Perhaps numbers never do reveal the full story, but they tell a large part of it. Every Friday, The Numbers Game will take a look at statistics from the present and the past, busting myths and revealing hidden truths:
Talk about the leading allrounders in the game today, and the usual suspects crop up - Shaun Pollock, Andy Flintoff, Jacques Kallis (though he's hardly much of a force as a bowler these days). Not many would mention Chaminda Vaas in the list - he's had his moments with the bat, the reasoning would go, but he hasn't been consistent enough to merit a place among the Pollocks and the Flintoffs.
Perhaps it's time to revisit that theory. Vaas's 49 in the first Test in Colombo against West Indies was only the latest of a number of instances when Vaas has pulled his weight with the bat when his team has needed him to. The most famous instance occurred last year against Australia at Kandy - after bundling out the Australians for a mere 120 in the first innings, the Sri Lankans were themselves staring down the barrel at 67 for 6 when Vaas walked out. When the last wicket finally fell, Sri Lanka's total had lifted to 211, and Vaas was undefeated on 68, easily the highest score of the innings - the second-highest score was 43 by Muttiah Muralitharan, with whom Vaas added 79 for the tenth wicket. (Clearly, Murali brings out the best in Vaas: in the ongoing Test against West Indies, the two put together 66.) Australia recovered and finally went on to win the match, but it wasn't Vaas's fault - in the second innings, he made 45, taking his match contribution to 113 runs and five wickets.
Vaas's career average as a Test batsman is only 21, but since 2003 that figure is a far more respectable 27.30. Vaas has surely lost some pace and zip as a bowler, but he has more than made up for it with a greater focus on his batting. As the table below shows, the numbers compare quite favourably with another player who is supposedly on his last legs as a bowler. Pollock averages a shade under 27 with the bat, though his better bowling stats ensure that his batting minus bowling average - that sacred figure by which allrounders are judged - remains in the positive.
(Stats since 2003; minimum qualification - 50 wickets and 300 runs)
Aussie dominance and England's chances
England might feel they have a realistic chance in this summer's Ashes, but the Australians have built an awesome legacy over the last few years, and it's unlikely they will let go of it in a hurry. The table below shows just complete the Australian domination has been in the last six years - since September 1999, they have a 53-9 win-loss record - that's very nearly six wins per loss. The West Indian side of the 1980s is often taken as a benchmark to measure domination, but even they didn't have it so good, with a marginally lower ratio.
But over the last 18 months, England have shown that they can run with the big boys too: since 2004, they have a win-loss ratio slightly better than Australia's during the corresponding period. Their dominance can also be gleaned by the difference between their batting and bowling averages during this period - it's nearly 15, even higher than the figure for Australia. Little wonder, then, that England are so upbeat about their prospects this time.
(Stats contributed by Muhammad Usman Sharif)
Let us know what you think