South Africa v India, 2nd ODI, Johannesburg

Miller the weakest link in middle order

Firdose Moonda in Johannesburg

January 14, 2011

Comments: 21 | Text size: A | A

David Miller plays a lofted shot, West Indies v South Africa, 2nd ODI, Antigua, May 24, 2010
David Miller has not set the stage alight as much as was expected © AFP
Enlarge

"Can you imagine if we wrote Jacques Kallis off after his first 12 ODIs?" HD Ackerman, former South Africa Test batsman, asked. It would have meant aborting a career that has, so far, spanned 307 ODIs, seen over 11,000 runs, including 17 centuries, and boasts an average of 45.84.

It's unfathomable to think that such an illustrious career should have been cut short based on Kallis' first 12 ODIs; in those, he only managed 203 runs, at an average of 25.38, with one half-century. That's Ackerman's answer when he is asked if he thinks David Miller has done enough in his short time as a national cricketer to warrant a place in the South African team. Miller has played in 12 ODIs and averages 26.50, slightly more than Kallis did at the same stage, but has not set the stage alight as much as was expected.

In a shaky-looking middle to lower order, that consists of Miller, Johan Botha and the tail, it seems Miller is the weakest link. Ackerman has been one of Miller's strongest backers and said that in time, he can become the strongest member of the middle order. "The selectors and the fans are going to be have to patient with him. He is only 21-years old but he has massive potential to represent South Africa in all forms of the game."

Patience is not something South Africa can afford to have in abundance for the next few weeks, because the World Cup is looming. "People are going to ask questions about him [Miller] because of the World Cup. South Africa are desperate to win the World Cup, so they want the best side possible," Ackerman said. Miller's position, at No.6 or 7, will be a crucial one according to Ackerman, because it will require batsmen to be able "to play spin well."

Ackerman saw the two places being contested between Miller, Colin Ingram and Faf du Plessis, with du Plessis guaranteed a spot if Ackerman was the man choosing. "Faf hasn't played yet but he has the advantage of being able to bowl, which neither David or Colin do. He is also a fine fielder. The other two are also good fielders, but Faf is better than both of them."

Essentially, that means Miller and Ingram will fight it out for the remaining berth and Ackerman backed Miller to take it, saying his true batting style had not been allowed to come out at national level yet, but was lurking. "The David Miller I saw get out on Wednesday was not the David Miller I know. He is a good, clean hitter of the ball and he was trying to nudge and nurdle and he got out."

Miller made a name at the Dolphins for being a big hitter but Ackerman said that didn't mean Miller can't rotate the strike in the middle overs if needed. "When I say he is a big hitter, I mean that he gets the ball to the sweepers, the deep covers, the mid-offs. He doesn't just drop the ball and run, he hits it well and far. He can still take a single or a two off those shots." As for sticking to that skill and not getting bogged down into playing differently to what he is used to, Duncan Fletcher, the team's batting consultant, felt that ability would come with time. "All it needs is a little bit more experience I guess," he said.

Ingram, who has more of that experience at the domestic level and has fared better in his nine ODIs than Miller has in his 12, may be the more automatic choice in the subcontinent for that reason. Ingram is currently standing in for Kallis in No.3 position, and it may be a tricky task for him to move down the order, according to Ackerman. "For him to be taken to the World Cup and have to bat six could be difficult. The No.3 and No.6 roles are completely different and it will need a total change of mindset."

Kallis is not going to play any part in the ODI series, which means Ingram will probably stay at No.3 for the remaining four matches and not have any time lower down the order. Ackerman felt that experience was vital but added that the line-up may shift as South Africa get within sniffing distance of the ICC showpiece. "If South Africa go three-nil up in the series, then we will start seeing them use their game-plan that they want to carry into the World Cup." With conditions in South Africa very different to what they will experience in the subcontinent, they can't afford to experiment with their World Cup combinations before securing the series. Whatever happens, Ackerman hopes Miller will be part of it.

Firdose Moonda is ESPNcricinfo's South Africa correspondent

RSS Feeds: Firdose Moonda

© ESPN Sports Media Ltd.

Posted by   on (January 15, 2011, 20:03 GMT)

where is Albie morkel? i think they didnt even slected him in WC squad?

Posted by nzcricket174 on (January 15, 2011, 17:41 GMT)

If you want a good clean striker of the ball batting at 7 Albie Morkel is your best choice.

