South Africa news May 9, 2014

SA franchises face higher quota requirement

12

Franchises teams in South Africa could be required to field a minimum of five players of colour per match, and provincial teams at least six players of colour, for the 2014-15 season as part of ongoing efforts to accelerate transformation. ESPNcricinfo understands CSA are looking to implement the new quota in addition to the current regulation that requires franchise XIs to include at least one black African player, which was introduced last season in response to concerns from the department of sport about the slow rate of change in South Africa's major sports.

The proposal is being considered after a directive from the country's sports minister Fikile Mbalula initially threatened to impose a quota at national level; that was retracted after Mbalula reached an understanding with federations over their development plans. While there are no official targets for South Africa's national team, the franchises will be required to show increased commitment to change.

The South African Cricketers' Association is believed to have preferred a target that would require franchises to field an average of five players a season, because that would allow more breathing room in case of injuries or loss of form. However, they will not oppose the motion, which is likely to be ratified at CSA's board meeting on June 3. CSA did not respond to questions.

Three of the six franchises already meet the proposed requirement. Dolphins, Cobras and Lions regularly fielded five players of colour in last season's first-class competition, with Cobras never fielding fewer than six. On three occasions, the Warriors' first-class XI had five players of colour, while Titans and Knights fielded four players of colour throughout.

A source revealed that both Titans and Knights are spending the off-season trying to contract players of colour. Titans have already secured the services of Tabraiz Shamsi, a left-arm spinner from Dolphins. The source said there was an emphasis on signing black African players, rather than just players of colour, in anticipation of a greater requirement to represent the country's largest demographic group, which makes up 80% of the population.

While Lions often fielded three black African players at first-class level, none of the other franchises matched that number. Dolphins, Titans and Knights had two black African players in their starting XIs at least 60% of the time, Warriors only managed more than one black African twice, and Cobras had only one black African in their first-class XI.

In early April, Mbalula had announced the government would implement a 60% quota in favour of players of colour in its national teams. Sporting federations that failed to meet the criteria would run the risk of being barred from international competition and their state funding being cut.

Following his announcement, Mbalula met with officials from cricket, rugby, athletics, netball and football to discuss the government's expectations. On April 22, Mbalula retracted the statements but said he had reached an understanding with the federations concerned. "Talking is not endless, but we need to find each other," he said. "I am not imposing any 60-40 onto anybody. I've talked to the federations."

The ministry report, compiled by an eminent persons' group, ranked the five sporting codes mentioned above along the following lines: if more than 50% of the national team was made up of players of colour (labeled generic black in the report), it considered the sport 100% transformed and gave it a mark out of 10. Sports then received another score for their black African player percentage, as opposed to mixed-race or Indian descent. If half of the 50% players of colour were black African, the sport would receive 10 out of 10 in the black African section.

Cricket received 10 out of 10 for its transformation in the generic black category and just 3.5 in the black African subsection, which was deemed poor. The report noted that at under-19 level, cricket teams to England and India scored 5 and 8 out of 10 in the black African category, which was regarded as an improvement. It also said, "Cricket is now ready to raise the target for generic black representation from its current 50% level to higher levels (60%)," because "this will further strengthen its longer term human capital base." That explained the reason for the five players of colour requirement, which is 45% of a cricket team.

Firdose Moonda is ESPNcricinfo's South Africa correspondent

Comments have now been closed for this article

  • Greatest_Game on May 15, 2014, 20:37 GMT

    Does anyone know what the quota is for Mamelodi Sundowns, Kaizer Chiefs, Moroka Swallows etc? As I don't follow soccer I have no idea what the sports ministry has decreed?

  • ZCFOutkast on May 13, 2014, 8:44 GMT

    You people talk about grassroots as if in 20 year old South Africa there aren't enough players in cricket(&rugby) good enough to play at the top level. They've been there done that in their thousands - unfortunately marginalised along the way. Haven't you been reading the reports? Time for FC&national representation.

