South Africa v New Zealand, 2nd Test, Port Elizabeth, 2nd day

Outclassed New Zealand in tatters

The Report by Andrew McGlashan

January 12, 2013

Comments: 155 | Text size: A | A

New Zealand 47 for 6 (Watling 15*, Bracewell 3*) trail South Africa 525 for 8 dec (du Plessis 137, Amla 110, Elgar 103*, Bracewell 3-94) by 478 runs
Scorecard and ball-by-ball details


Dean Elgar raises his arms after getting to a hundred, South Africa v New Zealand, 2nd Test, Port Elizabeth, 2nd day, January 12, 2013
Dean Elgar's hundred was just one of the high points for South Africa © Gallo Images
Enlarge

Utter dominance from South Africa. That should not be a surprise, but it should be admired. Say what you like about New Zealand, and their batting was again exposed in painful fashion late on the second day, but South Africa are producing some irresistible Test cricket.

This time a batsman who began with a pair two Tests ago scored a maiden hundred and another who has eased into Test cricket as though born to play it scored his second in four matches. Then the premier fast bowler in the world began to bully New Zealand's top order before a man slotting back into the side claimed a brace. Even South Africa's spinner was in on the mayhem with two wickets in his first over. A scuffle in the stands shortly before the close provided more of a fight than what was in the middle.

By the close, New Zealand were reduced to a hopeless 47 for 6, with two wickets for a Dale Steyn, Rory Kleinveldt and Robin Peterson, in response to South Africa's imposing 525 for 8. At least they made it past 45. Graeme Smith did not have to bat as long as he did, but wanted to give Dean Elgar the chance of his maiden hundred which came shortly after tea with a lofted and priceless boundary against Jeetan Patel.

It did not take long for the game to look very different with the ball in South African hands. Martin Guptill was dropped at second slip by Jacques Kallis in the first over - South Africa's catching is their only blemish in this series - but it was not long before he offered another off Steyn which Alviro Petersen grabbed. It continued Guptill's struggles in white: his last seven innings now read 11, 13, 4, 11, 1, 0 and 1.

There were suggestions last week that Steyn operated within himself at Newlands - he did not have to push too hard - but here the speedgun was peaking at 147kph. At the other end Morne Morkel roughed up Kane Williamson with two painful blows in the ribs, leading to a weak push outside off to give Steyn his second. It was the perfect example of a fast-bowling double-act.

And just because Vernon Philander was absent it did not mean any breather for a battered New Zealand. Kleinveldt, the memories of a torrid debut at Brisbane rapidly fading, produced an unplayable lifter to take Dean Brownlie's glove and then trapped Daniel Flynn with a full delivery he played around. Flynn review. It was plumb.

Could it get worse? Yes. Peterson tossed his second ball wide and Brendon McCullum, who until then had shown considerable grit, could not resist a drive which he only edged very thinly to slip as it spun from the footmarks. Colin Munro, on debut, then played forward to his first ball and gave a simple inside edge via his pad to short leg. The hat-trick ball spun past Doug Bracewell's edge. It would have been no surprise if it had taken it.

The intense closing period was in contrast to a largely sedate day with South Africa, as is their forte, producing an efficient, professional, display with the bat. Elgar, who made a jittery 21 at Newlands last week as he attempted to secure a middle-order spot vacated by Jacques Rudolph, was again nervous at the start of his innings but this time managed to ride through a tricky period. A strong pull off Neil Wagner settled him and he then began to expand against Patel.

