Bangladesh in Sri Lanka, 2012-13 March 29, 2013

'I have more variations now' - Senanayake

  shares 12

Although Sri Lanka's pace reserves have struggled to produce quality in recent years, hurt by a spate of serious injuries, a bevy of burgeoning spinners has begun to vie for long-term places in the national team. 



19-year-old Akila Dananjaya had a successful introduction to international cricket during the World Twenty20 last year, but has been used with utmost care and consideration, owing to his extreme inexperience. 20-year-old Tharindu Kaushal has amassed a staggering pile of domestic scalps in his debut season, but despite having been in the Test squad for two tours, he is yet to make an international appearance. Others like Suraj Randiv and Ajantha Mendis were picked on early promise, but have since lost their way in international cricket - though each of them is only one emphatic domestic season away from drawing interest again.


The latest spinner to emerge from the peloton to make a dash for the top limited-overs spinner's spot is 28-year-old Sachithra Senanayake. A tall offspinner with a relaxed approach to the crease, a reputation for taking heavy hauls, and the record to go with it, he has recently seen his career surge, in more ways than one. He had played for Sri Lanka in a handful of limited-overs matches early in 2012, but in South Africa and in Australia, his returns ranged from modest to mediocre, and after a three-month stretch as a regular, he was replaced by several of the competing spin bowlers.

This year, though, a jaw-dropping $625,000 offer from Kolkata Knight Riders for the 2013 IPL brought Senanayake back into the limelight, and a strong first-class season earned him a recall into a national side looking to embed future stars. His first ODI against Bangladesh brought him only one wicket for 46 runs, but in Pallekele on Thursday night, he was Sri Lanka's best bowler by a distance, taking 2 for 26 from six overs. 



"For about a year I didn't have the opportunity to come into the national team," Senanayake said. "But I did well in the provincial and domestic matches that I had to play, so that's probably why I'm in the team again. I didn't lose hope of getting back into the team and I performed well and showed that I'm good enough.


"I have more variations now than I did when I first played for Sri Lanka. I think I'll be able to do well because of those changes. Before, I just bowled the offbreak and the one that goes straight on. Now I have two more - one that goes the other way, and one that keeps low."

Senanayake was also handed a central contract at the beginning of the month, despite not having played since August 2012, at the international level. The contract is an indication that Sri Lanka's new selection panel has high hopes from him, and will grant him time to mature at the top level. 




"I'm very thankful to the selection committee, because they didn't choose players on a whim," he said. "They've been watching cricketers for a while, and if they were performing well, [they saw] how long they had been doing well for. They've followed players closely and then categorised them, which is great."

Senanayake has been one of the most consistent spinners in domestic cricket, and his resurgence was built upon an exceptional List A season, in which he reaped 18 wickets at an average of 11.16. He was also among the top four wicket-takers in this year's first-class competition, with 49 wickets at 16.32. He is the only specialist spinner in the young Twenty20 squad named for the one-off match against Bangladesh.

He feels that having bowled on an SSC pitch, which is better suited to batting than many in the country, he has had to work hard to earn his wickets, and that that experience will hold him in good stead when playing for Sri Lanka.


"In international cricket, even in Sri Lanka, you don't get as many spin-friendly wickets as in the domestic circuit here," he said. "If you look at the SSC pitch though, it is one of the best batting tracks in the country. Because of that, I don't feel a big change when we play international cricket, and I think I'll be able to do well."



He is aware, however, that there are exciting, young players on the scene who have not evaded the selectors' gaze either. Senanayake may have an SLC contract, while many of them don't, but there is little room to lag. After the Twenty20 on Sunday, Sri Lanka's next assignment is the Champions Trophy in England, where Senanayake may be tasked with carrying the spin burden, given most pitches are unlikely to warrant fielding two slow bowlers.



"It's great the amount of competition that we have at the moment, because when there is a group of players behind me who are also pushing for players, I know that I have to do better than them. With that level of competition, if I don't do well in two or three games, I can't be certain of my place in the team. I have to constantly be on top of my game to earn selection for the next match."

Andrew Fidel Fernando is ESPNcricinfo's Sri Lanka correspondent. He tweets here

Comments have now been closed for this article

  • on March 29, 2013, 18:16 GMT

    I've been following Senanayake's career, especially in the domestic circuit for many years.He has reached his peak late and as he rightly says, the couple of variations he has added to his repertoire have paid dividends. His height and flexibility are added strengths. Many Sri Lankan spinners lived in the shadows of Murali and have suffered from great expectations. Senanayake along with Rangana Herath will form a formidable tandem. Youngsters like Akila andThrindu Kaushal will no doubt stake their claims. Sadly Sri Lanka's Test agenda is limited hence it will be difficult for Sachitra to prove his worth. He is also an excellent fielder and is no rabbit with the bat. Good luck to him!

