Zimbabwe v Pakistan, 2nd Test, Harare

Why Zimbabwe need more Tests

Zimbabwe showed good application in the first two sessions and with more Test experience they could avoid being suckered into traps set by the Pakistan bowlers after tea

Firdose Moonda in Harare

September 10, 2013

Comments: 21 | Text size: A | A

Brendan Taylor plays the ball on the leg side, Zimbabwe v Pakistan, 2nd Test, Harare, 1st day, September 10, 2013
With nothing more than sheer determination, Brendan Taylor found his rhythm © Associated Press
Enlarge
Related Links

Until 19 minutes after tea, Zimbabwe were making a strong case for why they deserve to play more Test cricket in what could be their last long-format fixture until July next year. They were 172 for 3, had seen off an hour of high quality seam bowling on a lively surface in the morning session. Two of their batsmen, one of whom was still at the crease, had made half-centuries and their line-up also featured one partnership in excess of 100 runs.

Then, Malcolm Waller fell into a trap that had obviously been set for him. Having watched Waller's ease against the spin of Saeed Ajmal and Abdur Rehman, Misbah-ul-Haq brought back Junaid Khan to try and unsettle him. He delivered four short balls in the first over Waller faced but started the second by reverting to a good length. With the fourth ball, he held it just back of a length and Waller was trapped.

Perhaps expecting a slightly fuller length, Waller did not move his feet at all as he fished and found only an outside edge. That started a familiar middle-order wobble, which Zimbabwe had managed to avoid in the last Test but which they have become known for. They lost 4 for 31 to turn the innings from respectable to needing rescuing.

Zimbabwe's position did little to reflect their hard graft earlier, which once again demonstrated their top-order has the temperament for Test cricket. For the first 10 overs, they had no choice but to try and survive.

Junaid moved the ball both ways in a spell that underlined his worth to the Pakistan attack while Rahat Ali backed him up fairly well. Through a mixture of either moving the ball away from the batsmen at the last instant or swerving it back into them, Junaid ensured Zimbabwe had to play at all but four of the first 30 balls he bowled. Rahat was slightly less menacing and made them go for 21 of the 30 balls he delivered. Between them, they also beat the outside edge eight times in 10 overs.

Tino Mawoyo went early and Vusi Sibanda and Hamilton Masakadza came close to following. Neither were sure what Junaid was going to present them with next and hasty withdrawals of the bat could easily have taken the edge. Run-scoring was almost impossible and if bat managed to find ball, it was only with the aim of defence.

A far lesser side than Zimbabwe could have found themselves four or five down in the face of hostile, incisive bowling by Pakistan's pace attack. That they did not, would only have helped the confidence of the batting pair, especially when Younis Khan came on and offered some relief.

For Sibanda, the self-assurance overflowed too quickly. He resorted to his favourite stroke, the pull, and ended up playing on. Questions will rightly be asked about his ability to pace an innings and whether he becomes too aggressive too quickly, especially since he has not scored a Test fifty in almost two years.

He need look no further than his captain, Brendan Taylor, for an example of how to hang back until absolutely sure. Taylor, who knew he was struggling for form in the lead-up to this match, played just five scoring shots in the first 60 balls he faced. His boundary came off an edge to the third man boundary and the three singles he scored in that time were the result of slightly better timed pushes than the ones he was employing in defence the rest of the time.

Taylor did not take risks because he was battling through the initial stages of his innings. When Pakistan overpitched, he mistimed his drives. When he got a full toss, he did not hit it with any power and eventually he resorted to trying one of his favourite one-day strikes, the ramp over the wicket-keeper's head but when he could not even get hold of that, he knuckled down and waited for something to go his way.

Only when the spinners started giving it a bit more flight, did Taylor start to come into his own. With nothing more than sheer determination, Taylor found his rhythm and he had the luxury of time because Masakadza was playing a fairly fluent knock, and was especially comfortable against the spinners, on the other end.

