best bowler off the park but lets be fair to the Australians there was an injury cloud around Steyn before the series. The main problem here for SA is that there much vaunted best bowling attack in the world lacks depth. When One of Morkel, Steyn and Philander goes down they have NOBODY to take their place. Australia are far better served in this area (and hopefully this will be proved by pattisons performance in the second dig). They also have proven Bird, Hilfenhaus, Starc and young cummins on the bench. Lets not even start on spinners... relying on duminy and elgar is a joke. I think its now plain to see exactly where the best bowling attack is. Take a bow Australia.

  • dunger.bob on March 2, 2014, 3:59 GMT

    That's all fair enough but you can't actually form a bowling attack on the assumption that one of your star bowlers is going to get injured. The assumption would normally be that all your bowlers are going to be available for the whole match. In that light this looks a good attack. Swing (Abbott), seam (Philander) pace and bounce (Morkel) and to top it all off a touch of genius courtesy of Mr. Steyn. .. It looks pretty good, spin or no spin. Losing any player during a match is rotten luck. That's all there is to it.

    When the time comes for Steyn to step aside he won't be at all easy to replace. He's not the fastest or the meanest or any of that rubbish. What he is is one of the smartest and most skillful bowlers the game has seen. .. People like him don't exactly grow on trees so good luck with that.

    When the time comesreplacing Steyn goes

  • Swan_Draught on March 2, 2014, 2:53 GMT

    Much like Australia in Adelaide 2012. It's never great to see any player get injured but the Saffers just have to deal with it.

  • on March 2, 2014, 2:50 GMT

    This isn't the same team that beat england, shame would hav enjoyed watching a team beating them at there best. This aus team are a lot like england 2005 similar captain and attack S.A with kallis is the dominant #1 team the true challenge

  • Ryan_H on March 2, 2014, 2:47 GMT

    It seems Philander has been put in his place by the Aussies particularly Warner. He spoke a bit too much against the Indian Batsmen who appeared hapless on foreign pitches But the Aussies, who are experienced playing on similar pitches, showed him he is mostly an ordinary bowler and needs assistance from the pitch to bloom and prosper.

  • kempvet on March 2, 2014, 1:35 GMT

    What kept Australia at the top for over a decade was their depth of non test players, SA has had a golden run in recent years, they have nowhere near the depth of non test players that Australia had during their decade of complete dominance. When SA falls, they will fall hard, the cracks are appearing now, and they are appearing in their own backyard.

  • on March 2, 2014, 1:27 GMT

    I know the SA team will not and should not make excuses but forgive me if I do not shed a tear for SA's predicament. When we lost Pattinson early in the 2nd test in 12/13 it crippled us, potentially cost us the match and forced Siddle and Hilfenhaus out of the 3rd test as they were over-bowled for obvious reasons.

    No one gave us a pass mark then. If SA lose this test and are under manned they should not get one either. Bring on a 2-1 victory to Australia!

  • on March 2, 2014, 0:47 GMT

    Sounds a bit like how Australia may fare without Mitchell Johnson.

  • meursault on March 2, 2014, 0:28 GMT

    Well, Australia effectively lost the 2012 series because Pattinson got injured early in the second test and left them unable to close it out -- it also made them wear Siddle into the ground and they went into Perth with a poor attack. Maybe this Steyn injury will be the piece of bad lack that effectively loses South Africa this series.

  • pat_one_back on March 1, 2014, 23:34 GMT

    A huge sleight on Smith to say Clarke should have been caught! Clarke went hard at a rubbish short wide ball that kicked off the inconsistent pitch and took the shoulder, it would have been a miracle catch of all time and needed Morkel's arms to be reached. The only person to drop Clarke was Morkel when he collected the back of Clarke's head, sickening blow and very sporting the way he rushed down to Clarke, it was a great moment in cricket, fierce, gutsy & professional, kudos to you Morne, if only you'd followed up with a full one! Very disappointing if Steyn's not back this test, Aust have their own concerns with Patto & Harris having history, perhaps some kharma for all those SA's who made fun of Aust having less resilient bowlers than Steyn!

  • on March 1, 2014, 23:27 GMT

    the problem for SA is that when you manipulate the wicket, changing it from a bouncy one to a flat road to thwart the opposition's attack, you have to win the toss

  • chicko1983 on March 1, 2014, 22:58 GMT

    Clear the Aussie mind games work in this article. Warner has the wood over philander and his ball tampering claims have meant that there were no throws into the square like last test. Then earnie with his part timer comment about duminy. Steyn, unfortunately, looks to be picking up injuries more regularly and his very best spells are getting less regular. It will be a shame if he doesn't make it to 400 test wickets, which at the moment, seems far away for him.

  • Mervo on March 1, 2014, 22:44 GMT

    Without a spinner the Yarpies cant have much success anywhere else. Without Steyn, they look vulnerable. The second innings will tell who has the best attack.

