Sri Lanka v Australia, 2nd Test, Pallekele September 6, 2011

Time is right for Copeland

The world Shane Warne entered in 1992 lacked respect and understanding for legspin, and many of the batsmen with whom Trent Copeland has just joined battle regard medium pace almost as dimly
  shares 16

From the day Shane Warne retired, every Australian spin bowler to follow him was destined to endure comparisons with the incomparable. Nathan Lyon is the man presently encumbered, and Michael Clarke is the latest captain to stress "he's not Shane Warne" when assessing his spinner's more moderate skills. A far more reasoned Warne parallel does exist in the Australian attack, however. It is with the medium pace of Trent Copeland. This is not because they share anything whatsoever in method, personality, physical gifts or mentality. Rather it is because Copeland stands to benefit, almost as much as Warne did, from a generation of batsmen not concerned with the subtleties of his skill.

A great deal of Warne's early success in Test cricket was achieved as much by the shock of the new as by the genius of the newbie. Save for Pakistan's Abdul Qadir, and India's Bhagwat Chandrasekhar, there had not been an international legspin bowler of sustained quality and success anywhere in the world for more than 30 years. If subcontinental batsmen had not seen much in the way of high class legspin for decades, their counterparts in England, New Zealand and South Africa had seen even less. To watch some of the early attempts by these unfortunates to play the young Warne, his spitting leg breaks and skidding flippers, was to take a mild kind of sadistic pleasure in cruel and unusual punishment.

Some years later and Copeland has entered international cricket at a similar juncture for his unfashionable style. Medium pace bowlers have a long and storied history in Test cricket, but the lineage of great ones petered out somewhere around the time that the West Indies were pounding the rest of the world into submission with speed, bounce and plenty of swagger. It is not so much that medium pace disappeared as a skill as that the methods by which they were successful became less prevalent. Covered pitches negated an avenue for cheap wickets, while improved bats and closer boundaries elevated the odds of containment.

Yet the onset of the Twenty20 age has offered a window for those bowlers prepared to play on the patience of batsmen no longer conditioned for occupation. It has also afforded a chance for bowlers of lesser velocity to play on the egos of those same batsmen. Where once a maiden was seen as an uneasy truce between batsman and bowler, now it is a conclusive points victory for the latter. The volume of training weighted towards T20 and the clearing of pickets has seeped into the techniques and outlooks of batsmen once considered dour, and those who cannot win contracts in the shortest form of the game are empirically if not technically poorer for it. The will to outlast bowlers like Copeland is likely to be superseded by the desire to collar him.

Copeland rose to prominence by stealth, helped by the lack of genuine respect there seemed to be for his skills as he began to cut swathes through Australian domestic batting. His lack of velocity was commented on when he was first chosen for New South Wales, and batsmen and selectors continued to pass the occasional snide comment about his likely speed gun readings even as the bowler himself was splintering Sheffield Shield teams on a regular basis. When he was included in Cricket Australia's Centre of Excellence intake for 2011, the selector Greg Chappell observed: "There were some in the playing ranks who thought he might struggle to back it up this year."

Back it up he did. By the time Copeland was chosen for the Sri Lanka tour, he had winkled out 87 batsmen in 17 first-class appearances at a price of scarcely 21 runs per wicket. Whatever he has lacked in pace he has compensated for with bounce, swing, seam and the most suffocating accuracy seen by an Australian bowler since his faster seam bowling cousins Glenn McGrath and Stuart Clark finished up. In his first Test Copeland was instantly reliable, blocking up one end while Clarke rotated his pace bowlers and the spin of Lyon from the other.

A wicket in Copeland's first Test over, that of Tillakaratne Dilshan, summed up the risque attitude he can take advantage of against batsmen who presume to lord it over any bowler not firing deliveries down at 140kph. The first ball, eminently respectable, was driven through cover for four. The second, subtly shorter and wider, affording Dilshan less control over his shot, was slapped to the hyper-agile Ricky Ponting at short cover. Though Copeland did not take another wicket for himself in the match, his economy allowed plenty to be taken by his comrades.

