South Africa v Pakistan, 1st Test, Johannesburg January 30, 2013

Batting Pakistan's Achilles' heel

Pakistan's bowling compares favourably with that of the hosts but the visitors' batting will undoubtedly hold the key to their fortunes

At first glance, South Africa, the No. 1 Test team, seem clear favourites in the upcoming series against Pakistan. Since the beginning of 2008, South Africa have lost only one series at home and won twice in Australia and England.

Pakistan, on the other hand, have had a mixed bag of results in the same period. They were beaten convincingly in Australia (2009-10) and England (2010) but turned their fortunes around by beating England 3-0 in the UAE at the beginning of 2012. However, given Pakistan's unpredictability, the result of the series is hard to predict. On their previous tour of South Africa in 2006-07, Pakistan won the second Test and missed out on a great chance to register a series win in the third Test in Cape Town. The variety in Pakistan's bowling will test the hosts but the visitors' batting frailties are just as likely to be exposed against a top-quality attack in pace-friendly conditions.

Pakistan played their first Test against South Africa in Johannesburg in 1995 and lost by a huge margin of 324 runs. South Africa also won their first series in Pakistan in 1997 but were upstaged in Durban (1998) by 29 runs in a low-scoring game. Pakistan's next win in South Africa came in 2006-07 when they won by five wickets in Port Elizabeth. Overall, South Africa have the superior head-to-head record winning eight Tests and losing three. In the previous series played between the two teams, both matches ended in high-scoring draws as the South African pace bowlers struggled to bowl out Pakistan on flat tracks in the UAE. The visitors, looking to become the most successful subcontinent team in South Africa, will draw confidence from the fact that their varied bowling attack was a major factor behind both their wins in South Africa.

Pakistan in Tests against South Africa
  Played Wins Losses Draws W/L ratio
Overall 18 3 8 7 0.37
Home 7 1 2 4 0.50
Away 9 2 6 1 0.33
Neutral 2 0 0 2 -

As has been the case with all subcontinent teams, Pakistan have also struggled on the batting front in South Africa. In five Tests played in South Africa since 2000, Pakistan average 24.24 with the bat while the hosts average a much higher 37.66. Both teams, however, have the same number of centuries (4) while South Africa have a higher number of five-wicket hauls (3). In the same period, the teams have played each other four times in Pakistan winning one Test each. At home, Pakistan have a much better batting average (35.98) compared to their performance in South Africa. The average difference (difference between Pakistan's batting average and bowling average) at home (-2.04) is significantly better than the corresponding number in Tests in South Africa (-13.42). South Africa also batted and bowled Pakistan in the two Tests played in the UAE in 2010 but were unable to emerge with a win. Overall, South Africa have a superior average (41.00) and more centuries (14) and five-fors (8).

Pakistan's stats v South Africa (Tests since 2000)
  Matches Wins/Losses Bat avg Bowl avg Avg diff 100s (Pak/SA) 5WI(Pak/SA)
Tests in South Africa 5 1/4 24.24 37.66 -13.42 4/4 1/3
Tests in Pakistan 4 1/1 35.98 38.02 -2.04 1/5 2/4
Tests in UAE 2 0/0 45.30 57.11 -11.81 1/5 1/1
Overall 11 2/5 31.21 41.00 -9.79 6/14 4/8

Pakistan's greatest strength over the years has been their bowling attack. A top-class pace/spin combination has consistently given them opportunities to win Tests abroad. Since 2010, South Africa, unsurprisingly, have had the best numbers for pace bowlers. In 28 matches, South Africa's fast bowlers have picked up 384 wickets (wickets per match 13.71) at an excellent average of 25.95. In contrast, their spinners have picked up 81 wickets at a much higher average of 45.97. Pakistan fast bowlers, who have picked up 221 wickets in 26 Tests, have the fourth-best average (30.30) behind those of South Africa, Australia and England. However, they have the best average on the spin front. Saeed Ajmal, who has picked up 104 wickets in his last 18 Tests, has the best average (24.47) and strike rate (58.3) among spinners in Tests since 2010 (min 50 wickets). The narrow difference (1.76) between averages of Pakistan spinners and pace bowlers is bettered only by England, who have a corresponding number of 0.95.