Posted by   on (January 15, 2011, 16:49 GMT)

My dream team for south africa will be Smith,Amla,Kallis,De villears,C.Ingram,J.Duminy,A Morkel,j.Botha,M.Morkel,D.Steyn And LL Tsotsobe/WD Parnel 3 quality seamers and a gud sppiner with 2 class all rounders . There can be shuffle between Faf du Plesis and miller if d stage demands Please S A selectors give J.Morkel a chance he is a genuine allrounder

Posted by Robster1 on (January 15, 2011, 14:02 GMT)

Am still amazed that Morne Van Wyk is not at the very least in the squad.

Posted by   on (January 15, 2011, 12:42 GMT)

ALBIE at seven with miller or ingram at 6 botha 8 steyn 9 morkel 10 tahir 11. with smith and amla to open after that kallis ab de villers and duminy.

then theres the likes of tsotobe parnell theron bosman du plesiss and van de merwe and even langeveldt. with that starting team you can have the to main seamers along with albie and kallis plus the 2 spinners and duminy. if its a track for the fast bowlers bring in another seamer for one of the spinners. or even boucher or gibbs.........

Posted by   on (January 15, 2011, 10:50 GMT)

I agree that Graeme Smith is experiencing a slump in form. To call him the weakest link in the SA make-up is however a bit ridiculous. I am at the point where I'm taking it for granted that anybody who takes such an ill-informed position is clearly thinking with their emotions and not their heads.

Posted by   on (January 15, 2011, 10:17 GMT)

Come off it guys, some of your comments show just how little SA domestic cricket you have been watching. David is a fantastic hitter of the ball, and he is exactly what we need in the no. 6 batting position. To add to that he is a proper batsman as well, not a bowler who bats a bit or a batsman who bowls a bit. Lets be honest, Albie Morkel is not an all rounder, he is a bits and pieces player, and he would not be picked for the side for his batting or bowling alone, and neither would Faf du Plessis. The selectors have got it right with Hashim Amla when we all said it would not work as he bats too slowly, and they got it right with AB and JP as well, not to mention Parnell and Tsotsobe. The case of Kallis is just another reason why public opinion should be kept out of the selection process, he would never have played more than 20 tests or one-dayers if the public had been allowed to decide his fate. Lets sit back and enjoy the future, as both Colin and David mature into fine players

Posted by riskrao on (January 15, 2011, 9:11 GMT)

yes the weakest link in SA team is GC SMITH... he needs to show what hes capable of... the reason y he hasn't performed that well in the past 3 years is due to frequent freaking finger injuries... hope he hits form in the coming ODI's. about miller & ingram, they both look suspect agnst spin which will be crucial in WC. will be interesting who gets picked and who doesn't... miller, ingram, duminy, duplessis(if hes picked) all poor agnst spin. these 4 matches will say who gets the nod. and for ALBIE, hes way tooo inconsistent both with the bat & ball... he can perform in IPL though... albie won't make it to SA team anymore. hes finished...:(

Posted by   on (January 15, 2011, 7:04 GMT)

Rahul Dravid's stats in ODIs from start were as follows: 3,4,3,11,22,7,13,39.......and he ended up making more than 10000 runs at av of nearly 40........one must spot amount of talent in the player, later he will deliver........why India keep on investing in Vijay, Raina, Rohit because these guys have tonns of talent.......

Posted by prakashupad on (January 15, 2011, 6:58 GMT)

My Team for the World Cup would be Smith,Amla,Kallis,De Villiers,Duminy,Faf Du Plessis,Albie Morkel,Steyn,Parnell/Botha,Morkel,Imran Tahir.....Du Plessis over Miller and Ingram because he is a batting allrounder and an xcellent fielder...Tahir over Botha because he has got loads of experience....

Comments have now been closed for this article

TopTop
Email Feedback Print
Share
E-mail
Feedback
Print
Firdose MoondaClose
Tour Results
South Africa v India at Centurion - Jan 23, 2011
South Africa won by 33 runs (D/L method)
South Africa v India at Port Elizabeth - Jan 21, 2011
South Africa won by 48 runs (D/L method)
South Africa v India at Cape Town - Jan 18, 2011
India won by 2 wickets (with 10 balls remaining)
South Africa v India at Johannesburg - Jan 15, 2011
India won by 1 run
South Africa v India at Durban - Jan 12, 2011
South Africa won by 135 runs
More results »
News | Features Last 3 days
News | Features Last 3 days