Zimbabwe v India, 3rd ODI, Harare

Inexperience overwhelms Zimbabwe's preparation

The dearth of international matches means Zimbabwe spend a considerable amount of time practising. But their inexperience shows during matches, when their skills seem to desert them

Liam Brickhill

July 27, 2013

Comments: 20 | Text size: A | A

Amit Mishra and Dinesh Karthik appeal for the wicket of Vusi Sibanda, Zimbabwe v India, 1st ODI, Harare, July 24, 2013
With Zimbabwe playing fewer matches compared to other teams, coach Andy Waller believes the team needs to learn from their losses that much faster © AFP
Enlarge
Related Links
Series/Tournaments: India tour of Zimbabwe
Teams: Zimbabwe

The Zimbabwe squad have spent the last ten weeks doing very little else besides getting fit, bowling, batting and catching cricket balls. How many catches must each fielder have held in that time? How many balls must each batsman have hit, or a bowler bowled? Plenty, no doubt. Yet, when it matters, catches are dropped. Batsmen's shots evaporate. Bowlers over-step at crucial times. Why?

There was a point during Friday's match when it seemed that, despite the costly errors of the morning, Zimbabwe's batsmen had put the Indian bowlers under pressure and put their in a position from which they should win. At the end of the 20th over, Zimbabwe were 109 for 1. Vusi Sibanda raced to fifty, Dinesh Karthik had just missed a stumping, and, to end the over, Hamilton Masakadza had spanked a rank full toss from Amit Mishra almost clear out of the ground. Game on.

In the next over, Zimbabwe lost Sibanda and Brendan Taylor - who they believe is their best batsman - in quick succession. Suddenly, their confidence dissipated. In minutes, they slipped to 133 for 6, and the match was gone.

The focal point of pressure in a batting side is the middle order. If numbers 4, 5 and 6 need to do anything well, it's absorb pressure. With everything at stake, the hosts' middle order capitulated. When the game was gone, and it didn't really matter what the rest of the batsmen did, Elton Chigumbura and Prosper Utseya put together a tidy 88-run stand for the seventh wicket - incidentally, the second highest partnership of the entire match.

Andy Waller, the Zimbabwe coach, admitted that this defeat was more disappointing than Wednesday's, given that they had won a crucial toss and found themselves in strong positions more than once in the game. "We were in a good position to beat them and some rash shots cost us," he said. "It actually showed with the partnership of Prosper and Elton - without any pressure, they got us to the 180, 190 after 40 [overs]. Had we only been two or three down, we probably would've been 210, 220 looking at 70 in the last ten. I'd say, after twenty overs, I thought we were going to win the game. Even though we let them get away with a lot more runs, I thought we had a chance but then we made some silly errors."

To put it another way, Zimbabwe choked. Much has been made of the susceptibility of Zimbabwe's southern neighbours' to the 'C' word, but choking or panicking in pressure situations certainly isn't the preserve of the South Africans. In his famous essay The Art of Failure, author and journalist Malcolm Gladwell dissects the reasons why skilled people might fail in times of stress. Gladwell draws a clear distinction between choking and panicking, writing that the former is a result of thinking too much, while panic is an outcome of thinking too little. The differentiator, it seems is experience. People without experience panic because they don't know what to do, while people with experience choke because they forget how to do it.

Yet what if one is highly trained, as the Zimbabweans are, but lacks the experience of putting that training into effect? Did Zimbabwe choke on Friday, or did they panic?

 
 
The catch is that Zimbabwe don't really have any other options. In the absence of regular international competition, they practice. Because they practice too much and play too little, when they do find some quality opponents they flounder, making further competition more unlikely and leaving them with no option but to train some more.
 

"One thing we can't do is put it down to not practising hard," added Waller. "For ten weeks now, we field every day, we take catches every day, we throw at stumps every day. We do a lot of batting, we do a lot of bowling, and we practice those things. We're looking for no-balls and that sort of stuff.

"But it's different when you get out to the middle. Those pressure situations: the more we play, the more we're going to be able to handle those pressures and become mentally stronger. I was saying to the guys, we have to learn from our mistakes. Other teams who are playing all the time, they're playing games and they can learn from that. We're not going to get all those games so we've got to learn a damn lot quicker than the opposition do."

While Zimbabwe have practised, hard, on every off day during this series, India haven't really turned up much, apart from at the matches themselves. Their first 'practice' involved some light fielding, with plenty of laughs, and a spot of football. The Indians see no value in intensive training of that sort - not on a minor tour such as this one, not at this level, and especially not unless it's accompanied by actual experience of game situations. They'll net, sure, but when was the last time you heard about India - or any top side for that matter - focus purely on training for more than two months?

The catch is that Zimbabwe don't really have any other options. In the absence of regular international competition, they practice. Because they practice too much and play too little, when they do find some quality opponents they flounder, making further competition more unlikely and leaving them with no option but to train some more. In the last year, Zimbabwe have played eight ODIs. Since June, India have played 12. It's not that these teams aren't on a level playing field. They're barely playing the same sport.

