South Africa v New Zealand, 1st Twenty20, Durban

Paid price for being over keen - McCullum

ESPNcricinfo staff

December 22, 2012

Comments: 5 | Text size: A | A

Brendon McCullum clips one through the leg side, South Africa v New Zealand, 1st Twenty20 international, Durban, December 21, 2012
Brendon McCullum was dismissed for 6 in Durban © Gallo Images
Enlarge

New Zealand paid the price for trying to be too aggressive without earning the right to, in the first Twenty20 international in Durban, according to their new captain Brendon McCullum. The visitors collapsed for 86 and were beaten by eight wickets in the opening fixture of their tour of South Africa.

"We obviously wanted to be aggressive today, and we wanted to put South Africa under pressure right from the get-go, but we learned a lot about earning the right to do so first," McCullum said after the game. "Ensure that you stick to your fundamentals, and first and foremost give yourselves that opportunity to be able to be aggressive. I think one thing we'll definitely take out of this game is that we were just a little over-keen to try and put some pressure on South Africa from the outset.

"We 100% believe that we can win the next game, we've just got to fine tune a couple of areas. I can't fault people for being overly keen to want to get into a series. It's just that we didn't quite earn the right to be as aggressive as we wanted to be and put South Africa under pressure. And we'll ensure that in 48 hours time, we'll definitely put up a much better performance …"

After choosing to bat at Kingsmead, New Zealand had slumped to 36 for 6 by the ninth over, with only Colin Munro making it to double figures among the top-seven batsmen. Munro was one of four debutants New Zealand included in their XI. Corey Anderson, Jimmy Neesham and Mitchell McClenaghan were the others.

"It was a bit two-paced," McCullum said of the pitch. "I think some balls were keeping a little low, especially the cross-seamers were keeping a little bit low, and some kicked a little bit … We just played too many out-shots early on when we weren't quite set. We didn't get the pace of the wicket, so that's something we can definitely learn from."

Faf du Plessis, the South Africa captain, said his team had learned from the mistakes New Zealand's batsmen made. South Africa achieved the target in the 13th over, with du Plessis top-scoring with an unbeaten 38 at No. 3. South Africa also had three debutants - Henry Davids, Chris Morris and wicketkeeper Quinton de Kock - and du Plessis was pleased with the attitude of the new-look Twenty20 side.

"We put a lot of emphasis on that we're a young side, so we want to have a lot of energy and we want to have a good presence," du Plessis said. "That's what I was telling the guys, we've done an excellent job of doing that. He [Quinton de Kock] surprised me. As a young guy coming in, you'd think that he'd be a little bit more nervous but he made it look easy. That's what we strive for as a team, and so he did very well."

South Africa and New Zealand will play the second Twenty20 international in East London on December 23.

© ESPN Sports Media Ltd.

Posted by Glenn10 on (December 23, 2012, 0:13 GMT)

Its not all bad, some future talent got a taste against the best. A few things came to light; McClenaghan will only ever be a T20 player - seemed to be exhausted after every ball just to generate his pace. Can't see him being any more than a Shaun Tait type of player. Munro seemed OK, however, his feet never moved at times, which makes me think he maybe limited to a step up. I hope I'm wrong as he has a good first class record. The Jury is out on others, although Neesham looks promising as an alrounder and bowled one ball at 135Km - Could be our next Chris Cairns with some more exposure. I strongly think the T20 team should include absolutely NO test players. It should be used for development only. Who cares if we are last in T20 ratings - we should be aiming for the No 4 ranking in Tests by 2016 and to achieve this we need keep our best core batsmen and bowlers away from this T20 circus. It should have different selectors, coaches, the lot - Same as NZ operates Rugby 7's.

Posted by gothetaniwha on (December 22, 2012, 17:51 GMT)

Are you kidding me Mc Cullum , no one believes that drivel ,how bout spending less time in dressing shed and more time out batting ( like Taylor ) and that u are selected to do .I cannot remember a performance that bad in the last 30 years esp the way our players got out .

Posted by morangehambo on (December 22, 2012, 14:11 GMT)

And this how McCullum starts.... As a kiwi fan living abroad - i just want us to have a real go. No excuses, again. C'mon the black caps!

Posted by jimbond on (December 22, 2012, 9:53 GMT)

Nope, its a price paid for a useless administration, and a price paid for mismanaging the limited resources that NZ has (Such as Taylor, Southee, Ryder, Vettori, Oram)

Posted by Greg-Willson on (December 22, 2012, 8:18 GMT)

Unfortunately we say the same things after every thrashing - 'we learnt a lot from that and will take lessons forward through to the next match'. As a mad Kiwi cricket fan, it is so disappointing what is happening at the moment

Comments have now been closed for this article

TopTop
Email Feedback Print
Share
E-mail
Feedback
Print
Tour Results
South Africa v New Zealand at Potchefstroom - Jan 25, 2013
South Africa won by 1 wicket (with 0 balls remaining)
South Africa v New Zealand at Kimberley - Jan 22, 2013
New Zealand won by 27 runs
South Africa v New Zealand at Paarl - Jan 19, 2013
New Zealand won by 1 wicket (with 26 balls remaining)
South Africa v New Zealand at Port Elizabeth - Jan 11-14, 2013
South Africa won by an innings and 193 runs
South Africa v New Zealand at Cape Town - Jan 2-4, 2013
South Africa won by an innings and 27 runs
More results »
News | Features Last 3 days
News | Features Last 3 days
Sponsored Links

Why not you? Read and learn how!