| Series | Countries | Live Scores | Fixtures | Results | News |
Features
|
Photos | Video & Audio | Blogs | Statistics | Archive | Games | Mobile | ||||||||||||||||||||
|
Pakistan's bowling compares favourably with that of the hosts but the visitors' batting will undoubtedly hold the key to their fortunes
Madhusudhan Ramakrishnan
January 30, 2013
![]()
|
|||
|
Related Links
Players/Officials:
Hashim Amla
| Jacques Kallis
Series/Tournaments:
Pakistan tour of South Africa
Teams:
Pakistan
| South Africa
Grounds:
The Wanderers Stadium
|
|||
At first glance, South Africa, the No. 1 Test team, seem clear favourites in the upcoming series against Pakistan. Since the beginning of 2008, South Africa have lost only one series at home and won twice in Australia and England.
Pakistan, on the other hand, have had a mixed bag of results in the same period. They were beaten convincingly in Australia (2009-10) and England (2010) but turned their fortunes around by beating England 3-0 in the UAE at the beginning of 2012. However, given Pakistan's unpredictability, the result of the series is hard to predict. On their previous tour of South Africa in 2006-07, Pakistan won the second Test and missed out on a great chance to register a series win in the third Test in Cape Town. The variety in Pakistan's bowling will test the hosts but the visitors' batting frailties are just as likely to be exposed against a top-quality attack in pace-friendly conditions.
Pakistan played their first Test against South Africa in Johannesburg in 1995 and lost by a huge margin of 324 runs. South Africa also won their first series in Pakistan in 1997 but were upstaged in Durban (1998) by 29 runs in a low-scoring game. Pakistan's next win in South Africa came in 2006-07 when they won by five wickets in Port Elizabeth. Overall, South Africa have the superior head-to-head record winning eight Tests and losing three. In the previous series played between the two teams, both matches ended in high-scoring draws as the South African pace bowlers struggled to bowl out Pakistan on flat tracks in the UAE. The visitors, looking to become the most successful subcontinent team in South Africa, will draw confidence from the fact that their varied bowling attack was a major factor behind both their wins in South Africa.
| Played | Wins | Losses | Draws | W/L ratio | |
| Overall | 18 | 3 | 8 | 7 | 0.37 |
| Home | 7 | 1 | 2 | 4 | 0.50 |
| Away | 9 | 2 | 6 | 1 | 0.33 |
| Neutral | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | - |
As has been the case with all subcontinent teams, Pakistan have also struggled on the batting front in South Africa. In five Tests played in South Africa since 2000, Pakistan average 24.24 with the bat while the hosts average a much higher 37.66. Both teams, however, have the same number of centuries (4) while South Africa have a higher number of five-wicket hauls (3). In the same period, the teams have played each other four times in Pakistan winning one Test each. At home, Pakistan have a much better batting average (35.98) compared to their performance in South Africa. The average difference (difference between Pakistan's batting average and bowling average) at home (-2.04) is significantly better than the corresponding number in Tests in South Africa (-13.42). South Africa also batted and bowled Pakistan in the two Tests played in the UAE in 2010 but were unable to emerge with a win. Overall, South Africa have a superior average (41.00) and more centuries (14) and five-fors (8).
| Matches | Wins/Losses | Bat avg | Bowl avg | Avg diff | 100s (Pak/SA) | 5WI(Pak/SA) | |
| Tests in South Africa | 5 | 1/4 | 24.24 | 37.66 | -13.42 | 4/4 | 1/3 |
| Tests in Pakistan | 4 | 1/1 | 35.98 | 38.02 | -2.04 | 1/5 | 2/4 |
| Tests in UAE | 2 | 0/0 | 45.30 | 57.11 | -11.81 | 1/5 | 1/1 |
| Overall | 11 | 2/5 | 31.21 | 41.00 | -9.79 | 6/14 | 4/8 |
Pakistan's greatest strength over the years has been their bowling attack. A top-class pace/spin combination has consistently given them opportunities to win Tests abroad. Since 2010, South Africa, unsurprisingly, have had the best numbers for pace bowlers. In 28 matches, South Africa's fast bowlers have picked up 384 wickets (wickets per match 13.71) at an excellent average of 25.95. In contrast, their spinners have picked up 81 wickets at a much higher average of 45.97. Pakistan fast bowlers, who have picked up 221 wickets in 26 Tests, have the fourth-best average (30.30) behind those of South Africa, Australia and England. However, they have the best average on the spin front. Saeed Ajmal, who has picked up 104 wickets in his last 18 Tests, has the best average (24.47) and strike rate (58.3) among spinners in Tests since 2010 (min 50 wickets). The narrow difference (1.76) between averages of Pakistan spinners and pace bowlers is bettered only by England, who have a corresponding number of 0.95.
