Sri Lanka v Pakistan, 2nd Test, SSC, 2nd day August 15, 2014

Sarfraz Ahmed to the rescue

10

Sarfraz Ahmed scored his third consecutive half-century
Sarfraz Ahmed scored his third consecutive half-century © AFP

Pakistan's famously unpredictable batting tripped up on day two at SSC, as they lost their four best batsmen for 30 runs after the top order had provided a strong platform. The slump had Pakistan reeling at 140 for 5, handing control of the game back to Sri Lanka.

Pakistan entered the second and final Test with a clear intention to win to square the series. Day one went well but Rangana Herath's five-for grounded them on the second, though a solid 93-run partnership between Sarfraz Ahmed and Asad Shafiq ensured Sri Lanka didn't run away with the game.

Sarfraz gave another demonstration of how much his batting has improved over the past year, dominating that stand with Shafiq. His scores since making a comeback are - 74, 5, 48, 55, 52 and 66* - which suggests Pakistan have at last found a wicketkeeper who can contribute with the bat. "I was asked by Waqar [Younis] to focus on my natural game," Sarfraz said, after another productive day with the bat. "The best part of my innings I believe is that it came when my team needed me."

Both Shafiq and Sarfraz are from Karachi and rose to prominence from the same cricket club, Pakistan Cricket Club. "My partnership with Asad has a special bond, mainly because we both have been playing together at club and domestic level. We shared quality time on the pitch mainly because our individual understanding is good.

"Obviously there was huge pressure mounting, so Asad and me decided to get stuck in and take some time. And once we were set, we preferred attacking Herath and hence Sri Lanka had to open the field so runs started to flow from both ends."

Sarfraz is playing with controlled aggression, showcasing fluent strokes to gather quick and important runs. "I have worked so hard to get back in the side and I don't want to lose this momentum. I am obviously under pressure but the support by the dressing room is the major boost to my career. The confidence they are offering me is making a big difference."

The Pakistan bowlers began the second day on a high after reducing Sri Lanka to 261 for 8 but they conceded 59 runs to the final two Sri Lanka wickets. Struggling to dismiss the tail is a problem Pakistan have had to deal with often in recent years.

"We have entered the Test with a positive approach and do not want to lose," Sarfraz said. "Although we lost quick wickets, that doesn't mean there is any negative approach but the top order went down while playing attacking shots. But at the same time credit should be given to Hearth as well as he bowled superbly.

"There are patches developing at one of the ends [tennis court] that are helping the spinners and with every passing day they will deteriorate more so it will be tough. But my immediate target tomorrow is to run down the deficit [of 76] runs and put the pressure back on Sri Lanka."

Umar Farooq is ESPNcricinfo's Pakistan correspondent. @kalson

Comments have now been closed for this article

  • on August 16, 2014, 8:26 GMT

    Glad to see him scoring runs at crucial situations. Would like him to keep a bit better because He missed 2 chances which led to this score otherwise Pakistan would have easily wrapped up the Lankancd within 225.

  • Ray24 on August 16, 2014, 5:48 GMT

    @Chandana - we are happy with a keeper who can score 50. Our regular batsmen cannot score 100, how can we penalize Sarfaraz for failing to score 100. While everyone is crediting Sarfarazs' fight back you are the only one asking for Kamran Akmal's inclusion - you sure are NOT a Pakistan well wisher.

  • on August 16, 2014, 4:02 GMT

    No Joke why cant Pakistan now send out people like Wahab Riaz, Junaid Khan, Abdur Rehman and Ajmal at third, fourth, fifth and sixth positions? I mean you know that if the opening pair makes a few runs the middle order will collapse and if the opening pair fails then only one batsman will make a stand from the middle over. I think Pakistan should re-invent the game!!!!I swear I'd rather see Abdur Rehman open the batting than one of the Akmals anywhere in the team. ALSO WHERE IS IRFAN?

  • on August 15, 2014, 21:10 GMT

    This shows that if merit is the only criteria for selection, then right and match winning players will be on the team.

  • on August 15, 2014, 20:27 GMT

    @chandana: umar has only one 100. plus he is part time keeper for limited overs i dont think he will be a good choice for test keeping. though he should play as batsman in playing 11 but not as keeper.

  • Desihungama on August 15, 2014, 20:26 GMT

    Qazi hassan - I second that. Not to mention Sarfaraz should also be credited for ensuring the Akmal curse stay permanently out of the Test team.

  • on August 15, 2014, 20:08 GMT

    Really a good sign that he is scoring runs, he seems to be a next Moin Khan............ But i want Kamran back in ODI's..........

  • on August 15, 2014, 19:49 GMT

    Sarfraz is not converting these fifties and therefore needs to be dropped. Not a single hundred! If he had converted one of his fifties in the last match Pakistan would not have lost. Bring back Kamran Akmal, who has 6 test hundreds and is a much more consistent wicketkeeper.

  • on August 15, 2014, 18:59 GMT

    sarfraz is gaining good respect day by day. a team like pakistan can not afford a keeper with out batting ability. he has really improved. and i hope he continues like this good batting effort with good keeping. his keeping must not suffer because of batting. alot of work to do in this game. he has to mange rehman and wahab and score some runs quickly. and try to get in to some sort of lead..last 2 wickeets of sl added 59 without any proper batsman at wicket. rehman, wahab and ajmal will have to match that effort as the runs by tail will be the deciding factor.

  • on August 15, 2014, 18:35 GMT

    More benefits to come from the ouster of Kamran Akmal.

