A versatile left arm spinner who broke onto the international circuit
at the tender age of 17 and was hailed as the successor to the great
Bishen Singh Bedi, he never made it to the heights that were expected
of him. Discarded from the Test side way before his time, the love of
cricket made him qualify as a first class umpire and later a TV
commentator so that he could continue to be part of the game.
We all know him as Maninder Singh. Years after he played his last Test
for India, he feels the comparison made early in his career affected
the scope of development for him. Incidentally, Maninder was the last
batsman to be dismissed in the historic tied Test match against
Australia at Madras. He was present at the VCA ground in Nagpur for
the first warm-up game of the Australia tour where Cricinfo caught up
with him and he relived some moments in his playing career:
Q: You made your international debut at the age of 17 and were
hailed as the successor to Bishen Singh Bedi. How did it feel?
A: Well it was a great feeling because that is what I was working out
for when I started playing cricket. My theme was to play for the
country and when I got selected to play it was a joyous moment. But
being hailed as the next Bishen Bedi took a heavy toll on my career
and on me. How can you suddenly start comparing somebody who is new to
someone who has taken 266 wickets in Test matches. Whenever I played,
everyone expected me to turn the match all by myself. I was young and
learning all the time. So having that tag on me was more of a
disadvantage to my playing career than an advantage. It was a great
compliment but it was unfair to expect too much too soon.
Q: Do you think that was the reason you ended up with 88 wickets
from 35 Tests at an average of 37?
A: Because of the pressure, I tried too hard to get wickets. I realise
now when I am doing commentary that if you run after wickets, they run
further away from you. These things you learn with time and
experience, but probably I was too late to learn them. Another thing
is that I played most of my Test cricket against Pakistan. In fact, I
played 15 of those 35 Tests against Pakistan and eight of them in
Pakistan. It is very difficult to get wickets as a spinner in Pakistan
with no support at all, everyone knows the conditions there. As a
spinner you need to be patient and draw the batsman out, outthink him,
experiment with a plan, plot against each batsman. But I never had the
time to do that because I was always expected to get wickets the
moment I came onto bowl.
Q: Do you think you were pushed into the international circuit a
bit too early in your career?
A: Yes, it was. I feel a spinner should play at least two to three
first class seasons and experience the ups and downs in first class
cricket before he is thrown into the sea of international cricket. If
you have always had a good day in the field, then suddenly one day
things don't go your way and you don't know how to overcome it. A
batsman should also have at least two to three years of experience at
the domestic level. It is only the fast bowlers who can be thrown into
the international team immediately. Or you have to be a genius like
Sachin Tendulkar. At international level, you need to be able to
adapt and also possess a level of maturity that can only come when you
have bad days in domestic cricket and learn from them because you have
a chance to comeback in the next match. In international cricket there
is no second chance.
Q: When you were discarded from the Test side, do you feel you had
a good amount of cricket left in you?
A: Yes, the confidence was always there. The feeling was always there
that if I work hard I can come back. I kept working hard but there
were so many suggestions coming in at that time that I got confused in
the end. I would say I believe in destiny, so I think it was destined
to be like this.
Q: Can you relive that Madras Test? What was that moment like? What
were you feeling?
A: Actually, I will honestly say I was absolutely numb at that time
because we were in such a good winning position then. We had five
wickets and just 40 runs to score. I felt we had made it, we had made
a great victory, but suddenly we lost three four quick wickets and
when I went into bat, we needed four to win and Ravi Shastri took two
of the first ball, then one off the second. I had to make the winning
run and Ravi came up to me and showed me the gaps. He said if you
could get a run, get it, otherwise give it a smack. So that is what I
was trying to do. There were three balls to face and I thought I would
try to take a single without any kind of risk. If I can't get it
through the fielders, then I might as well give it a heave. But it was
not to be that way and the game went down in history.
Q: You kept insisting that it hit your bat first, then the pad. You
have been an umpire yourself. Tell us what must have been going on in
the umpire's head when he adjudged you leg before?
A: I am sure the umpire was nervous. I am sure he was very nervous. I
was surprised because before I even played the ball, I could see his
finger going up. I mean almost before playing the ball. That shows he
was nervous but that's part of the game. At that time I lost my head,
Ravi lost his head but if it was destined to be like that, then it had
to happen. I look at it now and realise how much pressure was on the
umpire. The nervousness showed on him when he hastened in giving that
decision.
Q: Do you think having a regular physio or a doctor to be part of
the team would have helped you at that time to recover?
A: Yeah I think it would have helped very much at that time and maybe
it would have been a different story. Had I been able to talk to some
doctor or sports psychologist at that time he would have helped me get
over my action and I would have improved. That's the reason why I keep
insisting on having a sports psychologist. So many times in your
playing career you lose your concentration or your form for some
reason and these are the people that can get you back. So like the
Indian team has now, if we had someone then it would have helped a
lot. I needed a lot of talking to. I was a guy who needed to practice
everyday, I needed a proper program and that would have helped.
