World T20 2014 April 7, 2014

Murderous Myburgh, barnstorming Bravo

Karthik Krishnaswamy
ESPNcricinfo revisits the best innings of the World T20 2014
  shares 35

Alex Hales, 116* off 64 balls
England v Sri Lanka, Super 10

Yes, there was dew, and Sri Lanka's bowlers were trying to coax a spherical lump of soap into behaving like a cricket ball by the end of the match, but that was about the only factor in Alex Hales' favour when he and England began their pursuit of 190.

England had been shambolic on the field, letting four catches go. They then slumped to zero for two. At the start of the second over, on strike for the first time, Hales showed he wasn't too rattled by the circumstances, driving Angelo Mathews for successive fours through cover.

Still, when England began their 10th over, they needed 134 from 66 balls, or more than two runs every ball. From there, Hales and Eoin Morgan floored the accelerator, and England scored 61 runs in the next five overs, with Mahela Jayawardene helping them along by dropping Hales when he was on 55.

Even so, at the start of the 15th over, England still needed more than 12 an over. They had only just kept pace. They still needed, to lapse into Twitter-speak, that #onebigover. Hales delivered it, launching Ajantha Mendis for three big sixes over deep midwicket and spanking him for four through cover. Suddenly, England needed 9.60 an over - more or less their required rate at the start of the innings - and Sri Lanka were spooked. England lost Morgan, but Hales wasn't to be denied, as he finished with a flourish - three sixes in the last two overs - to inflict upon Sri Lanka their only defeat of the tournament.

Glenn Maxwell, 74 off 33 balls
Australia v Pakistan, Super 10

Australia's innings, in their ultimately doomed chase of 192 against Pakistan, makes for bizarre reading. Two of their batsmen made half-centuries, and none of the others got into double figures. When Glenn Maxwell came in, they had lost two wickets in the first over, to the left-arm spinner Zulfiqar Babar.

Maxwell responded in the only way he knows, launching the ball over the leg side in that effortlessly brutal manner of his. At the end of the Powerplay, Australia were 57 for 2, with Maxwell on 31. In the eighth over, Maxwell slapped Bilawal Bhatti for two fours through the off side and two sixes over the leg side, in the process reaching his fifty in 18 balls.

By the time Maxwell holed out for 74, Australia needed what seemed a very manageable 66 from 50 balls. But the manner of their capitulation after his dismissal suggested Maxwell had been batting in an entirely different cricket match. Even as Finch carried on to finish with a far more prosaic 65 off 54, the rest of the line-up crumbled against a bowling attack that woke up from the Maxwell-induced daze and rediscovered itself.

Meg Lanning, 126 off 65 balls
Australia Women v Ireland Women, Group A

Meg Lanning hadn't had a great start to the tournament. She had scored 2 in Australia's opening-day defeat to New Zealand and 6 in their win over South Africa. Neither Lanning nor Australia would have foreseen their triumphant finishes to the tournament - Australia as winners, Lanning as the highest run-getter - when she walked in to bat against Ireland with her team 24 for 1 in the third over.

Lanning began sedately, and was on 18 off 17 before she struck three fours in one over from Lucy O'Reilly. That leapfrogged her score above that of opener Delissa Kimmince. Starting with that over, Lanning scored 108 out of the 137 Australia scored (or more than 78% of their runs) while she was at the crease, and finished with the highest individual score in Women's T20.

Lanning's first 50 came up in 32 balls, and her second in 21. With her captain going berserk, Alex Blackwell played her part to perfection during an 83-run third-wicket partnership. Blackwell faced 12 balls and scored 12 runs - one dot, one double and ten singles to get off strike.

Dwayne Bravo, 46 off 26 balls
West Indies v Pakistan, Super 10

In a straight shootout for a semi-final spot, against one of the better bowling attacks in the tournament, West Indies had crawled to 84 for 5 in 15 overs. After they had started their innings in their usual manner, scoring 30 of their 39 Powerplay runs in fours and sixes, even the boundaries had dried up - they hadn't found the ropes in 4.3 overs.

All of that ceased to matter as Dwayne Bravo and Darren Sammy exploded, as West Indies scored 82 in their last five overs - the most ever scored against a Full Member opposition in T20s - and 59 in their last three. Bravo turned the tide with his assault on Umar Gul in the 18th over, smashing his first two balls for six and following it up with a cracking boundary over point later in the over.

