Mike Holmans September 12, 2008

Hip, hip Hoggard!

After that tour, Nasser Hussain said Hoggard was a dream to captain because he was the kind of guy who would run through walls for you – he never gave up

Somewhere between Hamilton and Wellington, two crew members were thrown overboard from the good ship England and told they’d have to swim for it. Steve Harmison swam strongly enough to catch up and be hauled back on board, but with the announcement that he will not be getting a central contract, Matthew Hoggard’s Test career looks over.

As a Hoggard fan I am saddened; as a Yorkshire fan, hopeful that he will think it worth carrying on to keep taking 40 or 50 championship wickets a season at 24; as an England fan, I’m delighted that the transition was timed so brilliantly. It was pretty obvious from the first few times we saw him that Jimmy Anderson would one day take over as our premier swing bowler, and the performances he’s put in this year are evidence of a baton being passed with an efficiency the Great Britain 4x100m track teams could usefully study. Just as the Hoggster runs out of steam, the lad from Burnley is off and running hard

Hoggard is the kind of sporting hero we English treasure: self-deprecating, a wholehearted trier, and not quite world-class.

The featherbeds and billiard tables which so often pass for Test pitches these days offered him little help when he used the old ball. Later on, he developed a (slightly) slower ball and some cutters, so he could be brought on in the 50th over without risking too much carnage, but before 2005 or so he could be as much liability as asset once the ball lost its shine. He was cannon fodder for the likes of Matthew Hayden (in Australia), unless bowling negatively as on the “Bore Them Out” tour of 2001-2, when Hoggy bowled as far outside off stump as Ashley Giles pitched outside leg and the whole of India snored.

After that tour, Nasser Hussain said Hoggard was a dream to captain because he was the kind of guy who would run through walls for you – he never gave up. The other great thing about him was his dependability; you always knew what you were going to get from him. He was as predictable and as reliably satisfying as the full monty breakfast in your favourite caff.

His old-ball stuff may have been mediocre (I don’t care much for the tomatoes anyway), but the meat of his bowling was with a new ball.

By his own account, he just ran up and ‘wanged’ it down the other end, but that is taking modesty too far: he is much more skilful than that implies. The deftness with which he executed the three-card trick on Hayden (in England) and Graeme Smith (anywhere) suggests that he can make a fine post-cricket living fleecing gullible punters at fairgrounds with a Find The Lady stand.

Being a new-ball specialist overseas when the Kookaburra ball is used almost everywhere bar England and India seems like an impossible task, but his two best matches were abroad.

The first was in Christchurch in 2001-2, when his opening spell, broken after three overs by close of play and after another ten by lunch on the following day, read 20-7-59-5. He came back later to mop up the tail, ending with 7 for 63. In the second innings, both sets of batsmen went gloriously wild with Thorpe and Astle scoring two of the four fastest double hundreds in Test history, but the first innings lead Hoggard had ensured with magnificent swing bowling saw England home.

‘Hoggard’s Match’ though, was Johannesburg 2005. He took a fearful clattering from Herschelle Gibbs, who was in rollicking form, but disposed of most of the rest of the top order for very little, ending the innings with 5-144 and restricting South Africa's lead to 8. A commanding 180 from Trescothick set South Africa a possibly gettable target of 325, but again it was only Gibbs who could make a fight of it. Three wickets in Hoggard’s first five overs set SA back on their heels, and his eventual career best 7-61 clinched England’s first series victory in South Africa for forty years.

When he goes to the great cricket ground in the sky, he won’t be eligible for membership of the Great Players CC, but Johannesburg will earn him an invitation to turn out for their XI as a guest for one match.

He will be heartbroken that it’s over, but Matthew Hoggard can be proud of a worthy Test career.

Comments have now been closed for this article

  • testli5504537 on October 1, 2008, 19:45 GMT

    Hoggy has been brilliant for England. Not always the most fashionable, but as Vaughan once said, he'll bowl all day for you. He had a huge heart and always gave it all. A great shame, but it's good news for Yorkshire.

  • testli5504537 on September 13, 2008, 2:04 GMT

    To develop Chris's point, England's next Tests are in India. It's quite likely that Broad will make way for Samit Patel, which with Flintoff and Panesar leaves two places, currently filled by Harmison and Anderson. Next in line must be Sidebottom. And, if the selectors are to be believed, Pattinson.

    Hoggard hasn't been bowling well enough to grab headlines for Yorkshire this season. He isn't the bowler he was - and while he can still be a force in county cricket, he won't be dangerous to quality Test batsmen.

    Two or three years ago, he was a very good bowler indeed, but time marches on.

  • testli5504537 on September 13, 2008, 0:36 GMT

    It is with some regret that I agree Hoggard's international days have met their denouement, however, he simply is not amongst the best three specialist seamers England could now select. Harmison has always had the potential, and rudiments, to be far more effective than Hoggard, whilst Anderson and Broad offer far more as bowlers than does Hoggard. He is the superior new ball bowler at present, however, he lacks the pace, and crucially bounce, that Anderson and Broad provide. Given, then, that steepling bounce remains the finest attribute a seamer can have, accuracy notwithstanding, Hoggard simply cannot be selected.

  • testli5504537 on September 12, 2008, 19:14 GMT

    Are you kidding me? Hoggard, not quite world class? Well that's like saying Rahul Dravid, not quite a legend. Hoggard is as world class as Rahul Dravid is a legend.

  • testli5504537 on September 12, 2008, 18:52 GMT

    Hoggard has been treated pathetically. If I recall, he actually only failed in 2 innings (one in SL and then followed it up with one in NZ) where he had something like 1/120. He got injured after the series (at home) against WI and then turned up in SL where he failed in 1 innings.

    Anderson is far too inconsistent. He still has a couple of years to go to be counted as a reliable swing bowler.

  • testli5504537 on September 12, 2008, 17:06 GMT

    Dont start writing tributes too soon. James Anderson is too inconsistent, Steve Harmison has just played 4 decent ODI's and Stuart Broad lacks Test Match class. England required a Hoggard in India. Sadly they wont have him here. 2-0 awaits

  • testli5504537 on September 12, 2008, 16:59 GMT

    England's obsession with pace has caused Hoggard to fade away from the limelight. He has been their most consistent bowler for the past 3 years although the faster, bigger bowlers took all the headlines( even when they are not performing). I suspect the same fate will be bestowed on Ryan Sidebottom who has carried the majority workload for the past year and everyone tends to forget that after one-off one-day series victory against a ageing SA side. IMO Hggard still has to be among the top 4 english bowlers along with Freddie, Ryan and Jimmy.

  • No featured comments at the moment.