Australia v WI, World T20, Group 2, Mirpur

Australia fail to walk the talk

Abhishek Purohit

March 28, 2014

Comments: 64 | Text size: A | A
Croft: Faulkner woke a sleeping giant

This is not the first Australian team to put down a few catches. Nor is it the first one to struggle against spin. Australian teams, however, do not usually lose a Twenty20 when they need 66 from 51 with eight wickets in hand. Having done that, they then don't end up losing a close game where they have had a go at the opposition with typical pre-match banter. That too in a world tournament.

Against both Pakistan and West Indies, Australia were arguably in winning positions, more so against the former. When it came to the decisive stages of both matches, however, their personnel let them down. Against Pakistan, it was the batsmen who choked, collapsing from a strong position. Against West Indies, it was the bowlers who lost their lines and lengths under pressure from Darren Sammy and Dwayne Bravo. With 42 needed off the final three overs, and 31 off the last two, there would have had to be equal, if not more, pressure on the batting side specially in a must-win situation for both teams. The way Mitchell Starc crumbled in the penultimate over certainly did not exert any pressure on the West Indies pair.

George Bailey, however, did not think their bowling tonight was the major cause for pushing Australia to the brink of an exit from the tournament. The Australia captain said that the side had not cut it in all three disciplines.


James Faulkner reacts after Darren Sammy finishes the match with a six, Australia v West Indies, World T20, Group 2, Mirpur, March 28, 2014
The manner of the loss and West Indies' celebrations after the match would have hurt Australia more than the defeat against Pakistan © Getty Images
Enlarge

"Your mind tends to track back to the most recent thing, the bowling. But once again I don't think we batted particularly well," Bailey said. "All of the top six probably played pretty ordinary shots or shots at inappropriate times, so I think [the fact] that we scraped to 178 was pleasing given that we didn't bat particularly well.

"And again we probably let ourselves down in the field with some chances and that comes back to bite harder in T20 than in any other format; the repercussions are so immediate. I am sure there are things we would like to do differently in bowling and the guys would like to have their overs again and do something different. But you cannot lay the blame just on the bowlers. All three disciplines were not up to the standards that we set."

Bailey did not think there were any issues with the balance of the team combination, and said it wasn't that Australia had suffered heavy defeats.

"We have lost two games, but it's not like we have been knocked over for 120 in each game," he said. "We haven't batted very well, and we have scored a 180 and whatever we scored the other night. It's not a glaring weakness. It's the same with bowling and I'd say the same about our fielding. We have just lost two close games in a tournament where you cannot afford to do that."

You can say that as much as it was about Australia succumbing at the climax, it was also about Pakistan and West Indies doing the exact opposite. They thrived at the death and outplayed Australia. That is what is glaring about these two losses. Australia knew they could not afford to go down, they had their chances, but they failed to take them. The West Indies loss will hurt them more, for what James Faulkner said before the game, and for how West Indies responded to it - by winning a sharp contest and with their in-your-face celebrations targeted at the Australians.

"Talk is cheap," Sammy said. "Cricket is a game of action, you can talk all you want, but it is the action that matters. West Indies acted today."

The Australians talk a lot, of course, but it is only rarely that they fail to walk it. Bailey and his men will be smarting, but unfortunately for them, their chances of hitting back in this tournament are all but over.

Abhishek Purohit is a sub-editor at ESPNcricinfo

RSS Feeds: Abhishek Purohit

© ESPN Sports Media Ltd.

Posted by   on (March 29, 2014, 12:13 GMT)

I would love the Aussies to not win the WC next year in their backyard, and also the WT20 when it's held Down Under; Faulkner made sure that their players remained the least liked of all teams in this cup...

Posted by   on (March 29, 2014, 11:40 GMT)

I'll tell you one thing. The Australian pace battery clearly lacks the zip and that has made all the difference. I'm sure if Johnson , Harris and Siddle were in the team, they would have defended 41 of 3 overs to say the least :)

Posted by disco_bob on (March 29, 2014, 10:27 GMT)

@Greatest_Game, let me clarify. The T20 championship itself is good to win simply because it's a world cup. However because T20 is such a useless format that only a cricket novice would consider to be actual cricket, that coming second is not any honour or achievement at all. So after losing the first match it's best to lose the rest as fast as possible to get out of this carnival that celebrates the decline of proper Test cricket. As I said on another thread, do you think SA would turn down a chance to win this T20 world cup if it meant drawing the final Test at Cape Town. Absolutely, because Test cricket matters.

Posted by sachin_equal_to_bradman on (March 29, 2014, 8:24 GMT)

Thanks MZM149!!! I was trying to know which country you are!!! And finally its our neighbours pakistan!!! Then no more bashings for you since in this WcT-20 we 2 countries have been fortunately so smooth in comments!!! Let that stay that way and wish an india pakistan final jus to bring the whole world to stand-still and as usual hope that india clinch it with a nail biter :P

Posted by   on (March 29, 2014, 8:04 GMT)

Looks like the entire cricket world unites when the aussies get humiliated. @mzm here is a stat. Without mitch in ur bowling and warner out of form this aussie team will be exposed in every condition. Secondly you don't have a quality spinner in any form of the game. Quite frankly if u guys think by "not liking" a particular side u wl b world champions..u wl b humilated by superior teams in every match! Trust me IN don't know if India can defend their crown n 2015..but I am pretty sure the aussies won't win the cup either. Outclassed and kicked out aussies! That's something all of us will enjoy watching any day! Cheers..

Posted by realfan on (March 29, 2014, 7:57 GMT)

@mzm149 : how does it feel when i say pak got lucky in 2009 WT20 matches and they got lucky in finals because dilshan suddenly lost form????

Posted by mzm149 on (March 29, 2014, 7:45 GMT)

@sachin_equal_to_bradman: Well we won in 2009.

Posted by Adoh on (March 29, 2014, 7:40 GMT)

Yep, Australia definately lack raw talent. That's why the IPL pay them so highly relative to WI payers.

Posted by   on (March 29, 2014, 7:32 GMT)

con gratulations windies your great to watch , you dont sledge ,like the aussies do ,you let the bat do the talking , well done keep up the good work .

Posted by sachin_equal_to_bradman on (March 29, 2014, 7:32 GMT)

@mzm149: Try to win a World T-20 and then comment about india....All these T-20 Editions you were just making the numbers and partying all countries and being a tourist is not an acheivement buddy.... Am not against aussies but am against indian Bashers.....

Comments have now been closed for this article

TopTop
Email Feedback Print
Share
E-mail
Feedback
Print
Abhishek PurohitClose
Tournament Results
India v Sri Lanka at Dhaka - Apr 6, 2014
Sri Lanka won by 6 wickets (with 13 balls remaining)
India v South Africa at Dhaka - Apr 4, 2014
India won by 6 wickets (with 5 balls remaining)
Sri Lanka v West Indies at Dhaka - Apr 3, 2014
Sri Lanka won by 27 runs (D/L method)
Pakistan v West Indies at Dhaka - Apr 1, 2014
West Indies won by 84 runs
Bangladesh v Australia at Dhaka - Apr 1, 2014
Australia won by 7 wickets (with 15 balls remaining)
More results »
News | Features Last 3 days
News | Features Last 3 days
Sponsored Links

Why not you? Read and learn how!