Australia in South Africa 2013-14 March 6, 2014

De Villiers and Steyn to the fore

ESPNcricinfo marks the South African players out of 10 following their second series defeat in eight years of Test cricket


AB de Villiers

South Africa's best player was the man who could be their next captain and the good news is he enjoys additional responsibility. De Villiers was their top scorer by some distance with 341 runs at 56.83, took the record for the longest streak of fifties in consecutive Tests (12) and his century at St George's Park set South Africa up to level the series. It also ushered JP Duminy back to form. He also rightly asked for a review for a catch off Duminy's bowling which proved correct. He batted within himself for five hours and 26 minutes to try and save the last Test.

Dale Steyn

Even with nothing in his stomach, Steyn was able to run in for more overs and take more wickets than any of his team-mates in Centurion. Even on one leg, he was able to hold his own at the crease for an hour and a quarter, face 44 balls and not get frustrated by the single run to his name. In between that he produced one of the most breathtaking spells of reverse swing in recent memory to ensure South Africa beat Australia and the weather inside four days in Port Elizabeth. Illness and injury stopped him from being at his best in the first and third but, with 12 wickets in the series, he was still better than anyone else in his team.


Morne Morkel

South Africa's scariest bowler does not have the wickets to explain the damage he caused but he deserves credit. Morkel was the quickest and the most miserly of the home pack and put his energy into working over the opposition captain. He hit Michael Clarke on the elbow, chest, glove and helmet at Newlands but he did not get him out. Morkel still does not mix as many full deliveries into his short-ball barrage, so he often butters up batsmen for others to get out.


Hashim Amla

With his duck in the first innings in Port Elizabeth, Amla went seven innings without a half-century and there was worry he was stuck in the doldrums. He shot out with a beautifully composed century in the second and helped South Africa set the victory target. He also formed the first line of defence in the second innings at Newlands, pushing the match into the fifth day.

Faf du Plessis

The rescue-artist was in his element because South Africa often needed salvaging this series. Du Plessis partnered Dean Elgar in Port Elizabeth and pulled South Africa up from 11 for 2. At Newlands, he top-scored with 67 in the first innings and threatened a repeat of his Adelaide exploits in the second. He also provided one of the most entertaining sub-plots of the series when he compared Australia's fielders to a pack of dogs and they promptly howled him off the field when they dismissed him.

JP Duminy

His development into a genuine all-round option grew when he contributed with bat and ball - 223 runs and seven wickets - to allow South Africa to operate without a specialist spinner for the two-thirds of the contest. Duminy helped build the foundation of the series-leveling win in Port Elizabeth when he found form with a calm 123 and he played a role in sealing victory by dismissing Warner in the chase. His four wickets at Newlands also included Warner and his ability to break partnerships is something South Africa may call on in future.

Vernon Philander

Philander's bowling average ballooned to 51.71 in this series, his worst to date. He was guilty of bowling too full and not adhering as closely to his fourth-stump line, which made him an ideal target for an aggressive Australian line-up. But he made a bold statement with bat in hand. Philander spent a total of eight hours and 14 minutes at the crease across the five innings in which he batted and at Newlands showcased his ability to resist. He was not out in both innings and almost saved the series. South Africa do not need to look for another lower-order all-rounder. They have one in Philander.


Kyle Abbott

In tough bowling conditions and without a leader in the attack, Abbott performed admirably in the first innings at Newlands. He found the smallest hint of swing and concentrated on accuracy. He was better rewarded in the second although his three wickets came long after Australia were on the charge. Abbott also displayed temperament when asked to act as nightwatchman and held up his end for six minutes short of two hours.


Dean Elgar

His role in the series was initially thought to be limited to putting down Warner at fine leg when he was fielding as a substitute in Centurion, but Elgar found himself in the playing XI in the next Test. Despite having lost his national contract, he braved blows from Johnson and rescued South Africa from a shaky start. He did not contribute much more with the bat and his left-arm spin leaves much to be desired but he showed he could turn into a handy cricketer for South Africa.

