Lions v Mumbai, CLT20 2010, Johannesburg

'We were a family out there' - Alviro Petersen

Telford Vice

September 10, 2010

Comments: 14 | Text size: A | A

There is plenty to ponder when a David like Alviro Petersen breathes the same rarefied air as the Goliath who is Sachin Tendulkar. And the Highveld air was indeed rare at the Wanderers in Johannesburg, where Petersen's Lions played Tendulkar's Mumbai in the Champions League Twenty 20 opener.

Lo and behold, David's dapper dazzlers stuck to the Biblical script by slaying Goliath's giants by nine runs. Let the atheists among us quiver in disbelief: look in the Book. It was, unarguably, by any measure reasonable or unreasonable, the biggest win in the hitherto limping Lions franchise's history, and Petersen knew it.

"It's a great start," he said after the game. "It's all we could ask for. We were underdogs, but we were a family out there. On paper, the Mumbai Indians are probably the better team. But we focused on what we had to do and our bowlers came through beautifully in the end."

Tendulkar did his bit with a sparkling 69, but it wasn't enough on the night. Not that Petersen was about to admit that the Mumbai skipper was an unusually large thorn in the Lions' paws. "Whether we play against Sachin Tendulkar or just an ordinary guy, we play with the same intensity."

For all that, Petersen has first-hand knowledge that Tendulkar is anything but ordinary. They first met on the field in Kolkata, in February this year, when the South African marked his Test debut with an innings of 100. Tendulkar made 106, the 47th of his 48 centuries in the 166th of his 169 Tests.

Neither had a memorable first one-day international in Jaipur, but the second match of that series, in Gwalior, will forever be remembered as the game in which Tendulkar took one-day batting into a galaxy far, far away with his monumental 200 not out. Petersen scored nine.

The trend looked set to continue at the Wanderers on Friday. In the fourth over of the Lions' innings, Petersen and Jonathan Vandiar scooted for the same end of the pitch. Petersen was declared dead on arrival for 12 when the bails were removed leisurely at the other end.

Tendulkar looked dead in the water for six when Ethan O'Reilly struck him plumb in front in the second over of the Indians' reply. Asoka de Silva was among the few in the ground who reckoned otherwise. A blink of an eye later, Tendulkar was bumbling about mid-pitch when a frozen rope of a throw whizzed past the stumps. "I just put it behind me and thought about the next ball," Petersen said about the near miss. "The next ball is the important thing." Three overs of next balls after that, a shy that might have run Tendulkar out for 18 hit him instead.

By the time Shane "Cheese" Burger knocked out two of Tendulkar's stumps, in the 15th over, the momentum was firmly with Mumbai. Only for Burger to snatch the advantage back for the Lions by yorking Kieron Pollard, a ball after the West Indian had launched him over long-on for six. JP Duminy and R Sathish also became casualties as the Lions surged to their famous victory.

"Hats off to the Lions bowlers. They were exceptional in the last four overs. Until then, we were very much in the game," said Duminy, who had been sent to the post-match press conference instead of his captain. "He [Tendulkar] played extremely well, but it's a team sport and we all have to chip in. Unfortunately, we ended up a few runs short."

Vandiar, who rose from the ashes of his moment of madness with Petersen to score a 71 that bristled with pugnacity and verve, showed he has a few things to learn about diplomacy off the field as well as on it. Asked what he thought about batting as well as he had against an attack studded with bowlers of the stature of Zaheer Khan, Lasith Malinga and Harbhajan Singh, Vandiar said, "They're world class, but they're just guys."

Petersen, who went to some trouble to explain that his team remained the tournament underdogs, despite their fine win, might want to have a word with the youngster about that. After all, the Lions captain has up close and personal knowledge of what world class players can do.

Telford Vice is a freelance cricket writer in South Africa

RSS Feeds: Telford Vice

© ESPN Sports Media Ltd.

Posted by Rohan1 on (September 11, 2010, 13:07 GMT)

The only reason I even bother to watch rubbish like T20 is to watch Sachin Tendulkar bat. The moment he's out I change the channel to something less farcical.

Posted by Apache_Indian on (September 11, 2010, 9:58 GMT)

@ Le-Stephenios .. I think, my friends have made it clear to you :) Now I'm sure if the team you support loses the WC 2011 by "just 1 run" you will be disappointed. One more thing I would like to add is, Sachin was not out on 200 whereas Anwar and Jajasuriya had lost their wickets (nervous 190s ?) And Richards faced 170 balls to score 186* whereas Sachin's strike rate was much better.

Posted by maddy20 on (September 11, 2010, 7:42 GMT)

@Le-Stephenios A difference of 0.4 seconds gave Usian Bolt the title "World Record Holder" . It is that difference that makes the Champions a class apart from the rest of the folks. I would not expect an ignorant mind like yourself to understand this but thought I will atleast try! Anyways I thought the bowling changes were terrible. McLaren opening with Murtaza? One would expect players like Malinga and Zaheer would start the proceedings!

