November 2, 2012

Influence of wides and no balls on Test bowler averages

A stats analysis to determine the effect of wides and no-balls on the bowling averages in Tests
21

Waqar Younis has the lowest number of wides and no balls per Test amongst the top pace bowlers
Waqar Younis has the lowest number of wides and no balls per Test amongst the top pace bowlers © Getty Images

The previous article was a huge data-rich one involving bowler-pairs. Even understanding the significance of data presented there would have taken some time. This is also a bowler-centric article but much simpler to read and understand, if not in analysis. I must thank Arijit Dasgupta for this suggestion.

A few days after India won the World Cup during 1983, it was decided that the wides and no balls would be debited to the bowler analysis. It was a simple idea but had significant problems in execution and it took more than 2 years for the first scorecards to be rolled out with the wides/no balls information shown against the bowler's analysis. It is possible that the bowlers and wides were debited to the bowlers from Test # 961 onwards (India-Pakistan match played at Bangalore during September 1983). However the debited numbers were not shown against the bowler analysis until Test # 1029 (Australia-New Zealand Test match at Brisbane starting on 8 November 1985).

So this is our real cut-off Test. So one can say that the cut-off is data-driven than law-implementation-driven especially as the 1983-87 period is a grey area. Milind's query to MCC on this has resulted in a vague unclear answer. The only assumption, and a valid one, is that where wides/no balls have been shown against a bowler analysis, these are included in the bowling analysis runs.

Arijit's idea was that this single law change had a profound influence on the Bowling averages of bowlers over the past 25 plus years and that I should study this in depth. This seemed an excellent idea and I have been working on it for the past month. It turned out to be a complex exercise, because of the reasons outlined below.

This analysis concentrates almost totally on the post-1985 period, or more correctly the post-T1029 period. For the pre-T1029 period, I will present a single summary of the wides/no balls which would have been debited to the bowlers. This will give an idea of the possible increase in bowling averages.

For the first 1028 Tests the total number of wides/no balls stands at 15353 and the number of bowler wickets at 31727. This leads to a notional increase of 0.48 runs per wicket. For the next 1027 Tests the total number of wides/no balls stands at 29118 and the number of bowler wickets at 31449. This has led to an increase of 0.93 runs per wicket. This clearly shows a doubling of the number of wides/no balls post-T1029. This may be due to the stricter interpretation of extras-related rules, stricter handling of short balls, significant law changes and the increase in declaring a ball wide owing to the influence of ODIs.

Before anything, let me be clear that the overriding consideration in all these adjustments is simply that Team wides/no balls are king. These would remain sacrosanct. All adjustments will be done only with the bowler level wides/no balls. With this guiding principle I have ensured that the Team scores remain untouched. The salient points of this analysis are outlined below.

1. All scorecards, including the Cricinfo ones, do not include full information about the number of deliveries that were declared wide/no ball and how many runs were scored off these deliveries. When 5 wides are conceded, 5 runs are added properly to the team score, extras total, no balls tally in the team extras line and bowler runs conceded. However, somewhat inconsistently, this is shown as only 1 wide delivery against the bowler. Same is true for the rare case where 5 runs are scored off a no ball. As an example, please peruse the very last innings scorecard. Test # 2055, India-New Zealand Test at Bangalore. In the Indian second innings, Southee bowled a 5-ball wide in the team's second over. The extras shows 5 wides, team total and bowler runs are increased by 5 runs but only 1 wide is shown against Southee in the bowling analysis.

2. Even after Test # 1029, there are matches in which no wides and no balls are shown against the bowler analysis even though there are team wides and no balls. Nothing can be done about these and such Test matches are kept out of these calculations.

3. There are matches in which the team wides/no balls are less than the sum of the bowler wides/no balls. The adjustment here is simple. Reduce the bowler wides/no balls proportionately to match the team wides/no balls. Very logical and correct. If there is something wrongly done, I would rather assume that all mistakes are restricted to the bowler figures rather than the team numbers.

4. Now comes the difficult part. The team wides/no balls are higher than the sum of the bowler wides/no balls. This is a highly nuanced situation. There are many types of differences so I had to use a different method for each adjustment.

