West Indies v Australia, 3rd Test, Roseau April 23, 2012

West Indies target Michael Hussey's wicket

19

West Indies captain Darren Sammy has pointed to Michael Hussey's wicket as the most critical for the hosts as they attempt to secure a share of the Test series with Australia in Dominica to match the ledgers of this tour's ODI and Twenty20 encounters.

In a low-scoring series so far defined by the difficulty of scoring rapid runs on slow surfaces, Hussey's contribution at No. 6 carries far more resonance than the mere numbers, a hard-won 177 runs at 44.25. Sammy said that while he was happy with how his bowlers - Kemar Roach especially - had fulfilled the plans drawn up by the coach Ottis Gibson to restrict Australia's top order, Hussey's recurring rearguards had to be stopped if the West Indies are to win at Windsor Park.

"Hussey has always come in and played a crucial role, and that is one area we are looking to put a stop to," Sammy said. "Once we get them five down, he seems to bat well with the lower order, so we'll be looking to get him out as quickly as possible.

"We've executed our plans to the top order really well and I know they're wary of Roach. The first time he played against them they were and now he's even bowling better. Fidel [Edwards] bowled well without any luck [in Trinidad] and I come in and do my role, [Shane] Shillingford had a good Test, so as a bowling unit I'm quite happy with the way we've gone in this series."

Edwards remains a doubtful starter due to a sore back, Sammy and the selectors conscious of the fact that the end of this series is swiftly followed by the tour of England, while Edwards has been ever present in the West Indian Test bowling attack over the past 12 months.

"We're still monitoring him, Fidel is still optimistic that he's going to play," Sammy said. "We'll monitor it, speak to the physio and Fidel and by tomorrow morning we should have a definite on his situation.

"The selectors will take into consideration that we've got to keep our bowlers fresh, especially Fidel, who had a long two-year break from the game and since he's been back we've been playing a lot of cricket. So we take that into consideration, we have Ravi Rampaul waiting in the wings who was really good for us last year, and I know he's itching to get another opportunity."

Windsor Park's pitch has a little more grass coverage than the bare strips witnessed in Barbados and Trinidad, while batsmen on both sides were impressed on match eve by the pace, bounce and trueness of one of the other centre wickets used for training. Sammy said the surface would provide more encouragement to both batsmen and bowlers than either of the previous two pitches.

"It has a little more grass, the ball will do something early," Sammy said. "I played a four-day game against Guyana here and on the third day it was really good for batting. I expect it to be a good wicket, bowlers and batsmen will be happy. Both teams are looking to win so it should be a very exciting game on a good cricket pitch."

Sammy's desire to build a more robust culture around his team has made great strides, and the incentive offered by a drawn series is significant, not having been achieved by the West Indies against Australia since an endlessly watchable encounter in 1999. It would also match the efforts of the ODI and T20 teams, and send the team to England with ever more optimism.

"It would mean everything to us," Sammy said of securing a 1-1 result. "When Australia came here everybody didn't give us a chance, but we've played a brand of cricket that we want to get used to. That said we've still got to get the victories and that's what we're looking for. To level a series against Australia would be another stepping stone for us.

"It's a culture we're trying to build in the team, the belief we can win against higher-ranked opposition. It's slowly creeping in. In all three series we've displayed that type of attitude. Change sometimes it is difficult to accept and now the players are making a conscious effort to think more about their cricket and what it means to the Caribbean people, and we're looking to display that sort of attitude."

The West Indies players will be reminded strongly of what their performances mean, by what are expected to be packed crowds at the ground, despite the match being played across the working week.

Edited by Kanishkaa Balachandran

Daniel Brettig is an assistant editor at ESPNcricinfo. He tweets here

Comments have now been closed for this article

  • Meety on April 24, 2012, 20:24 GMT

    Well they did get him out for 120....

  • on April 23, 2012, 13:44 GMT

    @VivGilchrist- Pitches are terrible??? WI scored 449 for 9 and declared against the mighty Australians on a terrible pitch? WI must have superlative batting stars.

  • landl47 on April 23, 2012, 12:35 GMT

    Perhaps someone would explain how a batsman is 'targeted'. Everyone round the bat? I'll bet right now that won't happen against Hussey. The bowlers trying harder to get him out than they try against other batsmen? If so, they should be dropped because they aren't trying hard enough. It's basically just a meaningless phrase for 'we'd like to get Hussey out', as though somehow saying 'targeted' will make that happen. What the WI need is a plan against the lower order, as failing to get them out cost them the first test. I suggest they focus on that and forget trying to 'target' a batsman who averages over 50 in tests.

