Does Azhar deserve another chance?
Predictably enough, Kapil Dev' assertion that Md Azharuddin was not popular with the team members has stirred a hornet's nest
Partab Ramchand
03-Feb-2000
Predictably enough, Kapil Dev' assertion that Md Azharuddin was not
popular with the team members has stirred a hornet's nest. According
to the present coach, the former Indian captain is an unwanted person
in the Indian dressing room. It is well known that the team management
vetoed the views of the selection committee, which wanted Azhar to be
in the team for the Carlton & United Series. Now we know why.
Azhar, fighting to stage a comeback, is not in the mood to take such
things lying down. Reacting angrily, he called for the Board of
Control for Cricket in India to ask Kapil to substantiate the
statement. ``As far as I know, I never had any problems with the
team. No one should be allowed to get away with such baseless
statements.''
If Azhar says he never had a problem with the players, then what can
one infer from the Sidhu walkout from England in 1996? It will be
easy to blame Sidhu for the sorry episode, but there are always two
sides to a coin and Azhar must also shoulder his share of the
blame. Also, from reports over the years, it was clear that all was
not hunky dory between Azhar and some team members and in fact there
were stories of one senior player offering to retire if Azhar was
retained as skipper after the 1999 World Cup.
It's true that Azhar had a long stint as captain, first from 1990 to
1996 and then from 1998 to 1999. But a long tenure does not ensure a
captain's popularity with the players. It is well known that Azhar was
foisted as captain on the team because he was a pliable candidate,
because the BCCI officials found the mild mannered Hyderabadi easier
to handle. There was certainly nothing in his captaincy qualities to
warrant such a long stay at the top. The fact that he is -
statistically - the most successful captain in Indian Test cricket
does not make him a shrewd skipper or a successful tactician. He was
lucky to be appointed captain in the first place, fortunate to have
retained it for so long despite a succession of reverses for the first
three years and his statistical success was largely because of
victories over weaker teams on our designer home pitches. Even his
re-appointment in 1998 was largely a retrograde step and as events
proved, Indian cricket did not make any great headway in his second
tenure.
It is one of the ironies of the game that Azhar is one among only
three captains to have led their country in three World Cup
tournaments. But look at the record of the two captains he shares this
honour with. Clive Lloyd's tally is two titles and a runner-up
position on the third occasion and Imran Khan's record is one triumph
and twice semifinalist. Azhar, on the other hand, managed to keep his
place despite a record of one semifinal and twice beaten in the group
matches.
As if his lack of leadership qualities was not enough, Azhar was a
disaster as a communicator. He played hide and seek with the media. At
press conferences, he answered mostly in mono syllables, made it clear
to the mediamen that he was not interested in the proceedings, and
just yawned or looked this way and that as if he was doing them a
favour by spending a few minutes with them.
But look at the same Azhar now. He is aware that he needs the media to
stay in the public eye as he tries to make his way back into the
Indian team. So now all over the country he makes himself easily
accessible to the media, attends meet the press programmes readily,
and gives interviews freely to all and sundry.
A lot was made of the Indian team requiring the services of Azhar
`Down Under', with some even going on to say that he would have made a
difference to the side's fortunes. However, given his record in the
past one year, and more so his showing in Australia in 1991-92 when he
was eight years younger, the odds are that Azhar, who completes 37 in
a few days time, would have failed. Perhaps he should count himself
lucky that he was not exposed by Glenn McGrath, Brett Lee and others
on the faster, bouncier tracks in Australia.
To back Azhar's return to the Indian team, cricket followers pointed
out to his form around the domestic circuit. Does a century in the
Ranji Trophy or a half century in the Wills Trophy or the Deodhar
Trophy on the kind of batsman oriented pitches we have in the country
qualify for a comeback? And for a player with over 15,000
international runs?
That Azhar has been an outstanding batsman no one will deny. His
record speaks for itself and he would be in anyone's list of all time
great ten Indian batsman. But age catches up with the best of players
and while it is a tribute to the former Indian captain's fitness that
he has carried on for 15 years batting and fielding as only he can, it
is obvious that Azhar's best days are behind him. Indeed, it is kind
of sad that an artist like him can no longer command a place in the
side. But if it is any comfort to him, GR Viswanath, from whom Azhar
is a direct descendant, met with much the same fate. After playing 87
consecutive Tests for a world record, the supreme touch artist had one
poor series against Pakistan in 1982-83, was dropped at the age of 34
and was never considered again. Viswanath being Viswanath, he just
quietly left the stage, though privately he did seem hurt that he
wasn't given another opportunity. Does Azhar then deserve another
chance?
Perhaps the most telling comment was made by Sunil Gavaskar in reply
to a question on TV on Wednesday. Asked whether it was right to keep a
player away just because he may not be popular with some of the team
members, Gavaskar firmly replied in the affirmative. He said that team
spirit was all important and if it is found that this atmosphere is
destroyed by the induction of someone who is not popular, then he
should be kept out.
Gavaskar had a point. Indian cricket is in the doldrums right now with
a string of reverses. This is certainly not the right time to do
anything that would undermine team spirit - especially when it means
gambling with a 37-year-old well past his best who may or may not come
off.