England Women v India Women, 1st Twenty20 June 26, 2012

Sarah Taylor sparkles in 33-run win

ESPNcricinfo staff

England Women 137 for 5 (Taylor 69, Marsh 41, Sultana 2-12) beat India Women 107 for 8 (Wyatt 2-10, Brunt 2-21) by 33 runs
Scorecard

England Women began their home series against India Women with a clinical performance with both bat and ball, not allowing the visitors into the contest after a minor blip early on in the first Twenty20 international. Sarah Taylor was the star with the bat in Canterbury, scoring a brisk half-century to set up a strong total, after which Katherine Brunt and Danielle Wyatt led an all-round bowling effort.

The only time England Women were on the back foot was when they lost their captain Charlotte Edwards early after getting sent in to bat. She was lbw to N Niranjana, leaving England 1 for 1 in 1.1 overs. The recover began immediately, though, with Laura Marsh and Taylor adding 105 runs for the second wicket.

Marsh scored 41 off 39 balls and Taylor 69 off 49 deliveries, with ten fours. By the time they were separated in the 15th over, England were scoring at more than a run a ball. Gouher Sultana dismissed both batsmen in successive overs, which meant England were deprived of momentum towards the end and reached 137 for 5, when they could have got a little more.

India's chase began poorly when Brunt dismissed both openers in successive overs to reduce the visitors to 20 for 2 in five overs. Mithali Raj and Harmanpreet Kaur had begun a useful partnership, adding 30 before two more wickets fell in the space of four runs to leave India 54 for 4 in 13th over. There was no coming back from there. India were restricted to 107 for 8 and Wyatt picked up two wickets in the final over to finish with economical figures of 4-1-10-2.

Comments have now been closed for this article

  • on June 27, 2012, 9:43 GMT

    Hi another excellent win & Sarah Taylor really looks a class player both batting & fielding. I think your photo is wrongly captioned - isn't that Sarah Taylor, not Laura Marsh?

  • gunnerr4life on June 26, 2012, 20:50 GMT

    I was really surprised with the fielding effort made by Greenway . She caught two outstanding catches as well ... Wyatt bowled beautifully too !

  • EnglishCricket on June 26, 2012, 20:19 GMT

    hmm.....I wonder how quickly Fast Women Bowlers bowl their deliveries?

  • JG2704 on June 26, 2012, 18:17 GMT

    Women's cricket can be quite captivating. Obviously there aren't any 85m+ sixes or anything. The other thing I noticed was that the running between the wickets doesn't look as good. I know they are not going to be as quick over the ground but by the same token the fielders aren't as quick/throwing arms as strong etc. Sarah Taylor really did impress me. Her shots would not have looked out of place in the men's game. She basically looked head and shoulders above everyone else. She also wears no pads as a wicket keeper and technically looks good in that dept too.

  • on June 27, 2012, 9:43 GMT

    Hi another excellent win & Sarah Taylor really looks a class player both batting & fielding. I think your photo is wrongly captioned - isn't that Sarah Taylor, not Laura Marsh?

  • gunnerr4life on June 26, 2012, 20:50 GMT

    I was really surprised with the fielding effort made by Greenway . She caught two outstanding catches as well ... Wyatt bowled beautifully too !

  • EnglishCricket on June 26, 2012, 20:19 GMT

    hmm.....I wonder how quickly Fast Women Bowlers bowl their deliveries?

  • JG2704 on June 26, 2012, 18:17 GMT

    Women's cricket can be quite captivating. Obviously there aren't any 85m+ sixes or anything. The other thing I noticed was that the running between the wickets doesn't look as good. I know they are not going to be as quick over the ground but by the same token the fielders aren't as quick/throwing arms as strong etc. Sarah Taylor really did impress me. Her shots would not have looked out of place in the men's game. She basically looked head and shoulders above everyone else. She also wears no pads as a wicket keeper and technically looks good in that dept too.

  • No featured comments at the moment.

  • JG2704 on June 26, 2012, 18:17 GMT

    Women's cricket can be quite captivating. Obviously there aren't any 85m+ sixes or anything. The other thing I noticed was that the running between the wickets doesn't look as good. I know they are not going to be as quick over the ground but by the same token the fielders aren't as quick/throwing arms as strong etc. Sarah Taylor really did impress me. Her shots would not have looked out of place in the men's game. She basically looked head and shoulders above everyone else. She also wears no pads as a wicket keeper and technically looks good in that dept too.

  • EnglishCricket on June 26, 2012, 20:19 GMT

    hmm.....I wonder how quickly Fast Women Bowlers bowl their deliveries?

  • gunnerr4life on June 26, 2012, 20:50 GMT

    I was really surprised with the fielding effort made by Greenway . She caught two outstanding catches as well ... Wyatt bowled beautifully too !

  • on June 27, 2012, 9:43 GMT

    Hi another excellent win & Sarah Taylor really looks a class player both batting & fielding. I think your photo is wrongly captioned - isn't that Sarah Taylor, not Laura Marsh?