Seemingly spooked by this, Saeed Ajmal, who had till now been his usual teasing self, went into a containing mindset and tried to fire it through flat and quick. He lost his length, and Bravo pulled him over midwicket for successive sixes in the 19th over. Sammy followed it up with another, and Ajmal's bruised figures read 4-0-41-0.

Stephan Myburgh, 63 off 29 balls
Netherlands v Ireland, First Round

Chasing 190 is a daunting ask. Having to do it in 14.2 overs is ridiculous. It's what Netherlands had to do in their last qualifying group match to get through to the Super 10s. To even dream of doing it, they needed an improbably electric start, and Myburgh gave them that.

After taking two balls to get his eye in, he smote Andy McBrine's offspin for three successive sixes. An over later, he did the same to Alex Cusack's medium-pace, and Netherlands had wiped out 64 runs from their target in just 3.3 overs. Myburgh reached his half-century in 17 balls, sending Netherlands on their way to the biggest-ever Powerplay score - 91 - and hit seven sixes out of his team's record total of 19.

Virat Kohli, 72* off 44 balls
India v South Africa, semi-finals

Chasing 173, the openers had put on 39 in 3.5 overs. It allowed Virat Kohli to ease into his innings, and that spelled trouble, in bold neon capitals, for South Africa. Kohli, being Kohli, could play well within himself, take no risks and still score briskly.

The first risky shot of Kohli's innings, a slog-swept six off Imran Tahir that just cleared a leaping deep midwicket, was the one that took him past 50. At that point he had struck two sixes and one four, and run five doubles and 25 singles. He had only faced two dot balls.

Kohli had planned his innings perfectly. India needed 40 off the last four overs and had seven wickets in hand. Kohli was unstoppable by now, and with Suresh Raina accelerating their march with a series of streaky shots in the 17th over, so were India.

Kohli struck three fours off Dale Steyn in his last two overs, including two trademark whips wide of mid-on, the second of which was the winning hit. It was the fifth four of his innings, and he had only hit two sixes. Astonishingly, he had only failed to score off three balls.

Karthik Krishnaswamy is a senior sub-editor at ESPNcricinfo

Comments have now been closed for this article

  • POSTED BY SajithaD on | April 8, 2014, 16:18 GMT

    This shows why cricket is a team game...Because the champion team doesn't have a single player in the list yet they manage to lift the world cup... Ex: how many runs they sav

  • POSTED BY Omarrz on | April 8, 2014, 16:16 GMT

    Where is Akmal's 94? Pakistan was struggling at 25-2 in 5 overs when he came out to bat. Shehzad's hundred was an easy one..it was against the pathetic Bangladesh.

  • POSTED BY on | April 8, 2014, 15:52 GMT

    Should have included Ahmed Shezad innings and Umar Akmal's innings. Why is first innings scores considered easier to make? I would argue that it is much harder to score in first innings as you don't know how the wicket behaves and what is a good target score. Finding the right balance between defense and aggression is more difficult with no baseline score to work with. Maxwell strike rate was better but he was out in the 11th over. Maxwell was involved in total of 116 run partnership whereas Umar Akmal was involved in 164 run partnerships. Umar stayed until the 19th over. Maxwell innings was sensational but not match winning. Similarly how many players have score one day 100's against Bangladesh? How many batsmen have carried the bat in 20/20 match? If Bangladesh is considered a weak team in their own backyard, then what about Ireland who could even qualify? How can the writer include Stephan Myburgh, 63 off 29 balls over Ahmed Shehzad's 111 not out?

  • POSTED BY ramz30380 on | April 8, 2014, 15:12 GMT

    I think the pick was based on the impact of the innings, the opposition and the importance of the match tht was played - on tht context - I think Myburgh's innings for Netherlands was the stand out - 63 off 29 balls!

    All the innings mentioned here were somewht very important and tensed games and hence the priority.... all innings barring Bravo's & Lannings' had come in run chases when the nerves run high!

    It was purely for the lesser importance of the opponents I think Shezad's innings was not considered! Nevertheless, a 100 is a 100 and when it comes in T20 its always special!

  • POSTED BY on | April 8, 2014, 14:53 GMT

    I am a pakistani but i say that Inning of Maxwell was head and shoulders above Akmal because it was against the run of play. Maxwell did that while chasing a mammonth target when Aus had lost 2 wickets in first over. He was up against best spin attack and had st.rate much better than that of Akmal... And Shehzad inning rightly didnt get a mention because it was against one of weaker teams...

