Sydney Sixers v Brisbane Heat, Big Bash, SCG December 16, 2011

Haddin, MacGill shine in Sixers win

Alex Malcolm

Sydney Sixers 3 for 140 (Haddin 76) beat Brisbane Heat 8 for 139 (MacGill 2-21) by seven wickets

Who said Twenty20 was a young man's game? The bright lights, fluorescent pink uniforms, fireworks and cheerleaders were all pitched at the younger audience. But it was the older players who dominated the opening night of the brand-new Big Bash League, on which the Sydney Sixers thumped the Brisbane Heat at the Sydney Cricket Ground.

Forty-year-old Stuart MacGill, playing his first professional match since retiring in May 2008, and 35-year-old Brett Lee bowled tight spells to restrict the Heat to 8 for 139 from their 20 overs before Sixers captain, the 34-year-old Australia Test wicketkeeper Brad Haddin, made 76 off just 59 balls to help steer his side home by seven wickets.

On a sluggish surface, the Sixers drew first blood, literally, when Lee struck Brendon McCullum, the New Zealand keeper-batsman, square between the eyes. McCullum, who is the leading run-scorer in Twenty20 internationals, was forced to retire hurt with blood pouring from the bridge of his nose.

The Sixers quicks mixed up their pace well as Heat pair Matthew Hayden and James Hopes battled to find any fluency with their stroke-play. Hopes was the first to fall when he holed out at long-off to a Dwayne Bravo slower ball.

Then MacGill took control. In three years out of the game it seemed he had gained more control than he ever had. He bowled with wonderful guile and skill. Given he had only played a handful of Grade games in preparation for the tournament he showed that skilled players never lose their ability.

First he defeated McCullum in flight, tossing the ball above McCullum's swollen eyes and getting him to advance and miscue to long off.

Then MacGill clean bowled his former Test team-mate Hayden for 29 with one that dipped and spun back sharply. Hayden looked rusty in his 28-ball stay. He showed brief glimpses of his abilities and will undoubtedly be better for the time in the middle.

MacGill finished with 2 for 21 from four quality overs, and might have had three wickets if Brett Lee had not unfortunately fallen onto the rope and dropped the ball after he had taken a brilliant catch off Andrew Robinson.

Dan Christian, a New South Welshman who lives in Adelaide but is representing Brisbane for this Big Bash tournament only, was the only Heat batsman to get going. He made 32 from 22 before holing out in the deep of Mitchell Starc. Peter Forrest fell in the same manner, Steven Smith completing an outstanding catch while having to play hop-scotch to avoid stepping on the rope.

The Sixers captain, Haddin, then made a mockery of a slow surface by playing with fluency and sublime timing. His 76 included five fours and five enormous sixes. He clubbed 16 from one Alistair McDermott over, first lofting straight for six, then backing away and lofting over cover for four, before pulling the last ball over fine leg and into the stands. He later thumped consecutive sixes off Nathan Hauritz, the second hitting the upper deck of the Ladies' Stand. He fell to the only ball he mis-hit, but the damage was done. The Sixers cruised home with nine balls to spare, and without using the services of Dwayne Bravo or Ed Cowan.

The Sixers look a sharp outfit with plenty of experience and depth, and they have started the tournament in fine fashion.

Comments have now been closed for this article

  • Andrew on December 18, 2011, 23:11 GMT

    @ Clive_Dunn - ".. I'm not sure this really helps Australian cricket recapture its former glories..." it won't & its not meant to. IMO - T20s SHOULD be a Masters tournament! @ VivGilchrist - yep, it seems that because NSW does provide a large % of talent, they instantly think that Sydney should have 2 teams which in theory should create rivalry. The reality is - EVEN if it did create cross-town rivalty - its only 2 games of the season. I agree Newcastle/Canberra or Woollongong should of got a gig. Not sure how logistics would handle it - but its not like the players then have to travel to a Shield game the next day!

  • Lachlan on December 17, 2011, 7:22 GMT

    and yet noone reallly cared. why, because the BBL is a pathetic joke.

  • Damon on December 17, 2011, 5:41 GMT

    Has the BBL become a form of Masters cricket as everyone seems to be 40+ and long retired from cricket ? I'm voting for changing the rules and allowing the old guys golf carts in the field and introducing a toilet break after every over. I'm not sure this really helps Australian cricket recapture its former glories.

  • Basil on December 17, 2011, 2:09 GMT

    Like I said, Sydney is pathetic at supporting sport. Funny, I thought Melbourne was a big multi-cultural city too. Is T20 really more interesting or is it that the boredom only lasts 3 hours?

  • wayne on December 17, 2011, 1:36 GMT

    I agree, VivGilchrist - the whole thing just felt really hollow, even by T20 standards. To be honest, the most entertaining bit about the match was Brendon McCullum getting hit in the nose, and then casually shrugging off the fact he had blood pouring out of his head. Tough cookie. Brett Lee seemed much more concerned than Baz did.

  • far on December 17, 2011, 1:32 GMT

    t20 is for old farts who come out of retirement and the young to make a name for them self

  • Chris on December 17, 2011, 0:13 GMT

    Like Warne and other cricketers have mentioned, T20 should replace ODI's. By all means keep them around including the world cup, but play down its significance with a lower budget and just have it for practice or upcoming players. The whole point of ODI's was to take it to the masses where they couldn't complain cricket being boring. ODI's are still too long and boring for that and T20 has proven that it is far more popular with State matches being more entertaining than international ODI's. The reason Sydney doesn't support sport very well is due to a number of reasons, but Sydney is a working city where everyone works long hours and doesn't get time to go out to games, public transport is hopeless, costs are rip-offs (esp. for families) and it's so multi-cultural in Sydney that there's a lot of those 4-5million people that just find no interest in the sports that we play.

  • Basil on December 16, 2011, 22:07 GMT

    If you compare this match to the last 4 Tests Australia have played in T20 is not a patch on the traditional form of the game. All the pre-fabricated excitement, dancing girls, fireworks, does not hide the shallowness of the "game". It was a boring game. After the Sixers hit the winning runs it left me with feelings of "so what?". Also, Sydney for a city of 4 million, once again proved that they are the worst city in Australia at supporting sport with a tiny crowd. How they can warrant a second team over a Newcastle or Canberra is beyond me.

  • David on December 16, 2011, 21:13 GMT

    Can't wait to see MacGill and Warne go head to head when the Sixers play the Stars!!!

  • Dummy4 on December 16, 2011, 19:41 GMT

    why am i hearing negatives from some adverse viewers, i think it was responsive considering some star players didn't opt to go for money,and instead made there services available for Australia, Proud of u Australian stars

  • No featured comments at the moment.