Australia v England, 4th ODI, Perth January 23, 2014

Australia aim to keep No.1 ranking


'England's best chance for a win'

Match facts

January 24, 2014, Perth
Start time 11.20am (0320GMT)

The Big picture

Australia began Wednesday second on the ICC's one-day international rankings. The players went for a spot of training, returned to their hotel in Perth, probably watched some television and by the end of the day they were No.1. India's loss to New Zealand in the second ODI in Hamilton was enough to drop MS Dhoni's men down from first to second on the rankings list and, by default, Australia will enter their fourth ODI in Perth occupying the top spot. Of course, if they lose to England at the WACA, it could be the shortest rule since Frank Forde spent a week as Australia's prime minister back in 1945. But their stated goal is to return to the top of the rankings in all three formats, and their victories in the first three matches of this series have allowed them to achieve that in the 50-over game - even if it is only temporarily.

To retain their ranking, Australia will need to rely on a second string batting line-up with Michael Clarke, Shane Watson, David Warner and Brad Haddin all rested now that the series has been decided. For a period on Wednesday it even appeared that their stand-in captain George Bailey might miss a second consecutive game after picking up a hip flexor niggle during the win in Brisbane, which might have meant a captaincy debut for his nominated deputy Mitchell Johnson or a rushed flight to Perth for one of the resting men. However, on Thursday, Bailey was passed fit and will lead the Australians as they hope to continue towards another clean sweep over Alastair Cook's side.

For Cook, it looms as serious challenge to lift his team given the series is now dead, and considering the way he responded to the loss in Sydney. After the game, a despondent Cook indicated that his time as ODI captain could be coming to an end, and that "English cricket needs a little bit of a change". Presumably he meant personnel, but a change in on-field results would be a good start. Victory in Perth would also prevent this England side from joining the 1993 and 2001 outfits as the only England teams ever to lose 10 consecutive matches across all formats. Against an Australian team missing four of their finest players, this could be England's best chance.

Form guide

(Completed matches, most recent first)

Australia WWWLL
England LLLLW

Watch out for

It has been an up-and-down week for George Bailey, who on Monday was named Australia's One-Day International Player of the Year at the Allan Border Medal night in Sydney, having earlier that day missed out on selection in Australia's Test squad to tour South Africa. But as befits a man of Bailey's maturity, he took his Test axing in his stride and concentrated instead on ensuring he recovered from his hip flexor injury in time for this ODI. Bailey decided against going out with the team to celebrate the series win on Sunday night or his personal award on Monday evening so that he could maximise his chances of recovering. Now he wants to show the selectors that he still has plenty of runs in him.

Ian Bell has made starts in all three ODIs so far in this series but is yet to go on and make a really big score. His scores of 41, 68 and 29 have shown that he is in decent touch but perhaps the most frustrating thing for Bell has been that in two of the three innings he has been run out. Perhaps Perth, where he played club cricket ten years ago, will be kinder to him.

Team news

Australia confirmed their XI on Thursday, with four changes from the side that won in Sydney. Clarke, Haddin and Warner will all miss after being rested, while Xavier Doherty will also be left out on a surface expected to offer more to the fast men. Bailey will return from injury and Johnson from a rest, while the other two inclusions are Steven Smith for his first ODI in more than a year and Matthew Wade, who is keen to prove that he still has plenty to offer at international level.

Australia 1 Aaron Finch, 2 Shaun Marsh, 3 George Bailey (capt), 4 Steven Smith, 5 Glenn Maxwell, 6 Matthew Wade (wk), 7 Daniel Christian, 8 James Faulkner, 9 Mitchell Johnson, 10 Nathan Coulter-Nile, 11 James Pattinson.

The promotion of Ben Stokes to No.3 in the Sydney match did not work out for England but Perth was the site of his maiden Test century during the Ashes, so they may be inclined to give him another chance. James Tredwell might struggle to hold his place given the expected pace in the WACA pitch, although Boyd Rankin is unavailable due to a hamstring problem, so Chris Woakes could come in if Tredwell is left out.

England (possible) 1 Alastair Cook (capt), 2 Ian Bell, 3 Ben Stokes, 4 Gary Ballance, 5 Eoin Morgan, 6 Ravi Bopara, 7 Jos Buttler (wk), 8 Tim Bresnan, 9 Stuart Broad, 10 Chris Jordan, 11 James Tredwell / Chris Woakes.

Pitch and conditions

The WACA should offer more pace and bounce than any of the venues so far in the series. The forecast for Perth is partly cloudy and 33C.