Masakadza was well-set, enough to suggest hopes for a Test century, but when he was dismissed, it was up to Taylor to bat through the day. He enjoyed a sprightly stand with Waller and had that grown, Zimbabwe's promise may have been fulfilled.

Zimbabwe endured a period of play that even their most loyal supporters are calling more of the same. Waller threw it away, not realising he was being set up by Junaid, Richmond Mutumbami was careless in the channel outside off stump and tried to play a defensive stroke too late and Elton Chigumbura was bowled by a Rehman delivery that kept low - a sign of what this surface will deliver as the match progresses.

Greater awareness may have saved all three of them and the lack of such foresight is the clearest indication that Zimbabwe need to play more Test cricket. Without facing bowlers for extended periods of time, they will not know when plans are being worked out against them and how to guard against that.

Building and timing an innings is learnt only through practice and only batsmen who are able to make those skills a habit succeed at Test level. This innings could be Zimbabwe's penultimate chance to do that.

They will bat again in this Test but then face at least nine months with no Test cricket, because of the postponed Sri Lanka series and a flawed Future Tours Programme. Zimbabwe's performance in this series should stand as a reason why they should not be left out in the cold and despite financial and fixture concerns worldwide, something should be done to ensure these players benefit from more time in the middle.

Firdose Moonda is ESPNcricinfo's South Africa correspondent

RSS Feeds: Firdose Moonda

© ESPN Sports Media Ltd.

Posted by CrICkeeet on (September 12, 2013, 3:10 GMT)

Firdos Moonda, well said but I'm afraid its a useless report bcs FTP is blind. Who doesn't know that Bangladesh and Zim need more test? Bt has ICC any time to think about cricket improvement? They better think how 2 make a room for CLT20..... That brings money rather than ban zim test... pathetic!

Posted by ZCFOutkast on (September 11, 2013, 18:14 GMT)

Cont....It doesn't take a rocket scientist to work out the math and come up with a monthly figure ZC need to sustain the game. An accumulated debt of $15m in a high interest, inflationary economy is nothing. ZC should be commended for keeping things to that level.

The ICC is aware. They've seen the financials&ZC's state of affairs and they are aware of the insurmountable task they face. The question you should be asking yourself is, why hasn't the ICC reported their plight and exposed the truth amidst media reports. Peter Chingoka says it outright - "what we've earned from India's tour is but a drop in the ocean". If you have different facts and are willing to test that then bring it forth. There's only so much creativity you can employ to push double entry(or rig an election for that matter), and $15m is not easy! Bring the evidence of maladministration. ZCU kept the game to themselves and a minority. They had tiny costs to deal with in comparison to what the current ZC faces!!

Posted by ZCFOutkast on (September 11, 2013, 17:58 GMT)

ZC have less than 10 salaried administrators on their payroll (including the MD&President)! Have virtually no income, so no money to spend! Paying umpires, groundsmen, franchise admins, 80+ players, coaches, national team players far outstrips whatever little they rake in! Never mind development of juniors. That's why they live on debt!

The TV rights deal amounts to nothing because the side is not worth much to broadcasters, secondly kit sponsorship is not forthcoming, and even if it is it's too little. Where will ZC get the money to pay players or itself if even what they get from the ICC is not enough to cover a small part of the FC season or host a series.

Many parents buy kit&equipment for their kids to participate in many sports in Zimbabwe. They also pay for their outbound tours. I've never heard them complain about that or point a finger at the association.

Posted by Bang_La on (September 11, 2013, 12:54 GMT)

Same with Bangladesh, they need to play more tests.

Posted by Anti_ZCFOutkast on (September 11, 2013, 12:36 GMT)

It is time ZC showed some loyalty to its players, actually paying them, and treating them like professionals. Most of the age-group sides are funded by parents, grounds are in disrepair, the domestic season is at risk of not happening, cricketers are buying their own kit and gear, and the players are working for free. What exactly are ZC spending their money on? The 110 administrators they have?