Wayne Parnell

He waited four years to play a fourth Test and when he did, it only lasted briefly. Parnell send down 8.3 overs of promise and took two wickets in his first three deliveries to script an important part of their comeback. Whether he will make one of his own will depend on how soon he recovers from a groin strain.


Alviro Petersen

After the first Test in which he showed none of the control an opening batsman should have, Petersen was thought be suffering a severe case of Johnsonitis when gastro kept him out of the second. He seemed to have lost ground to Elgar but on his return, Petersen blasted a shaky half-century in the David Warner mould. He was intent on getting the runs before the Australians got him and it probably bought him some time at the top.

Ryan McLaren

Adequate is the best word to describe McLaren's contributions. As the first-choice in South Africa's plan to plug the Jacques Kallis-sized hole in their team, he was expected to bat in the lower-order and perform the duties of a fourth seamer. He did both but not outstandingly. With Parnell and Abbott making more memorable marks on the series, he may have fallen behind in the queue.


Graeme Smith

This is not the way Smith would have wanted it to end but perhaps it serves as confirmation his exit was not premature. Smith did not last longer than 19 minutes in any of the six innings and never faced more than 24 deliveries. He looked uncomfortable and unhappy when at the crease and allowed Australia to target him as they promised to. His poor form also meant South Africa did not get off to a single good start, with their highest opening stand a mere 20.

As a leader, Smith was also going through a difficult patch while he wrestled with his feelings over retirement. He made the right decision at the right time to declare in Port Elizabeth and managed an attack without a bowler in all three matches.

Quinton de Kock

When the boy wonder charged Steve Smith and slapped him straight to mid-off to depart for 7 in his first innings in Test cricket, those who said he was too inexperienced for the longest format at the highest level were not surprised. That shot smacked of the recklessness of youth. He played his way to a more measured 34 in the second dig but still needs to mature into a Test player, which is also evident from his lack of awareness in the field, which suggests he may be more comfortable behind the stumps.


Robin Peterson

It may be over for Peterson after he was overlooked for the second and third Tests. He was expensive in the first and with South Africa struggling to get the balance of their side right, had to be dispensed with in favour of part-timers.

Firdose Moonda is ESPNcricinfo's South Africa correspondent

Comments have now been closed for this article

  • Rob on March 8, 2014, 18:30 GMT

    Next test XI - Puttick, Elgar, Amla, du Plessis, de Villiers, Duminy, de Kock, Philander, Steyn, Morkel, Harmer. In the squad - Van Zyl, Abbott, McLaren and Parnell.

  • Lou on March 8, 2014, 5:43 GMT

    @xtrafalgarx, of course I was talking about the SA players. I'm an Aus fan, stop pretending you can read people's minds.

  • David on March 8, 2014, 5:07 GMT

    I'd give de Kock more credit than this! He averaged more than Alviro Petersen and Graeme Smith!

    de Kock's lowest score was 7. In the same innings Amla scored 0. Alviro's one score of 53 , and three scores of 9, 2 and 1 together average LESS than de Kock scored.

  • Guy on March 8, 2014, 3:27 GMT

    @inefekt and @Bill Pollock, I don't read @Protears' comments as excuses, just reasons why the South African team shouldn't panic at this loss and has plenty of reasons to expect to remain very good into the future. Personally, I agree with that view. @rickytherocket makes some good points on where the team is headed, though I think Alviro is the best short-term opening option. Which leaves a pretty decent line up of: Elgar, Alviro, Amla, de Villiers (c), du Plessis, Duminy, de Kock, Philander, Parnell, Steyn, Morkel. I don't really rate Duminy but in the absence of a decent front-line spinner SA's best option is to keep him and Elgar to take some spin duties while the four quicks do the main damage. Parnell seems the right fourth quick for variety and batting ability, though Abbott is respectable. ABDV without the gloves will almost certainly remain the best all-conditions batsman in the world by a street and probably be an excellent captain to boot. All is not lost (from an Oz fan).