  • Batmanian on April 23, 2012, 12:34 GMT

    RandyOz - we can be reasonably relieved we've seen the last of Phil Hughes. Khawaja may get another go when Hussey and Ponting clear out, but there's plenty of other ambiguous talent worth a look. Personally, I'd be considering David Hussey as the back up if there's an injury in the near future. Especially with RSA coming up - Hughes has done it before, and for all we know Khawaja could, but there are about five rolls of the dice before we the selectors go that way again...

  • Green_and_Gold on April 23, 2012, 12:27 GMT

    @RandyOz - on Cowan - i think in one test he was part of 2 consecutive 50 run partnerships, i think that is something. Dont get me wrong though cause i know he needs more runs - it just that he seems to be coping a lot of flack. i also think people forget that he is an opener and facing the new ball when its moving around the most.

  • baseball_sucks on April 23, 2012, 12:16 GMT

    So Sammy says the WI will "be looking to get [Hussey] out as quickly as possible." Wow. That's tactical genius right there people. What was the strategy before? Let him bat for as long as he wants...?

  • on April 23, 2012, 11:44 GMT

    The pitches haven't been terrible!! They have been below par and there's no excuse for the top orders failing especially that of the Aussie team. Excuse the schoolboys of the WI team but not those of the Aussie team. The thing about Hussey batting higher up in the order is the ball would be newer and he is more likely to lose his wicket much more cheaply and there's no one to come in and put runs on the board after that. I reckon it's a gamble but let's see what happens.

  • rotma11 on April 23, 2012, 11:13 GMT

    Reading Sammy's comments I cant help but wonder what would've happened to Aus first innings if he had taken a simple catch to remove Hussey from a bowler (F. Edwards) who had consistently beat the bat without much luck. Sammy continually makes the correct statements, but the reality is that " I come in and do my role" that Sammy speaks of it far from the truth. He bowled 16 overs in the first and 8 in the second innings. That's 1 more than F. Edwards bowled the entire first innings (23). We have to be real as fans when we talk about team building. Attitude plays a big part and so do personal performances. In the end winning is everything. We don't win nearly that often to justify the constant rhetoric.

  • Aussasinator on April 23, 2012, 10:17 GMT

    Yes Hussey is the mainstay of the batting ans he has to be targeted. but not on a standalone basis but alongwith Clarke and Warner, the other two who can take the game away.

  • Meety on April 23, 2012, 10:15 GMT

    @zdrgn - I think Huss is too old to open.

  • Meety on April 24, 2012, 20:24 GMT

    Well they did get him out for 120....

  • on April 23, 2012, 13:44 GMT

    @VivGilchrist- Pitches are terrible??? WI scored 449 for 9 and declared against the mighty Australians on a terrible pitch? WI must have superlative batting stars.

  • landl47 on April 23, 2012, 12:35 GMT

    Perhaps someone would explain how a batsman is 'targeted'. Everyone round the bat? I'll bet right now that won't happen against Hussey. The bowlers trying harder to get him out than they try against other batsmen? If so, they should be dropped because they aren't trying hard enough. It's basically just a meaningless phrase for 'we'd like to get Hussey out', as though somehow saying 'targeted' will make that happen. What the WI need is a plan against the lower order, as failing to get them out cost them the first test. I suggest they focus on that and forget trying to 'target' a batsman who averages over 50 in tests.

  • Batmanian on April 23, 2012, 12:34 GMT

    RandyOz - we can be reasonably relieved we've seen the last of Phil Hughes. Khawaja may get another go when Hussey and Ponting clear out, but there's plenty of other ambiguous talent worth a look. Personally, I'd be considering David Hussey as the back up if there's an injury in the near future. Especially with RSA coming up - Hughes has done it before, and for all we know Khawaja could, but there are about five rolls of the dice before we the selectors go that way again...

  • Green_and_Gold on April 23, 2012, 12:27 GMT

    @RandyOz - on Cowan - i think in one test he was part of 2 consecutive 50 run partnerships, i think that is something. Dont get me wrong though cause i know he needs more runs - it just that he seems to be coping a lot of flack. i also think people forget that he is an opener and facing the new ball when its moving around the most.

  • baseball_sucks on April 23, 2012, 12:16 GMT

    So Sammy says the WI will "be looking to get [Hussey] out as quickly as possible." Wow. That's tactical genius right there people. What was the strategy before? Let him bat for as long as he wants...?