Pace/spin stats for top teams since Jan 2010
Team Matches Pace (wickets/avg) Pace (5WI) Spin (wickets/avg) Spin (5WI)
South Africa 28 384/25.95 22 81/45.97 0
Australia 33 427/28.16 20 118/37.11 5
England 37 417/29.19 14 199/30.14 14
Pakistan 26 221/30.30 9 221/28.44 9
West Indies 26 229/32.55 11 143/39.15 5
New Zealand 23 218/35.75 8 79/48.51 2
India 35 260/37.26 7 268/37.80 12
Sri Lanka 28 148/52.57 3 209/32.05 13

The hosts' outstanding batting strength can be gauged from the fact their batting line-up possesses three of the five batsmen who average more than 60 (2000-plus runs) since 2010. Only Alastair Cook has scored more centuries (13) than Hashim Amla and Jacques Kallis, who have scored 12 centuries each. While Amla and Kallis have more centuries than fifties, AB de Villiers has struggled to convert his half-centuries to three-figure scores. While Graeme Smith, who is set to become the first player to lead in a 100 Tests, has scored over 2000 runs at an average of 48.28, his opening partner Alviro Petersen, has been less successful scoring 1514 runs at 42.05.

As expected, both Amla and Kallis have excellent numbers against pace and spin. While Amla has slightly better values of average and balls-per-dismissal against pace, Kallis has the better numbers against spinners. De Villiers has comparatively lower numbers against pace bowling but outperforms Kallis and Amla against spin. While Smith has fairly even stats against fast and slow bowling, Petersen has struggled against spin with an average of 29.41 and a balls-per-dismissal value of 65.58.

South Africa's top batsmen in Tests since Jan 2010
Batsman Matches Runs Average 100/50 Pace (avg/balls per dismissal) Spin (avg, balls per dismissal)
Hashim Amla 28 2912 69.33 12/10 74.88/125.84 68.92/139.14
Jacques Kallis 27 2569 67.60 12/5 64.47/121.56 77.00/132.42
AB de Villiers 28 2306 62.32 5/12 54.52/93.24 85.00/157.54
Graeme Smith 28 2173 48.28 8/10 47.96/79.63 47.08/96.25
Alviro Petersen 21 1514 42.05 5/5 50.43/92.95 29.41/65.58

Younis Khan, who has scored three centuries in his last four Tests against South Africa, averages nearly 60 since the beginning of 2010. He also played a pivotal role in Pakistan's win in Port Elizabeth in 2006. Azhar Ali, who is the highest run-getter for Pakistan in the same period, averages 45.27 with four centuries and 13 fifties. Misbah-ul-Haq, Pakistan's captain, averages 58.60 but has a very poor ratio of centuries to fifties (1:13). Mohammad Hafeez, who has scored three centuries at an average of 41.35, is likely to be partnered at the top of the order by Taufeeq Umar or Nasir Jamshed.

Both Younis and Azhar have very similar stats against fast bowlers. Against spinners, however, Younis has been the better player; he averages 75.50 and has a balls-per-dismissal value of 149.40 while Azhar has corresponding numbers of 47.80 and 141.00. While Misbah has very good numbers against pace and spin, Hafeez and Taufeeq have had their struggles especially against spin (averages 34.92 and 35.90 respectively).

Pakistan's top batsmen in Tests since Jan 2010
Batsman Matches Runs Average 100/50 Pace (avg/balls per smissal) Spin (avg/balls per dismissal)
Azhar Ali 24 1811 45.27 4/13 43.76/96.76 47.80/141.00
Younis Khan 16 1305 59.31 4/5 45.83/96.83 75.50/149.40
Misbah-ul-Haq 18 1287 58.50 1/13 67.77/169.66 52.07/111.53
Mohammad Hafeez 18 1282 41.35 3/5 46.00/74.33 34.92/61.84
Taufeeq Umar 18 1214 37.93 3/5 39.00/81.90 35.90/91.45