The situation is clearly unfair, but what is left for Zimbabwe? Should they just pack up and forget this whole international cricket lark? What could possibly break them out of this funk? Waller, only two matches old in his national coaching career, is firm in his support for his charges. "I still believe we've got the players. I have no doubt we've got the players who can get the runs but we've got to learn from our mistakes."

That's undoubtedly true, but in the remainder of this series, and the ones which follow later this year against Pakistan and Sri Lanka, the pressure to win and turn things around, will only increase the longer Zimbabwe go without a victory.

"The importance of the next two or three months is huge and that's what we keep discussing," captain Brendan Taylor said earlier this week. "It's up to us players to try to contribute to getting the public back in and getting sponsors back in. So it's a big time for us and a couple of good results against the best side in the world can only do us some good."

It's not a fair game, and there are no easy answers or solutions for Zimbabwe. All they can do is pick themselves up, dust themselves off and come back for more. They cannot run from pressure situations. They've got to learn to embrace them. Somewhere along the way, they've got to find some self-belief.

Liam Brickhill is a freelance journalist based in Cape Town

RSS Feeds: Liam Brickhill

© ESPN Sports Media Ltd.

Posted by   on (July 28, 2013, 6:48 GMT)

How Can one expect Zimbabwe beating India ??? In your dreams Mate!!!! Give all of us a break >>>..May be once in a blue Moon...Ha Ha Ha...

Posted by sukuviju on (July 28, 2013, 3:31 GMT)

Englands loss in the championship trophy final was a clear case of choking. South Africa did not choke in the Championship Trophy because they were well beaten, they did not lose a match from a winning position.

What any team require is a good number 5,6, & 7 batsman who can absorb the presuure of early wickets, occupy the crease and play out the full 50 overs. India is blessed with Raina & Dhoni at 5 & 6, while Dhoni occupies the crease and runs hard, Raina produces little gems that relieves pressure and thereafter they now have the luxury of Jadeja who is turning out to be a good all rounder. The best part of Jadeja is nothing much is expected and so whatever good he does appears to be a bonus. Batsmen take him lightly and lose their wicket, bowlers take him lightly and concede runs. I feel replacing Dinesh Kartik with Pujara at number 4 will make the Indian batting very solid in testing conditions while Rahane & Kartik's presence in the 15 will keep all the batsmen on their toes.

Posted by Anti_ZCF_Outckast on (July 28, 2013, 2:35 GMT)

Tides will change, with time.

Posted by S.Jagernath on (July 27, 2013, 21:56 GMT)

At least Zimbabwe have Suresh Raina,a very valuable player for Zimbabwe.

Posted by gsingh7 on (July 27, 2013, 19:13 GMT)

chasing 295 how was 109 in 20 overs a winning position?? its not as if zimbabwe have world class middle order to cruise to win. mishra was always going to be best indian bowler as he can turn both ways. when he came to bowling the batting side collapsed and its not called chocking when number 10 side lose to number 1 side with more than 50 runs.

Posted by Anti_ZCFOutkast on (July 27, 2013, 18:23 GMT)

Waller has been one of the most reliable batsmen over the last 12 months. Why drop him after two failures for a player like Matsi who has failed for the last 10 years or Maruma who is out of his depth at international level.

Posted by Blade-Runner on (July 27, 2013, 17:15 GMT)

@khiladisher ; Chumpion teams like India have got great luck so the training n talent are put to bare minimum.

Posted by Ninety9 on (July 27, 2013, 17:08 GMT)

It's a clear case of putting too much pressure on yourself. It might sound negative, but I really do believe that Zimbabwe have a better chance of winning a game after they've lost the series. The coach is talking about causing an upset right from the start and that is not helping the Zimbabwe players. Once they know the series is gone, they will play their natural game and all their practice hours will show fruit. It's a tough spot to be in, but the weight of expectations and pressure of bringing back public and sponsors is not exactly what the team, the captain, and the coach should be talking about at this moment. All they should talk about is playing freely.

Comments have now been closed for this article

TopTop
Email Feedback Print
Share
E-mail
Feedback
Print
Liam BrickhillClose
Tour Results
Zimbabwe v India at Bulawayo - Aug 3, 2013
India won by 7 wickets (with 96 balls remaining)
Zimbabwe v India at Bulawayo - Aug 1, 2013
India won by 9 wickets (with 115 balls remaining)
Zimbabwe v India at Harare - Jul 28, 2013
India won by 7 wickets (with 87 balls remaining)
Zimbabwe v India at Harare - Jul 26, 2013
India won by 58 runs
Zimbabwe v India at Harare - Jul 24, 2013
India won by 6 wickets (with 31 balls remaining)
More results »
News | Features Last 3 days
News | Features Last 3 days