Posted by ZCFOutkast on (September 11, 2013, 9:11 GMT)

People should just stop talking about Zimbabwe as if they are amateurs! Zimbabwean players are of professional international standard, and Zim is a Full Member. Period! They don't need kindness in the form of playing in other countries' FC competitions, they have their own - the Logan Cup! We've already underlined our superiority by beating BD twice and dominated the Intercontinental Cup using our 3rd string players.

As for the player drain you refer to @Sachit, it's not up to ZC to retain players but for them to display their loyalty to Zim like the rest. You don't hear of Chatara&Vitori packing their bags&off like Jarvis now speaking of qualifying for Eng. Chigumbura reached international heights SeanErvine did not reach at the same age, and even got a County contract yet he never woke up and suddenly decided Zim are no longer good enough for him! He outperformed Ervine in the BPL&is a vastly superior T20&ODI player, plus will develop into a better FC one, yet he remains grounded.

Posted by Bangla_Low_team on (September 11, 2013, 8:44 GMT)

Well there was a test series between 2 of the lowest ranked teams earlier in they year but it was only 2 test matches series strangely. The series was 1-1 as well so a decider would've made sensed.

Posted by mihir_nam on (September 11, 2013, 8:12 GMT)

Would be glad to see Zimbabwe Vs Ireland Test Match in Malahide ..

Posted by Sachit1979 on (September 11, 2013, 7:11 GMT)

More than Zimbabwe needing more tests, they need to retain their pool of talented Cricketers who are leaving country's Cricket for lucrative offers from clubs and franchises outside.

I believe ICC could pitch in and help Zimbabwe re-establish their Cricket. Rich boards within ICC could help them with money and ICC can appoint a COO who takes care of ZCU operations atleast at international Cricket level and highest level of domestic Cricket. At this moment, it looks like Zimbabwe Cricket is not in very efficient hands.

Posted by JustIPL on (September 11, 2013, 3:43 GMT)

It may boil down to India haing more tests against the zim as they are confident that so called young indian team will win comfortably. Thats why they are avoiding playing stronger nations specially numero uno SA, Eng & Pak. Zim are not that stuff what they looked during the first test. This time pak pile up runs in the first innings and then zim will bat last

Posted by   on (September 11, 2013, 1:23 GMT)

Untill financial situatiion improves we are misssing a good emerging team with the potential to become a good 1 like wi or nzs level. i think hamilton is a good choice for captain hes already leader of the players union and proved to be a good one in the 1st test if he can become captain of tests then taylor can keep wickets and they can use an extra batsman like raza butt or williams

Posted by elifant on (September 11, 2013, 0:33 GMT)

I dont understand why the Zimbabwe (or Bangladesh) team is not invited to participate in domestics competitions in the major cricket playing countries. There could be a system where by rotation they get to play in a first class cricket competition in a major country every year. As it is there are only 8 major test playing countries out of which 2 (NZ and WI) are not that great, so it is in the interest of the game that we develop competitive international teams around the world. Hoping to develop competitive teams from countries without a real cricketing culture is a pipe dream so Zimbabwe and Bangladesh are the logical choices. It would enlightened self interest on the part of the major countries to help these teams out but I guess they don't see things that way.

Posted by Little_Aussie_Battler on (September 10, 2013, 23:48 GMT)

Been watching some of the tests via the internet. Considering Zimbabwe's situation I have to say I am impressed. On top of this, they have brought in a good number of indigenous players which will encourage future generations.

Considering the terrible situation they were in with their domestic problems, it is incredible that the game of cricket is so resilient. One would have thought with the white flight out of Zimbabwe it would have been curtains for the game, but it is somehow battling on.

It would be nice to see more people attending the tests in Zimbabwe. There appears to be more tv cameramen there than spectators. Ticket prices need to be significantly lowered by the sounds of it. Not sure if it is shown of free to air television there, but it needs to be to get interest and build a following.

Posted by raf1 on (September 10, 2013, 19:16 GMT)

Yes, that is only logical. The million dollar question is that would Zimbabwe want that? They are in a dire financial condition and might not want to host other teams. ICC should try to help and arrange a tri-series involving two marketable sides like India and Pakistan so they get the funds and arrange for a couple of tests each with them before and after the series.