  • Situations such as team line showing 5/6/7/8... wides/no balls and only one bowler 's analysis showing 1/2/3/4... wide/no ball. No problems since these are similar to the Southee situation. Just make the specific bowler's wides/no balls as 5 or 6 or whatever. Could as well be team showing 10 wides and bowler showing 2 wides. The key is an exact difference of multiple of 4 wides/no balls.
  • Situations where the difference is x wides but more than one bowler has bowled the wides. I have taken a logical, if not the most accurate approach that the difference will be attributed to the bowler who has bowled most wides. For instance, if the team has 5 wides and two bowlers have bowled 1 and 2 wides, the additional 2 wides are allotted to the bowler who has captured 2 wides. May not be perfect but there is a good chance that it is correct.
  • Sometimes there is no pattern. Team has been debited 8 wides and the bowler total is 3 wides. Nothing can be done about it and it is left as it is.
  • For recent matches there was the option of perusing the commentary. However it is a thankless option and there is no way I could have done it because of the difficulty and the time required. 130 overs are shown in three screens and perusal of each delivery was needed. Browser search of wide is useless because of the "wide of point" type of commentary.
  • In a few cases I have perused the scorecards and taken an intuitive and informed decision. By now I had got a clear idea of the bowler characteristics.
5. At the end of about a week's tough work, I had improved the bowler level byes/no balls availability from about 21000 to just over 22800. This works to about 78% of the total tally of wides/no balls for this period of 29000+ and represents a major successful move forward. The overall impact might only be a reasonably small figure but the impact on individual bowlers sometimes goes as high as 7%. The analysis from this point onwards is a simple one and my tables indicate the current average, adjusted average and the % difference. Multiple tables are shown so that we can get different insights.

In view of my own physical condition, I am not going to offer detailed comments on the tables. I will present all the tables and at the end, summarise what I perceive are the key points. Readers can always contribute their bit and make this a discussion forum. Let me also say that I will publish many more comments without any response from me. I have to necessarily cut the amount of work I do. More often than not, I have to let my silence speak.

Since it is not possible to identify the wides/no balls conceded by the pre-T1029 bowlers, it is not possible to increase their averages. So the only fair method of comparison will be a notional reduction of the post-T1029 bowlers' averages.

75+ wickets bowlers ordered by reduction % of bowling average

BowlerTypeCtryStartEndMatsWktsAvgeWDsNBsTotalAdjAvge% chg
             
Malinga L.SRFMSlk200420103010133.163522926430.547.88%
Reiffel P.RRFMAus199219983510426.96519820325.017.24%
Collins P.TLFMWin199920063210634.621223524732.296.73%
Edwards F.HRFWin200320125415838.386933840735.806.71%
Lee BRFAus199920087631030.825358764028.756.70%
Pollock S.MRFMSaf1995200810842123.122860263021.626.47%
FernandoRFMSlk200020124010037.843421024435.406.45%
KasprowiczRFMAus199620063811332.88321922230.915.98%
Morkel MRFSaf200620124215030.375221526728.595.86%
Roach K.A.JRFWin20092012218227.702011313326.075.86%
Flintoff ARFMEng199820097922632.793536640131.015.41%
ShoaibAkhtarRFPak199720074617825.691722724424.325.34%
Mohd SamiRFPak20012012368552.743020923949.935.33%
AmbroseRFWin198820009840520.99642242819.935.04%
Abdur RazzaqRFMPak199920064610036.931017518535.085.01%
Srinath JRFMInd199120026723630.473130733829.044.70%

200+ wickets bowlers with over 2.0% reduction % of bowling average

BowlerTypeCtryStartEndMatsWktsAvgeWDsNBsTotalAdjAvge% chg
 
Lee BRFAus199920087631030.825358764028.756.70%
Pollock S.MRFMSaf1995200810842123.122860263021.626.47%
Flintoff ARFMEng199820097922632.793536640131.015.41%
AmbroseRFWin198820009840520.99642242819.935.04%
Srinath JRFMInd199120026723630.473130733829.044.70%
Vaas WPUJCLFMSlk1994200911135529.582042044028.344.19%
Wasim AkramLFMPak1985200210441423.62939140022.654.09%
Gough DRFEng199420035822928.401924426327.254.04%
Zaheer KhanLFMInd200020128529132.076730537230.793.99%
McDermottRFAus198419967129128.63430530927.573.71%
McGrath G.DRFMAus1993200712456321.642636439020.953.20%
Walsh C.ARFWin1984200113251924.441239240423.663.19%
Hoggard M.JRFMEng200020086724830.502521624129.533.19%
Caddick A.RRFMEng199320036223429.91621522128.973.16%
Cairns C.LRFMNzl198920046221829.402217519728.503.07%