Through it all Copeland demonstrated something else that will test the wits of unaware international batsmen. For a Test match tyro, his temperament is admirably even. There is a hint of the mature Jason Gillespie about the way Copeland conducts himself, amiable and reliable to friends and team-mates, insatiable and calculating to batsmen and opponents. He appears to possess a deep reservoir of thought and patience. That Copeland owns a clean enough pair of hands to immediately command a place in the Australian slips cordon says plenty for his thoroughness. The last Australian seam and swing merchant to stand there on a regular basis was another medium paceman Copeland may wish to emulate - Terry Alderman.

The world Warne entered in 1992 lacked respect and understanding for legspin, and many of the batsmen with whom Copeland has just joined battle regard medium pace almost as dimly. All those perceiving Copeland as a mere trundler of club proportions are thinking precisely what he wants a batsman to think. As he and hubris conspire to plot the downfall of another strokemaker, Copeland will hope that notion sticks around for a some time yet.

Daniel Brettig is an assistant editor at ESPNcricinfo

Comments have now been closed for this article

  • on September 8, 2011, 23:26 GMT

    Chris Stoudemire Daws you are tha man you know your stuff. Terry Alderman Praveen Kumar Martin Bicknell to name just a few he could try and emulate. He can be more of a holder on flat decks and an enforcer in Australian South African Newzealand and South African conditions.

    Great bowler see the delivery to Dilshan yesterday?

  • Biggus on September 8, 2011, 13:07 GMT

    Nothing wrong with accurate medium pacers who can make the ball misbehave a bit, especially on a tour of England as some have rightly noted. It seemed to work for Terry Alderman, one of my all-time favourites. Max Walker was another good one. S.F. Barnes, Maurice Tate, Alec Bedser-some pretty good bowlers in that lot eh? One of the down sides for me of the greatly increased professionalism in the game with it's cricket academies and all that is a certain 'homogenisation' in bowling styles and I think the demise of the medium pacer has been hastened by these changes. I like what I've seen of Copeland, though being in Perth that's not a huge amount. I am, however, keen to see more, and his batting and catching seem to bear witness to his previous role as a keeper-batsman. It's still too early to break out the party hats and whistles but he may be a most significant find.

  • Meety on September 8, 2011, 12:51 GMT

    @puskas - the big difference between Copeland & other Indian trundlers is that he is considerably taller & with a high action gets good bounce. H eappeared to have a bit of seam too, something that only Kumar was able to do on more helpful pitches. @Cheyne Devine - the answer maybe found in the SCorecard of the Shield final between NSW & Tassie. Copeland bowled a mountain of overs, he just keeps coming. He is one "pace" bowler who could bowl 30 overs in a day if asked. @dsig3 - dunno if Pidgeon had more bounce, but I'd be stoked for a comparable career!!!!

  • Rosey86 on September 8, 2011, 12:46 GMT

    Completely agree with my good mate Wood Dash E. With a Duke in his hand, that kind of accurate seam bowling on English greentops will be an asset. There is more to him than meets the eye. Pace is good, but it is not everything

  • on September 8, 2011, 12:40 GMT

    Looks like Trent Copeland and the Australian cricket team are not the only ones in form. Well done Daniel Brettig on a perceptive piece of writing. Keep it up.

  • on September 8, 2011, 10:59 GMT

    Wood Dash E, you're totally right. He'd be horrifying on an early April damp English green top. No reason he can't be a success, just look at the recent success of P Kumar in England. He'll be fine.

  • Webba84 on September 8, 2011, 10:46 GMT

    @puskas: The indian attack is being panned because, in addition to being slow, which is no crime in and of itself, they were insufficiently accurate, lacking in variation, lost their patience before the batsman did and were completely predictable. Copeland is slow, yes, but that's where the similarities end.

  • puskas on September 8, 2011, 8:30 GMT

    I haven't seen him, but surely the description above is of a type of bowler currently being panned as toothless in the Indian attack. I accept that a complement to the other Australian seamers may indeed be what Oz needs, but I cannot see that batsmen are unfamiliar with bowling of this type.

  • on September 8, 2011, 5:31 GMT

    Among the recently retired modern greats of the last decade Glenn McGrath is the only fast bowler who reminds you of Curtly Ambrose,an exact mirror image infact with Allan Donald coming a close 2nd.Copeland has shown some qualities of Little Bird and Pigeon and his figures in first class cricket are pretty good .Let us see how he goes from now.

  • on September 8, 2011, 4:57 GMT

    Let him play a season of county cricket in England. Bowling on Green Tops with the duke he will be lethal.