Since 2010, both South Africa and Pakistan have had five century opening stands but the hosts average higher. Similarly, for the second wicket, South Africa have a higher average but the same number of century partnerships (8). With Amla and Kallis have been in top form, South Africa average a superb 76.11 (ten century stands) for the third wicket. In contrast, Pakistan have struggled averaging just 33.43 (two century stands). The hosts' dominance extends to the fourth-wicket partnership as well but the trend is reversed for the fifth wicket. Pakistan have more centuries (7) and a higher average (47.48) than the hosts. However, South Africa are by far the better team in terms of averages for wickets 6-10.

Partnership stats for the two teams (since Jan 2010)
Wicket SA (Innings) SA (Runs/avg) SA (100/50 stands) Pakistan (Innings) Pakistan (Runs/avg) Pakistan (100/50 stands)
1 49 2038/42.45 5/9 51 1710/34.89 5/9
2 48 2677/56.95 8/8 49 2271/48.31 8/10
3 47 3349/76.11 10/11 47 1538/33.43 2/7
4 43 2307/56.26 8/8 46 1883/44.83 6/7
5 40 1323/34.81 3/7 42 1947/47.48 7/9
6 38 1587/45.34 5/9 42 757/19.41 0/3
7 35 898/27.21 1/7 38 819/23.40 0/7
8-10 87 1934/23.30 1/10 102 1517/15.17 1/5

In Johannesburg, the venue for the first Test, teams batting first have had no significant advantage, winning and losing two matches each. However, in Cape Town and Centurion, teams batting first have struggled badly winning just one and losing 11 Tests. The first-innings average is the highest in Cape Town (30.77) and lowest in Centurion (25.16). While the second-innings averages in Johannesburg and Cape Town are not much higher than the corresponding first-innings numbers, the difference is massive in Centurion (second-innings average of 48.44).

Both Centurion and Cape Town have third-innings averages below 30 while Johannesburg has a corresponding average of 34.45. Cape Town, which has shown a trend to ease out as the match progresses, has a fourth-innings average of 46.59 while the other two venues have averages of 28.62 and 35.58 respectively. Pace bowlers have picked up the highest percentage of wickets (bowler wickets only) in Johannesburg (84.55%) followed by Centurion (79.76%). Despite picking up very few wickets, spinners have the best average at the Wanderers (33.85) followed by Cape Town (37.93).

Venue stats since Jan 2007
Venue Matches Result% Bat first (wins/losses) Avg (1st inns/2nd inns) Avg (3rd inns/4th inns) Pace (wkts/avg) Spin (wkts/avg)
Johannesburg 4 100 2/2 28.45/28.56 34.45/28.62 115/28.34 21/33.85
Cape Town 9 83.3 1/6 30.77/32.35 28.63/46.59 217/30.28 60/37.93
Centurion 6 77.7 0/5 25.16/48.44 26.41/35.58 138/31.87 35/40.57

Madhusudhan Ramakrishnan is a sub-editor (stats) at ESPNcricinfo

Comments have now been closed for this article

  • Ali on January 31, 2013, 23:14 GMT

    Funny I see more Indian fans over here then SA fans, I guess we really did hit them hard in our previous tour. Look SA is one heck of a team, they have won in both ENG and AUS this year, their form is absolutely formidable. At this point in time I don't think any team in the world can beat SA, home or away. I just hope Pakistan put up a good fight and challenge this formidable SA side. A victory over here will be 100x better then any victory over India :)

  • Vinod on January 31, 2013, 20:52 GMT

    Hoping for a good match. Pakistani batsmen should not put too much pressure on themselves and should initially aim for 250. Their bowling lineup is strong enough to put any opposition under pressure. One thing to note for Pakistani bowlers is that it's not enough to get 5 or 6 wickets cheaply as our Indian bowlers found out during our recent overseas tours. It's important not to leak too many runs bowling to tailenders. This is where Ajmal and Irfan can come in. If they have planned something even for the tailenders then the contest could well be a close one.