Posted by sbharathwaj on (September 11, 2010, 7:06 GMT)

@ le-stephenois ,r u out of your mind of comparing his 200 feat as anything close to ordinary..though i rate his 175 & 141 vs oz higher than 200,he ran every run for himself in 200 unlike scoring the last 80 odd runs with a by runner (anwar) @ the age of 37..!!!isnt it remarkable

Posted by sweetspot on (September 11, 2010, 6:38 GMT)

Sachin must understand that his academic approach as captain is costing MI dearly. Gambling may not come to him as naturally as say, to MS Dhoni, but taking chances is very much part and parcel of the modern game. You are rewarded for the chances you take, even if they don't come off sometimes. If you take NO chances, the opposition already has you on the backfoot. There is no conservative, safe way of winning consistently. Just because MI had a good run in the IPL doesn't mean other teams cannot surprise them. Sachin the captain is the weak link in a team where Sachin the batsman is the strongest link.

Posted by   on (September 11, 2010, 5:19 GMT)

I refuse to believe MI was the better team on paper.The truth is all the IPL teams have some chinks in their armour be it bowling or batting and less said better about the fielding.Shikhar Dhawan,Rajgopal Satish are not the ones you want to have in your team as batsmen.MI's bowling flopped yesterday and that sealed their fate.But for Tendulkar,it would have been a much bigger loss.You have to admit some of the fringe Indian talents are nowhere near world class.

Posted by sweetspot on (September 11, 2010, 5:09 GMT)

@le-stephenois - What makes it monumental is that NOBODY else has got to the 200 mark in thousands of games. What do you think the next 100m dash record is going to be? 7.5 seconds? Highly unlikely.

Posted by   on (September 11, 2010, 4:38 GMT)

Tendulkar is foolish captain but good batsman.. it is evidant here and IPL final.. learn some captancy lessons from MS the great.. or get lost.. u waisted many players talents in this match..

Posted by CricFan24 on (September 11, 2010, 4:00 GMT)

@le_stephenois. You are absolutely right. Tendulkar is ALREADY in a galaxy far,far away from any other batsman. Let the others get close to the combination of nearly 18000 runs, 46 Hundreds, avg. 45, SR 87- over 21 yrs, then we can talk. The 200* was actually merely the cherry on top.

Posted by randikaayya on (September 11, 2010, 3:44 GMT)

The only decisive performance on the day for Mumbai came from malinga. Tendulkar failed to take his side home despite getting 4 lives and iis clearly behind Vandiar and McKenzie. he should give up being captain perhaps appoint Bravo or Bhajji in his place and focus on batting!

Posted by   on (September 11, 2010, 2:00 GMT)

Can we change the name convention please? Lets call all the IPL teams minnows, thats the only description I can think of :)

Posted by _NEUTRAL_Fan_ on (September 11, 2010, 1:56 GMT)

Games aren't played on paper! There is a lot of unknown and unadvertised and un-hyped teams around and it is a good idea to take a look at how each team goes b-4 labeling them as Davids and Goliath. Look at Real Madrid FC, are they the best football team in the world because they payed a lot of cash and have a lot of media loving stars? No! Cricket is a team sport and the great teams of the past were a great team 1st with great players 2nd. Sachin's captaincy is questionable. It was in the past and that is the key for me. He didn't have a successful stint in the past but again it may be all about what the media wants.

Posted by _NEUTRAL_Fan_ on (September 11, 2010, 1:56 GMT)

Games aren't played on paper! There is a lot of unknown and unadvertised and un-hyped teams around and it is a good idea to take a look at how each team goes b-4 labeling them as Davids and Goliath. Look at Real Madrid FC, are they the best football team in the world because they payed a lot of cash and have a lot of media loving stars? No! Cricket is a team sport and the great teams of the past were a great team 1st with great players 2nd. Sachin's captaincy is questionable. It was in the past and that is the key for me. He didn't have a successful stint in the past but again it may be all about what the media wants.

Posted by le_stephenois on (September 11, 2010, 1:48 GMT)

"Tendulkar took one-day batting into a galaxy far, far away with his monumental 200 not out." Really? 6 runs more than Saeed Anwar, 11 runs more than Jayasuriya and Richards and 14 runs more than Tendulkar himself in 99, is a galaxy far far away? This is cheapening the four innings mentioned, all were great, if Tendulkar scored 250, then I'd agree with you. As it is, 6 runs more is simply a statistical anomaly. You make it sound like he got about 80 more runs than the previous record, stop exaggerating the feat, please.

Comments have now been closed for this article

TopTop
Email Feedback Print
Share
E-mail
Feedback
Print
Telford ViceClose
Telford Vice Telford Vice, crash-boom-out left-hand bat, sort-of legspinner, was never sure whether he was a cricket person. He thought he might be when he sidestepped a broken laptop and an utter dearth of experience to cover South Africa's first Test match in 22 years in Barbados in 1992. When he managed to complete Peter Kirsten's biography as well as retain what he calls his sanity, he pondered the question again. Similarly, when he made it through the 2007 World Cup - all of it, including the warm-up matches - his case for belonging to cricket's family felt stronger. But it was only when the World Twenty20 exploded gloriously into his life in 2007 that he knew he actually wanted to be a cricket person. Sort of ...
Tournament Results
Warriors v EPR Inv XI at Port Elizabeth - Sep 8, 2010
EPR Inv XI won by 10 wickets (with 32 balls remaining)
Central D v RCB at Pretoria - Sep 7, 2010
RCB won by 22 runs
Warriors v EPR Inv XI at Port Elizabeth - Sep 7, 2010
EPR Inv XI won by 29 runs
Central D v South Aust at Benoni - Sep 6, 2010
South Aust won by 7 wickets (with 23 balls remaining)
More results »
News | Features Last 3 days
News | Features Last 3 days