December 5, 2012

More curiously significant numbers: Birthdays and aids to concentration

Samir Chopra
Sunil Gavaskar cuts on his way to a half-century, England v India, 2nd Test, Old Trafford, 3rd day, August 7, 1971
If you were the gritty Sunil Gavaskar, you could take on 220 pounds, couldn't you?  © Getty Images

Cricket is a game of numbers and so it is no surprise that I have blogged several times here, at the Pitch, on 'curiously significant numbers'. The first entry was on statistical landmarks, the second, on significant dates in cricket history, and yet another on libraries and cricket. Those are numbers that are significant within the domain of cricket: averages, career records, memorable team or individual scores, and the like. But sometimes we can indulge in the converse. We can pick a number of significance to ourselves and see if cricket can somehow render it more significant.

This is self-indulgent in the extreme, but today I'd like to recount two ways in which I've turned to cricket to see if there was a resonance of interest to me with significant numbers in my life.

Perhaps unsurprisingly my first inquiries in this dimension were to find out what significant events in cricketing history had transpired on my birth date. For those interested, I have some distinguished company. I share a birthday with Bill Edrich. I didn't share any of his talent of course, but I'll take the common anniversary for now. Unfortunately, I also share a birthday with Vikram Rathour, who was rather unkindly described as a 'walking wicket' after India's tour of South Africa in 1996-97. After these flirtations with quality and mediocrity there are some encounters with obscurity too: I share birthdays with Prosper Utseya and Edwin Evans. As far as cricketing events on the field go, my birthday has not seen too many dramatic occurrences in Test cricket or even one-day internationals for that matter, but it still remains the 78th anniversary of the day South Africa lost 19 wickets in a day in a Test and the eighth anniversary of Mushtaq Mohammad's Test debut.. (I'm sure there are fans out there who were born on far more memorable dates; what great party lines you have in your possession!)

The other way I've turned to cricket when confronted with a number of interest to me is in a rather far flung domain: weightlifting. For the past three years, on many occasions while lifting weights in my gym, I have used a rather simple technique for focusing my mind before I attempt to lift a weight: I think of a cricket score that is the same as the weight on the bar and imagine myself scoring that number. When I say 'a cricket score' I mean an individual achievement. So, as an example, if the weight in question is 220 pounds I might imagine myself as Sunny Gavaskar in Port of Spain in his debut series; if it was 185, as Michael Atherton, pulling off his epic rescue against South Africa; if 155 then I am Sachin Tendulkar laying the Australian attack to waste in Chennai in 1998 … the list goes on. For some reason I am never able to summon up a score in a one-day international, not even Kapil Dev's 175 in the 1983 World Cup.

There is a pattern here, of course. I lift in pounds not kilos, and the weights are almost always whole multiples of five: they end with a 5 or a 0 (fractional weights introduce a challenge that I've not yet met). This makes my mental hunt for a matching score a little more interesting but, of course, since many of my weightlifting numbers repeat, once a score has been located, I use it again and again. I have not mentioned this concentration technique to any of my lifting partners at my gym for obvious reasons: it would take too long to explain and I'm not sure I could handle all the eye-rolling that would follow; I'm already considered a serious nerd with a bizarre interest in an obscure game, and this story would push matters to the brink.

There are many other interesting mental feats of arithmetic that cricket enables for the statistics-obsessed fan. But that's another story, to be told on another day.

Samir Chopra lives in Brooklyn and teaches Philosophy at the City University of New York. He tweets here

RSS Feeds: Samir Chopra

© ESPN Sports Media Ltd.

Posted by Zeeshan Mahmud on (December 11, 2012, 22:50 GMT)

Speaking of school and finals looming at colleges, grades are another metaphor with 100 being a century and any score of 200 or so being a total itself before percentile conversion.

Posted by krishna vemuri on (December 6, 2012, 22:37 GMT)

This semester in grad school after nine years has been an up and down ride. Whenever things got tough, I kept telling myself, naturally, without any hint of drama, to show the bowlers some respect and when they are tired, then, as you say, lay the attack to waste. Those same words. I did not realize till half-way into the semester that I was thinking in cricket analogies. It fit naturally into my situation and I stuck with it. That and the recent SA-Aus series sustained me in grad school this semester. Otherwise, it would have been a long, hard ride into mania.

Posted by ADD on (December 6, 2012, 8:19 GMT)

Sharing one's birthday with the best batsman and bowler in the world today makes one realise that when they were handing out cricketing talent to newborns in the '80s, He hadn't yet heard of astrology.

Posted by Zeeshan Mahmud on (December 6, 2012, 1:11 GMT)

Lol same here. When I jump ropes, is my half-century...and so on till I reach a double at a stretch. My highest was 501 (not out in the sense that I voluntarily stopped).

Nice article btw.

Comments have now been closed for this article


Samir Chopra
Samir Chopra lives in Brooklyn and teaches Philosophy at the City University of New York. He runs the blogs at and Eye on Cricket. His book on the changing face of modern cricket, Brave New Pitch: The Evolution of Modern Cricket has been published by HarperCollins. Before The Cordon, he blogged on The Pitch and Different Strokes on ESPNcricinfo. @EyeonthePitch

All articles by this writer