Top bowlers in order of wickets

BowlerTypeCtryStartEndMatsWktsAvgeWDsNBsTotalAdjAvge% chg
             
MuralitharanrobSlk1992201013380022.73238839022.242.15%
Warne S.KrlbAus1992200714570825.422316318625.151.03%
Kumble ArlbInd1990200813261929.651027028029.201.53%
McGrath G.DRFMAus1993200712456321.642636439020.953.20%
Walsh C.ARFWin1984200113251924.441239240423.663.19%
Kapil Dev NRFMInd1978199413143429.653202329.590.18%
Hadlee R.JRFMNzl197319908643122.3002222.290.02%
Pollock S.MRFMSaf1995200810842123.122860263021.626.47%
Wasim AkramLFMPak1985200210441423.62939140022.654.09%
HarbhajanrobInd199820119840632.226152132.170.16%
AmbroseRFWin198820009840520.99642242819.935.04%
Ntini MRFSaf1998200910139028.834513017528.381.56%
Botham I.TRFMEng1977199210238328.4000028.400.00%
MarshallRFWin197819918137620.958536120.780.77%
Waqar YounisRFMPak198920038737323.567455223.420.59%
Imran KhanRFPak197119928836222.8100022.810.00%
Vettori D.LlspNzl1997201211236034.42412112534.081.01%
Lillee D.KRFAus197119847035523.9200023.920.00%
Vaas WPUJCLFMSlk1994200911135529.582042044028.344.19%
Donald A.ARFSaf199220027233022.25629115321.792.08%
WillisRFEng197119849032525.2000025.200.00%
Lee BRFAus199920087631030.825358764028.756.70%
Gibbs L.RrobWin195819767930929.0900029.090.00%
Trueman F.SRFEng195219656730721.5800021.580.00%

Bowlers who have conceded most wides/no balls per Test

BowlerTypeCtryStartEndMatsWktsAvgeWDsNBsTotalWdNb/Test
            
Malinga L.SRFMSlk200420103010133.16352292648.80
Lee BRFAus199920087631030.82535876408.42
Collins P.TLFMWin199920063210634.62122352477.72
Edwards F.HRFWin200320125415838.38693384077.54
Mohd SamiRFPak20012012368552.74302092396.64
Morkel MRFSaf200620124215030.37522152676.36
Roach K.A.JRFWin20092012218227.70201131336.33
FernandoRFMSlk200020124010037.84342102446.10
KasprowiczRFMAus199620063811332.8832192225.84
Pollock S.MRFMSaf1995200810842123.12286026305.83
Reiffel P.RRFMAus199219983510426.9651982035.80
ShoaibAkhtarRFPak199720074617825.69172272445.30
Flintoff ARFMEng199820097922632.79353664015.08
Srinath JRFMInd199120026723630.47313073385.04
.....
Swann G.SrobEng200820124619229.595050.11

General Comments

1. Probably the most significant bowling average change is one for Curtly Ambrose. The already very low average of this great bowler has been further reduced to below-20.0, 19.93 to be exact, making comparisons with Syd Barnes possible.

2. The next two significant reductions are for two very dissimilar bowlers, Brett Lee and Shaun Pollock. Their bowling averages have been reduced by over 6%. Pollock's average has been reduced to a wonderful figure of 21.62. They have bowled over 600 wides/no balls. What may be the reason for an accurate bowler like bowling so many no balls?

3. Similarly two totally dissimilar bowlers head the % reduction: Malinga and Reiffel. A real paradox. One a tear-away slinger and the other, a seemingly accurate medium-pacer.

4. Look at Swann's tally of wides/no balls. He has bowled a single wide in his 5 year career. That was in the 2011 Birmingham Test against India. That must have been a momentous occasion. And the icing on the cake: these were 5 wides.

5. If Swann is so accurate, how does one explain Muralitharan's 388 no balls? Warne, on the other hand, seems to have bowled only 163 no balls.

6. Not just Murali. Why do so many top bowlers bowl so many no balls. Surely some of these resulted in loss of a wicket.

7. Look at Waqar Younis' accuracy, only 52 wides/no balls and compare the same with Wasim Akram's 400 wides/no balls. The faster bowler has far fewer wides/no balls.In fact Waqar Younis has the lowest wides/no balls per Test amongst the top pace bowlers.

8. Saqlain Mushtaq and Muralitharan have the highest average of wides/no balls per Test, for spinners, either side of 3.0. If we conclude that unconventional off-spin is the reason, then Harbhajan seems to have excellent control with only 0.22 wides/no balls per Test.

9. Now for the maximum number of wides and no balls bowled by a bowler in an innings. These are either from the raw unadjusted scorecard data or where the changes are 100% correct (1 wide in analysis line for a single bowler and 5 wides in team extras line).

  • No Balls: Unusually high numbers are present. Wasim Akram, in Test # 1283 against South Africa (1995), conceded 21 No balls. Ambrose's analysis in Test # 1363 shows 21 No balls, but this is wrong since the bowler total is in excess of the Team totals. Hence only Wasim Akram's is the correct figure indisputably.
  • Wides: There are two candidates. In Test # 1809 Pak against Eng (2006), Umar Gul conceded either 10 or 14 wides but not very clear. In Test # 1836 against Eng (2007), Collymore conceded either 10 or 14 wides but not very clear. I could peruse the commentaries to sort this out but it would amount to too much work for very little gains.
  • Total WDs/NBs: There are two 22s and 23s each but in unclear situations. Hence the total high must be allotted to Wasim Akram, with 21 No balls and Vaas, in Test 1592 against Pak (2002) who conceded 1 wide and 20 no balls.