  • Shongololo on May 13, 2014, 7:40 GMT

    Truly tackling transformation takes a lot of hard work...like grassroots initiatives, dedication, hard work, coaching clinics through the age groups, programs of excellence, etc. And, of course, money. But you can be guaranteed that the cream will rise to the top, the side will have a spread of players more representative of the demographics and it will be a fundamentally stronger team as the game is played by more, the talent pool is larger. That's the transformation I support, not this easy cop-out, this politically-motivated rubbish that counts heads based on colour and then pats itself on the back for 'achievement'. That 'achievement' is nothing more than social engineering. Unpalatable as that may sound, that's the truth...and if world sport was consistent, it would tell South Africa to stop meddling. Read the IOC Charter if you don't believe me!

  • LourensGrobbelaar on May 12, 2014, 13:27 GMT

    @ZCFOutKast Tsolekile got his chance in 2004 in the tests against England and he did not impress. Live with it.

  • dillyk on May 12, 2014, 6:55 GMT

    The protest mantra was "no normal sport in an abnormal society", now in a free and democratic country i think international sanction have to be imposed again... new mantra "no abnormal sport in a normal society"

  • ZCFOutkast on May 11, 2014, 8:31 GMT

    @AltafPatel Boucher was stuffing up - while Tsolekile was impressing with his domestic form - long before you even knew QdK existed.

  • TommytuckerSaffa on May 11, 2014, 5:48 GMT

    If quotas are to be forced on us. Then I am far happier with this strategy of quotas at franchise and provincial level - than at National level. After all, the National team is picked from whats available in the country.

    As Gareth Bain mentioned, all SA domestic teams already have at least 4/5 players of colour playing.

  • AltafPatel on May 10, 2014, 15:48 GMT

    If Tsolekeli be taken in the team for colour quota, SA could not have got fantastic deKock.

  • on May 10, 2014, 15:18 GMT

    If the players are good enough then they should play, if not then it'll be to the detriment of SA cricket. Don't see any quotas in football for whites so don't think there should be any here. need to focus more on grassroots so they being better coloured players into the teams. The players might feel that the teams don't really want them just have to fill their quotas

  • on May 10, 2014, 9:42 GMT

    I think you should look at the soccer team and then decide if the quota is necessary.

  • Greatest_Game on May 15, 2014, 20:37 GMT

    Does anyone know what the quota is for Mamelodi Sundowns, Kaizer Chiefs, Moroka Swallows etc? As I don't follow soccer I have no idea what the sports ministry has decreed?

  • ZCFOutkast on May 13, 2014, 8:44 GMT

    You people talk about grassroots as if in 20 year old South Africa there aren't enough players in cricket(&rugby) good enough to play at the top level. They've been there done that in their thousands - unfortunately marginalised along the way. Haven't you been reading the reports? Time for FC&national representation.

  • Shongololo on May 13, 2014, 7:40 GMT

    Truly tackling transformation takes a lot of hard work...like grassroots initiatives, dedication, hard work, coaching clinics through the age groups, programs of excellence, etc. And, of course, money. But you can be guaranteed that the cream will rise to the top, the side will have a spread of players more representative of the demographics and it will be a fundamentally stronger team as the game is played by more, the talent pool is larger. That's the transformation I support, not this easy cop-out, this politically-motivated rubbish that counts heads based on colour and then pats itself on the back for 'achievement'. That 'achievement' is nothing more than social engineering. Unpalatable as that may sound, that's the truth...and if world sport was consistent, it would tell South Africa to stop meddling. Read the IOC Charter if you don't believe me!

  • LourensGrobbelaar on May 12, 2014, 13:27 GMT

    @ZCFOutKast Tsolekile got his chance in 2004 in the tests against England and he did not impress. Live with it.

  • dillyk on May 12, 2014, 6:55 GMT

    The protest mantra was "no normal sport in an abnormal society", now in a free and democratic country i think international sanction have to be imposed again... new mantra "no abnormal sport in a normal society"

  • ZCFOutkast on May 11, 2014, 8:31 GMT

    @AltafPatel Boucher was stuffing up - while Tsolekile was impressing with his domestic form - long before you even knew QdK existed.

  • TommytuckerSaffa on May 11, 2014, 5:48 GMT

    If quotas are to be forced on us. Then I am far happier with this strategy of quotas at franchise and provincial level - than at National level. After all, the National team is picked from whats available in the country.