  • Chris_Howard on March 1, 2014, 22:22 GMT

    Yet again, Australia has been on the right side of the luck ledger while their opponents suffered the worst of it.

    It'd be interesting to see the results of the last 7 Tests if the luck was balanced.

  • Shaggy076 on March 1, 2014, 22:07 GMT

    I agree South Africa have had unfortunate injuries in this test and the last but they had a full compliment of bowlers in the first test.

  • on March 1, 2014, 21:59 GMT

    Warner lacks tact and respect, but he can sure bat. Throughout the series he has made "The worlds`s best attack " look like club cricketers. SA ( and some blinkered reporters ) have been caught up in their hubris. The attack looks unbalanced and reliant on conditions that favour them. No champion team has such a hole in the spinning department. I hope Steyn is back to his best soon.

  • ScottStevo on March 1, 2014, 21:20 GMT

    Whilst I agree with you that SA aren't anywhere near as strong a bowling unit without Steyn, who, despite being below Philander on the rankings is by far and away the superior bowler, although, Steyn wasn't missing in the first test at all and in fact, bowled more overs in the first innings than any other SA bowler. So SA were missing their 4th bowler in the 2nd test which fortunately didn't cost SA anything and they'll be missing their best bowler in this test. No excuses though, that's what we Aussies were told in our previous series vs SA in Aus. Personally, I'm hoping he can miraculously get fit overnight as I'd prefer to play SA when their best XI is on the field.

  • No featured comments at the moment.

  • ScottStevo on March 1, 2014, 21:20 GMT

    Whilst I agree with you that SA aren't anywhere near as strong a bowling unit without Steyn, who, despite being below Philander on the rankings is by far and away the superior bowler, although, Steyn wasn't missing in the first test at all and in fact, bowled more overs in the first innings than any other SA bowler. So SA were missing their 4th bowler in the 2nd test which fortunately didn't cost SA anything and they'll be missing their best bowler in this test. No excuses though, that's what we Aussies were told in our previous series vs SA in Aus. Personally, I'm hoping he can miraculously get fit overnight as I'd prefer to play SA when their best XI is on the field.

  • on March 1, 2014, 21:59 GMT

    Warner lacks tact and respect, but he can sure bat. Throughout the series he has made "The worlds`s best attack " look like club cricketers. SA ( and some blinkered reporters ) have been caught up in their hubris. The attack looks unbalanced and reliant on conditions that favour them. No champion team has such a hole in the spinning department. I hope Steyn is back to his best soon.

  • Shaggy076 on March 1, 2014, 22:07 GMT

    I agree South Africa have had unfortunate injuries in this test and the last but they had a full compliment of bowlers in the first test.

  • Chris_Howard on March 1, 2014, 22:22 GMT

    Yet again, Australia has been on the right side of the luck ledger while their opponents suffered the worst of it.

    It'd be interesting to see the results of the last 7 Tests if the luck was balanced.

  • Mervo on March 1, 2014, 22:44 GMT

    Without a spinner the Yarpies cant have much success anywhere else. Without Steyn, they look vulnerable. The second innings will tell who has the best attack.

  • chicko1983 on March 1, 2014, 22:58 GMT

    Clear the Aussie mind games work in this article. Warner has the wood over philander and his ball tampering claims have meant that there were no throws into the square like last test. Then earnie with his part timer comment about duminy. Steyn, unfortunately, looks to be picking up injuries more regularly and his very best spells are getting less regular. It will be a shame if he doesn't make it to 400 test wickets, which at the moment, seems far away for him.

  • on March 1, 2014, 23:27 GMT

    the problem for SA is that when you manipulate the wicket, changing it from a bouncy one to a flat road to thwart the opposition's attack, you have to win the toss

  • pat_one_back on March 1, 2014, 23:34 GMT

    A huge sleight on Smith to say Clarke should have been caught! Clarke went hard at a rubbish short wide ball that kicked off the inconsistent pitch and took the shoulder, it would have been a miracle catch of all time and needed Morkel's arms to be reached. The only person to drop Clarke was Morkel when he collected the back of Clarke's head, sickening blow and very sporting the way he rushed down to Clarke, it was a great moment in cricket, fierce, gutsy & professional, kudos to you Morne, if only you'd followed up with a full one! Very disappointing if Steyn's not back this test, Aust have their own concerns with Patto & Harris having history, perhaps some kharma for all those SA's who made fun of Aust having less resilient bowlers than Steyn!

  • meursault on March 2, 2014, 0:28 GMT

    Well, Australia effectively lost the 2012 series because Pattinson got injured early in the second test and left them unable to close it out -- it also made them wear Siddle into the ground and they went into Perth with a poor attack. Maybe this Steyn injury will be the piece of bad lack that effectively loses South Africa this series.

  • on March 2, 2014, 0:47 GMT

    Sounds a bit like how Australia may fare without Mitchell Johnson.