Australia in Sri Lanka 2011 September 21, 2011

All-round consistency seals triumph

Madhusudhan Ramakrishnan
In a series where neither team enjoyed a sustained dominance, Australia's disciplined performance with both bat and ball proved to be the crucial difference in the end

Like his predecessor Ricky Ponting, Michael Clarke started his Test captaincy with a series win in Sri Lanka. Although the end result was not as convincing as the 3-0 win in 2004, a new-look Australia were much more disciplined and aggressive than Sri Lanka throughout the series. Following a terrible run in 2010 when they lost 2-0 in India and 3-1 in the Ashes, Australia entered the first Test in Galle as underdogs considering Sri Lanka's excellent home record. Michael Hussey's resolute 95 pushed Australia to 273 after they were in trouble at 112 for 4. Nathan Lyon's five-wicket haul on debut helped the visitors to bowl Sri Lanka out for just 105. Sri Lanka, faced with a target of 379, briefly threatened to make a match of it, but eventually went down by 125 runs. Following the success in the first Test, Australia dominated the rain-affected second Test and comfortably drew the third at the SSC to consign Sri Lanka to their first home-series defeat since 2006.

Hussey's remarkable resurgence in Tests continued in the series as he amassed 463 runs in the three Tests. With 570 runs, he was also Australia's highest run-getter in the disastrous Ashes campaign. Between his debut and the end of 2007, Hussey had made a terrific start to his Test career with seven centuries in his first 19 Tests at an average of 80.58. His form fell drastically over the next two years as he averaged just 37.04 in 27 Tests. Following his outstanding century in the Sydney Test against Pakistan in 2010, Hussey came back to form and has now scored four centuries in his last eight Tests. In five innings in the series, Hussey scored two centuries and was out twice in the nineties thus narrowly missing out on Brian Lara's record for the most centuries by an overseas player in a Test series in Sri Lanka.

Michael Hussey's Test record
Period Matches Runs Average 100/50
Overall 62 5113 53.26 15/26
Debut - Dec 2007 19 1934 80.58 7/8
Jan 2008 - Dec 2009 27 1704 37.04 3/11
Jan 2010 - present 16 1475 56.73 5/7

During the course of the series, Hussey went past the 5000-run mark in Tests and also became the eighth Australia batsman to score over 1000 runs in the subcontinent. Hussey's average of 63.05 is the highest among all Australia batsmen to score over 1000 runs in Asia. His aggregate of 463 runs in the three-Test series is the second-highest by a visiting batsman in Sri Lanka after Brian Lara's 688 runs in the 2001-02 series. With his impressive performances, he also achieved the remarkable feat of winning three consecutive player-of-the-match awards.

Australia's top batsmen in the subcontinent (minimum 1000 runs scored)
Batsman Matches Runs Average 100/50
Michael Hussey 11 1198 63.05 4/5
Allan Border 22 1799 54.51 6/8
Matthew Hayden 19 1663 50.39 4/8
Mark Taylor 13 1020 48.57 2/3
Ricky Ponting 28 1889 41.97 5/10

Australia proved to be much more consistent than Sri Lanka in both the batting and bowling departments. They averaged 36.12 runs per wicket as compared to Sri Lanka, who averaged 28.89. The Australia batsmen also had a much better conversion rate of fifties to centuries. They scored five hundreds and four fifties (hundreds-to-fifties ratio of 1.25) while Sri Lanka managed only two centuries and eight fifties (hundreds-to-fifties ratio of 0.25). Australia's positive approach was also reflected in the fact that they scored at a quicker rate than Sri Lanka in both the first and second innings. Although Sri Lanka's average (36.06) in the second innings was marginally better than Australia's (34.90), they were disappointing in the first innings of the first two Tests averaging just 25.60. Sri Lanka had two more century partnerships than Australia, but the visitors had 12 fifty-plus stands as compared to the home side's eight. .

Performance of the two teams in the series
Team Innings Runs per wicket Runs per over 100/50 100/50 partnerships
Australia Overall 36.12 3.25 5/4 2/10
Sri Lanka Overall 28.89 2.65 2/8 4/4
Australia 1st 37.03 3.09 3/2 1/5
Sri Lanka 1st 25.06 2.60 1/4 2/3
Australia 2nd 34.90 3.52 2/2 1/5
Sri Lanka 2nd 36.06 2.71 1/4 2/1

Australia featured a new opening combination for the series with the return of Phillip Hughes. Hughes endured a tough time in the first two Tests before bouncing back with a fine century in the third Test at the SSC. It was Hughes' first century since his twin centuries in his second Test against South Africa in March 2009. His more established opening partner Shane Watson, however, had a an ordinary series by his recent high standards managing just 87 runs in five innings. Australia's biggest gain in the batting department was Shaun Marsh, who made his debut in the second Test, scoring a century batting at No. 3. In the first innings in Pallekele, Marsh, together with Hussey, was involved in the highest fourth-wicket partnership for Australia against Sri Lanka.