  • MichaelBurton on March 31, 2013, 15:43 GMT

    @TheRisingTeam: Talent is what matters not the age...

  • fr600 on March 30, 2013, 16:36 GMT

    There is no correlation between improved statistics and more variations for him. We want performance, not variations.

  • on March 30, 2013, 7:34 GMT

    Very good observation SamRoy. You've hit the nail on the head! The search for variety arose after the initial success of Ajantha Mendis. Ajantha has been exposed in Test cricket where his lack of a hard-spun off or leg break is a major limitation. Akila Danajaya and Tharindu Kaushal on the other hand are supposed to possess the hard-spun off break in addition to other variations.

  • Ahgg on March 30, 2013, 6:02 GMT

    Whilst applauding the new selection committee for giving chances to talented and proven domestic performers like kusal, kithruvan, sachithra and angelo it is also sad to see guys like Ramith and chaturanga get called up ahead of sachithra Amerasinghe and Roshan silva who has outstanding records in domestic cricket and have proven to be consistent heavy scorers. What has Ramith and chaturanga done to get selected? whilst Ramith averages around 16 with the bat chaturanga has not even played more than 3 games. There is clearly favouritism as well. Hope the selectors will take note and give serasinghe and silva a chance soon.

  • SamRoy on March 30, 2013, 4:54 GMT

    In SL there is an unhealthy trend of spin bowlers learning to bowl too many variations and not having a stock ball and not concentrating on line and length. This works in limited overs but not in test cricket. An off-spinner basically needs only three different deliveries to be successful as a test cricketer: a hard-spun off-break (at different speeds), a top-spinner and an arm-ball. A floater and wrong-uns (like carrom ball, doosra, etc.) are added bonuses. The stock ball should be the off-break. And a finger-spinner must have a lot of accuracy. No short balls. Remember most spinners can't get away with the odd loose delivery like Murali could as he spun the ball a country mile.

  • Sinhaya on March 30, 2013, 3:02 GMT

    Great to see that our future is very bright.

  • Htc-Android on March 29, 2013, 23:57 GMT

    I think this guy should be given a place in the test team. Its better to go with a proper spinner like him instead of going with mystery spinners mendis and dhananjaya.

  • on March 29, 2013, 19:59 GMT

    need more tricks , go home practice more tricks

    more and more tricks ,

  • on March 29, 2013, 18:38 GMT

    @TheRisingTeam - If he follows Sachin then he will have a 12+ year career easily and he is a good spinner. His domestic records are far better than anyone's any domestic record in any country..

  • on March 29, 2013, 18:16 GMT

    I've been following Senanayake's career, especially in the domestic circuit for many years.He has reached his peak late and as he rightly says, the couple of variations he has added to his repertoire have paid dividends. His height and flexibility are added strengths. Many Sri Lankan spinners lived in the shadows of Murali and have suffered from great expectations. Senanayake along with Rangana Herath will form a formidable tandem. Youngsters like Akila andThrindu Kaushal will no doubt stake their claims. Sadly Sri Lanka's Test agenda is limited hence it will be difficult for Sachitra to prove his worth. He is also an excellent fielder and is no rabbit with the bat. Good luck to him!

  • MichaelBurton on March 31, 2013, 15:43 GMT

    @TheRisingTeam: Talent is what matters not the age...

  • fr600 on March 30, 2013, 16:36 GMT

    There is no correlation between improved statistics and more variations for him. We want performance, not variations.

  • on March 30, 2013, 7:34 GMT

    Very good observation SamRoy. You've hit the nail on the head! The search for variety arose after the initial success of Ajantha Mendis. Ajantha has been exposed in Test cricket where his lack of a hard-spun off or leg break is a major limitation. Akila Danajaya and Tharindu Kaushal on the other hand are supposed to possess the hard-spun off break in addition to other variations.

  • Ahgg on March 30, 2013, 6:02 GMT

    Whilst applauding the new selection committee for giving chances to talented and proven domestic performers like kusal, kithruvan, sachithra and angelo it is also sad to see guys like Ramith and chaturanga get called up ahead of sachithra Amerasinghe and Roshan silva who has outstanding records in domestic cricket and have proven to be consistent heavy scorers. What has Ramith and chaturanga done to get selected? whilst Ramith averages around 16 with the bat chaturanga has not even played more than 3 games. There is clearly favouritism as well. Hope the selectors will take note and give serasinghe and silva a chance soon.