  • on April 23, 2012, 11:44 GMT

    The pitches haven't been terrible!! They have been below par and there's no excuse for the top orders failing especially that of the Aussie team. Excuse the schoolboys of the WI team but not those of the Aussie team. The thing about Hussey batting higher up in the order is the ball would be newer and he is more likely to lose his wicket much more cheaply and there's no one to come in and put runs on the board after that. I reckon it's a gamble but let's see what happens.

  • rotma11 on April 23, 2012, 11:13 GMT

    Reading Sammy's comments I cant help but wonder what would've happened to Aus first innings if he had taken a simple catch to remove Hussey from a bowler (F. Edwards) who had consistently beat the bat without much luck. Sammy continually makes the correct statements, but the reality is that " I come in and do my role" that Sammy speaks of it far from the truth. He bowled 16 overs in the first and 8 in the second innings. That's 1 more than F. Edwards bowled the entire first innings (23). We have to be real as fans when we talk about team building. Attitude plays a big part and so do personal performances. In the end winning is everything. We don't win nearly that often to justify the constant rhetoric.

  • Aussasinator on April 23, 2012, 10:17 GMT

    Yes Hussey is the mainstay of the batting ans he has to be targeted. but not on a standalone basis but alongwith Clarke and Warner, the other two who can take the game away.

  • Meety on April 23, 2012, 10:15 GMT

    @zdrgn - I think Huss is too old to open.

  • RandyOZ on April 23, 2012, 9:22 GMT

    Although it is obvious they would target Hussey, as you would put him up there as one of the 3 best Aussie batsmen since the Don, the real worry for me at the moment is Cowan. He hasn't done anything and this is his last test to produce. Ussie and Phil Hughes are hot on his heels, and are far younger than Cowan.

  • everfaithful77 on April 23, 2012, 7:07 GMT

    SAMMY should avoid statements like targeting a particular batsman as this could increase the RESOLVE of not only that batsman but all the others making it harder to get them out. I think he should stick to more generalized respectful comments about opposing teams and individual players. That aside he has definitely MATURED as a leader on and off the field of play and that's very heartening for Windies fans. He has played his part well in all areas of the game but I would like to see him back himself up as a batsman to score a CENTURY. However to achieve that he must bat higher up the order more regularly ideally at no.6 or 7. I liked what he did in the last test coming in at no. 3 to give the inns some impetus. Also RAMPAUL should replace Edwards who has been below his best in this series. The selectors may consider replacing Barath who hasn't put together a significant score with Fuddadin at no. 3. If Windies play to their true ABILITY and SELF-BELIEF they can triumph in this test.

  • zdrgn on April 23, 2012, 6:50 GMT

    i think hussey should be promoted as a opener as he has opened batting in county circuit. watson can be used more effectively down the order.ponting can come to bat in his favourite number 3 position.

  • dunger.bob on April 23, 2012, 6:36 GMT

    Firstly I'd like to pat the West Indies players on the back. I reckon they are starting to get some momentum going and putting some good sessions together back to back. Otis is right to be optimistic and teams who go into a series underestimating them could get their noses whacked. .. I don't think we Aussies did that btw .. I have faith that the current regime in Oz won't fall that schoolboy trap .. they are treating EVERY series with the utmost respect. .. it's just that the WI's are playing some good cricket too and it's bloody nice to see ! .. .. moving on to the 3rd Test, it sounds to me as though this pitch might be a better for the seamers .. so I'm looking forward to seeing how Starc goes .. pity Mr. Snuffleuffugous is still unavailable ... this Test could throw up some new scenarios because the pitch sounds a fair bit different to what we've been treated to so far ..

  • VivGilchrist on April 23, 2012, 6:12 GMT

    All this talk about openers failing but I think if you look at it, scoring has been very hard to do on these terrible pitches.

  • Meety on April 23, 2012, 5:18 GMT

    @Mervo - a couple of things, 1) I would say it's far too early in Warner's career to start changing his batting position, particularly as his pre-Windies form reaped an ave of 50+, he is 6th on the run scorers list of both teams where really only Chanderpaul has excelled, 2) If Warner's technique v spin is as bad as you say (admit there is evidence to suggest so as Warner's 2 test 100s came against sides without a frontline spinner), how would batting at #6 help him as he is more likely to face spin then pace that far down the order?????