Q: Who has been the best batsman you have seen and bowled to?
A: The best batsman that I have seen till date is Sachin Tendulkar. I
think he is god's gift to mankind. And as far as bowling goes, Gordon
Greenidge was the hardest to bowl to. He waited for the bad balls and
then punished them. He never played rash shots, his game plan was very
simple, he played straight to most deliveries and pounced on anything
short or outside the offstump. He was very difficult to dismiss.
Vivian Richards was also a very good player but for him it was a
prestige issue because I was being compared and talked about as the
best left arm spinner around in those days. So he made it a point to
go after me. After all he was Viv Richards and he always wanted to go
after the best. He would hit me for a few boundaries and sixes,
sometimes out of the park but then I could get him out also when he
played like that. Javed Miandad was again a very tough customer to
tackle. He is one of those players who plays with the psyche of the
bowlers. He would do certain things to get you angry and once you're
angry you lose your rhythm and do wild things. You cannot focus on
your bowling if you're angry. He did that to me when he realised that
I was going to be hard to score off, so he went after me a few times
and I retaliated as well.
Q: What do you think of umpiring standards these days? Are the
commentators right in criticizing them so much?
A: You will always have a conflict while umpiring. This is because
each umpire is a different person and everyone has a different opinion
on similar issues. There are so many decisions that could go either
way and that is all due to the human factor. There will always be this
issue about decisions being wrong or right, it will always be
controversial. Every umpire in each country thinks differently. If it
is an Indian umpire he knows the conditions in India, he sees flat
wickets and he knows that the ball here does not rise much whereas in
Australia the conditions are different. The ball takes off from the
wicket and it has good bounce, so an Australian umpire will know that
the ball is going to bounce higher when it hits the wicket. Even
umpires in England have different ideas in their mind. They know the
grounds will be wet with dew and the moist conditions will favour
swing mostly. The ball does not spin much either in English
conditions. So when we go about with neutral umpiring, it is helpful
in one way that the touring team does not complain about biased
umpiring of the local umpires but in the bargain cricket suffers. If I
go to Australia today as a neutral umpire, I will have no idea of the
wickets there because I have only seen it on television. So I will be
in no position to judge if the ball is going to hit the stumps or will
bounce over it. The same rule applies to commentators as well.
Q: In the Bangalore Test you picked up seven in the first innings
but were ineffective in the second innings. What happened there?
A: I was very confused in that second innings. There were a lot of
suggestions, to bowl with flight, bowl flatter, bowl faster. There
were a lot of ideas and there was no time to think and correct myself.
So I think that is where I went wrong. Another thing was that there
was not much support from the other end. Ravi was there, Shivlal was
there but none were able to bowl as well as I did. If even one of them
had bowled well enough I think we would have done better there.
Q: What do you think of the wickets in India? How can we get
sporting wickets?
A: It is the Board who has to start. They have to wake up and take
notice. It is a pity to see that there are still such dead wickets in
India. I mean how do you expect these boys to play on bouncy tracks if
you don't have them at home. For the last four years there has been
the system of the match referee submitting a pitch report and till
date there has never been a report of a bad wicket. If it is reported
there is a certain amount of fine imposed on the Association. I
haven't heard of any Association that has been fined for a bad pitch.
We have so many talented cricketers here in India but it's sad to see
them struggle when they go out to play on bouncy tracks. I think there
is nothing wrong with the talent in India. We have a lot of talented
players like Zaheer Khan and even Ashish Nehra is bowling beautifully.
Q: Do you think the selectors are struggling to find a suitable
replacement for Anil Kumble?
A: I think they are going to struggle. If they think they will be able
to replace a bowler like Anil Kumble, they are wrong. Kumble is a
match winner and not an ordinary bowler. You cannot find a replacement
for him overnight. If there was a suitable replacement he would have
played for at least two or three years for India by now. I am very
impressed with Harbhajan and Sanghvi here in the first game but
frankly it would be unfair on any bowler to compare him to Kumble. He
is a class act and if you look at a new bowler as a comparison to
Kumble you will never find anyone to replace him at all. Because match
winners are not made they are born.
Q: Do you think cricketers like yourself can come forward and help
the youngsters with their problems?
A: I am always there. Even when I am umpiring or doing commentary if
someone comes up to me and asks for help, I am ready to correct him,
and even show it to him. Bishen Bedi and Prasanna have been helping
out the spinners at the Academy in Bangalore. I believe the NCA is
doing a good job with the youngsters but I am disappointed at how they
treated Gavaskar. I mean a man of Sunil Gavaskar's stature can do
wonders for the talented boys but I feel very disheartened the way
administrators have treated a cricketer like him. They have always
tried to push cricketers out, it's a never-ending battle and I think
only cricketers should be on the committee of the NCA.