  • SamRoy on March 30, 2013, 4:54 GMT

    In SL there is an unhealthy trend of spin bowlers learning to bowl too many variations and not having a stock ball and not concentrating on line and length. This works in limited overs but not in test cricket. An off-spinner basically needs only three different deliveries to be successful as a test cricketer: a hard-spun off-break (at different speeds), a top-spinner and an arm-ball. A floater and wrong-uns (like carrom ball, doosra, etc.) are added bonuses. The stock ball should be the off-break. And a finger-spinner must have a lot of accuracy. No short balls. Remember most spinners can't get away with the odd loose delivery like Murali could as he spun the ball a country mile.

  • Sinhaya on March 30, 2013, 3:02 GMT

    Great to see that our future is very bright.

  • Htc-Android on March 29, 2013, 23:57 GMT

    I think this guy should be given a place in the test team. Its better to go with a proper spinner like him instead of going with mystery spinners mendis and dhananjaya.

  • on March 29, 2013, 19:59 GMT

    need more tricks , go home practice more tricks

    more and more tricks ,

  • on March 29, 2013, 18:38 GMT

    @TheRisingTeam - If he follows Sachin then he will have a 12+ year career easily and he is a good spinner. His domestic records are far better than anyone's any domestic record in any country..

  • asiacricket1234 on March 29, 2013, 18:14 GMT

    I think this guy is better than Murali. At least he doesn't chuck to get wicket. An honest bowler who work hard to get his wickets. Wish him all the best :)

  • TheRisingTeam on March 29, 2013, 17:42 GMT

    He's 28 not 18 just an average spinner :)

  • TheRisingTeam on March 29, 2013, 17:42 GMT

    He's 28 not 18 just an average spinner :)

  • asiacricket1234 on March 29, 2013, 18:14 GMT

    I think this guy is better than Murali. At least he doesn't chuck to get wicket. An honest bowler who work hard to get his wickets. Wish him all the best :)

  • on March 29, 2013, 18:38 GMT

    @TheRisingTeam - If he follows Sachin then he will have a 12+ year career easily and he is a good spinner. His domestic records are far better than anyone's any domestic record in any country..

  • on March 29, 2013, 19:59 GMT

    need more tricks , go home practice more tricks

    more and more tricks ,

  • Htc-Android on March 29, 2013, 23:57 GMT

    I think this guy should be given a place in the test team. Its better to go with a proper spinner like him instead of going with mystery spinners mendis and dhananjaya.

  • Sinhaya on March 30, 2013, 3:02 GMT

    Great to see that our future is very bright.

  • SamRoy on March 30, 2013, 4:54 GMT

    In SL there is an unhealthy trend of spin bowlers learning to bowl too many variations and not having a stock ball and not concentrating on line and length. This works in limited overs but not in test cricket. An off-spinner basically needs only three different deliveries to be successful as a test cricketer: a hard-spun off-break (at different speeds), a top-spinner and an arm-ball. A floater and wrong-uns (like carrom ball, doosra, etc.) are added bonuses. The stock ball should be the off-break. And a finger-spinner must have a lot of accuracy. No short balls. Remember most spinners can't get away with the odd loose delivery like Murali could as he spun the ball a country mile.

  • Ahgg on March 30, 2013, 6:02 GMT

    Whilst applauding the new selection committee for giving chances to talented and proven domestic performers like kusal, kithruvan, sachithra and angelo it is also sad to see guys like Ramith and chaturanga get called up ahead of sachithra Amerasinghe and Roshan silva who has outstanding records in domestic cricket and have proven to be consistent heavy scorers. What has Ramith and chaturanga done to get selected? whilst Ramith averages around 16 with the bat chaturanga has not even played more than 3 games. There is clearly favouritism as well. Hope the selectors will take note and give serasinghe and silva a chance soon.

  • on March 30, 2013, 7:34 GMT

    Very good observation SamRoy. You've hit the nail on the head! The search for variety arose after the initial success of Ajantha Mendis. Ajantha has been exposed in Test cricket where his lack of a hard-spun off or leg break is a major limitation. Akila Danajaya and Tharindu Kaushal on the other hand are supposed to possess the hard-spun off break in addition to other variations.

  • fr600 on March 30, 2013, 16:36 GMT

    There is no correlation between improved statistics and more variations for him. We want performance, not variations.