| Team | Matches | Pace (wickets/avg) | Pace (5WI) | Spin (wickets/avg) | Spin (5WI) |
| South Africa | 28 | 384/25.95 | 22 | 81/45.97 | 0 |
| Australia | 33 | 427/28.16 | 20 | 118/37.11 | 5 |
| England | 37 | 417/29.19 | 14 | 199/30.14 | 14 |
| Pakistan | 26 | 221/30.30 | 9 | 221/28.44 | 9 |
| West Indies | 26 | 229/32.55 | 11 | 143/39.15 | 5 |
| New Zealand | 23 | 218/35.75 | 8 | 79/48.51 | 2 |
| India | 35 | 260/37.26 | 7 | 268/37.80 | 12 |
| Sri Lanka | 28 | 148/52.57 | 3 | 209/32.05 | 13 |
The hosts' outstanding batting strength can be gauged from the fact their batting line-up possesses three of the five batsmen who average more than 60 (2000-plus runs) since 2010. Only Alastair Cook has scored more centuries (13) than Hashim Amla and Jacques Kallis, who have scored 12 centuries each. While Amla and Kallis have more centuries than fifties, AB de Villiers has struggled to convert his half-centuries to three-figure scores. While Graeme Smith, who is set to become the first player to lead in a 100 Tests, has scored over 2000 runs at an average of 48.28, his opening partner Alviro Petersen, has been less successful scoring 1514 runs at 42.05.
As expected, both Amla and Kallis have excellent numbers against pace and spin. While Amla has slightly better values of average and balls-per-dismissal against pace, Kallis has the better numbers against spinners. De Villiers has comparatively lower numbers against pace bowling but outperforms Kallis and Amla against spin. While Smith has fairly even stats against fast and slow bowling, Petersen has struggled against spin with an average of 29.41 and a balls-per-dismissal value of 65.58.
| Batsman | Matches | Runs | Average | 100/50 | Pace (avg/balls per dismissal) | Spin (avg, balls per dismissal) |
| Hashim Amla | 28 | 2912 | 69.33 | 12/10 | 74.88/125.84 | 68.92/139.14 |
| Jacques Kallis | 27 | 2569 | 67.60 | 12/5 | 64.47/121.56 | 77.00/132.42 |
| AB de Villiers | 28 | 2306 | 62.32 | 5/12 | 54.52/93.24 | 85.00/157.54 |
| Graeme Smith | 28 | 2173 | 48.28 | 8/10 | 47.96/79.63 | 47.08/96.25 |
| Alviro Petersen | 21 | 1514 | 42.05 | 5/5 | 50.43/92.95 | 29.41/65.58 |
Younis Khan, who has scored three centuries in his last four Tests against South Africa, averages nearly 60 since the beginning of 2010. He also played a pivotal role in Pakistan's win in Port Elizabeth in 2006. Azhar Ali, who is the highest run-getter for Pakistan in the same period, averages 45.27 with four centuries and 13 fifties. Misbah-ul-Haq, Pakistan's captain, averages 58.60 but has a very poor ratio of centuries to fifties (1:13). Mohammad Hafeez, who has scored three centuries at an average of 41.35, is likely to be partnered at the top of the order by Taufeeq Umar or Nasir Jamshed.
Both Younis and Azhar have very similar stats against fast bowlers. Against spinners, however, Younis has been the better player; he averages 75.50 and has a balls-per-dismissal value of 149.40 while Azhar has corresponding numbers of 47.80 and 141.00. While Misbah has very good numbers against pace and spin, Hafeez and Taufeeq have had their struggles especially against spin (averages 34.92 and 35.90 respectively).
| Batsman | Matches | Runs | Average | 100/50 | Pace (avg/balls per smissal) | Spin (avg/balls per dismissal) |
| Azhar Ali | 24 | 1811 | 45.27 | 4/13 | 43.76/96.76 | 47.80/141.00 |
| Younis Khan | 16 | 1305 | 59.31 | 4/5 | 45.83/96.83 | 75.50/149.40 |
| Misbah-ul-Haq | 18 | 1287 | 58.50 | 1/13 | 67.77/169.66 | 52.07/111.53 |
| Mohammad Hafeez | 18 | 1282 | 41.35 | 3/5 | 46.00/74.33 | 34.92/61.84 |
| Taufeeq Umar | 18 | 1214 | 37.93 | 3/5 | 39.00/81.90 | 35.90/91.45 |
Since 2010, both South Africa and Pakistan have had five century opening stands but the hosts average higher. Similarly, for the second wicket, South Africa have a higher average but the same number of century partnerships (8). With Amla and Kallis have been in top form, South Africa average a superb 76.11 (ten century stands) for the third wicket. In contrast, Pakistan have struggled averaging just 33.43 (two century stands). The hosts' dominance extends to the fourth-wicket partnership as well but the trend is reversed for the fifth wicket. Pakistan have more centuries (7) and a higher average (47.48) than the hosts. However, South Africa are by far the better team in terms of averages for wickets 6-10.