10. Cannot resist this comment. I read a report wherein Kohli has mentioned that England and India gave India flat tracks for practice matches and green tops for Tests. If this is true, then how did England score 474/8, 269/6, 221, 544, 710/7 and 591/6. Around 60 Runs per wicket. Green tops? And Australia scored 330, 240, 659/4, 369, 604/7 and 167/5. RpW is around 51.5. India has the right to select any team, no spinners or 11 batsmen or 11 bowlers or 11 Zonal players for the practice match. Why make the silliest of statements to support it?

One final summary. I have given below the top-10 of the current Bowling average tables, for bowlers who have captured more than 150 wickets.

Barnes, Davidson, Marshall, Garner, Ambrose, Laker, Trueman, McGrath, Donald, Hadlee.

Now the same table with the wides/no balls removed for post-T1029 bowlers.

Barnes, Ambrose, Davidson, Marshall, McGrath, Garner, Laker, Trueman, Pollock, Donald.

The most significant change is Shaun Pollock moving from no.15 to no.9. Ambrose moves from 5 to 2. McGrath moves from 8 to 5. Muralitharan remains at no.11 in both tables.

To download the complete bowler tables and match summaries, please CLICK HERE.

Finally my thanks once again to Arijit.

Anantha Narayanan has written for ESPNcricinfo and CastrolCricket and worked with a number of companies on their cricket performance ratings-related systems

Comments have now been closed for this article

  • Waspsting on November 5, 2012, 11:24 GMT

    @Ananth - I'm posting this link here, though it relates more to the previous article as its probably easier for all to see.

    Makes interesting reading -

    http://www.espncricinfo.com/magazine/content/story/535666.html

  • Waspsting on November 4, 2012, 13:47 GMT

    "The only bone of contention is that for the first 1000 Tests or so tthis was not done and as such there is a difference in methodology. Let us say , this detrmines what Ambrose's average would have been if the laws, or rather the scoring methods, were not changed."

    Hard to say who gets hurt the most, given the laws they played under

    possibly back-foot no ball laws penalized bowlers figures more than modern rules.

    With the back foot law, batsman usually had time to change their shot into an attacking one (sort of "free hit"), with todays front foot law, they don't.

    Best time for bowlers, obviously front foot law and no-balls not counting against bowlers stats.

    Not so easy to determine if back foot law (but no balls not counted against bowler) helps/hinders bowler relative to front foot law-but no balls counted against bowler.

    i'm assuming if batsman hit a four of a no ball under the back foot law, those runs counted against bowler{?}

  • Jeff on November 4, 2012, 11:52 GMT

    Are no balls that are not the fault of the bowler still credited against him? For example, bowling when the captain has set three long legs? Does not happen often. But that is probably the way it goes. Ananth

  • John Gibson on November 4, 2012, 11:18 GMT

    Both Collymore and Gul had 14 wides in an innings, including 2 lots of 5 each. Can send details if interested.

  • arijit on November 3, 2012, 20:01 GMT

    Anantha A million thanks for the way you turned my casual comment into such an excellent and thorough article. [[ Readers maketh this blog. Simple it might have been but a very incisive one. Ananth: ]] I have one point to make about the later suggestion about working out a further reduced average for the top 5 bowlers by crediting them with the wickets they would have got if the extra balls were legal deliveries. This goes against the objective of achieving parity in the assessment of earlier and later bowlers. Here, the former lose out. The earlier bowlers did bowl no-balls and wides, and while the runs weren't debited, nor were the “dismissals” credited. Get well soon. Warm regards

  • Waspsting on November 3, 2012, 11:29 GMT

    Was wondering how Keith Miller fared? He didn't even mark his run up, just ran in from wherever he felt like. Claimed in his book it was easy for him and bowling of no balls struck him as a lack of cricketing sense (possibly just big talk - Miller did a lot of that) [[ No answers to the first question. Ananth: ]] Hope your better, Ananth.

  • Waspsting on November 3, 2012, 11:25 GMT

    i remember both Ambrose and Wasim being pretty casual with no balls in general.

    I think Ambrose's possible record haul of no balls might have been a particularly bad day for him that i remember watching(?)

    It was in Aus, and for whatever reason, he just couldn't get his run up right. was bailing out at point of delivery every other ball.

