South Africa v New Zealand, 1st ODI, Paarl January 19, 2013

Franklin sets sights on series victory

ESPNcricinfo staff
  shares 3

After his ice-cool 47 guided New Zealand to a one-wicket victory over South Africa in Paarl, James Franklin has targeted a first ODI series win in the country. New Zealand have only won three ODIs out of 19 in South Africa against the home side, and were battered in the just-concluded two Test series as well.

Franklin was well aware of the challenge ahead for New Zealand in the three-match series. "We are under no illusions … we have to be almost at our best, if not our best, to compete with these guys," Franklin said. "Particularly over here in South Africa, we don't have a great track record here in one-day cricket, now we have got a real chance of maybe winning a one-day series."

New Zealand captain Brendon McCullum was also full of praise for his side after the narrow win. "The gutsy and gritty performance under some fairly extreme pressure, scorecard pressure, the guys really stood up," McCullum said. "To come up against the No. 1 team in the world in their own conditions as well, be behind the eight ball and still find a way to win is great for us, the guys are certainly enjoying the moment."

South Africa looked to be in control of the game for much of New Zealand's chase of 209, especially once the visitors were reduced to 105 for 7. Franklin was the only recognised batsman in the middle, but he forged partnerships with Nathan McCullum and Kyle Mills to keep New Zealand alive.

"We knew we were ahead of the run-rate, we knew it was a case of trying to bat as deep as we could, and take the game as deep as we could," Franklin said. "Nathan's and Kyle's attitude was that, if we can bat 50 overs, we can get across the line, and we snuck in with four overs to go."

For the final few runs, Franklin had last man and debutant Mitchell McClanaghan for company. Despite the ball reverse-swinging, McClanaghan survived long enough for Franklin to knock off the remaining runs. "Mitch came out and he had to get through four balls initially to Ryan [McLaren]," Franklin said. "He was resolute in defence, then it was a case of me being a bit more aggressive, it had to be me to get the majority of the runs with one wicket left."

McClanaghan had been hugely impressive with the ball earlier in the day, taking 4 for 20, the best figures for a New Zealand player on ODI debut. "Mitch has bowled really well in one-day cricket back home, particularly last season," Franklin said. "He's obviously here now seeing where he fits in international cricket, he started very well in the Twenty20 series, he's an attacking bowler, he swings it and he's pretty nippy. Today was just outstanding, for a guy to come in and do that on debut against South Africa in their own backyard."

Comments have now been closed for this article

  • POSTED BY SameOld on | January 20, 2013, 23:27 GMT

    Good effort, Franklin. And about time, too. More please! Consistent performance from JF would go a long way to improving the outlook for this occasionally impressive, but decidedly wobbly team.

    Nathan McCullum's all-round contribution shouldn't be overlooked: Got through his overs pretty cheaply, couple of good catches and yet another busy, scrapping innings to prevent a slide becoming a full collapse. Under-rated, but very handy player.

    Great debut from McClanaghan. SA didn't give him those wickets, he took them all with a combination of pace, consistency and guile. Maybe the hand of one Shane Bond showing there. McClanaghan made Amla look positively mortal early on, too. Very impressive. Could easily have had 5 or 6 wickets with a little bit of luck. It's funny that with all the focus on rugby in NZ, many of their cricketers look like they belong on a rugby side. SA too, now I think of it.

  • POSTED BY corzaNZ on | January 20, 2013, 21:00 GMT

    Don't get ahead of yourself Franklin, you had one good performance now back it up in game 2 not in 2 years from now. McCullum please open the batting, Nicol is out of his depth take away the bullying of Zimbabwe he averages 20.5 with 1 fifty and play Munro in the middle order 1.B McCullum 2.Guptill 3.Watling 4.Williamson 5.Elliot 6.Franklin 7.Munro 8.N McCullum 9.Mills 10.Boult 11.McClenaghan

  • POSTED BY NikhilGupta03 on | January 20, 2013, 12:55 GMT

    brave performance by the Black Caps yesterday!! i feel that they are a very underrated limited overs side.The only change that should be made is opening the batting with Guptill and Watling, but that will only take place from the next series onwards when Ross resumes service for NZ and we can drop Rob Nicol,who has severe technical issues.