  • on August 16, 2014, 8:26 GMT

    Glad to see him scoring runs at crucial situations. Would like him to keep a bit better because He missed 2 chances which led to this score otherwise Pakistan would have easily wrapped up the Lankancd within 225.

  • Ray24 on August 16, 2014, 5:48 GMT

    @Chandana - we are happy with a keeper who can score 50. Our regular batsmen cannot score 100, how can we penalize Sarfaraz for failing to score 100. While everyone is crediting Sarfarazs' fight back you are the only one asking for Kamran Akmal's inclusion - you sure are NOT a Pakistan well wisher.

  • on August 16, 2014, 4:02 GMT

    No Joke why cant Pakistan now send out people like Wahab Riaz, Junaid Khan, Abdur Rehman and Ajmal at third, fourth, fifth and sixth positions? I mean you know that if the opening pair makes a few runs the middle order will collapse and if the opening pair fails then only one batsman will make a stand from the middle over. I think Pakistan should re-invent the game!!!!I swear I'd rather see Abdur Rehman open the batting than one of the Akmals anywhere in the team. ALSO WHERE IS IRFAN?

  • on August 15, 2014, 21:10 GMT

    This shows that if merit is the only criteria for selection, then right and match winning players will be on the team.

  • on August 15, 2014, 20:27 GMT

    @chandana: umar has only one 100. plus he is part time keeper for limited overs i dont think he will be a good choice for test keeping. though he should play as batsman in playing 11 but not as keeper.

  • Desihungama on August 15, 2014, 20:26 GMT

    Qazi hassan - I second that. Not to mention Sarfaraz should also be credited for ensuring the Akmal curse stay permanently out of the Test team.

  • on August 15, 2014, 20:08 GMT

    Really a good sign that he is scoring runs, he seems to be a next Moin Khan............ But i want Kamran back in ODI's..........

  • on August 15, 2014, 19:49 GMT

    Sarfraz is not converting these fifties and therefore needs to be dropped. Not a single hundred! If he had converted one of his fifties in the last match Pakistan would not have lost. Bring back Kamran Akmal, who has 6 test hundreds and is a much more consistent wicketkeeper.

  • on August 15, 2014, 18:59 GMT

    sarfraz is gaining good respect day by day. a team like pakistan can not afford a keeper with out batting ability. he has really improved. and i hope he continues like this good batting effort with good keeping. his keeping must not suffer because of batting. alot of work to do in this game. he has to mange rehman and wahab and score some runs quickly. and try to get in to some sort of lead..last 2 wickeets of sl added 59 without any proper batsman at wicket. rehman, wahab and ajmal will have to match that effort as the runs by tail will be the deciding factor.

  • on August 15, 2014, 18:35 GMT

    More benefits to come from the ouster of Kamran Akmal.

  • No featured comments at the moment.

  • on August 15, 2014, 18:35 GMT

    More benefits to come from the ouster of Kamran Akmal.

  • on August 15, 2014, 18:59 GMT

    sarfraz is gaining good respect day by day. a team like pakistan can not afford a keeper with out batting ability. he has really improved. and i hope he continues like this good batting effort with good keeping. his keeping must not suffer because of batting. alot of work to do in this game. he has to mange rehman and wahab and score some runs quickly. and try to get in to some sort of lead..last 2 wickeets of sl added 59 without any proper batsman at wicket. rehman, wahab and ajmal will have to match that effort as the runs by tail will be the deciding factor.

  • on August 15, 2014, 19:49 GMT

    Sarfraz is not converting these fifties and therefore needs to be dropped. Not a single hundred! If he had converted one of his fifties in the last match Pakistan would not have lost. Bring back Kamran Akmal, who has 6 test hundreds and is a much more consistent wicketkeeper.

  • on August 15, 2014, 20:08 GMT

    Really a good sign that he is scoring runs, he seems to be a next Moin Khan............ But i want Kamran back in ODI's..........

  • Desihungama on August 15, 2014, 20:26 GMT

    Qazi hassan - I second that. Not to mention Sarfaraz should also be credited for ensuring the Akmal curse stay permanently out of the Test team.

  • on August 15, 2014, 20:27 GMT

    @chandana: umar has only one 100. plus he is part time keeper for limited overs i dont think he will be a good choice for test keeping. though he should play as batsman in playing 11 but not as keeper.

  • on August 15, 2014, 21:10 GMT

    This shows that if merit is the only criteria for selection, then right and match winning players will be on the team.

  • on August 16, 2014, 4:02 GMT

    No Joke why cant Pakistan now send out people like Wahab Riaz, Junaid Khan, Abdur Rehman and Ajmal at third, fourth, fifth and sixth positions? I mean you know that if the opening pair makes a few runs the middle order will collapse and if the opening pair fails then only one batsman will make a stand from the middle over. I think Pakistan should re-invent the game!!!!I swear I'd rather see Abdur Rehman open the batting than one of the Akmals anywhere in the team. ALSO WHERE IS IRFAN?

  • Ray24 on August 16, 2014, 5:48 GMT

    @Chandana - we are happy with a keeper who can score 50. Our regular batsmen cannot score 100, how can we penalize Sarfaraz for failing to score 100. While everyone is crediting Sarfarazs' fight back you are the only one asking for Kamran Akmal's inclusion - you sure are NOT a Pakistan well wisher.

  • on August 16, 2014, 8:26 GMT

    Glad to see him scoring runs at crucial situations. Would like him to keep a bit better because He missed 2 chances which led to this score otherwise Pakistan would have easily wrapped up the Lankancd within 225.