    Speaking of no-balls - there was the ridiculous conclusion to an Eng-Pak test at the Oval, when Wasim and Saqi were bowling no balls every ball - and the umpires had apparently just stopped looking for them! Eng captain Stewart made a sarcastic comment about it at post match interview (after Eng lost)!

    The WI batsmen from the 75/76 tour of Aus (1-5 loss) claimed Jeff Thomson was constantly overstepping by a yard or so, but was never called by the umpires. Who knows? A possible factor in Thommo's rep as probably the fastest bowler ever.

    (continued)

  • milpand on November 3, 2012, 10:11 GMT

    contd...

    The meeting of the Cricket Committee on 15 October 1984 recorded that “some countries were already recording no balls and wides and therefore a decision had been required as to whether it should be universally adopted. At the conference [ICC] it had been agreed that no balls and wides should be recorded against the bowler during the forthcoming season, subject to a suitable method of recording them in the scorebook being drawn up.”

    At the next meeting in December it was reported that this method had been communicated to all countries. It was decided not to incorporate this in the Laws as it was primarily a matter of statistics rather than the playing of the game.

    What this leaves a little unclear is whether any overseas Tests were played (or rather, scored) to this regulation prior to the 1985 UK season. However, the scorecard from the first Ashes Test that summer, at Headingley, includes “NOTE: wides and no balls are now debited against the bowler." [[ Thanks, Milind, for sharing it. Rather verbose but at least pinpoints 1985 as an important year in the implementation of this convention change. My cut-off of the first 1985 Winter Tests seems okay. Ananth: ]]

  • milpand on November 3, 2012, 10:08 GMT

    MCC is not responsible for the playing of Test matches. Yet Neil from MCC Library looked up specific information that goes back nearly 30 years, and with over 200 years of archive information. While the response doesn’t help very much it does provide some background that is worth sharing.

    ******** Neil's reply:

    As so often this proved far trickier to solve than might be imagined. The stipulation regarding wides and no-balls being debited to the bowler did not enter the Laws until 2000. It appears first to have been proposed at the ICC meeting at Lord’s on June 29-30 1983. The 1984 Wisden (p.1251) states: “it was proposed, and is likely to be accepted at the Conference’s next meeting…” Wisden 1985 records that the annual meeting on July 18-19 1984 decided that “No-balls and wides should continue to be debited to a bowler, as was now happening in most countries.”

    contd...

  • Arjun on November 3, 2012, 8:17 GMT

    Ananth,

    Some observations....

    1) A Donald has bowled only 0.99 % of total balls as wides/noballs, remarkable for Fast Bowler. 2) MG Johnson has bowled more wides(75) than noballs(67) in his career. 3) 2 slingers malinga and edwards have bowled max. % of extra deliveries. 4) A Fraser didn't bowl single wide in his career. [[ I did not realize that I had not got this data in completely. Now I have done it for the other table also. Waqar Yopunis is something. Only 0.32% of the balls bowled. I think Swann is simply amazing. Ananth: ]]

  • Waspsting on November 5, 2012, 11:24 GMT

    @Ananth - I'm posting this link here, though it relates more to the previous article as its probably easier for all to see.

    Makes interesting reading -

    http://www.espncricinfo.com/magazine/content/story/535666.html

  • Waspsting on November 4, 2012, 13:47 GMT

    "The only bone of contention is that for the first 1000 Tests or so tthis was not done and as such there is a difference in methodology. Let us say , this detrmines what Ambrose's average would have been if the laws, or rather the scoring methods, were not changed."

    Hard to say who gets hurt the most, given the laws they played under

    possibly back-foot no ball laws penalized bowlers figures more than modern rules.

    With the back foot law, batsman usually had time to change their shot into an attacking one (sort of "free hit"), with todays front foot law, they don't.

    Best time for bowlers, obviously front foot law and no-balls not counting against bowlers stats.

    Not so easy to determine if back foot law (but no balls not counted against bowler) helps/hinders bowler relative to front foot law-but no balls counted against bowler.

    i'm assuming if batsman hit a four of a no ball under the back foot law, those runs counted against bowler{?}

  • Jeff on November 4, 2012, 11:52 GMT

    Are no balls that are not the fault of the bowler still credited against him? For example, bowling when the captain has set three long legs? Does not happen often. But that is probably the way it goes. Ananth

  • John Gibson on November 4, 2012, 11:18 GMT

    Both Collymore and Gul had 14 wides in an innings, including 2 lots of 5 each. Can send details if interested.