  • POSTED BY on | April 8, 2014, 14:39 GMT

    Ahmed Shahzad's innings...???? can see this is poor article..not worth reading...

  • POSTED BY class9ryan on | April 8, 2014, 14:33 GMT

    Surprising, no Jean-Paul Duminy 86* in this list !!! Umar Akmal did no wrong to propel Pakistan to such a score where their Shahzad, Hafeez had put them into the pit and there was a ever-struggling Kamran Akmal with him. If not AB's but these two innings need a mention.

  • POSTED BY thalagune on | April 8, 2014, 13:19 GMT

    actually hales was supported by severe dew and ajanth mendis who kept bowling dollies outside off stump repeatedly for hales to hit sixes,had herath played instead of mendis dont think hales would have got a hundred and dont think england would have won..

  • POSTED BY srini.n on | April 8, 2014, 12:56 GMT

    Two key factors in Alex Hales's favour : 1) Going into that match vs SL, England was in real danger of getting knocked out of the tournament, so the pressure must have been really high. 2) They were chasing a pretty formidable target (dew or no dew), unlike Akmal/ ABD/ Duminy/ Shehzad whose big knocks all came when batting first

  • POSTED BY mzm149 on | April 8, 2014, 12:08 GMT

    What was so special about Dwayne Bravo's 46 in 26. Thats regular in T20 cricket. Where are Akmal's 94 in 54, de Villiers' 69* in 28, Duminy's 86* in 43 and most importantly Shehzad's 111* in 62?

  • POSTED BY SajithaD on | April 8, 2014, 16:18 GMT

    This shows why cricket is a team game...Because the champion team doesn't have a single player in the list yet they manage to lift the world cup... Ex: how many runs they sav

  • POSTED BY Omarrz on | April 8, 2014, 16:16 GMT

    Where is Akmal's 94? Pakistan was struggling at 25-2 in 5 overs when he came out to bat. Shehzad's hundred was an easy one..it was against the pathetic Bangladesh.

  • POSTED BY on | April 8, 2014, 15:52 GMT

    Should have included Ahmed Shezad innings and Umar Akmal's innings. Why is first innings scores considered easier to make? I would argue that it is much harder to score in first innings as you don't know how the wicket behaves and what is a good target score. Finding the right balance between defense and aggression is more difficult with no baseline score to work with. Maxwell strike rate was better but he was out in the 11th over. Maxwell was involved in total of 116 run partnership whereas Umar Akmal was involved in 164 run partnerships. Umar stayed until the 19th over. Maxwell innings was sensational but not match winning. Similarly how many players have score one day 100's against Bangladesh? How many batsmen have carried the bat in 20/20 match? If Bangladesh is considered a weak team in their own backyard, then what about Ireland who could even qualify? How can the writer include Stephan Myburgh, 63 off 29 balls over Ahmed Shehzad's 111 not out?

  • POSTED BY ramz30380 on | April 8, 2014, 15:12 GMT

    I think the pick was based on the impact of the innings, the opposition and the importance of the match tht was played - on tht context - I think Myburgh's innings for Netherlands was the stand out - 63 off 29 balls!

    All the innings mentioned here were somewht very important and tensed games and hence the priority.... all innings barring Bravo's & Lannings' had come in run chases when the nerves run high!

    It was purely for the lesser importance of the opponents I think Shezad's innings was not considered! Nevertheless, a 100 is a 100 and when it comes in T20 its always special!

  • POSTED BY on | April 8, 2014, 14:53 GMT

    I am a pakistani but i say that Inning of Maxwell was head and shoulders above Akmal because it was against the run of play. Maxwell did that while chasing a mammonth target when Aus had lost 2 wickets in first over. He was up against best spin attack and had st.rate much better than that of Akmal... And Shehzad inning rightly didnt get a mention because it was against one of weaker teams...

  • POSTED BY on | April 8, 2014, 14:39 GMT

    Ahmed Shahzad's innings...???? can see this is poor article..not worth reading...

  • POSTED BY class9ryan on | April 8, 2014, 14:33 GMT

    Surprising, no Jean-Paul Duminy 86* in this list !!! Umar Akmal did no wrong to propel Pakistan to such a score where their Shahzad, Hafeez had put them into the pit and there was a ever-struggling Kamran Akmal with him. If not AB's but these two innings need a mention.