  • Balaji on January 31, 2013, 20:09 GMT

    After Yousuf there is a vacant position to be filled.Younis is good, but jamshed, shafiq,they haven't played much. Test cricket is different from Odi. hafeez, Irfan are not test stuff. Ajmal is overrated player who has not much left in him . he is already 35. one bad tour he will be out of the team. In tests you have to play as a team like the windies of 80's australians of the 90's.Now southafrica have settled as a team and the have only one or two changes but for pakis they do not know where to put whom. They can dominate a session of the day but they can't come even closer. sorry friends watch out my words.This is a one sided contest. biff and his team is going to humiliate this overrated pakis. Hail the king kallis and the prince amla.

  • Muneer on January 31, 2013, 17:26 GMT

    One thing to note is the fielding will be the key here. Pakistan on average drop 4-5 catches per innings. They need to take 14-15 wickets per innings and close to 30 wickets in a Test to win. S. Africa on the other hand on average convert 1-2 half chances to wickets per innings. So even if the bowling is on equal terms, where Pakistan will lose games is in fielding. Some of the close games Pakistan has lost over the last 2-3 years is where they missed catches, runouts, stumpings. Sydney 2010 comes to mind or Hobart 2010 where Ponting went on to score 200+ after being dropped on 0. Tendulkar scored 85 in WC 11 SF and was dropped 4 times. Players like Amla, Kallis, Smith, and AB will make you pay dearly when you give them a life or two or three. Pakistan badly needs a fielding coach.

  • Azim on January 31, 2013, 17:21 GMT

    Loosing Taufeeq is not a big lose and getting Farhat is not a big gain. Calling Farhat means touring management is under pressure and they ran out of idea. Since too many chances were given to Farhat and this time cricket fans will suffer watching him again? On merit Ahmed Shezad and Kamran Akmal qualify for the opening position if not then some one new should have been a better use of this tour and for the future investment for grooming the opener. Traditionally great Pakistani batsmen came from Karachi; for scoring 300 plus runs in the second inning PCB needs to start supporting and giving more chances to batsmen from Karachi - it is important to mention here that batsman from Lahore and its vicinity are great for the shorter of the game.

  • Chris on January 31, 2013, 16:46 GMT

    Pakistan will get annihilated by South Africa no chance good luck!!!

  • Prashan on January 31, 2013, 16:19 GMT

    @ejsiddiqui, yes since that Pak SA series in UAE in 2010, Pakistan only lost one test match and that in Sri Lanka due to atrocious umpiring. I feel Pakistani batting though improved still can be the root cause should they lose. Anyway, I am supporting Pakistan.

  • Jawwad on January 31, 2013, 15:34 GMT

    The Wanderers outfield is just as fast as SAF bowlers so expect some runs from Pakistan. I like to see what happens when Steyn, Morkel and other bowling plans do not go as expected. If you bowl wayward at Wanderers, you are in to leak runs. I do know this will be a cracker of a series and will test the grit of Misbah's men. My eyes are on Azhar Ali. He may be going through a rough patch but if he succeeds and Pakistan loses, I won't be so much worried as their future will be in good hands. Of course a win for Pakistan will send some shock waves around cricketing world. Good luck to both teams.

  • Graeme on January 31, 2013, 15:01 GMT

    @LilianThomson - I'll agree that most of your comment may have merit, but the chase of 161 by Kallis and Prince was one of the toughest days of Test cricket I've had the pleasure of watching. There is no way Pakistan threw that. I checked the scorecard to refresh my memory and Kallis/Prince put on 37 in 26.2 overs before lunch, 40 in the first 15 after and then finally were able to put the foot down. Hoping this series produces more of the same

  • khurram on January 31, 2013, 14:53 GMT

    to those who are from across and talking about it, yes paksitan's batting is always their weak link and they dont have super bastmen like india. for you guys paksitans win loss ration in SA is better than that of india having all super batsmen all that period. and yes what difference will it make if pak loose 3-0? india having great names in batting department lost to england and Aus 4-0 recently and the lost to england side at home as well. and india were no1 that time. pakistan is always a weak side. but they will fight.