  • on September 8, 2011, 23:26 GMT

    Chris Stoudemire Daws you are tha man you know your stuff. Terry Alderman Praveen Kumar Martin Bicknell to name just a few he could try and emulate. He can be more of a holder on flat decks and an enforcer in Australian South African Newzealand and South African conditions.

    Great bowler see the delivery to Dilshan yesterday?

  • Biggus on September 8, 2011, 13:07 GMT

    Nothing wrong with accurate medium pacers who can make the ball misbehave a bit, especially on a tour of England as some have rightly noted. It seemed to work for Terry Alderman, one of my all-time favourites. Max Walker was another good one. S.F. Barnes, Maurice Tate, Alec Bedser-some pretty good bowlers in that lot eh? One of the down sides for me of the greatly increased professionalism in the game with it's cricket academies and all that is a certain 'homogenisation' in bowling styles and I think the demise of the medium pacer has been hastened by these changes. I like what I've seen of Copeland, though being in Perth that's not a huge amount. I am, however, keen to see more, and his batting and catching seem to bear witness to his previous role as a keeper-batsman. It's still too early to break out the party hats and whistles but he may be a most significant find.

  • Meety on September 8, 2011, 12:51 GMT

    @puskas - the big difference between Copeland & other Indian trundlers is that he is considerably taller & with a high action gets good bounce. H eappeared to have a bit of seam too, something that only Kumar was able to do on more helpful pitches. @Cheyne Devine - the answer maybe found in the SCorecard of the Shield final between NSW & Tassie. Copeland bowled a mountain of overs, he just keeps coming. He is one "pace" bowler who could bowl 30 overs in a day if asked. @dsig3 - dunno if Pidgeon had more bounce, but I'd be stoked for a comparable career!!!!

  • Rosey86 on September 8, 2011, 12:46 GMT

    Completely agree with my good mate Wood Dash E. With a Duke in his hand, that kind of accurate seam bowling on English greentops will be an asset. There is more to him than meets the eye. Pace is good, but it is not everything

  • on September 8, 2011, 12:40 GMT

    Looks like Trent Copeland and the Australian cricket team are not the only ones in form. Well done Daniel Brettig on a perceptive piece of writing. Keep it up.

  • on September 8, 2011, 10:59 GMT

    Wood Dash E, you're totally right. He'd be horrifying on an early April damp English green top. No reason he can't be a success, just look at the recent success of P Kumar in England. He'll be fine.

  • Webba84 on September 8, 2011, 10:46 GMT

    @puskas: The indian attack is being panned because, in addition to being slow, which is no crime in and of itself, they were insufficiently accurate, lacking in variation, lost their patience before the batsman did and were completely predictable. Copeland is slow, yes, but that's where the similarities end.

  • puskas on September 8, 2011, 8:30 GMT

    I haven't seen him, but surely the description above is of a type of bowler currently being panned as toothless in the Indian attack. I accept that a complement to the other Australian seamers may indeed be what Oz needs, but I cannot see that batsmen are unfamiliar with bowling of this type.

  • on September 8, 2011, 5:31 GMT

    Among the recently retired modern greats of the last decade Glenn McGrath is the only fast bowler who reminds you of Curtly Ambrose,an exact mirror image infact with Allan Donald coming a close 2nd.Copeland has shown some qualities of Little Bird and Pigeon and his figures in first class cricket are pretty good .Let us see how he goes from now.

  • on September 8, 2011, 4:57 GMT

    Let him play a season of county cricket in England. Bowling on Green Tops with the duke he will be lethal.

  • dsig3 on September 8, 2011, 4:14 GMT

    @Cheyne Devine I think you have answered your own question. The batsmen may have to wait all day for his boundary because Copeland wont be giving many freebies. He might not get him out, but he wont leak runs and I dont think Copeland will mind. Thats exactly what his role is, to prevent batsmen scoring freely and taking control from one end.

  • on September 8, 2011, 3:21 GMT

    but how will he fare agianst batsmen like a.cook who are more then willing to wait all day for a boundry?

  • dsig3 on September 8, 2011, 3:10 GMT

    Well......he is just a trundler Daniel. McGrath was a bit quicker and got alot more bounce. So was Stuart Clark. Copeland is just an accurate trundler. But guess what, thats exactly what we need right now. Harris, Johnson, Siddle are all attacking bowlers. I dont really care how many wickets he gets because his role will be to keep things quiet while our other bowlers try and blast away for glory. I was never too high on him after watching him bowl in Aus, but I was wrong about him. He has a role in the Aus team. He allows the other bowlers to attack.