| Wicket | SA (Innings) | SA (Runs/avg) | SA (100/50 stands) | Pakistan (Innings) | Pakistan (Runs/avg) | Pakistan (100/50 stands) |
| 1 | 49 | 2038/42.45 | 5/9 | 51 | 1710/34.89 | 5/9 |
| 2 | 48 | 2677/56.95 | 8/8 | 49 | 2271/48.31 | 8/10 |
| 3 | 47 | 3349/76.11 | 10/11 | 47 | 1538/33.43 | 2/7 |
| 4 | 43 | 2307/56.26 | 8/8 | 46 | 1883/44.83 | 6/7 |
| 5 | 40 | 1323/34.81 | 3/7 | 42 | 1947/47.48 | 7/9 |
| 6 | 38 | 1587/45.34 | 5/9 | 42 | 757/19.41 | 0/3 |
| 7 | 35 | 898/27.21 | 1/7 | 38 | 819/23.40 | 0/7 |
| 8-10 | 87 | 1934/23.30 | 1/10 | 102 | 1517/15.17 | 1/5 |
In Johannesburg, the venue for the first Test, teams batting first have had no significant advantage, winning and losing two matches each. However, in Cape Town and Centurion, teams batting first have struggled badly winning just one and losing 11 Tests. The first-innings average is the highest in Cape Town (30.77) and lowest in Centurion (25.16). While the second-innings averages in Johannesburg and Cape Town are not much higher than the corresponding first-innings numbers, the difference is massive in Centurion (second-innings average of 48.44).
Both Centurion and Cape Town have third-innings averages below 30 while Johannesburg has a corresponding average of 34.45. Cape Town, which has shown a trend to ease out as the match progresses, has a fourth-innings average of 46.59 while the other two venues have averages of 28.62 and 35.58 respectively. Pace bowlers have picked up the highest percentage of wickets (bowler wickets only) in Johannesburg (84.55%) followed by Centurion (79.76%). Despite picking up very few wickets, spinners have the best average at the Wanderers (33.85) followed by Cape Town (37.93).
| Venue | Matches | Result% | Bat first (wins/losses) | Avg (1st inns/2nd inns) | Avg (3rd inns/4th inns) | Pace (wkts/avg) | Spin (wkts/avg) |
| Johannesburg | 4 | 100 | 2/2 | 28.45/28.56 | 34.45/28.62 | 115/28.34 | 21/33.85 |
| Cape Town | 9 | 83.3 | 1/6 | 30.77/32.35 | 28.63/46.59 | 217/30.28 | 60/37.93 |
| Centurion | 6 | 77.7 | 0/5 | 25.16/48.44 | 26.41/35.58 | 138/31.87 | 35/40.57 |
Madhusudhan Ramakrishnan is a sub-editor (stats) at ESPNcricinfo
© ESPN EMEA Ltd.
| ||||||
| Comments have now been closed for this article |
||||||
ICICI Bank M2I. Register Now and Get A Gift Offer.
Safe & simple online money transfer. Apply Now!
Buy Wisden 2013 & get a FREE Playfair
Available now at Cricshop
In test cricket the following are the facts. Bowlers win matches, batsmen can put you in a winning position but they can lose matches with one horrible session. Pakistan has the bowling attack to win tests but their batting is the weak link. The series will be decided by how the Pakistani batsmen tackle the top class SA bowling barrage. Good luck Pakistan.
Pakistan are unpredictable as shown always. I hardly see them draw test matches as should they win, they do it by day 4 as shown by their test wins against England in UAE and also their test wins in England in 2010 against England and Australia which was registered by day 4. I guess the Pakistani batsmens lack of tendency to last 5 sessions is the reason that the games does not go on till day 5 when Pakistan play.
I think Pakistan is going to miss Mohd Yousuf in South Africa. Along with Younis and Misbah, he would have given the Pak middle order the strength and experience that it appears to be lacking now, specially against a pace-battery that is number one in the world and playing in their own back yard. In my opinion, Pakistani 11 for the first test should have read like this:
Hafeez, Jamshed, Azhar, Yousuf, Younis, Misbah, Sarfraz, Gul, Junaid, Ajmal, Irfan
Hoping to be proved wrong, I would say that in the final analysis Pakistan is going to miss Mohd Yousuf.