  • arijit on November 3, 2012, 20:01 GMT

    Anantha A million thanks for the way you turned my casual comment into such an excellent and thorough article. [[ Readers maketh this blog. Simple it might have been but a very incisive one. Ananth: ]] I have one point to make about the later suggestion about working out a further reduced average for the top 5 bowlers by crediting them with the wickets they would have got if the extra balls were legal deliveries. This goes against the objective of achieving parity in the assessment of earlier and later bowlers. Here, the former lose out. The earlier bowlers did bowl no-balls and wides, and while the runs weren't debited, nor were the “dismissals” credited. Get well soon. Warm regards

  • Waspsting on November 3, 2012, 11:29 GMT

    Was wondering how Keith Miller fared? He didn't even mark his run up, just ran in from wherever he felt like. Claimed in his book it was easy for him and bowling of no balls struck him as a lack of cricketing sense (possibly just big talk - Miller did a lot of that) [[ No answers to the first question. Ananth: ]] Hope your better, Ananth.

  • Waspsting on November 3, 2012, 11:25 GMT

    i remember both Ambrose and Wasim being pretty casual with no balls in general.

    I think Ambrose's possible record haul of no balls might have been a particularly bad day for him that i remember watching(?)

    It was in Aus, and for whatever reason, he just couldn't get his run up right. was bailing out at point of delivery every other ball.

    Speaking of no-balls - there was the ridiculous conclusion to an Eng-Pak test at the Oval, when Wasim and Saqi were bowling no balls every ball - and the umpires had apparently just stopped looking for them! Eng captain Stewart made a sarcastic comment about it at post match interview (after Eng lost)!

    The WI batsmen from the 75/76 tour of Aus (1-5 loss) claimed Jeff Thomson was constantly overstepping by a yard or so, but was never called by the umpires. Who knows? A possible factor in Thommo's rep as probably the fastest bowler ever.

    (continued)

  • milpand on November 3, 2012, 10:11 GMT

    contd...

    The meeting of the Cricket Committee on 15 October 1984 recorded that “some countries were already recording no balls and wides and therefore a decision had been required as to whether it should be universally adopted. At the conference [ICC] it had been agreed that no balls and wides should be recorded against the bowler during the forthcoming season, subject to a suitable method of recording them in the scorebook being drawn up.”

    At the next meeting in December it was reported that this method had been communicated to all countries. It was decided not to incorporate this in the Laws as it was primarily a matter of statistics rather than the playing of the game.

    What this leaves a little unclear is whether any overseas Tests were played (or rather, scored) to this regulation prior to the 1985 UK season. However, the scorecard from the first Ashes Test that summer, at Headingley, includes “NOTE: wides and no balls are now debited against the bowler." [[ Thanks, Milind, for sharing it. Rather verbose but at least pinpoints 1985 as an important year in the implementation of this convention change. My cut-off of the first 1985 Winter Tests seems okay. Ananth: ]]

  • milpand on November 3, 2012, 10:08 GMT

    MCC is not responsible for the playing of Test matches. Yet Neil from MCC Library looked up specific information that goes back nearly 30 years, and with over 200 years of archive information. While the response doesn’t help very much it does provide some background that is worth sharing.

    ******** Neil's reply:

    As so often this proved far trickier to solve than might be imagined. The stipulation regarding wides and no-balls being debited to the bowler did not enter the Laws until 2000. It appears first to have been proposed at the ICC meeting at Lord’s on June 29-30 1983. The 1984 Wisden (p.1251) states: “it was proposed, and is likely to be accepted at the Conference’s next meeting…” Wisden 1985 records that the annual meeting on July 18-19 1984 decided that “No-balls and wides should continue to be debited to a bowler, as was now happening in most countries.”

    contd...

  • Arjun on November 3, 2012, 8:17 GMT

    Ananth,

    Some observations....

    1) A Donald has bowled only 0.99 % of total balls as wides/noballs, remarkable for Fast Bowler. 2) MG Johnson has bowled more wides(75) than noballs(67) in his career. 3) 2 slingers malinga and edwards have bowled max. % of extra deliveries. 4) A Fraser didn't bowl single wide in his career. [[ I did not realize that I had not got this data in completely. Now I have done it for the other table also. Waqar Yopunis is something. Only 0.32% of the balls bowled. I think Swann is simply amazing. Ananth: ]]

  • Raghav Bihani on November 3, 2012, 5:41 GMT

    @Ananth: your previous article was brilliant. I could not read it fully as I was traveling.

    This article gives an interesting angle to bowlers. However, the new averages are all about what could have been. Ambrose remains at his actual average. removing impact of extras is only to see what could have been.

    In any analysis bowlers need to be penalised for the extras. It was interesting to the point you took the analysis. Now the suggestion to use SR of the bowler is absurd. Firstly, you are removing runs penalised from no balls. The runs scored off the bat would be very less. To give credit for wkts that might have fallen is taking it too far. It seems as if the extras are not the bowlers fault and we need to remove the impact.