Sri Lanka had their own problems at the top of the order with Tillakaratne Dilshan struggling for consistency. Incidentally, both teams scored nearly the same number of runs for the first and second-wicket partnerships. The Kumar Sangakkara-Mahela Jayawardene pairing, which had aggregated only 117 runs in five innings against Australia before the start of the series, found some form in the final two Tests with two century partnerships. However, the star for Sri Lanka was Angelo Mathews, who scored 274 runs in five innings with a century and two fifties. Mathews forged useful partnerships in the middle-order in the second Test and kept Sri Lanka alive in the series. The Australian middle-order batsmen applied themselves better than their Sri Lankan counterparts across the three Tests, and their positive batting proved to be the crucial difference in the end.

Partnership stats for the top order (1-6) of both teams
Partnership wicket Runs/Avg (Australia) Runs/Avg (Sri Lanka) 100/50 (Australia) 100/50 (Sri Lanka)
1 150, 30.00 150, 30.00 0/2 0/2
2 130, 26.00 131, 26.20 0/1 0/0
3 277, 55.40 263, 52.60 0/4 2/0
4 379, 75.80 150, 30.00 1/0 0/0
5 308, 61.60 176, 35.20 1/1 1/0
6 178, 35.60 282, 56.40 0/2 1/2

In the first two Tests, Ryan Harris was the key bowler for Australia. He constantly troubled all Sri Lanka's batsmen with his movement and was particularly effective against the right handers by bringing the ball back sharply into them. He picked up Dilshan and Prasanna Jayawardene on two occasions and crucially dismissed Mahela Jayawardene in the second innings of the first Test giving Australia the victory. Harris, the highest wicket-taker for Australia with 11 wickets at an average of just 14.54, was missed in the third Test as Australia's attack looked less incisive. Trent Copeland, who made his debut in the first Test, also tasted significant success against Dilshan dismissing the batsman three times. Mitchell Johnson's form will, however, continue to be a cause for concern for Australia. Johnson picked up six wickets at an average of 52.16 and struggled for impact in all games.

For Sri Lanka, Rangana Herath was the standout bowler with 16 wickets at an average of 23.00. Although he leaked runs while bowling to Clarke, Herath picked up the Australian captain's wicket three times. Brad Haddin, who had an ordinary series with the bat, struggled to score off Herath and was dismissed twice scoring 24 runs.

Batsman v bowlers in the series
Batsman Bowler Runs Balls faced Scoring rate Dismissals Average Balls/Dismissal
Michael Clarke Rangana Herath 98 136 4.32 3 32.66 45.33
Tillakaratne Dilshan Trent Copeland 26 52 3.00 3 8.66 17.33
Tillakaratne Dilshan Ryan Harris 18 27 4.00 2 9.00 13.50
Brad Haddin Rangana Herath 24 75 1.92 2 12.00 37.50
Mahela Jayawardene Trent Copeland 22 80 1.65 2 11.00 40.00
Prasanna Jayawardene Ryan Harris 0 16 0.00 2 0.00 8.00

More than the batting quality, it was Muttiah Muralitharan's extraordinary bowling that had transformed Sri Lanka into a competitive Test team away and a daunting opponent in home Tests. In home matches in which Muralitharan played (Tests since 2000), Sri Lanka were well and truly dominant winning 28 Tests and losing just 11. They had a bowling average of 26.36 as compared to visiting teams who averaged nearly 42.11. Although there have been only six Tests played in Sri Lanka since Muralitharan's retirement, the drastic drop in the bowling quality is highly evident. Sri Lanka have failed to win even one of the six Tests and struggled to bowl out even a weak West Indies team. In recent home Tests, while Sri Lanka's bowling average has shot up to 37.31, the corresponding figure for visiting teams is 34.17. In home Tests featuring Muralitharan, Sri Lanka picked up 18 wickets per match on an average, but since his retirement, the corresponding number has dropped to less than 13.

Sri Lanka in home Tests with and without Muttiah Muralitharan (Tests since 2000)
Period Matches Wins Losses W/L ratio Bowling runs/wicket (Sri Lanka) Bowling runs/wicket (visiting team) Avg diff
2000 - 2010 (with Muralitharan) 49 28 11 2.54 26.36 42.11 15.75
2010 - present (without Muralitharan) 6 0 1 0.00 37.31 34.17 -3.34



Comments have now been closed for this article

  • Dummy4 on September 23, 2011, 11:48 GMT

    King Cricket of the modern Australian era, once Mr. please play as long as you can Huss.