    As Gareth Bain mentioned, all SA domestic teams already have at least 4/5 players of colour playing.

  • AltafPatel on May 10, 2014, 15:48 GMT

    If Tsolekeli be taken in the team for colour quota, SA could not have got fantastic deKock.

  • on May 10, 2014, 15:18 GMT

    If the players are good enough then they should play, if not then it'll be to the detriment of SA cricket. Don't see any quotas in football for whites so don't think there should be any here. need to focus more on grassroots so they being better coloured players into the teams. The players might feel that the teams don't really want them just have to fill their quotas

  • on May 10, 2014, 9:42 GMT

    I think you should look at the soccer team and then decide if the quota is necessary.

  • on May 9, 2014, 17:16 GMT

    Oh, here we go again with the overreactions... The teams already field 5 (and more) players of colour in games, without quotas. These rules just appease certain elements of the board, but change very little in reality.

  • Metro-ant on May 9, 2014, 8:33 GMT

    I get that they want a team that reflects the population to some extent and encourage a culturally diverse team but this is just a lazy approach. Want to encourage more colored and black players in your squads? Start at grassroots, come to the schools where football is considered more popular. Open clinics and training academies in these areas so when they do get the opportunity to represent the Proteas, the selectors won't need to look at colour at all.

  • No featured comments at the moment.

  • Metro-ant on May 9, 2014, 8:33 GMT

    I get that they want a team that reflects the population to some extent and encourage a culturally diverse team but this is just a lazy approach. Want to encourage more colored and black players in your squads? Start at grassroots, come to the schools where football is considered more popular. Open clinics and training academies in these areas so when they do get the opportunity to represent the Proteas, the selectors won't need to look at colour at all.

  • on May 9, 2014, 17:16 GMT

    Oh, here we go again with the overreactions... The teams already field 5 (and more) players of colour in games, without quotas. These rules just appease certain elements of the board, but change very little in reality.

  • on May 10, 2014, 9:42 GMT

    I think you should look at the soccer team and then decide if the quota is necessary.

  • on May 10, 2014, 15:18 GMT

    If the players are good enough then they should play, if not then it'll be to the detriment of SA cricket. Don't see any quotas in football for whites so don't think there should be any here. need to focus more on grassroots so they being better coloured players into the teams. The players might feel that the teams don't really want them just have to fill their quotas

  • AltafPatel on May 10, 2014, 15:48 GMT

    If Tsolekeli be taken in the team for colour quota, SA could not have got fantastic deKock.

  • TommytuckerSaffa on May 11, 2014, 5:48 GMT

    If quotas are to be forced on us. Then I am far happier with this strategy of quotas at franchise and provincial level - than at National level. After all, the National team is picked from whats available in the country.

    As Gareth Bain mentioned, all SA domestic teams already have at least 4/5 players of colour playing.

  • ZCFOutkast on May 11, 2014, 8:31 GMT

    @AltafPatel Boucher was stuffing up - while Tsolekile was impressing with his domestic form - long before you even knew QdK existed.

  • dillyk on May 12, 2014, 6:55 GMT

    The protest mantra was "no normal sport in an abnormal society", now in a free and democratic country i think international sanction have to be imposed again... new mantra "no abnormal sport in a normal society"

  • LourensGrobbelaar on May 12, 2014, 13:27 GMT

    @ZCFOutKast Tsolekile got his chance in 2004 in the tests against England and he did not impress. Live with it.

  • Shongololo on May 13, 2014, 7:40 GMT

    Truly tackling transformation takes a lot of hard work...like grassroots initiatives, dedication, hard work, coaching clinics through the age groups, programs of excellence, etc. And, of course, money. But you can be guaranteed that the cream will rise to the top, the side will have a spread of players more representative of the demographics and it will be a fundamentally stronger team as the game is played by more, the talent pool is larger. That's the transformation I support, not this easy cop-out, this politically-motivated rubbish that counts heads based on colour and then pats itself on the back for 'achievement'. That 'achievement' is nothing more than social engineering. Unpalatable as that may sound, that's the truth...and if world sport was consistent, it would tell South Africa to stop meddling. Read the IOC Charter if you don't believe me!