    Next we will demand that runouts are not true wickets and do not reflect on pure batting skills of batsmen. Thus we should remove runouts to calculate adj. average for all batsmen. It may be interesting to know but not usable for analysis. [[ Raghav These are only suggested alternatives. I agree that the bowlers SHOULD be penalized for wides/no balls. The only bone of contention is that for the first 1000 Tests or so tthis was not done and as such there is a difference in methodology. Let us say , this detrmines what Ambrose's average would have been if the laws, or rather the scoring methods, were not changed.

    Ananth: ]]

  • Ananth on November 3, 2012, 3:05 GMT

    Arjun The column on % of Wds/Nbs as % of Balls bowled has been added to the Excel table. It has been added to the second table: "75+ wkts bowlers in order of % change (greater than 2%"). Ananth

  • Jonathan Ellis on November 3, 2012, 2:13 GMT

    Well, with no-balls against Murali... Of course some of them were for throwing, but others would also have been for overstepping. [[ No thoughts on why there were so many for overstepping. Probably 5 were for throwing, courtesy Emerson/Harper. Ananth: ]] And there were never any suspicions about Saqlain Mushtaq's action, doosra or no doosra, but he was a persistent overstepper and in fact should have been no-balled for it even more often than he was - I remember one time he ran through England on the last day and took something like four wickets with what should have been no-balls for getting his feet wet...

    Botham, meanwhile, in his autobiography claims to have bowled only seven no-balls (is it known how many wides he bowled? I'd be surprised if it was many) in his entire Test career, to the point that it was apparently noteworthy that two of them were called by one umpire.

  • Dinesh on November 2, 2012, 19:36 GMT

    Ananth:

    Hope your Hand is recovering well.

    Again an excellent Article. Ambrose already had an awesome avg and it gets further reduced to under 20. another article on bowlers and again Pollock surfaces in the top Bracket.We have talked about it time and again that he doesnt get the Due. Among the current lot, Ishant Sharma is one who will consistently be ranked among those with the Highest no balls.

    @Boll: I second that. I too always had the same doubt, why do the bowlers have to touch the crease at all leave alone over step it.

  • Boll on November 2, 2012, 15:11 GMT

    So, having said that, and despite some very interesting results here (Ambrose et al) counting wides/nbs against a bowler is clearly the way to go. Pretty sure I only ever bowled 2 (in consecutive balls I think) in my life (as a spinner) but was so disgusted that from then on, little more than my big toe ever touched the line.

    I still don`t understand the need to get as close as possible, i.e aim for only half the heel behind the line every ball. It`s not the Olympic long-jump for Christ`s sake, where every centimetre counts. [[ Your second paragraph is so perfect that I cannot but express my admiration. I have never understood why inches matter, especially for spinners. Ananth: ]]

  • Boll on November 2, 2012, 14:49 GMT

    Just as an interesting aside, I remember seeing Warney interviewed some years back when footage clearly revealed that his 99 vs NZ was ended by a Vettori no-ball (not called obviously) - classic!

  • Boll on November 2, 2012, 14:43 GMT

    @Navin Agarwal. More power to Kapil if that was his modus operandi. I`m sure many (former?) batsmen(?) will have similar memories of team-mates happily charging in and bowling from 20 yards during training/net sessions, and then wondering why we were less than sympathetic when they bowled a spate of no-balls during a game. Actually, it annoyed the hell out of me.

  • Arjun on November 2, 2012, 12:50 GMT

    Ambrose

    Wkts - 405 actual avg. 20.99 noballs - 422 SR - 54.58 (he would have picked 7.73 more wkts)

    New Adjavg. = (8501-422)/(405+7.73) = '19.57' [[ Arjun I am trying to minimize the work I have to do. This calculation matters really for the top 5 bowlers or so. I would appreciate if this can be done by you for the top 5 bowlers. Ananth: ]]

  • Arjun on November 2, 2012, 12:03 GMT

    Ananth,

    Hope your recovery is alright. [[ Still in a sling. Ananth: ]] The adjavg. can be further adjusted by using career strike-rate of bowler and assuming he would have further got 'x' no. of wkts in those no balls. Ambrose bowled 422 noballs, using his SR we can assume he would have got about 8 more wkts, then add that no. to his career wkts and new adjavg. could be calculated.

    Also can you add a column of wide + noballs in proportion to total balls bowled. [[ Would the first be too different to the % change. Can you do couple of calculations. Will do the later. Ananth: ]]

  • Zuhair Abbasi on November 2, 2012, 10:36 GMT

    Imran Khan never conceded an extra in 88 tests? 362 wickets? That's unbelievably awesome [[ Almost no information available on No balls in Pakistan matches during Imran's career. Ananth: ]]

  • Navin Agarwal on November 2, 2012, 10:31 GMT

    I understand that stats for Kapil are not available but Sunil Gavaskar once said on TV that Kapil was one bowler who always tried not to bowl no-balls even in net practice. It is my view that his no-ball figures would be very less.