  • Dummy4 on March 7, 2014, 21:21 GMT

    These are the most laughable ratings I have ever seen. A 2 for Quinton de Kock? TWO out of TEN?? Yes he got out early in his first innings of the series -- so did David Warner. In his second innings he looked at home and he was cruising to a half-century. But at that point the opposition was conquered and we were battling the rain. The rate needed to be picked up and Amla was too concerned with getting his 21st century to take that job. So because de Kock tries to score a bit quicker and gets out in the thirties he gets a 2?

    And what does Parnell have to do to get a decent score other than two key TOP ORDER wickets in his first over? Those wickets set up the game for us! Contrast that to Big Vern who gets 7 in your eyes even though he was completely ineffective with the ball (I don't care about his batting, he is not there to bat but to take EARLY, TOP ORDER wickets)?

    Ms Moonda I shed a tear after reading your article about Graeme Smith it was so moving, but these ratings are way off

  • Clifford on March 7, 2014, 14:08 GMT

    SA potentially have a lot of problems right now: They've lost two upper order bats that averaged 50+ and Amla is in the doldrums. I don't know why he was batting at number 4 - sure he can do it but going forward it can't serve the team to have him coming in that low.

    SA still don't have a spinner/4th bowler worth talking about and their inability to consistently bowl out Aus was telling. Their three quicks are the epitome of a unit and I think they are a Steyn injury away from mediocrity.

    The loss of Smith's leadership and Kallis' experience must have a huge impact. ABD as new Test captain is going to have to manage at least 3 relatively new batsmen plus the responsibility of leading the team thru 2 big international tournaments. If he does well as captain he'll be rated with Smith and Michael Clarke if not ...

  • John on March 7, 2014, 12:34 GMT

    The ratings for bowlers who have a bit of success with the bat or batsmen who have a bit of success with the ball are always a bit odd. Take Vernon Philander for South Africa in this series and Stuart Broad for England in the Ashes. Big Vern is picked as a bowler and by any measure he failed as a bowler therefore he should have rated a 4 in the same way Peter Siddle should have rated a 4. Yes he scored some runs but that's not his job. In the Ashes Broad was criticized for not scoring runs as he has in the past, once again it wasn't his job as he was picked as a bowler so why should he be criticized for not doing a job he wasn't selected to do? It's nice when it happens but not the role they were selected for.

  • ZCF on March 7, 2014, 12:33 GMT

    Haha Morne Morkel 7, for bruising a few players but not picking up wickets! What is this world coming to? I'm starting to think there's some media collusion to write positively about Morkel and deflect people's attention from the fact that for a long time he has deserved the chop. The 2 year contract itself for a bowler way past his best was shocking. Mark my words Morkel will continue to get worse. The question is who do we blame for keeping him in the team?

  • Dave on March 7, 2014, 12:02 GMT

    Congrats to the Aussies from a die-hard SA supporter. You out-thought and outplayed us in our own back yard.

    Our top order is a worry. I don't believe Alviro is the answer and we don't seem to have any other obvious (experienced) choices available. Elgar has potential and should be given the opportunity to grow as an opener. But who else?

    If AB is to take over the reins, I would bring in de Kock to keep. Also a good batting option, either opening or at 6/7.

    Morkel has pace and gets good bounce, but I was disappointed that he didn't follow up his hostility with a yorker or two. Once you get the batsman instinctively going back, it's important to pitch a few up and catch them in two minds.

    We need more variation in the bowling department. Preferably a left hander, like Parnell. Not too concerned about the lack of a specialist spinner, as Duminy seems to be improving. What is the latest on Marchant de Lange?

    Our reliance on Steyn and/or Philander to always deliver is worrying.

  • Dummy4 on March 7, 2014, 11:25 GMT

    Would suggest Hashim Amla be made the captain instead - he is icy calm and super composed. Smith had finished his shelf life having played a lot from a young age. A brand new opening pair is not desireable but seems inevitable for South Africa. Aus are red hot at the moment and looks as though they will win the 2015 World Cup.

  • No featured comments at the moment.