| Series | Countries | Live Scores | Fixtures | Results | News |
Features
|
Photos | Video & Audio | Blogs | Statistics | Archive | Games | Mobile | ||||||||||||||||||||
|
South Africa are undoubtedly the best Test side at present but they still have much to achieve to be considered among the all-time great teams
Firdose Moonda at Newlands
February 17, 2013
![]()
|
|||
|
Related Links
Features : Smith wants Philander to boost pace
Report : Resilient South Africa take sixth series in a row Matches:
South Africa v Pakistan at Cape Town
Series/Tournaments:
Pakistan tour of South Africa
Teams:
South Africa
|
|||
One way of judging how much a series victory means to a team is perhaps by the scale of their celebrations. South Africa's recent ones have involved singing the team song on the pitch. They sang it at Lord's, they did it in Perth and at Newlands, after beating Pakistan. They did not do it in Port Elizabeth, after their resounding triumph over New Zealand.
Success over Pakistan is highly valued, as was evident when the squad emerged two hours after the winning runs were scored, dodged the sprinklers that were watering the outfield and formed a huddle on the pitch. They did their thing and left to the sounds of the occupants in one of the hospitality suites chanting, "Happy Birthday," to AB de Villiers, who turned 29 today.
The result gave South Africa breathing room at the top of the Test rankings, a sixth consecutive series win, a 14th unbeaten Test match in as many months, and Graeme Smith a fifth consecutive Test win, the longest such streak in his captaincy. Those numbers make it sound like the start of a dynasty but to call it that would be premature.
How South Africa see themselves now |
South Africa are a worthy No.1 side and of the three teams to have had that honour recently - England and India being the other two - they seem to have the right mix of personnel and personality to stay on top for a period of time. South Africa's batting line-up has been described as among the best at the moment, but it is the bowling that has been the centerpiece of their success.
The pace pack of Dale Steyn, Morne Morkel, Vernon Philander, and the added value of Jacques Kallis, has been compared to the greats of old - the 1980s West Indians, although South Africa lack the same terrifying pace in every one of their bowlers, or the Australian attack of Glenn McGrath, Brett Lee and Jason Gillespie, but South Africa don't have the equivalent of Shane Warne.
Their first-choice spinner at the moment, Robin Peterson, had a massive impact on this Newlands Test but by his own admission you had to "deal with what you have." He does not turn the ball prodigiously, and doesn't often get favourable conditions at home, and he has learned to work within these boundaries.
So how close are South Africa to establishing their reign as an era? The mighty West Indies went 29 series without defeat. The closest anybody came to that was Australia, who did not lose for 16 series. South Africa just completed their 12th without losing. It puts into perspective how much more there is to achieve before they can consider themselves among the all-time greats.
They are, however, giants in their own country. This is their longest unbeaten streak, beating the 11 between 1998 and 2001. They are also close to completing seven years of being unbeaten away from home. They are part of an environment that is more competitive because the top teams are not far apart. This match was an example of that.
South Africa were made to work for their victory. Younis Khan and Asad Shafiq's twin centuries along with Saeed Ajmal's ten wickets gave South Africa's their first strenuous workout of the summer.
Ajmal really made them sweat. The world's premier spin bowler proved difficult to pick on a surface that suited him far more than the one at the Wanderers. It will give South Africa's batsmen something to think about, for the next Test in Centurion and for the test after that, in the UAE.
There is territory Smith's team has not conquered. They haven't won in India, Sri Lanka or the UAE. They have the opportunity of crossing the Emirates off the list later in the year. Until then, parties on the pitch will have to do.
| ||||||
| Comments have now been closed for this article |
||||||
ICICI Bank M2I. Register Now and Get A Gift Offer.
Safe & simple online money transfer. Apply Now!
Buy Wisden 2013 & get a FREE Playfair
Available now at Cricshop
Most World Number 1 teams never achieve greatness.
West Indies did from 1976-1995. Australia did from 1995-2005. But their successors from South Africa, India and England never did, and if Australia had dismissed FAF du Plessis at Adelaide eight weeks ago they would absurdly have displaced South Africa as number 1.
South Africa will have to replace Kallis soon, which will reduce them from a 12 to an 11 man side. And the Petersons, Morkel, du Plessis and Elgar will also need to be replaced by superior players if the team is to rise from narrow number 1 to "great".
I like this South African team, and I respect them as narrowly but certainly ahead of a chasing pack of England, Australia and Pakistan.
But this series so far has been Amla, de Villiers, Steyn and Philander versus Pakistan. The contributions of the other 7 players have varied between fitful and unacceptable.