@gsingh7: Sky won't fall if Pakistan loses the series 3-0 as it did not fall when India lost 4-0 twice in their last tours abroad even though batting wasn't their Achilles' heel! And if I am not wrong India lost home series against the English team as well, while Pakistan beat the same English team 3-0.
Funny I see more Indian fans over here then SA fans, I guess we really did hit them hard in our previous tour. Look SA is one heck of a team, they have won in both ENG and AUS this year, their form is absolutely formidable. At this point in time I don't think any team in the world can beat SA, home or away. I just hope Pakistan put up a good fight and challenge this formidable SA side. A victory over here will be 100x better then any victory over India :)
Posted by ImpartialExpert on (January 31, 2013, 20:52 GMT)Hoping for a good match. Pakistani batsmen should not put too much pressure on themselves and should initially aim for 250. Their bowling lineup is strong enough to put any opposition under pressure. One thing to note for Pakistani bowlers is that it's not enough to get 5 or 6 wickets cheaply as our Indian bowlers found out during our recent overseas tours. It's important not to leak too many runs bowling to tailenders. This is where Ajmal and Irfan can come in. If they have planned something even for the tailenders then the contest could well be a close one.
Posted by Espnbug on (January 31, 2013, 20:09 GMT)After Yousuf there is a vacant position to be filled.Younis is good, but jamshed, shafiq,they haven't played much. Test cricket is different from Odi. hafeez, Irfan are not test stuff. Ajmal is overrated player who has not much left in him . he is already 35. one bad tour he will be out of the team. In tests you have to play as a team like the windies of 80's australians of the 90's.Now southafrica have settled as a team and the have only one or two changes but for pakis they do not know where to put whom. They can dominate a session of the day but they can't come even closer. sorry friends watch out my words.This is a one sided contest. biff and his team is going to humiliate this overrated pakis. Hail the king kallis and the prince amla.
Posted by mkazmi on (January 31, 2013, 17:26 GMT)One thing to note is the fielding will be the key here. Pakistan on average drop 4-5 catches per innings. They need to take 14-15 wickets per innings and close to 30 wickets in a Test to win. S. Africa on the other hand on average convert 1-2 half chances to wickets per innings. So even if the bowling is on equal terms, where Pakistan will lose games is in fielding. Some of the close games Pakistan has lost over the last 2-3 years is where they missed catches, runouts, stumpings. Sydney 2010 comes to mind or Hobart 2010 where Ponting went on to score 200+ after being dropped on 0. Tendulkar scored 85 in WC 11 SF and was dropped 4 times. Players like Amla, Kallis, Smith, and AB will make you pay dearly when you give them a life or two or three. Pakistan badly needs a fielding coach.
Posted by Toescrusher on (January 31, 2013, 17:21 GMT)Loosing Taufeeq is not a big lose and getting Farhat is not a big gain. Calling Farhat means touring management is under pressure and they ran out of idea. Since too many chances were given to Farhat and this time cricket fans will suffer watching him again? On merit Ahmed Shezad and Kamran Akmal qualify for the opening position if not then some one new should have been a better use of this tour and for the future investment for grooming the opener. Traditionally great Pakistani batsmen came from Karachi; for scoring 300 plus runs in the second inning PCB needs to start supporting and giving more chances to batsmen from Karachi - it is important to mention here that batsman from Lahore and its vicinity are great for the shorter of the game.
Posted by Cricket_is_Unpopular on (January 31, 2013, 16:46 GMT)Pakistan will get annihilated by South Africa no chance good luck!!!
Posted by Sinhaya on (January 31, 2013, 16:19 GMT)@ejsiddiqui, yes since that Pak SA series in UAE in 2010, Pakistan only lost one test match and that in Sri Lanka due to atrocious umpiring. I feel Pakistani batting though improved still can be the root cause should they lose. Anyway, I am supporting Pakistan.
Posted by Desihungama on (January 31, 2013, 15:34 GMT)The Wanderers outfield is just as fast as SAF bowlers so expect some runs from Pakistan. I like to see what happens when Steyn, Morkel and other bowling plans do not go as expected. If you bowl wayward at Wanderers, you are in to leak runs. I do know this will be a cracker of a series and will test the grit of Misbah's men. My eyes are on Azhar Ali. He may be going through a rough patch but if he succeeds and Pakistan loses, I won't be so much worried as their future will be in good hands. Of course a win for Pakistan will send some shock waves around cricketing world. Good luck to both teams.