ICC news

Kohli reclaims No.1 ODI ranking

ESPNcricinfo staff

March 9, 2014

Comments: 303 | Text size: A | A

Virat Kohli drives down the ground, Bangladesh v India, Asia Cup 2014, Fatullah, February 26, 2014
Virat Kohli's century against Bangladesh had taken him to 886 points, his career-best rating © AFP
Related Links
Players/Officials: Virat Kohli
Series/Tournaments: Asia Cup
Teams: India

Virat Kohli has climbed past AB de Villiers to the top of the ICC ODI rankings for batsmen. Kohli achieved a career-best rating of 886 points after his century against Bangladesh in the Asia Cup. However, a subdued showing thereafter against Pakistan and Sri Lanka resulted in five points being shaved off, though he is still nine points ahead of de Villiers.

Kohli was last at the summit before the ODI series against New Zealand in January and had come into the Asia Cup two points behind de Villiers. In the past 12 months, Kohli amassed 1580 runs at 60.76 in 31 innings with six centuries, four of which were away from home and three of which were as captain. In the same period, de Villiers scored 1156 at 52.54 in 25 innings with three centuries.

The other Indians in the top ten are MS Dhoni at sixth and Shikhar Dhawan at eighth places. Lahiru Thirimanne, who struck two centuries in the Asia Cup including a match-winning 101 in the final, jumped 29 places to his best spot at 39th.

Lasith Malinga ended as the joint-highest wicket-taker in the Asia Cup, which helped him leapfrog 11 places into 22nd position in the bowlers' rankings.

Asian champions Sri Lanka are still ranked third with 112 points, one point below India, in the ODI team rankings. Australia claimed the top spot with 117 points.

© ESPN Sports Media Ltd.

Posted by android_user on (March 19, 2014, 16:42 GMT)

kohli is today good play

Posted by Fast_Track_Bully on (March 14, 2014, 5:51 GMT)

@ Sarath Kumara Weerasekara . yeah you can satisfy at least yourself with those statics - then thats good! get well soon!lolz

Posted by   on (March 13, 2014, 6:29 GMT)

@Fast_Track_Bully : These are not excuses but statistical reasons for avoiding full list. As a Statician, to use the full list with different time periods, different players, different settings/rules, different formats (T20 started much later), different countries (SL started cricket much later). If we to use the full list for comparison, we will have to use different regression methods to correct for the heterogeneity of the data. For simpla comparisons, best way is to seperate the full list to dofferent time periods and do the comparison which I have done. Even when we use the full list as you suggested, SL (0.46) and Pak (0.44) are way ahead Ind 0.32) on win/loss ratio in Aus, Eng and SA against them. For your consolation and happyness, you can devide the full list to different time periods of 5 years and estimate the same which you might find better results for Ind than SL and Pak. For example: From 01 Jan 2000 to 31 Dec 2005, you will find higher win/loss ratio for Ind than SL.

Posted by   on (March 13, 2014, 3:15 GMT)

@Fast_Track_Bully: This gives more elaborated results of 10 year time periods. You might notice IND has found it harder to record a win until 1970s while PAK has recoreded wins in their first decade (1950s). Also SL's record was not that bad in their fist couple of decades and they were really developing in fast bouncy track records. You can be proud of 1990s and 2000s (Era of Sachin,Dravid,Laxman, Ganguly, etc). But since 2010s, IND is just flat track bulies even if you believe or not. PAK is more or less consistant over the different periods while SL was fast acclamtizing to fast bouncy conditions. Ban also has shown some impressive results in their last period.

1930-1939: IND 0.00 1940-1949:IND 0.00 1950-1959:IND 0.00 PAK 1.00 1960-1969:IND 0.00 PAK 0.00 1970-1979:IND 0.30 PAK 0.36 1980-1989:IND 0.64 PAK 0.47 SL 0.06 1990-1999:IND 0.21 PAK 0.60 SL 0.31 2000-2009:IND 0.51 PAK 0.42 SL 0.45 BAN 0.00 2010-2014:IND 0.29 PAK 0.37 SL 1.00 BAN 0.25

Posted by Fast_Track_Bully on (March 12, 2014, 6:43 GMT)

@Sarath Kumara Weerasekara . " Everybody know that India was a great team when Sachin, Dravid, Laxman and Ganguly playing and before." . What an excuse to avoid full list? :P. Similarly I can argue 'Everybody knows we lost lot of matches after Sachin, Dravid, Laxman and Ganguly retired". lol

Posted by   on (March 12, 2014, 1:37 GMT)

Here's a Thought ...

An Asian XI Vs ROW for Charity of your Choice.. ODI

Asian XI

Mahela Jayawardena ( Capt ) Shahid Afridi Kumar Sangakkara Virat Kohli Misbah Ul Haq Angelo Mathews Mahendra Doni (WK) Shakib Al Hasan Umar Gul Saeed Ajmal Lasith Malinga


Chris Gayle David Warner Kevin Pietersen AB De Villiers Micheal Clerk ( Capt ) Brendon McCullum (WK) Dwayne Bravo James Faulkner Mitchell Johnson Dale Steyn Sunil Narine

Challenge yourself to name a better balanced team.

Posted by UsmanMuhammad on (March 11, 2014, 14:07 GMT)

Oh my GOD, what's happening here, let's bring an end to this rant. Kohli is a notch above today's average batsman BUT not to be called a Great at this stage. Let him serve his team and review how the equation looks in few years time. On the other hand, none of the asian teams are a force to reckon outside Asia. Pakistan are better than other Asian teams playing outside purely due to fast bowling resources and ability to take 20 wickets even if there batting collapses.

Even kohli would not know he has triggered a hot debate on this platform.

Posted by   on (March 11, 2014, 13:54 GMT)

Test win/loss ratio last 5 years in AUS, SA and ENG against the same teams. SL=0.16 Ind=0.10 Pak=0.11


Comments have now been closed for this article

Email Feedback Print
ESPNcricinfo staffClose
News | Features Last 3 days
News | Features Last 3 days