  • POSTED BY SameOld on | January 20, 2013, 23:27 GMT

    Good effort, Franklin. And about time, too. More please! Consistent performance from JF would go a long way to improving the outlook for this occasionally impressive, but decidedly wobbly team.

    Nathan McCullum's all-round contribution shouldn't be overlooked: Got through his overs pretty cheaply, couple of good catches and yet another busy, scrapping innings to prevent a slide becoming a full collapse. Under-rated, but very handy player.

    Great debut from McClanaghan. SA didn't give him those wickets, he took them all with a combination of pace, consistency and guile. Maybe the hand of one Shane Bond showing there. McClanaghan made Amla look positively mortal early on, too. Very impressive. Could easily have had 5 or 6 wickets with a little bit of luck. It's funny that with all the focus on rugby in NZ, many of their cricketers look like they belong on a rugby side. SA too, now I think of it.

  • POSTED BY corzaNZ on | January 20, 2013, 21:00 GMT

    Don't get ahead of yourself Franklin, you had one good performance now back it up in game 2 not in 2 years from now. McCullum please open the batting, Nicol is out of his depth take away the bullying of Zimbabwe he averages 20.5 with 1 fifty and play Munro in the middle order 1.B McCullum 2.Guptill 3.Watling 4.Williamson 5.Elliot 6.Franklin 7.Munro 8.N McCullum 9.Mills 10.Boult 11.McClenaghan

  • POSTED BY NikhilGupta03 on | January 20, 2013, 12:55 GMT

    brave performance by the Black Caps yesterday!! i feel that they are a very underrated limited overs side.The only change that should be made is opening the batting with Guptill and Watling, but that will only take place from the next series onwards when Ross resumes service for NZ and we can drop Rob Nicol,who has severe technical issues.

  • POSTED BY NikhilGupta03 on | January 20, 2013, 12:55 GMT

    brave performance by the Black Caps yesterday!! i feel that they are a very underrated limited overs side.The only change that should be made is opening the batting with Guptill and Watling, but that will only take place from the next series onwards when Ross resumes service for NZ and we can drop Rob Nicol,who has severe technical issues.

  • POSTED BY corzaNZ on | January 20, 2013, 21:00 GMT

    Don't get ahead of yourself Franklin, you had one good performance now back it up in game 2 not in 2 years from now. McCullum please open the batting, Nicol is out of his depth take away the bullying of Zimbabwe he averages 20.5 with 1 fifty and play Munro in the middle order 1.B McCullum 2.Guptill 3.Watling 4.Williamson 5.Elliot 6.Franklin 7.Munro 8.N McCullum 9.Mills 10.Boult 11.McClenaghan

  • POSTED BY SameOld on | January 20, 2013, 23:27 GMT

    Good effort, Franklin. And about time, too. More please! Consistent performance from JF would go a long way to improving the outlook for this occasionally impressive, but decidedly wobbly team.

    Nathan McCullum's all-round contribution shouldn't be overlooked: Got through his overs pretty cheaply, couple of good catches and yet another busy, scrapping innings to prevent a slide becoming a full collapse. Under-rated, but very handy player.

    Great debut from McClanaghan. SA didn't give him those wickets, he took them all with a combination of pace, consistency and guile. Maybe the hand of one Shane Bond showing there. McClanaghan made Amla look positively mortal early on, too. Very impressive. Could easily have had 5 or 6 wickets with a little bit of luck. It's funny that with all the focus on rugby in NZ, many of their cricketers look like they belong on a rugby side. SA too, now I think of it.