Full name Harry Butler Daft
Born April 5, 1866, Radcliffe-on-Trent, Nottinghamshire
Died January 12, 1945, High Cross, Hertfordshire (aged 78 years 282 days)
Major teams Nottinghamshire
Batting style Right-hand bat
Bowling style (unknown arm) slow
Education Trent College
|First-class span||1885 - 1899|
DAFT, HARRY BUTLER, second son of Richard Daft the most famous stylist of his time, died at High Cross, Herts, on January 12, aged 78. Born at Radcliffeon-Trent, he appeared in the Trent College XI when only 12 and showed such increased skill as he played with his seniors that in 1885, when 19, he was tried for the County in several games. Next season he appeared for Gentlemen v. Players at the Oval and he assisted Nottinghamshire as an amateur until he turned professional in 1890. Specially strong in defence, with skill in placing his strokes, he never suggested forcing ability and scarcely reached the high standard of his county's best batsmen. Besides being both amateur and professional he shared the rare distinction with his father of playing together in the County Eleven. This occurred in the August Bank Holiday Match, 1891, at Kennington Oval against Surrey, Richard Daft returning to the Nottinghamshire side after an absence of ten years because Arthur Shrewsbury was compelled to stand down through injury. Wisden, commenting on the case of father and son being in the same side, stated such a thing has not been seen in first-class cricket since old William Lillywhite and his son John played together. Richard Daft was then 56 and his son 25. W. G. Grace and his son, the Cambridge Blue, often played together, and in more recent years Bestwicks of Derbyshire and Quaifes of Warwickshire supplied similar instances. During the match between these counties at Derby in June 1922 the two Bestwicks shared the attack in bowling while W. G. Quaife and his son B. W. were batting in partnership.
Very difficult to dismiss when set, Harry Daft in 1894 against Kent at Trent Bridge scored 92 not out, and against Surrey at The Oval in 1896 carried his bat through the second innings for 77 in a vain attempt to save his side from defeat.
Altogether, he scored 3,861 runs, average 16.22, took 74 wickets at 27.52 runs apiece, and held 73 catches in first-class cricket. Continuing in county cricket until 1899, Harry Daft played his highest innings for Nottinghamshire, not out 103, against Northamptonshire in 1897, but that was not a first-class match, Northamptonshire not being raised to the championship group until 1905.
H. B. Daft earned higher fame in Association football when playing for Notts County as outside left, and helped to win the FA Cup in 1894 with a victory of 4-1 over Bolton Wanderers at Goodison Park, Liverpool. He gained England caps against Ireland in 1889, 91 and 92 against Scotland and Wales in 1890, and in 1892 played for English League against Scottish League.
Wisden Cricketers' Almanack
Some of the reactions on Twitter to Virat Kohli's record-equalling hundred during India's chase in Pune
In the past week, we have seen two shots that left us awestruck: Virat Kohli's jab that sailed over midwicket and Najibullah Zadran's six over the extra-cover boundary despite slipping in the process. Will either of the two top this compilation?
Stats highlights from the first ODI between India and England in Pune
Kedar Jadhav battled physical exertion and pain as he played the innings of his life, but there could not have been a better balm to soothe those pains than watching his team go the distance
Transitions in leadership are very much a talking point at the moment. India's ODI handover had hallmarks of the old and new ways
Currently, Ajinkya Rahane doesn't quite have the body of work in ODIs that merit his inclusion. What can he do to press for selection in the Champions Trophy?
Australia's selectors are set to announce the squad for the Test series in India on Sunday
The shot Shakib Al Hasan played to be dismissed on day five at Basin Reserve defies explanation. It also prompts a few questions
As batting and bowling in ODIs takes on more of the attacking virtues of T20 cricket, where does the format stand as a product of its own?