Smart stats

  • At 47 for 6, New Zealand are still 60 runs away from avoiding the lowest score in Tests (since 1900) in Port Elizabeth.
  • If New Zealand are dismissed below 100, it will be the second time since 2002 that they have been bowled out two times in a year for a sub-100 score. In 1958, they suffered the fate five times.
  • New Zealand need another 127 runs to avoid conceding the largest ever lead to South Africa (352 runs). They conceded a lead of 302 in Cape Town. Click here for a list of matches when New Zealand have batted first and here for a list of games when they have fielded first.
  • For only the second time, three South African batsmen scored a century in the same innings in a match against New Zealand. The previous occasion was in Dunedin last year. It is also the second such instance in Port Elizabeth (the previous being 1950).
  • South Africa's score of 525 is their second-highest against New Zealand and their highest against New Zealand in home Tests. It is also their highest total in Tests in Port Elizabeth.
  • Faf du Plessis' century is his second in four Tests. So far, he has scored 445 runs at an average of 111.25. His 137 is also the joint fifth-highest score by a South African No. 6 batsman.
  • Dean Elgar's first century is also the first by a No. 7 batsman for South Africa against New Zealand. Overall, it is the ninth century by a South African No. 7 and the first since Mark Boucher's 117 in 2008.
  • The 131-run stand between Du Plessis and Elgar is the highest sixth-wicket stand for South Africa against New Zealand. It is also only the third time (and second since the Boxing Day Test in 1999) that South Africa have had two century stands for the fifth and sixth wickets.

It was not always pretty from Elgar, especially outside off stump, but he ensured he did not waste his opportunity against a tiring attack. For a while before the interval it appeared time was not in Elgar's side and he started to attack before tea to try and reach the landmark - including a six over long-on against Wagner - but with more than three days remaining it would have been a ruthlessly harsh captain not to give him another opportunity.

Du Plessis was also stuck in the nineties over an interval. He went to lunch on 99 having played out consecutive maidens from Munro, but he must have been at ease during the break as the first ball he faced on resumption, from Patel, he drove into the stands to bring up his hundred. His lofted driving was a feature of the innings as he played them against seam and spin.

Du Plessis showed during his epic rearguard in Adelaide that he has a game that can adapt to various situations despite him having made his name in the one-day arena. With the ball moving, he defended solidly, left well and waited for the poor delivery having regained his composure after a nasty blow in a sensitive area in the first over of the day from Bracewell. As ever, it provided amusement to those who sat in the comfort of the dressing room.

There was a hint of desperation when New Zealand reviewed an lbw shout from Wagner with him on 80. He eventually became Munro's first Test wicket, after a stand of 131 with Elgar, when he got a leading edge high into the off side when aiming over leg. The dismissal saw his average plummeting down to 111.25. It has been one of most serene starts to a Test career in recent memory.

The opening ten overs of the day had brought just 11 runs and the prized wicket of Hashim Amla as New Zealand probed away under cloudy skies. After passing the outside edge on a number of occasions, it was Boult's worst delivery of his opening spell which broke through when Amla flicked at a ball down the leg side and nicked through to BJ Watling ending a stand of 113. Boult's celebration amounted to a sheepish grin, but after seeing Amla dropped on 48 yesterday, even removing him for 110 will have brought a sense of relief.

Yet there was a sense of inevitably that it would be a declaration to end the innings. The problem for New Zealand was the support for Bracewell and Boult. Wagner proved expensive, Patel, although finding turn, was not consistent enough to maintain the pressure and Munro's wickets were gifted by batsmen aiming to accelerate. Ross Taylor's absence has left a vast hole in the batting, but Tim Southee has also been sorely missed with the ball.

Andrew McGlashan is an assistant editor at ESPNcricinfo

RSS Feeds: Andrew McGlashan

© ESPN Sports Media Ltd.

Posted by Inducker on (January 13, 2013, 11:01 GMT)

@PFEL I shouldn't underestimate Elgar if I were you. I wouldn't mind being in the same company as Graham Gooch. Hashim Amla and Jacque Kallis also had dodgy starts to their test careers.Any test hundred is an achievement. To turn it round as quickly as Elgar has shows good temperament and an ability to perform at the highest level. But I guess with all this one day and T20 trash around most fans do have short attention spans.

Posted by Eskimo on (January 13, 2013, 10:53 GMT)

@Philip Machanick That is correct. It consists of all departments. I'm just stating it's the depart SA are the most lacking. I think everyone would agree on that.

DeckChairand6pack stated a very good point. It is way too soon to judge this SA team. We will have more or less an idea of SA's ability after the UAE series vs Pakistan (which I will be attending).

Unfortunately, I can't comment on the Windies era or The 1948 Invincibles, because I'm only 22-years old and can only recall on stories and history books. Nonetheless, I'm very passionate about my test cricket.

