England in South Africa 2015-16 January 8, 2016

Stokes 'better than I was at 24' - Botham

70

Play 00:50
'Extra pace and bounce in Johannesburg' - Butcher

Ian Botham has hailed Ben Stokes' "enormous potential" and suggested he may be a better player than he was at the same age.

Stokes broke Botham's record for the quickest Test double-century by an England player in the game at Cape Town - a moment Botham compared to his exploits in the Headingley Ashes Test of 1981 - and, despite being the youngest member of the squad, has quickly emerged as a key figure in a developing side.

In statistical terms, the 24-year-old Stokes has some way to go to match Botham. By the time Botham was 25, he had scored six Test centuries (Stokes currently has three), claimed 14 five-wicket hauls (to Stokes' two) and was captain of the side.

But such comparisons are unnecessary. In terms of the aggressive role he plays with the bat and the balance he lends the side by virtue of his all-round skills, there are obvious similarities between the two. Botham recognises that and sees in Stokes a kindred spirit who will be at the centre of every plan England make for much of the next decade.

"As a player, he's probably better than I was at 24," Botham said. "What I did was yesterday's news, what he did is today's news.

"He is not a jack of all trades and master of none. He is actually probably master of the three most important assets you need: batting, bowling and fielding.

"His bowling can only get better. He has all the attributes: he has pace; he can swing the ball; he can reverse it; he can bowl orthodox. And he is terrific fielder close to the bat, in the covers or midwicket, backward point, on the boundary."

Certainly Botham holds no resentment in losing a record to Stokes. He already feels Stokes is a better player than Andrew Flintoff (who scored five Test centuries and claimed three five-wicket hauls in his career) at a comparable stage - "he'll take more five-fors" - and suggests that Stokes should be allowed to play his natural game without complication or impediment.

"I held that record for 33 years, so it was about time it got broken," Botham said. "I enjoyed watching Ben Stokes. I have been a massive fan of his since I first saw him on the international scene. I think he has got tremendous, enormous potential to go all the way.

"That was one of those moments when you can just say 'I was there'. When you think back to Headingley '81, I know there were only about 10,000 people in the ground but I have met three-and-a-half million who say they were. Well, I was there for Ben Stokes.

"It was fun. And Ben Stokes will be enjoying it as well. He'll see it as fun as well. You walk out and you empty the bars rather then fill them and it's a nice feeling. Then you get out and you see them all going back in for a beer and you think 'sorry, lads: can't do it every day.' And he can't do it every day, either. That's what people have to remember. You have to give him the right to fail.

"Just let him go. Mike Brearley did absolutely the same with me. There was no leash in any way.

"I didn't think too much. There is too much thinking about the game, too much analysis, looking at computers. I don't need to look at a computer to know I've played a **** shot. It's not that hard.

"But he is crucial to Alastair Cook's selection policy. If he's playing, then Cook actually has an option of two other players in his mind. He is the genuine article."

Ben Stokes broke Ian Botham's record for the fastest double-hundred by an England player © Getty Images

Botham also believes that Jonny Bairstow's maiden century at Cape Town will give him the confidence to settle into the side and improve his wicketkeeping.

"I think Jonny Bairstow offers a lot to English cricket," he said. "I have always been a fan of his. He was a rough diamond three years ago but you knew those skills were there.

"He only put one down one chance and it wasn't easy. He also had the first stumping for three years by an English keeper in Durban. I think there are more pluses than negatives. He works very hard at his game and he will only get better. I genuinely think he is good enough."

Kumala Wines were proud supporters of 'Beefy Walking The Rainbow Nation'. For more information visit kumalawines.com

George Dobell is a senior correspondent at ESPNcricinfo

Comments have now been closed for this article

  • MasterBlaster100 on January 10, 2016, 22:53 GMT

    What Botham really meant is Stokes is better than he was at 34

  • PompandCircumstance on January 10, 2016, 16:35 GMT

    Stokes is the only real all rounder in Test Cricket these days. For India, Australi and South Africa potterong around with bits-and-pieces players hoping they are the next Kapil, Kallis, whatever, time to set higher standards.

  • Yevghenny on January 10, 2016, 14:37 GMT

    Next innings he blazes a top edge in a situation that required a lot more responsibility and maturity - not a mention of that. He has a long way to go, it was a magnificent innings, but so was Stuart Broad's 169 against Pakistan

  • Beefybotham60 on January 10, 2016, 14:14 GMT

    Can't believe Mitchell Marsh is even mentioned in this article - no 50's or 5 for's - he's a bit n pieces cricketer at best !

  • TommytuckerSaffa on January 10, 2016, 13:35 GMT

    I wish English press and media wouldnt ramp up their players so much. It causes so much undue pressure on the player. I am not denying that Stokes is a great talent, but let him be, let him develop and become who he wants to. This must be the 5th article about him in a month. It really is too much. Create interest building him up, create interest breaking him down. I saw this so often in British Press especially with their football team.

  • notimeforcricket on January 10, 2016, 11:15 GMT

    As ever some good sense and some nonsense in what Botham says. 1. statistically Stokes is not better than he was at the same age but he seems fitter so may go on longer! Botham got into the side earlier as England were pretty poor at the time. On Compton, complete tosh. yes, he is a stodgy guy. He did exactly what was needed in 1st test. In 2nd test, he got us through to lunch barely scoring and played a few shots after lunch, ending up with the same strike rate as Hales. On Amla,he is dead right. the signs are ominous. On Flintoff, also, even Freddie admits that he made the best of himself. Ben Hollioake was a better player (very much the star of the u19 team). Had he not died so tragically young, Flintoff may not have had the career he did (although I like to think they could have found room for both)

  • bisortho on January 10, 2016, 9:32 GMT

    Typical British sports person and media - a game of high and the players are rated highly and a few poor performance and no one will know who Ben Stokes.... A player cant be rated for one innings - look at his over all average - its pretty average.

    There are a number of players in history who have shown potential early on or in spots - but fizzled out pretty quickly - one example is Vinod Kambli...

    Hope he can carry on this form for a longer time to prove his real character

  • Lee Jones on January 10, 2016, 9:30 GMT

    Less of this 'Ben Stokes isn't English' nonsense. He may have been born in New Zealand, but he's a true England lad. Speaks in a northern accent, and is committed to county and country. As far as I'm concerned, he's as English as anyone.

  • nursery_ender on January 10, 2016, 8:57 GMT

    CHARLIEPHARLIE ON JANUARY 10, 2016, 5:11 GMT Another foreigner in the English team. Ben Stokes is a third gen kiwi ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- How good a player was he when he left NZ at the age of 6 or 7?

  • YorkshirePudding on January 10, 2016, 8:45 GMT

    @Michael Flynn, its difficult to compare the two, what with the state of modern pitches compared to those Botham played on in his 20's, not to mention how good the equipment is now complare to Bothams era, where few batsmen wore helmets, the bats were not the clubs they are today.

    THe bigget factor though are the pitches, modern pitches dont break up like those in the 80's, so they dont have the same degree of uncertainty especially after 3-4 days.

  • No featured comments at the moment.