A good , balanced post, IMO. As fond as I am of watching this current Protea lineup play test cricket, they do have some areas in which they could improve. They do not have a spinner, there are runs of plays where captain and bowlers seem to be out of ideas. Steyn is an undoubtedly great bowler, but to be considered the best ever, he needs to make things happen when nothing seems to be happening , which a bowler of his pedigree should do more often. And lastly, AB is not a keeper, and it is still not clear how keeping will affect his batting in the long term. But, this team is headed in the right direction. They are mentally a resilient lot, but what has really impressed me so far about this Protea lineup is a certain Nadal like humbleness. They refused to get carried away by success, which is why I can imagine this team going from strength to strength in the future. They are a happy bunch, but by no means satisfied, and they are grounded enough to know they can get better.
This "great or not" argument is really old. SA just became no.1. Why can't we just all give them their due, admit they are the best right now and let time show us whether they be able to stay top for an extended period of time. The only thing SA doesn't have is a great spinner, and if we are honest they are not likely to have one for the foreseeable future. Neither do I see what the "lack of pace" compared to WI has anything to do with classifying a bowling attack as great. Surely it is about the results they produce? Anyway, talk of "greatness" is premature. All we can accurately say is they are good, the best currently. Greatness will be determined if they can replace players in the coming years and still maintain their no.1 ranking. So everyone just chill until then and give them their due.
The article provides a balanced perspective, even the doubters (if any were still remaining) would consider SA to be the top side today but they are not quite one of the all-time greats. To provide some perspective, the Aus side during their domination managed to whitewash SL in SL 3-0, whitewash Pak in UAE/Asia 3-0, whitewash SA in SA 3-0 (the most impressive result) and although a similar result was thwarted the first time by a once-in-a-lifetime dravid/laxman partnership, they finally managed to win 2-1 in India in 2004. Similarly WI, Eng and NZ were often thrashed in their own backyards and almost all teams lost by a huge margin while visiting Aus. This SA side is not quite there yet, mainly because they don't have a Warne-like spinner and their batting though quite strong can sometimes crumble under pressure or against quality spin.
You should specify that it is SA under Smith that has not won in India. SA as a team has indeed won a Test series in India. 2 match series that they won 2-0 in 1999/2000 if I recollect...
Posted byI do not care whether this SA team is great or not. I just know they give me endless pleasure watching because they never give up, play positively and in the right spirit, do it for their country, supporters and themselves. They are representative of all population groups in the country and serve as a uniting factor. The last SA teams that were that good were those led by Peter vd Merwe (1965 -1967) and Ali Bacher (1970). It remains a shame that they could never play the West Indies during those years because Australia (3-1) in 1966/7 (Bob Simpson) and Bill Lawry (4-zip) in 1969/70 could not test them at all.
Posted byA person that says kallis do not play attractive innings must be stupid. Who have the most elegant technique? Drives the ball for 4 effordless through the covers, straight, onside, backfoot drive. He's consistant,scores runs everyware and during the early part of his carreer carried our batting. He was our banker. Since Amla came to the team and scored consistantly he is playing with more freedom.Unlike some great he batted the bulk of his carreer at 3 and 4 and not 6 like that person. If i want somebody to bat for my life it would be him. He saved us from a lot oflosses and with his runs scoring allowed us to win games.
Posted by"Kallis is a great batsman no doubt. But he has played very few dominant or even attractive innings,either in SA or elsewhere around the world. That is the reason I say he is not in the league of all time greats. Just going by averages and difficulty of circumstances(ignoring uniqueness) he may be regarded as better than Sachin,Ponting,Lara."
Attractive innings???? what do you mean by that? as for dominan neither Alan Border or Steve Waugh were particularly dominant batters but you ask any australian if there are two other batsman they would want to bat for their lives in the last 30 years?
What I dont get is why people don't accept results and always talk about fantasy? fact is this Current SA has team has lost one series in the last 23 are unbeaten away from home for six years! there is currently no other team currently who can boast that! the windes and aussies of old have no bearing on whether SA are the best current team now!
Posted bylet them come come to UAE .Pak cleansweepd england in UAE ans same will be done to this so called no 1 test team and at that time england was no 1 nd we must not compare this SA Team to the greats of past becos they are always dependent on three to four players of their team rest perform randomly .....therz no consistancy like the olds of aussies and windies
Posted by crashed on (February 19, 2013, 13:08 GMT)Oh well for those that turns a blind eye to the current SA teams performance is missing a great deal of history I rather enjoy the ride enjoy the match and smile at those that do not want to accept the teams current form and shout not good enough. Problem is if you do not watch it you might miss the moment SA is termed as great and everybody except you guys will recognise the moment. I do not want to miss it so for me they are the best and that for me is enough ... :) enjoy the ride do not miss the matches or you might miss the moment of greatness as well and may never have the guts to admit that they are great even when they are