Posted by sammyoneboy on (January 13, 2013, 10:42 GMT)

Mike Hesson said that they should crank up the bowling machine but "the guys don't like to be pushed too hard". Enough said because words fail me!

Posted by LillianThomson on (January 13, 2013, 10:28 GMT)

@Soso Killer, I'm not talking about the previous South African team's performances in India and Pakistan - where actually Paul Harris did rather well.

I'm talking about how this team will do. A team which will presumably try 4 quicks + Peterson in the UAE against Pakistan later this year, even though England found a 3rd quick was totally redundant a year ago. And a team which will have to face Rehman and Ajmal on spinning wickets with no bounce. For Peterson, du Plessis and Elgar or Duminy that will be a major challenge, and we don't know how much longer Kallis can maintain his lofty standards either.

But if SA beats Pakistan home and away this year, then I think they really will be able to claim greatness.

Posted by PFEL on (January 13, 2013, 10:15 GMT)

Even Elgar made a ton against NZ . . . they must be really bad

Posted by Soso_killer on (January 13, 2013, 9:58 GMT)

@LillianThomson i agree with you, talks of greatness should be postponed, not just for a little while though but indefinately.

As for the little matter of "not seeing SA winning in the SUB" i'm sorry my friend but thats ludacris. You see my friend SA was the last team to beat India in consecutive test in India until England achieved it against a weak and ailing team. Something that the "great" Australia could not achieve.

You see my friend SA is the only team to beat India by an innings twice in their own den twice in the last 10 years (remember Dale Steyn best career figures), something that the "great" Australia could not achieve even with the "great" Warne. England also did not achieve that even against an ailing team.

Talks of SA not winning in the SUB are uniformed and to be frank INSIPID

Posted by   on (January 13, 2013, 9:51 GMT)

@Eskimo a great team is not made in one department otherwise you would have to say the best Aus team was in Bradman's day, or WI in Lara's time. The current SA team is not so good for any 1 person's brilliance but consistent all-round performance, with a lot of the players at or near the top in their rankings.

Posted by DeckChairand6pack on (January 13, 2013, 9:37 GMT)

I would agree that it is premature to talk of the Proteas all time greatness. Let's not forget that it was only a few weeks back that we were nil nil by the skin of our teeth against Australia. Added to this our home record is poor. We need to sustain these good results for a few seasons before we can talk of greatness.

The Sub Continent holds no fear for the Proteas, been there done it, our record is good. Travelling is one of our strengths. I'm sure they would have no trouble taking on anyone, anywhere playing on the parking lot outside the supermarket of the opponents choosing.

Posted by Amol_Ind_SA on (January 13, 2013, 9:18 GMT)

All SA-batsmen, since the last decade or so have been great players of spin. So their coping here in IND or the sub-continent overall is not an issue at all...especially this particular SA-side.

Posted by ian45 on (January 13, 2013, 9:15 GMT)

@lilianthomson, you seem to be struggling a lot these days, just your pathetic cricket team, give it up troll

Comments have now been closed for this article

TopTop
Email Feedback Print
Share
E-mail
Feedback
Print
Andrew McGlashanClose
Andrew McGlashan Assistant Editor Andrew arrived at ESPNcricinfo via Manchester and Cape Town, after finding the assistant editor at a weak moment as he watched England's batting collapse in the Newlands Test. Andrew began his cricket writing as a freelance covering Lancashire during 2004 when they were relegated in the County Championship. In fact, they were top of the table when he began reporting on them but things went dramatically downhill. He likes to let people know that he is a supporter of county cricket, a fact his colleagues will testify to and bemoan in equal quantities.
Tour Results
South Africa v New Zealand at Potchefstroom - Jan 25, 2013
South Africa won by 1 wicket (with 0 balls remaining)
South Africa v New Zealand at Kimberley - Jan 22, 2013
New Zealand won by 27 runs
South Africa v New Zealand at Paarl - Jan 19, 2013
New Zealand won by 1 wicket (with 26 balls remaining)
South Africa v New Zealand at Port Elizabeth - Jan 11-14, 2013
South Africa won by an innings and 193 runs
South Africa v New Zealand at Cape Town - Jan 2-4, 2013
South Africa won by an innings and 27 runs
More results »
News | Features Last 3 days
News | Features Last 3 days