South Africa news October 2, 2013

CSA likely to introduce quota for black African players


On the same day South Africa's domestic season gets underway, CSA will vote on a proposal which could change the way it looks. At their October 11 meeting, a decision will be taken on introducing a quota which will require franchise teams to play two black African players and provincial teams to field three. A senior official expects the motion to be approved.

The idea was one of many which came up at CSA's transformation indaba (conference) - the first one addressing racial issues they held in a decade. ESPNcricinfo has learned it was overwhelmingly welcomed at the meeting in the face of South Africa's poor record of Africanisation in the 22 years post readmission. 

"Everybody agreed that we have failed in terms of black African players and that drastic measures must be taken," Norman Arendse, CSA's lead independent director who is also chair of the transformation committee, told ESPNcricinfo. 

Since 1991, only five black African players have represented South Africa at Test level even though black Africans comprise almost 80% of the country's population. Makhaya Ntini is the only one who has played more than 100 Tests, with his number of caps coming in at 101, while Mfuneko Ngam, Thami Tsolekile, Monde Zondeki and Lonwabo Tsotsobe have appeared in 17 matches all told. 

By contrast, 11 mixed-race players have donned the whites and three of Asian origin, including Pakistani-born legspinner Imran Tahir. Arendse said those cricketers, including the likes of Vernon Philander and Hashim Amla, illustrate the success of targets. 

South Africa introduced a quota system in 1998 to address the racial discrimination caused by the Apartheid system. The stipulation then was that every team had to field four players of colour - a term which encompasses black Africans, mixed-race people and those of Asian descent. It was officially removed in 2007. 

While Arendse hailed its achievements, he also explained that it shed light on the true nature of racial segregation in South Africa. "It showed us the stark disparity caused by Apartheid and how the black African community often had it a lot worse," he said.

"There are two obvious reasons why we don't see as many black African players coming through. One is the socio-economic conditions facing black African youngsters compared to their counterparts, especially as cricket is still very much a middle-class game. And the other is downright racism. There is enough black African talent but it seems to get lost." 

A recent report presented to CSA contained information that most black African players give up the game between the under-19 and provincial level, at an age at which, if they are not contracted, will need to find jobs. Arendse's other point was also underlined in the report as it revealed when black African players do get into the system, they are often further sidelined. Only two black African players turned out in more than 80% of their franchises' games last season and when they did, they bowled less overs and batted lower down than players of other races.

CSA is hopeful this will change if the proposal is approved next Friday, the same day the domestic one-day cup gets underway. Although the ruling, if passed, will not apply for the first round of matches, it could be implemented immediately thereafter and may raise concerns about the practicality of such a decision for franchises. 

In reality, all franchises except the Cobras would be able to meet the requirement immediately. The Cobras only have one black African on their books, left-arm spinner Siya Simetu. The Dolphins and Knights have each contracted two black African players, the Titans three, the Warriors four and the Lions have the most, at seven. 

Sources close to the franchise system said the possibility of some franchises loaning out their black African players to other teams in order to meet the quota also exists. "Sometimes a player won't get game time at his franchise because there will be too much competition for places," the insider said. "It's important that we ensure the players get adequate game time so there would be nothing wrong in them being sent to play for other teams."

That may defeat the purpose of unearthing and nurturing black talent and Arendse seems hopeful that will not happen. "What we need is for franchises to have four or six black African players in their set-up so that there is internal competition for places. One of the criticisms of the quota system is that it guarantees a player a place in the team but if there are more than the required number, you will be able to counter that," he said. "What we've also seen is that before long, the minimum is far exceeded and that is what we need to build a base." 

The lack of black African players has stood out most starkly in the Test team, which has not fielded a black African since January 2011. Arendse said the national selectors mentioned they get criticised for not picking black African players but their hands are tied because "they only have a handful to choose from". So CSA has taken it on themselves to "broaden the pool of black African players".

Cricket is not the only sport to be mulling quotas as a means to advance the cause of players of colour. In August, SA Rugby announced they would introduce a quota from next season which will require teams in the Vodacom Cup, the second-tier domestic tournament, to have seven players of colour in their 22-man squad and field at least five in the starting XV.

Firdose Moonda is ESPNcricinfo's South Africa correspondent

Comments have now been closed for this article

  • Dummy4 on October 5, 2013, 11:31 GMT

    Sport and Politics do not go hand in hand its simple as that ! Yes for sure improve the root of the issues African people had to endure . What should occur is the predominately African government should dig into their deep pockets and INVEST in SERIOUS and URGENT programmes runned by passionate people ! At professional level merit is the only way to select . The overall outcome from this political ideology is demoralize athletes encourage athletes to move abroad potentially improving rivals and it does create an imbalance within teams.