Stats and trivia

  • If England lose in Perth it will be their 10th straight loss in all formats combined, equalling their record losing streaks set in 1993 and 2001

  • Australia's last period at the top of the ICC one-day rankings ended in August 2012

  • Australia have used 21 captains in one-day internationals, including Ray Bright and David Hookes, and had Bailey been ruled out due to injury they might have added a 22nd


"It probably is their best chance. But having said that I think our side is still pretty good."
George Bailey believes his team is capable of extending England's losing streak

Brydon Coverdale is an assistant editor at ESPNcricinfo. He tweets here

Comments have now been closed for this article

  • David on January 24, 2014, 22:17 GMT

    @ testcricket_lover, @ Cantbat.Cantbowl.CantField, @ Shaggy076, @ Marcio all gave me stick for commenting how ironic it is that Aus got to #1 in ODIs because SA & NZ beat the team that Aus could not. Amidst much protesting from them, Shaggy reckoned the only thing that was sad was my post.

    So, fellers, after Aus' one day reign at the top, what do you say now. Do Aus still "really deserve" the #1 ranking after folding to the limp Poms? And talking of irony, they surrendered the top One Day Ranking after ..... one day ;) That is a LOT sadder than my post, right Shaggy. I mean ONE DAY!!! Pretty darn miserable in fact.

    @ Will90 - I'n not Indian. Try again, but I do agree, as you wrote, that "India should be below NZ in the rankings! :)"

    Australia - forever the One Day Champs! That record will be hard to beat.

  • David on January 24, 2014, 21:59 GMT

    @ Naman Gupta wrote "australia has done well and deserve the no 1 ranking."

    Yesterday. Today, no. Shortest #1 ranking in history?

  • David on January 24, 2014, 17:28 GMT

    @ Marcio asked "if Warner, Clarke and Johnson had played the whole series, do you think India would still have won in India?"

    Yes. After being whitewashed in the tests, what did you expect - a miracle?

  • Dummy4 on January 24, 2014, 5:29 GMT

    australia has done well and deserve the no 1 ranking. But clarke as captain looked a little flat this series - which is understandable considering the recent workload. Bailey looked good as captain in limited overs and probably should be stuck with as captain for ODI. I mean to use a half strength side touring against a full strength no 1 (then) and reduce the loss to 3-2 shows his captaincy credibility.

  • Will on January 24, 2014, 3:19 GMT

    @Greatest Game; it is well-known both sides are much stronger at home. The last time India played an ODI series in Australia (with Sri Lanka), Australia won 3 games to 1. So the aggregate between the teams is 5-4 to Australia. And of our last 11 games, 7 were played in India.

    Moreover, if Australia don't deserve to be ahead of India because you beat us in your own backyard, India should be below NZ in the rankings! :)

  • Nathan on January 24, 2014, 3:04 GMT

    @ Ballebaazzzzzzzzzzz

    Do you really want to open that can of worms? Australia is the most accomplished cricket nation ever.

    " I guess u have forgotten who broke the Test record winning streak of austrailia"

    I can't believe you're claiming this. I think that most will agree that 16 consecutive wins (twice) is more of an accomplishment then the team who prevented them from getting the 17th consecutive win.

    Win a test series in Australia and then we can begin to entertain India's dominance in the game. Until then continue to enjoy your home success.

  • Damien on January 24, 2014, 2:57 GMT

    @Ballebaazzzzzzzzzzz, who has broken the Test winning streak of Australia's? As far as Cricinfo is concerned Australia's record of 16 (twice) still stands. Not sure how India's two World Cups beats Australia's four. India have hosted the World Cup three times (compared to Australia's once) and only won at home at the third attempt. Again, not sure how India's two Champions Trophy wins (one shared) beats Australia's two. India have won one T20 World Cup compared to Australia's once being runner-up. Australians continue playing in the IPL after retiring from internationals cos they get paid lots and lots of money, not because it's in India, so all your ranting and raving actually counts for very little.

  • arsalan on January 24, 2014, 2:30 GMT

    @ballllebaaz let me ask u question which team has highest win% in tests nd odi,who have won wc 4 times,2 champions trophy,16 consecutive test wins twice,21 consecutive odi wins,most successful team in test nd odi cricket

  • Chirath on January 24, 2014, 2:24 GMT

    Can sumone explain to me why ENG are facing their 10th consecutive loss and not their 9th? 5-0 in the Ashes, 3-0 in current ODI series, that makes it 8-0. Is Brydon getting ahead of himself??

  • Marcio on January 24, 2014, 2:09 GMT

    So Greatest-Game, if Warner, Clarke and Johnson had played the whole series, do you think India would still have won in India? Personally, I doubt it.

  • No featured comments at the moment.