  • bobagorof on September 8, 2011, 2:53 GMT

    Another player who served Australia well without bowling 140+ was Paul Reiffel. I remember him being an integral part of Australia's seam attack, along with McGrath and Gillespie. He often was overshadowed by his bowling partners, but his accuracy enabled him to keep the pressure on at first change and he finished with a more-than-respectable record in both Tests and ODIs. Copeland's First Class record suggests he may be even more effective.

  • HatsforBats on September 8, 2011, 0:17 GMT

    Not to mention he's a former wicketkeeper/batsmen. Judging from the last test he should supply plenty of late order runs at a good clip. Very exciting to see this young talent get rewarded for his excellent 1st class record.

  • Evilpengwinz on September 7, 2011, 21:33 GMT

    As an Englishman, I don't think I've been so excited about a medium pacer or an Aussie bowler in test cricket for a while. If he's anywhere near as accurate as Mohammad Asif was last summer, then he'll be a handful for our batsmen in the next Ashes series.

  • No featured comments at the moment.

  • Evilpengwinz on September 7, 2011, 21:33 GMT

    As an Englishman, I don't think I've been so excited about a medium pacer or an Aussie bowler in test cricket for a while. If he's anywhere near as accurate as Mohammad Asif was last summer, then he'll be a handful for our batsmen in the next Ashes series.

  • HatsforBats on September 8, 2011, 0:17 GMT

    Not to mention he's a former wicketkeeper/batsmen. Judging from the last test he should supply plenty of late order runs at a good clip. Very exciting to see this young talent get rewarded for his excellent 1st class record.

  • bobagorof on September 8, 2011, 2:53 GMT

    Another player who served Australia well without bowling 140+ was Paul Reiffel. I remember him being an integral part of Australia's seam attack, along with McGrath and Gillespie. He often was overshadowed by his bowling partners, but his accuracy enabled him to keep the pressure on at first change and he finished with a more-than-respectable record in both Tests and ODIs. Copeland's First Class record suggests he may be even more effective.

  • dsig3 on September 8, 2011, 3:10 GMT

    Well......he is just a trundler Daniel. McGrath was a bit quicker and got alot more bounce. So was Stuart Clark. Copeland is just an accurate trundler. But guess what, thats exactly what we need right now. Harris, Johnson, Siddle are all attacking bowlers. I dont really care how many wickets he gets because his role will be to keep things quiet while our other bowlers try and blast away for glory. I was never too high on him after watching him bowl in Aus, but I was wrong about him. He has a role in the Aus team. He allows the other bowlers to attack.

  • on September 8, 2011, 3:21 GMT

    but how will he fare agianst batsmen like a.cook who are more then willing to wait all day for a boundry?

  • dsig3 on September 8, 2011, 4:14 GMT

    @Cheyne Devine I think you have answered your own question. The batsmen may have to wait all day for his boundary because Copeland wont be giving many freebies. He might not get him out, but he wont leak runs and I dont think Copeland will mind. Thats exactly what his role is, to prevent batsmen scoring freely and taking control from one end.

  • on September 8, 2011, 4:57 GMT

    Let him play a season of county cricket in England. Bowling on Green Tops with the duke he will be lethal.

  • on September 8, 2011, 5:31 GMT

    Among the recently retired modern greats of the last decade Glenn McGrath is the only fast bowler who reminds you of Curtly Ambrose,an exact mirror image infact with Allan Donald coming a close 2nd.Copeland has shown some qualities of Little Bird and Pigeon and his figures in first class cricket are pretty good .Let us see how he goes from now.

  • puskas on September 8, 2011, 8:30 GMT

    I haven't seen him, but surely the description above is of a type of bowler currently being panned as toothless in the Indian attack. I accept that a complement to the other Australian seamers may indeed be what Oz needs, but I cannot see that batsmen are unfamiliar with bowling of this type.

  • Webba84 on September 8, 2011, 10:46 GMT

    @puskas: The indian attack is being panned because, in addition to being slow, which is no crime in and of itself, they were insufficiently accurate, lacking in variation, lost their patience before the batsman did and were completely predictable. Copeland is slow, yes, but that's where the similarities end.