  • POSTED BY thalagune on | April 8, 2014, 13:19 GMT

    actually hales was supported by severe dew and ajanth mendis who kept bowling dollies outside off stump repeatedly for hales to hit sixes,had herath played instead of mendis dont think hales would have got a hundred and dont think england would have won..

  • POSTED BY srini.n on | April 8, 2014, 12:56 GMT

    Two key factors in Alex Hales's favour : 1) Going into that match vs SL, England was in real danger of getting knocked out of the tournament, so the pressure must have been really high. 2) They were chasing a pretty formidable target (dew or no dew), unlike Akmal/ ABD/ Duminy/ Shehzad whose big knocks all came when batting first

  • POSTED BY mzm149 on | April 8, 2014, 12:08 GMT

    What was so special about Dwayne Bravo's 46 in 26. Thats regular in T20 cricket. Where are Akmal's 94 in 54, de Villiers' 69* in 28, Duminy's 86* in 43 and most importantly Shehzad's 111* in 62?

  • POSTED BY princejain191 on | April 8, 2014, 11:57 GMT

    @UsmanMuhammad no it was not special because of the dew but because his innings single handidly won them the match(with some help from morgan , england were 2-0 after 1st over) and even with the dew chasing 190 against sri lanka's attack is a tough ask

  • POSTED BY on | April 8, 2014, 10:23 GMT

    Ahmad Shehzads 100 and Umar Akmals 94 were the best innnings... Poor article

  • POSTED BY on | April 8, 2014, 9:46 GMT

    Ahmed's innings and umar akmal's innings? Also ABD's innings?

  • POSTED BY libra0619 on | April 8, 2014, 9:18 GMT

    I do not think, you can miss first hundered by a Pakistani Player in T20 Ahmed shezad vs Bangladesh. Even better Innings by Umar Akmal, 94 against Australia.

  • POSTED BY UsmanMuhammad on | April 8, 2014, 8:21 GMT

    @princejain191. You are soooooo very right. Hales innings was sooooo special because he had smacked Lankan bowlers in severe dew. Pitty

  • POSTED BY on | April 8, 2014, 8:07 GMT

    Apart from Amjad Shehzad not being mentioned(it was arguably the best innings along with the effort of De villiers) Alex Hales innings has been clearly over rated. The young man neither displayed skill, nor finesse in that innings. Brute force and good luck cannot be counted as skill!

  • POSTED BY on | April 8, 2014, 7:33 GMT

    why did you forget Ahmed Shahzad's 106* against bangladesh?? we all can see that everyone has forgotten pakistan's contributions to this tournment..

  • POSTED BY sudaththa on | April 8, 2014, 7:32 GMT

    Kohli, Maxwell and Sammy is the best

  • POSTED BY DiamondSoul on | April 8, 2014, 6:35 GMT

    Wht about Umar akmal's 94 .I think it was the best innings in the whole tournament

  • POSTED BY on | April 8, 2014, 4:46 GMT

    what ? .. Umar Akmal's inning of 94 wasnt even good enuff for a mention

  • POSTED BY princejain191 on | April 8, 2014, 4:35 GMT

    Good selection guys !! Kohli's 72* for me was the best . Shehzad's exclusion was a #nobrainer. For all those who are saying umar's 94 should have been there : 1.He got them while batting first (less pressure, check all the other men's innings in the list) 2.He was dropped twice(1st by hogg and then in i think 2nd last over by finch) 3.Australia's bowling was dreadfull (half volleys and way too many full tosses) 4.He didn't win them the match,bowlers did (match was australia's to take when they had 8 wickets in hand and just needed to score at around 7 an over)

    So that's why shehzad's 100 against the MIGHTY BANGLADESHIS and umar's 94 did not make the cut !!!!!

  • POSTED BY sergio11 on | April 8, 2014, 4:23 GMT

    Raina's 21 of 8..actually the took the game completly away from the SA in the semis...i think Maxwells inng was the best inng...that was brutel...Umar akmal's inng was better than Bravo's 46...

  • POSTED BY MelbourneMiracle on | April 8, 2014, 3:26 GMT

    Again I don't see a mentioning about SL here and I totally agree as a Sri Lankan. Because it was team effort that won us the title - not the individual performance. Thank you Cricinfo for highlighting secret behind SL's win.