  • No featured comments at the moment.

  • Navin Agarwal on November 2, 2012, 10:31 GMT

    I understand that stats for Kapil are not available but Sunil Gavaskar once said on TV that Kapil was one bowler who always tried not to bowl no-balls even in net practice. It is my view that his no-ball figures would be very less.

  • Zuhair Abbasi on November 2, 2012, 10:36 GMT

    Imran Khan never conceded an extra in 88 tests? 362 wickets? That's unbelievably awesome [[ Almost no information available on No balls in Pakistan matches during Imran's career. Ananth: ]]

  • Arjun on November 2, 2012, 12:03 GMT

    Ananth,

    Hope your recovery is alright. [[ Still in a sling. Ananth: ]] The adjavg. can be further adjusted by using career strike-rate of bowler and assuming he would have further got 'x' no. of wkts in those no balls. Ambrose bowled 422 noballs, using his SR we can assume he would have got about 8 more wkts, then add that no. to his career wkts and new adjavg. could be calculated.

    Also can you add a column of wide + noballs in proportion to total balls bowled. [[ Would the first be too different to the % change. Can you do couple of calculations. Will do the later. Ananth: ]]

  • Arjun on November 2, 2012, 12:50 GMT

    Ambrose

    Wkts - 405 actual avg. 20.99 noballs - 422 SR - 54.58 (he would have picked 7.73 more wkts)

    New Adjavg. = (8501-422)/(405+7.73) = '19.57' [[ Arjun I am trying to minimize the work I have to do. This calculation matters really for the top 5 bowlers or so. I would appreciate if this can be done by you for the top 5 bowlers. Ananth: ]]

  • Boll on November 2, 2012, 14:43 GMT

    @Navin Agarwal. More power to Kapil if that was his modus operandi. I`m sure many (former?) batsmen(?) will have similar memories of team-mates happily charging in and bowling from 20 yards during training/net sessions, and then wondering why we were less than sympathetic when they bowled a spate of no-balls during a game. Actually, it annoyed the hell out of me.

  • Boll on November 2, 2012, 14:49 GMT

    Just as an interesting aside, I remember seeing Warney interviewed some years back when footage clearly revealed that his 99 vs NZ was ended by a Vettori no-ball (not called obviously) - classic!

  • Boll on November 2, 2012, 15:11 GMT

    So, having said that, and despite some very interesting results here (Ambrose et al) counting wides/nbs against a bowler is clearly the way to go. Pretty sure I only ever bowled 2 (in consecutive balls I think) in my life (as a spinner) but was so disgusted that from then on, little more than my big toe ever touched the line.

    I still don`t understand the need to get as close as possible, i.e aim for only half the heel behind the line every ball. It`s not the Olympic long-jump for Christ`s sake, where every centimetre counts. [[ Your second paragraph is so perfect that I cannot but express my admiration. I have never understood why inches matter, especially for spinners. Ananth: ]]

  • Dinesh on November 2, 2012, 19:36 GMT

    Ananth:

    Hope your Hand is recovering well.

    Again an excellent Article. Ambrose already had an awesome avg and it gets further reduced to under 20. another article on bowlers and again Pollock surfaces in the top Bracket.We have talked about it time and again that he doesnt get the Due. Among the current lot, Ishant Sharma is one who will consistently be ranked among those with the Highest no balls.

    @Boll: I second that. I too always had the same doubt, why do the bowlers have to touch the crease at all leave alone over step it.

  • Jonathan Ellis on November 3, 2012, 2:13 GMT

    Well, with no-balls against Murali... Of course some of them were for throwing, but others would also have been for overstepping. [[ No thoughts on why there were so many for overstepping. Probably 5 were for throwing, courtesy Emerson/Harper. Ananth: ]] And there were never any suspicions about Saqlain Mushtaq's action, doosra or no doosra, but he was a persistent overstepper and in fact should have been no-balled for it even more often than he was - I remember one time he ran through England on the last day and took something like four wickets with what should have been no-balls for getting his feet wet...

    Botham, meanwhile, in his autobiography claims to have bowled only seven no-balls (is it known how many wides he bowled? I'd be surprised if it was many) in his entire Test career, to the point that it was apparently noteworthy that two of them were called by one umpire.

  • Ananth on November 3, 2012, 3:05 GMT

    Arjun The column on % of Wds/Nbs as % of Balls bowled has been added to the Excel table. It has been added to the second table: "75+ wkts bowlers in order of % change (greater than 2%"). Ananth