Surrey v Nottinghamshire, The Oval, 2nd day July 9, 2013

Mullaney slots into promoted role

Vithushan Ehantharajah at The Oval

Nottinghamshire 360 for 6 (Mullaney 104*, Patel 87*) lead Surrey 198 by 162 runs

A second ever Championship hundred in three years for Steven Mullaney and an unbeaten 87 from Samit Patel were the key notes on a day when Nottinghamshire seized the initiative at The Oval.

Mullaney's previous foray into three figures came back in May 2010 when, on first-class debut for Nottinghamshire, he made 100 not out, but has until now only been able to replicate the feat in an MCCU fixture against Durham in April of this year.

Primarily a middle order dasher, he was shifted up the order against Sussex to plug the gap left by Ed Cowan to partner Riki Wessels, who himself had recently come in for the faltering Alex Hales. Both have made their respective transitions seamlessly.

Starting promisingly with an opening stand of 63 at Hove, they have followed up with 105 in this match - the highest opening partnership Nottinghamshire have had this season. The expectation here was that both would register half centuries, however Wessels was unable to join Mullaney at that milestone when he fell to Chris Tremlett's first ball of the day - a full delivery that swung in late and rapped his front pad.

But Mullaney moved on, displaying good persistence and better footwork to maintain a healthy scoring rate through to lunch. Good pressure from Surrey after the interval meant he was limited to three boundaries the last of which - a flat-batted slap through cover after Zander de Bruyn's slower-ball malfunctioned - was greeted with a scream of "Yes!" and a punch of the air, as it took him from 96 to 100.

Although the score won't suggest it, Surrey can take some positives from their efforts. For starters, through sheer will, they took charge of the second session. Perhaps it was down to a pep talk from Alec Stewart or Stuart Barnes - perhaps just 40 minutes of self-reflection - but the energy in the field was up and a fightback of sorts was on.

It was Tremlett who began converting this energy into something palpable, as he produced a brilliant four-over spell that went for only two runs and, more importantly, ended Michael Lumb's innings from around the wicket. Gary Keedy then out-foxed the dangerously stubborn James Taylor with a smart piece of bowling; tempting him down the wicket only for the ball to turn past the outside edge and find the gloves of Steven Davies, who completed the stumping.

But once that intensity dissipated in the late afternoon breeze, frustration crept back in, despite the dismissals of David Hussey and Chris Read - Hussey in particular looking to take the game away from Surrey. The new ball - taken after 94 overs - found two edges, one of which was put down by de Bruyn at first slip and the other he could only watch as it bisected him and Davies behind the stumps.

Quite how far ahead Nottinghamshire will be when their first innings closes will depend largely on Patel. Resting with 87 runs to his name, he will return tomorrow eyeing up a second Championship hundred of 2013 as he continues to kick on as one of the best middle order batsmen in the country.

Gareth Batty did his best to frustrate him, shutting down his release shot with two men positioned in close between square leg and midwicket. But, while it curbed the rate at which Patel scored his runs, it did little to curtail the quantity.

Comments have now been closed for this article

  • Ray on July 10, 2013, 9:02 GMT

    Following on (sorry!) from @Cyril_Knight's point about Meaker. Did we really need to go into this match with 3 spinners? I didn't attend the 2nd day but is this pitch now turning square? (Doesn't seem like it).

    Surrey should play to what is about their only strength - seam and that means Meaker should have been included. Ansari is a better bat than Keedy - and may be the future? - so Keedy should have been the one to have been left out.

  • Mark on July 9, 2013, 22:19 GMT

    When Somerset are slipping to a heavy defeat and still manage to achieve a net points gain over Surrey you know that things are bad. The script is already written: Surrey can only hope to limit the damage and make Notts bat again; setting any kind of defensible target seems well nigh impossible, the only aim is to reduce the margin of defeat from an innings to something more respectable.

    Notts, for their part, look set to gain the win that will avoid the danger of them slipping back into the relegation battle and will place them back on the fringes of the Championship battle. It may just instill renewed belief in the side too.

  • Cyril on July 9, 2013, 19:33 GMT

    "But the energy in the field was up and a fightback of sorts was on." I'd like some of what you were on if you saw this! Surrey were dreadful in the field, all day. They were very quiet too, apart from Harinath who as always does his best to cheer his bowlers.

    Batty's innovative field placing were somewhat neutralised by the lack of runs on the board, meaning Notts could afford to see off any new ideas or the odd short period of pressure knowing they are so far ahead in this match.

    Tremlett continues to infuriate. He can bowl one or two balls in a row that reflect his old self. His "brilliant four-over spell" for example. But as soon as he lets loose a bad ball, he folds and "limps" back to his mark. Meaker is fully fit (I asked him on Friday), he is being rested, I ask what for, he does the raised eyebrows, palms out expression!

  • No featured comments at the moment.