  • Great on October 4, 2013, 15:12 GMT

    Currently teams have a quote of non-white players. Putting in a quota of black players discriminates against the minorites. It will mean previously descriminated against minorites are discriminated against as they will lose positions to those who are the majority in the country.

  • Gordon on October 4, 2013, 14:56 GMT

    To me as long as any player has been playing well and showing good form over a long period of time they will get selected. Talent is important to notice it early on but the problem is you don't want to rush some players through way too quickly and have pressure on them. One thing I have noticed is that in England in the latest Ashes Series in England that some players have done well over time and they get selected yet their own form hasn't been too flash hot, to me you need to select players who are playing well and also who deserve to be in the team. I don't have the luxury of watching these domestic cricket talents coming through the ranks in South African Cricket but I still get updates and watch how games are going through this website and one thing I noticed in the past is that lots of players seem to be getting ignored yet their stats look amazing to me now I know stats aren't everything, they need good attitude. I want people to watch them play like scouts and check stats often.

  • Dummy4 on October 4, 2013, 12:14 GMT

    Most of us agree that some form of redress is required, but what the CSA [like the government] is doing here, is abdicating responsibility. What is the CSA [or government] doing to help people from grass-roots level? At schools? In communities? By blame-shifting onto the franchises, provincial or national teams they are pointing fingers at the wrong people - they should be pointing their fingers at themselves. Uplift the young cricketers and the provinces and franchises will quickly snap them up into their academies and teams where they will greatly benefit. Government is by the people, for the people. The same goes for the CSA. The easiest way for CSA to handle this is quickly blame someone else for their OWN shortcomings! An OLD political trick used across the world...

  • Sarel on October 4, 2013, 11:55 GMT

    Why do so many young black cricketers in SA not go thru to play professional cricket? IMHO, there are many reasons. 1. Most young black cricketers are relatively good in many sports - other sporting codes may offer better support, pay & long term prospects than does professional cricket 2. Promising black cricketers face pressure from families to pursue a stable job with good pay than pro-cricket where future pay prospects are uncertain. Quotas may address this; indeed nearly all notable black African pro-cricketers in SA came to prominence during the quota period 3. Successful young black talent in SA are highly priced in business and govt, further competition for their talent 4. In most professional sport codes, those at top level are richly rewarded, but those at mid/lower/semi-professional levels are not. Rather, they are often supported by family or friends, but many black cricketers in SA don't have this "luxury"; rather, its the often the opposite.

  • mahjut on October 4, 2013, 9:00 GMT

    Cpt Meanster - yes soccer is much more popular ... it's always been far, far more accessible. However, there are enough black cricketers in SA to work with and clearly that in itself means that enough are interested despite the hindrances ... the aim here is to prevent them - knowing they aren't going to be picked up and nutured and needing an income - seek jobs (post under 19) as well as ensuring that those that do get through get picked more often.

  • Aashir on October 4, 2013, 5:52 GMT

    @Cpt.Meanster, I am a South African and you've got it spot on. The vast majority of black South Africans do not like, watch or take any interest in cricket as they are extremely passionate about soccer. To compound this problem, our national television broadcaster has stopped airing test matches on free television channels. How can the game of cricket be promoted to a community of people that have a greater passion for soccer when they can not view it for free and cannot afford satellite television? Lets also not forget that black South Africans are not the only previously disadvantaged community in South Africa and that quota systems in any sphere of life creates divides and greater animosity than giving everyone equal rights and opportunities.

  • Jay on October 4, 2013, 1:39 GMT

    Okay, I went away and did some research. It seems a vast majority of black South Africans prefer soccer/football compared to cricket. And this goes back all the way to the apartheid era as well. Obviously, blacks weren't allowed to express themselves during that hostile regime. But is that true ? The fact that black South Africans love soccer more than cricket and prefer to take up that sport. Cause, I keep hearing and reading about it everywhere. Also, how is the representation of blacks in rugby because I know rugby is a big deal in SA with the Springboks. Somebody please enlighten me. I would prefer a South African to do so. Thanks.

  • Rob on October 3, 2013, 23:03 GMT

    The only result from this misguided policy is that further wedges will be driven between races. Encourage and support all to progress - quotas are merely the tool of politicians and we all know about them....Tokenism is not the way ahead in SA. And yes, India of all countries with its wretched social systems need to change most of all.

  • Jo on October 3, 2013, 17:01 GMT

    @yoohoo: Very good point. Permanant quota system will damage the quality of the game. You openup a window and gather main XI and banch strength enough and then close it only on national team representation. But it should continue for a while in a relatively scaled down/up funding grooming talent pool