  • M on September 23, 2011, 3:36 GMT

    @RandyOZ - not sure I read the same article... Huss hasn't scored more runs than Haydos - just has them at a better average (and against different competition). As a diehard Aus fan, I have supported Huss through highs and lows and felt too that his clock was ticking leading into last Ashes - his saving grace was the lack of serious young contenders at the time. There were some fine young guys but not with the experience and composure that Mr Cricket was forced to obtain before getting his opportunity late in life. The young guys should have developed that little bit more in part because of the tenacity of this man. Geoff Marsh may have said to Shaun "You know what this CAP means" but all he needed to do was to point to his statesman ... and say "He knew what this CAP meant!" Time waits for no man - lets hope the young generation have learnt the hunger from being made to wait just that one series longer.

  • 6 on September 23, 2011, 3:06 GMT

    Mike Hussey you beauty! You showed the world what a fine player you are even under pressure. Dont let age slow you down as it seems you are still in your prime. However Brad Haddins inability to score runs is a concerning facto as well as his keeping skills looking only ordinary

  • kieran on September 22, 2011, 10:45 GMT

    @landl47: Hussey was a class player long before his test debut, and his talent is equal to his determination (unless triple centuries are easy to come by in county cricket these days?). It's nice to hear your generally balanced (and nice) comments, but if you think that 3 innings wins in the Ashes will be the norm in the short term you must have one eye closed. Strauss won't be around much longer (no big loss) and your bowlers seem about as injury prone as Bruce Reid. If you can't see that what occurred last summer was completely out of the norm than you'll have hard times ahead as an Eng fan, seeing as your no.1 position depends on the results of another team.

  • Shane on September 22, 2011, 6:08 GMT

    Compare Katto to the same period in Jan 2008 - Dec 2009 and he was streets ahead yet was the first of the elders to go. Huss should've been dropped well before last years Ashes and not even had the chance to redeem himself. 3 tons in 27 tests is rubbish. Still he has made the most of his reprieve and it has paid off in spades and then some. Good on him. Champion

  • John on September 22, 2011, 5:14 GMT

    Hussey's a great player and one that, having not played a test until he was 30, showed how much can be accomplished by someone who is always up for the challenge. I wouldn't be surprised to see that, at 38, he will still be Australia's best batsman in the 2013 Ashes series. Of course, he was Australia's best batsman in the last Ashes series, too, and Australia lost 3 games by an innings. I don't expect that to change, either.

  • Randolph on September 22, 2011, 2:38 GMT

    MEK Hussey, what an utter legend. More runs than Haydos in the subcontinent, never wouldve picked it. This bloke is gonna steer us through the next Ashes series and belt England around the park before retiring. I just hope there are some young kids using him as their role model.

  • Andrew on September 22, 2011, 0:10 GMT

    Interesting stats - what would also have been telling was what the last 4 wickets for both sides produced. I think it would of shown that generally Oz's last 4 wickets produced a lot more than SL.

  • kieran on September 22, 2011, 0:00 GMT

    A good confidence booster for Aus, but still more questions than answers. Hopefully this series will be the end of Watto opening; he's done ok, but scoring 40-60 or a quick 20-30 is not the job of an opener (you with me Hyclass?). Siddle bowled well on a lifeless pitch, he is good cover for Harris. Marsh played well; Ponting will retire after the Aus summer, that brings in Khawaja at 3, with Marsh to open. The question of Mitch remains; if he's dropped Bollinger gets first crack. The batting from SL was pretty poor, particularly from the seniors. Dilshan was just plain irresponsible. Sangakkara looked good at times but was out to absolute peaches from Watto and Siddle so no blame there; would've been nice to see him get his 100 in his 100th.

  • John on September 21, 2011, 23:52 GMT

    I'm just waiting for popcorn and jonesy2 to say that Hussey is the best batsman in the world- after they just said the same thing about Clarke. Hussey's a great player and the only pity is he's already 36 and won't be around that much longer. Australia really doesn't look strong in the middle order except for him. Ponting's already on the way out (10 test innings now without a 50) and once Huss hangs them up it's going to be a struggle. For a guy who didn't play his first test until he was 30, he's had a magnificent career. Sri Lanka are already deep in the hole without Muralitharan. They need to scour the country for another bowler with a congenitally bent bowling arm, or it's hard to see them bowling any of the top teams out twice.

  • No featured comments at the moment.