West Indies v New Zealand, 2nd Test, Jamaica, 1st day

New Zealand's batsmen do too little

New Zealand's batsmen failed to convert starts into substantial scores in Jamaica, they failed to do it in Antigua too

Subash Jayaraman at Sabina Park

August 3, 2012

Comments: 2 | Text size: A | A

Ross Taylor celebrates his fifty as Martin Guptill looks on, West Indies v New Zealand, 2nd Test, Jamaica, 1st day, August 2, 2012
Martin Guptill and Ross Taylor scored fifties once again but failed to convert them into centuries © DigicelCricket.com/Brooks LaTouche Photography
Enlarge

It is a sin for Test batsmen to get in, make 40 or 50, and then get out, especially on pitches that do not aid bowlers much. New Zealand committed this sin once again on the first day at Sabina Park to be dismissed for a middling total. They will find that Test matches cannot be won regularly without hundreds on their score sheet.

Coming in to the second Test, Ross Taylor and his team were of the belief that they were not too far away from where they wanted to be in terms of consistent batting performances at the top of the order. A total of 260, which included several contributions from tailenders, in an innings that ended in 82.5 overs indicated they were wrong.

New Zealand's batsmen have scored only nine centuries in 14 Tests over the last two years. Three of those centuries were against Zimbabwe. They have 34 half-centuries in that period, so the conversion rate is poor. This latest failing in Kingston is not a one-off but another example of the consistent underperformance of New Zealand's top order.

The scarcity of hundreds could be due to a number of reasons: a lack of discipline, the inability to concentrate for long periods, or poor preparation for the tour. In the West Indies, only Martin Guptill has batted consistently for New Zealand, scoring 235 runs in three innings. He came closest to a hundred, before he inexplicably lost his composure on 97 in Antigua.

Before this tour, Guptill had spent time playing county cricket for Derbyshire, and said he found the experience "massively helpful". It shows. The last time any of the others played long-form cricket was the home series against South Africa in March. Guptill does not think his team-mates not preparing in similar fashion is affecting their performances because, "the guys have played a lot of cricket and know what they need to do to prepare for a tour."

None of the New Zealand batsman, however, were able switch seamlessly between formats like Chris Gayle did. And despite Gayle scoring a century after an 18-month absence from Test cricket, he too said he found it challenging.

In the absence of the injured Daniel Vettori, Brendon McCullum and the captain Ross Taylor were the two most experienced players in a young team. McCullum received a tough delivery from Tino Best, which he edged behind before he had scored. Taylor scored 60 but he needed to do more and show the way forward for the rest of the batting line-up. He played one attacking shot too many during a battle with Best and lost.

Kane Williamson's rearguard that saved the Wellington Test against South Africa now seems rather long ago. Playing his 13th Test, Williamson was let of by the part-time spinner Narsingh Deonarine - a sharp caught-and-bowled chance on the stroke of tea.

Soon after play resumed, though, Williamson chased a wide one from the same bowler and edged to first slip. His dismissal betrayed a lack of awareness of the situation New Zealand were in at 161 for 3. The Dean Brownlie who made hard-fought fifties against Australia in December 2011, in conditions more challenging than these in the Caribbean, poked tamely and was caught behind.

Shortly after Brownlie's dismissal, Guptill seemed to be cramping up and did some stretches a ball before responding to Kruger van Wyk's call for a sharp single. Given the situation New Zealand were in, he should have just said no, but didn't and was run out. He offered no excuses for that mishap and said he just didn't get off the blocks fast enough.

The odd half-century helps individual averages but, to pull weight as a team, New Zealand's batsmen have to push themselves harder and score big hundreds. Much harder than they have done in the West Indies. The solitary fighting century stand, like the one between Taylor and Guptill today, simply won't cut it.

Subash Jayaraman is a freelancer, blogger and podcaster based in Pennsylvania. He tweets here.

© ESPN Sports Media Ltd.

Posted by creekeetman on (August 3, 2012, 17:08 GMT)

@ abyrao.... spot on......................

Posted by abyrao on (August 3, 2012, 12:40 GMT)

McCullum at 3 is the first joke. He is a no 7 wicketkeeper, one odd inngs in 10 inngs doesnt make you a frontline bat, Brownlie has flopped, Kane Williamson averages 32 and they hype him as one of the worlds best talent. NZ in the last 3-4 years were always relying on the lower order with the likes of Vettori to bat. They should get in Ryder, Jamie How, force McCullum to keep as Van Wyk is the funniest thing they could experiment with.

Comments have now been closed for this article

TopTop
Email Feedback Print
Share
E-mail
Feedback
Print
Tour Results
West Indies v New Zealand at Kingston - Aug 2-5, 2012
West Indies won by 5 wickets
West Indies v New Zealand at North Sound - Jul 25-29, 2012
West Indies won by 9 wickets
WICB Pres XI v N Zealanders at North Sound - Jul 20-22, 2012
Match drawn
West Indies v New Zealand at Basseterre - Jul 16, 2012
West Indies won by 20 runs
West Indies v New Zealand at Basseterre - Jul 14, 2012
West Indies won by 24 runs
More results »
News | Features Last 3 days
News | Features Last 3 days