Kenya v Ireland, WCL Championship, Mombasa February 18, 2012

Bowlers, Mishra give Kenya comfortable win

ESPNcricinfo staff

Kenya 201 (Mishra 70*, Patel 42*) beat Ireland 200 (Stirling 46, Obuya 3-24)
Scorecard and ball-by-ball details

Regular strikes from Kenya's bowlers restricted Ireland to 200, and then Tanmay Mishra's unbeaten 70 off 76 balls ensured Kenya had little trouble chasing the below-par total of 200, in the first of two ODIs in Mombasa.

Ireland got off to a fast start after choosing to bat, thanks to the aggressive Paul Stirling, who struck six fours and a six in his 46 off 44 balls. Ireland had got to 74 for 1 in the 13th over when Stirling hit left-arm spinner Shem Ngoche straight into the hands of deep midwicket. Shem's brother James Ngoche, an offspinner, then bowled Ed Joyce for 3, and when Alex Cusack was caught at long-on off Shem's bowling Ireland were stuttering.

Gary Wilson and Kevin O'Brien began repairing the damage, but their 45-run partnership took 14.5 overs. Just when they might have wanted to kick on, Wilson was dismissed caught-and-bowled by Rakep Patel. O'Brien became the first of captain Collins Obuya's three victims, and, apart from John Mooney's quick 21, there were no significant contributions from the lower order. Ireland did not even manage to bat out the 50 overs, their innings ending in the 48th when George Dockrell was caught at mid-on off James Ngoche.

Kenya started slowly in the chase, but the required-rate never rose above five. Mishra and Obuya put on 58 for the third wicket to set a solid base, and then Rakep Patel stayed with Mishra till the end.

Mishra hit six fours, and collected runs well in his innings, while Patel struck a couple of big blows in his 42 not out off 53 balls. Kenya got home in the 43rd over with seven wickets in hand.

Comments have now been closed for this article

  • samedwards on February 19, 2012, 13:25 GMT

    @dulabari and @tatactg,even ban got thrashed by canada in 2003 World Cup....just 1 bad day doesn't make them a bad team...

  • Gizza on February 19, 2012, 7:43 GMT

    @dulabari and @tatactg, hasn't it occurred to you that perhaps the Kenyans have improved their game again? The posts criticising Bangladesh's Test status normally occur after an abolute belting by one of the top 8 sides (or Zimbabwe or Ireland). And when Ireland plays against the same team the games are much more competitive. Also look at the points table for the ICC WCL Championship http://www.espncricinfo.com/wcl-championship-2011-13/engine/current/series/518430.html?view=pointstable - Ireland are easily on top with a very healthy run rate. So you can say while they are no old Windies or Oz relatively speaking amongst the minnows, they will still probably win the WCL. If Bangladesh was playing this tournament I can see at least 6 teams (IRE, AFG, SCO, UAE, KEN, NED) really pushing them if not beating them. But Zimbabwe are better especially in limited overs batting and were only smashed in NZ because the Kiwis themselves are on the up and in the top 3 in-form teams in world cricket.

  • ARJO on February 19, 2012, 7:33 GMT

    Irish all-out below 99 and around a-120 in a first-class match against a depleted Kenyan side. it's now crystal clear that Irish need more times to get to Test arena. They are inconsistent now-a-days then 2/3 years back. Growth is not there surely, stagnent !!!

  • dulabari on February 19, 2012, 2:11 GMT

    If it was Bangladesh instead of Ireland, you could see hundreds of posts demanding to kick out Bangladesh from the cricket world.

  • tatactg on February 18, 2012, 19:17 GMT

    where are all those ireland fans who were so sure ire was soo much better than Zim/Bangladesh?

  • samedwards on February 19, 2012, 13:25 GMT

    @dulabari and @tatactg,even ban got thrashed by canada in 2003 World Cup....just 1 bad day doesn't make them a bad team...

  • Gizza on February 19, 2012, 7:43 GMT

    @dulabari and @tatactg, hasn't it occurred to you that perhaps the Kenyans have improved their game again? The posts criticising Bangladesh's Test status normally occur after an abolute belting by one of the top 8 sides (or Zimbabwe or Ireland). And when Ireland plays against the same team the games are much more competitive. Also look at the points table for the ICC WCL Championship http://www.espncricinfo.com/wcl-championship-2011-13/engine/current/series/518430.html?view=pointstable - Ireland are easily on top with a very healthy run rate. So you can say while they are no old Windies or Oz relatively speaking amongst the minnows, they will still probably win the WCL. If Bangladesh was playing this tournament I can see at least 6 teams (IRE, AFG, SCO, UAE, KEN, NED) really pushing them if not beating them. But Zimbabwe are better especially in limited overs batting and were only smashed in NZ because the Kiwis themselves are on the up and in the top 3 in-form teams in world cricket.

  • ARJO on February 19, 2012, 7:33 GMT

    Irish all-out below 99 and around a-120 in a first-class match against a depleted Kenyan side. it's now crystal clear that Irish need more times to get to Test arena. They are inconsistent now-a-days then 2/3 years back. Growth is not there surely, stagnent !!!

  • dulabari on February 19, 2012, 2:11 GMT

    If it was Bangladesh instead of Ireland, you could see hundreds of posts demanding to kick out Bangladesh from the cricket world.

  • tatactg on February 18, 2012, 19:17 GMT

    where are all those ireland fans who were so sure ire was soo much better than Zim/Bangladesh?

  • No featured comments at the moment.

  • tatactg on February 18, 2012, 19:17 GMT

    where are all those ireland fans who were so sure ire was soo much better than Zim/Bangladesh?

  • dulabari on February 19, 2012, 2:11 GMT

    If it was Bangladesh instead of Ireland, you could see hundreds of posts demanding to kick out Bangladesh from the cricket world.

  • ARJO on February 19, 2012, 7:33 GMT

    Irish all-out below 99 and around a-120 in a first-class match against a depleted Kenyan side. it's now crystal clear that Irish need more times to get to Test arena. They are inconsistent now-a-days then 2/3 years back. Growth is not there surely, stagnent !!!

  • Gizza on February 19, 2012, 7:43 GMT

    @dulabari and @tatactg, hasn't it occurred to you that perhaps the Kenyans have improved their game again? The posts criticising Bangladesh's Test status normally occur after an abolute belting by one of the top 8 sides (or Zimbabwe or Ireland). And when Ireland plays against the same team the games are much more competitive. Also look at the points table for the ICC WCL Championship http://www.espncricinfo.com/wcl-championship-2011-13/engine/current/series/518430.html?view=pointstable - Ireland are easily on top with a very healthy run rate. So you can say while they are no old Windies or Oz relatively speaking amongst the minnows, they will still probably win the WCL. If Bangladesh was playing this tournament I can see at least 6 teams (IRE, AFG, SCO, UAE, KEN, NED) really pushing them if not beating them. But Zimbabwe are better especially in limited overs batting and were only smashed in NZ because the Kiwis themselves are on the up and in the top 3 in-form teams in world cricket.

  • samedwards on February 19, 2012, 13:25 GMT

    @dulabari and @tatactg,even ban got thrashed by canada in 2003 World Cup....just 1 bad day doesn't make them a bad team...