  • POSTED BY TRAM on | April 8, 2014, 3:19 GMT

    It is confusing. Not because it is women, but because it is a DIFFERENT tournament with different standards (ex: shorter boundaries). Why mix up 2 separate tournament scores?

  • POSTED BY Antony_Lucas on | April 8, 2014, 1:22 GMT

    wow, Maxwell's innings wasn't half the innings Umar Akmal's was.. in the same match! I would go so far as to say Akmal's innings was technically, the best innings i have seen for quite a period in the short formats.

  • POSTED BY Chris_Howard on | April 8, 2014, 0:20 GMT

    Hats off to Cricinfo for including Meg Lanning's innnings in this list.

  • POSTED BY OT12 on | April 7, 2014, 23:12 GMT

    Seems like we Pakistani's were watching a different world cup:) I mean a Maxwell innings was in loosing cause he lost the game and the guy Umer Akmal who made 94 from the winning side doesn't get mentioned OK then what about Ahmed Century :)) this is absolute rubbish......

  • POSTED BY johnathonjosephs on | April 7, 2014, 22:17 GMT

    Umar Akmal's 94 and Sanga's 50 in the final deserve mention. Is there an article for best bowling? Herath produced one of the best bowling I have ever seen in a T20

  • POSTED BY on | April 7, 2014, 21:18 GMT

    Details of Ajmal's over in D.Bravo innings, No Ahmad Shehzad's unbeaten century, No Umar Akmal's hell of an innings of 94 runs.....

  • POSTED BY avmd on | April 7, 2014, 20:07 GMT

    Umar Akmal's was a matching winning knock but Maxwell's was not, which one should be the one worth mentioning if it has to be one ?

  • POSTED BY Ahmed81 on | April 7, 2014, 19:20 GMT

    WOW, no umer Akmal, no Ahmed Shehzad. Unbelievable

  • POSTED BY on | April 7, 2014, 19:18 GMT

    Hight of biasness. Someone gets a mention after scoring 46 of 26 but others do not get any mention even after scoring 100+ and 94 against a very good attack

  • POSTED BY on | April 7, 2014, 18:28 GMT

    Umar akmal 94?, iam sure that was way better than maxwells innings

  • POSTED BY android_user on | April 7, 2014, 18:00 GMT

    ahmed shehzad century of the tournament no mention there

  • POSTED BY on | April 7, 2014, 17:57 GMT

    and what about Umar Akmal's 94 or Ahmed Shahzad's 108 not out...come on writer...

  • No featured comments at the moment.

  • POSTED BY on | April 7, 2014, 17:57 GMT

    and what about Umar Akmal's 94 or Ahmed Shahzad's 108 not out...come on writer...

  • POSTED BY android_user on | April 7, 2014, 18:00 GMT

    ahmed shehzad century of the tournament no mention there

  • POSTED BY on | April 7, 2014, 18:28 GMT

    Umar akmal 94?, iam sure that was way better than maxwells innings

  • POSTED BY on | April 7, 2014, 19:18 GMT

    Hight of biasness. Someone gets a mention after scoring 46 of 26 but others do not get any mention even after scoring 100+ and 94 against a very good attack

  • POSTED BY Ahmed81 on | April 7, 2014, 19:20 GMT

    WOW, no umer Akmal, no Ahmed Shehzad. Unbelievable

  • POSTED BY avmd on | April 7, 2014, 20:07 GMT

    Umar Akmal's was a matching winning knock but Maxwell's was not, which one should be the one worth mentioning if it has to be one ?

  • POSTED BY on | April 7, 2014, 21:18 GMT

    Details of Ajmal's over in D.Bravo innings, No Ahmad Shehzad's unbeaten century, No Umar Akmal's hell of an innings of 94 runs.....

  • POSTED BY johnathonjosephs on | April 7, 2014, 22:17 GMT

    Umar Akmal's 94 and Sanga's 50 in the final deserve mention. Is there an article for best bowling? Herath produced one of the best bowling I have ever seen in a T20

  • POSTED BY OT12 on | April 7, 2014, 23:12 GMT

    Seems like we Pakistani's were watching a different world cup:) I mean a Maxwell innings was in loosing cause he lost the game and the guy Umer Akmal who made 94 from the winning side doesn't get mentioned OK then what about Ahmed Century :)) this is absolute rubbish......

  • POSTED BY Chris_Howard on | April 8, 2014, 0:20 GMT

    Hats off to Cricinfo for including Meg Lanning's innnings in this list.