Posted by Desihungama on (September 10, 2013, 19:08 GMT)

But Firdouse if Zimbabwe is not playing any Test Cricket until next July then that's their own making. SL was scheduled to tour them after Pak. I men what more Zimbabwe Cricket can ask for a tour by India, then Pakistan and Sl afterwards. It's the Zim board that is looking to cancel the series with SL and not the other way around. ZC needs to sort out it's priorities.

Posted by Cpt.Meanster on (September 10, 2013, 18:23 GMT)

Zimbabwe are the perfect testimonial as to why the ICC is a 'failed' organization. It's appalling that a 'test' playing nation is left alone to suffer. This does NOT happen in ANY other sport. Cricket is already shrinking with less and less countries actively playing the sport. If we lose Zimbabwe, then that would be the saddest day for cricket. A region that has produced world class players, officials and coaches shouldn't be left to the dogs. The ICC and the cricket's 3 richest boards - BCCI, ECB and CA must do something to improve Zimbabwe's financial woes.

Posted by   on (September 10, 2013, 17:51 GMT)

EnglishCricket - they do have some quality players. I'd have Taylor in my team any day of the week. Same as for NZ, WI & Bangladesh at the moment: they need to be playing more test cricket to build up the experience and match hardness that's required to turn promising positions into wins.

Posted by   on (September 10, 2013, 17:36 GMT)

No use hoping for others to help. Zim should try to get some tests against Bangladesh. Also some unofficial tests against Ireland. They can request BCCI to sponsor their team to take part in the Ranji trophy.

Posted by   on (September 10, 2013, 17:34 GMT)

ZCU should starting focussing on A tours..Retain Sean Ervine,Craig Ervine,Kyle Jarvis,Glen Querl if possible Gary Ballance..

i would select the possible team for test series against Pak

1.Sibanda 2.Masakadza 3.Taylor (capt) 4.Craig ervine 5.Sean williams 6.Charles coventry(WK) 7.Chigumbura 8.Peter moor 9.Kyle jarvis 10.Querl 11.Mpofu

Bench Strength 1.Malcom waller 2.Sean Ervine 3.Vittori 4.Utseya

Posted by grahaam on (September 10, 2013, 17:17 GMT)

How can they get more test matches? They cannot afford home series, despite the TV monies etc , so away matches look more unlikely. The board needs to open come clean about who the creditors are, and then seek help and guidance in either having the debts wiped clean , getting relief in repayments or apply to go into administration with a view of starting with a clean slate. The latter option could compromise the status they enjoy in international cricket, so the other options are more favourable. The board must act now!

Posted by EnglishCricket on (September 10, 2013, 17:15 GMT)

No! what Zimbabwe need is more 4 day games otherwise it will continue to be loss after loss. If you look at Zimbabwe return to Test Cricket, apart from Bangladesh they have not even drawn let alone beat a top 8 team at home and have gotten thrashed all away to New Zealand and West Indies both the weakest in terms of the top 8. I feel that South Africa being Zimbabwe neighbours have to help and possibly include many Zimbabwean in their domestic structure so they can experience quality Cricket which is played there and will obviously make them better as players. Zimbabwe don't even have 1 world class player so that says something.

Comments have now been closed for this article

TopTop
Email Feedback Print
Share
E-mail
Feedback
Print
Firdose MoondaClose
Tour Results
Zimbabwe v Pakistan at Harare - Sep 10-14, 2013
Zimbabwe won by 24 runs
Zimbabwe v Pakistan at Harare - Sep 3-7, 2013
Pakistan won by 221 runs
Zimbabwe v Pakistan at Harare - Aug 31, 2013
Pakistan won by 108 runs
Zimbabwe v Pakistan at Harare - Aug 29, 2013
Pakistan won by 90 runs
Zimbabwe v Pakistan at Harare - Aug 27, 2013
Zimbabwe won by 7 wickets (with 10 balls remaining)
More results »
News | Features Last 3 days
News | Features Last 3 days