  • Mervo on April 23, 2012, 4:51 GMT

    I agree - Australia's 'top' order is a misnomer. We need some openers who can actually open ... Warner is not well placed there with his poor technique and against spin he is an easy target. Maybe a lower order position for him at number 6 and move Hussey up. Really however, there must be real openers in Australia. Chris Rogers and Quinney are worth trying to see if they can make the transition to the next level. Ed Cowan seems to have frozen in the headlights and Warner was never a test opener.

  • disco_bob on April 23, 2012, 3:55 GMT

    It might be too late by the time Huss comes in to bat. Probably better to start targeting a bit higher up the order than no. 6

  • Gangitano on April 23, 2012, 3:50 GMT

    Good luck with that one boys.........

  • No featured comments at the moment.

  • Gangitano on April 23, 2012, 3:50 GMT

    Good luck with that one boys.........

  • disco_bob on April 23, 2012, 3:55 GMT

    It might be too late by the time Huss comes in to bat. Probably better to start targeting a bit higher up the order than no. 6

  • Mervo on April 23, 2012, 4:51 GMT

    I agree - Australia's 'top' order is a misnomer. We need some openers who can actually open ... Warner is not well placed there with his poor technique and against spin he is an easy target. Maybe a lower order position for him at number 6 and move Hussey up. Really however, there must be real openers in Australia. Chris Rogers and Quinney are worth trying to see if they can make the transition to the next level. Ed Cowan seems to have frozen in the headlights and Warner was never a test opener.

  • Meety on April 23, 2012, 5:18 GMT

    @Mervo - a couple of things, 1) I would say it's far too early in Warner's career to start changing his batting position, particularly as his pre-Windies form reaped an ave of 50+, he is 6th on the run scorers list of both teams where really only Chanderpaul has excelled, 2) If Warner's technique v spin is as bad as you say (admit there is evidence to suggest so as Warner's 2 test 100s came against sides without a frontline spinner), how would batting at #6 help him as he is more likely to face spin then pace that far down the order?????

  • VivGilchrist on April 23, 2012, 6:12 GMT

    All this talk about openers failing but I think if you look at it, scoring has been very hard to do on these terrible pitches.

  • dunger.bob on April 23, 2012, 6:36 GMT

    Firstly I'd like to pat the West Indies players on the back. I reckon they are starting to get some momentum going and putting some good sessions together back to back. Otis is right to be optimistic and teams who go into a series underestimating them could get their noses whacked. .. I don't think we Aussies did that btw .. I have faith that the current regime in Oz won't fall that schoolboy trap .. they are treating EVERY series with the utmost respect. .. it's just that the WI's are playing some good cricket too and it's bloody nice to see ! .. .. moving on to the 3rd Test, it sounds to me as though this pitch might be a better for the seamers .. so I'm looking forward to seeing how Starc goes .. pity Mr. Snuffleuffugous is still unavailable ... this Test could throw up some new scenarios because the pitch sounds a fair bit different to what we've been treated to so far ..

  • zdrgn on April 23, 2012, 6:50 GMT

    i think hussey should be promoted as a opener as he has opened batting in county circuit. watson can be used more effectively down the order.ponting can come to bat in his favourite number 3 position.

  • everfaithful77 on April 23, 2012, 7:07 GMT

    SAMMY should avoid statements like targeting a particular batsman as this could increase the RESOLVE of not only that batsman but all the others making it harder to get them out. I think he should stick to more generalized respectful comments about opposing teams and individual players. That aside he has definitely MATURED as a leader on and off the field of play and that's very heartening for Windies fans. He has played his part well in all areas of the game but I would like to see him back himself up as a batsman to score a CENTURY. However to achieve that he must bat higher up the order more regularly ideally at no.6 or 7. I liked what he did in the last test coming in at no. 3 to give the inns some impetus. Also RAMPAUL should replace Edwards who has been below his best in this series. The selectors may consider replacing Barath who hasn't put together a significant score with Fuddadin at no. 3. If Windies play to their true ABILITY and SELF-BELIEF they can triumph in this test.

  • RandyOZ on April 23, 2012, 9:22 GMT

    Although it is obvious they would target Hussey, as you would put him up there as one of the 3 best Aussie batsmen since the Don, the real worry for me at the moment is Cowan. He hasn't done anything and this is his last test to produce. Ussie and Phil Hughes are hot on his heels, and are far younger than Cowan.

  • Meety on April 23, 2012, 10:15 GMT

    @zdrgn - I think Huss is too old to open.