Warwickshire v Durham, NatWest T20, Edgbaston

Birmingham rebrand brings no miracle

George Dobell at Edgbaston

June 6, 2014

Comments: 6 | Text size: A | A

Warwickshire 147 for 4 (Chopra 51) beat Durham 146 for 7 (Hastings 36)
Scorecard


Ian Bell lofts down the ground, England v Sri Lanka, 5th ODI, Edgbaston, June 3, 2014
England showed no appetite for releasing Ian Bell six days before the first Test © Getty Images
Enlarge

This report could start with a description of Shoaib Malik's quietly impressive start to life at Edgbaston. It could start with a description of Ben Stokes' unhappy evening or the impressive pace generated by Boyd Rankin.

It could even compare the difference in standard of fielding between these two sides that was the main ingredient in a result that sees Warwickshire - in their guise as Birmingham Bears- leapfrog Durham in the North Division table.

But, bearing in mind that the T20 Blast is designed to relaunch the game in England and Wales, bearing in mind that this was a perfect summer's evening, bearing in mind the good gate figures elsewhere in the country and bearing in mind that this was a match scheduled in that Friday night slot in which so much hope was placed and it seems more pertinent to start with what might be described as the modest crowd number.

The official figure rated the attendance 6,000. Even taken a face value - it looked a generous assessment - that figure compares with an average of 5,500 for 2013. That was a season that benefited from little of the marketing push that preceded this campaign and when matches were seemingly spread across the week at random.

While it is too early in the campaign to jump to conclusions, such a figure does provide food for thought.

It may be that there has been a backlash against the decision to rebrand Warwickshire as Birmingham Bears for this tournament. While that tactic is, in many ways, at least understandable and perhaps even laudable, the fact is that the traditional membership is distinctly unimpressed by it. Anecdotal evidence suggests it is the straw that has broken the camel's back for some.

But the decision to deny the counties the services of the Test squad for this game seems a particularly short-sighted move. If the aim of this tournament is really to inspire a new generation of supporters, then the likes of Ian Bell and Chris Woakes should have been made available for this game on their home ground.

Not only is Bell arguably the most famous contemporary sportsman in the region - this is not a golden age for Midlands' football - and quite capable of adding significantly to gate figures, he is also crying out for more experience of T20 cricket. Having just been recalled to the England T20 squad, you might think he would like add to his tally of one T20 game in the last three-and-a-half-years.

Sadly, though, the suggestion that the ECB would make the centrally contracted players available more often for this competition has turned out to be false.

It also suggests that the ticket price - £22 on the gate - is just too high. While there is an incentive to pre-book (£15), that acts as a disincentive to those who prefer, understandably given Edgbaston's recent history, to wait and see how the weather is before booking.

And if this competition is about investing for the future by inspiring a new generation of supporters, a ticket price of £22 seems steep. A family of four will, after parking and refreshments, be lucky to spend less than £75. Cricket in England is not so popular that it can ask so much.

At least those that attended - a good-natured bunch that made their own fun when necessary - appeared to enjoy what they saw. Hopefully they will return.

Those that did attend saw that the difference between the teams in this match was the fielding. While Warwickshire's throws hit the stumps - Shoaib ran out Mark Stoneman in the first over with a direct hit from mid-off; Rankin picked up in his follow-through and ran out Scott Borthwick - Durham's missed. Chopra could have been run out on three occasions, most notably on 20 and 21, had Durham's accuracy been better. Paul Collingwood also put down a tough caught and bowled chance offered by Chopra on 43.

Stokes endured a miserable evening. While he bowled with waspish pace, he was involved with a mix-up that saw Borthwick sent back and run out and was then bowled, first delivery, by a quick, full ball from the ever impressive Jeetan Patel. By the time Stoneman dropped a simple chance offered by Laurie Evans off his bowling, it was hard not to fear for the lockers in the Edgbaston dressing room.

Durham were actually flattered a little by their final total. Only a career-best score from John Hastings, who might just be a giant in man fancy-dress, helped them to anything like a respectable total on a fine track. Hastings helped plunder 50 from the final five overs as the Warwickshire bowlers, so impressive until then, started to miss their yorkers by a crucial few inches.

It never looked likely to be enough. While Durham, and Usman Arshad in particular, built some pressure, it could never be sustained. Borthwick's first two balls - a horrid full toss and an even more ugly long-hop - were despatched for 10 in all by the increasingly impressive Jonathan Webb and with Chopra oozing class in his half-century and Malik and Evans providing the acceleration, Birmingham - or Warwickshire, as you prefer - were never likely to be denied.

George Dobell is a senior correspondent at ESPNcricinfo

RSS Feeds: George Dobell

© ESPN Sports Media Ltd.

Posted by   on (June 10, 2014, 5:48 GMT)

unbelievable, if the ECB can't get the t20 formula right with the counties, just have a franchise tournament, that is sure to make better success than this to begin with. Why do they need such a traditional approach?! Yes the counties will resist the move, but progress has to be made, anyway its not like the counties are making big money. The franchise system will help make some profits.

Posted by RFC73 on (June 7, 2014, 10:41 GMT)

Why should the ECB let the england players play? Twenty twenty is n o preparation for a Test match.

Posted by CodandChips on (June 7, 2014, 9:31 GMT)

"But the decision to deny the counties the services of the Test squad for this game seems a particularly short-sighted move." agree. How much harm can a a T20 do? Especially for Woakes who hasn't played any cricket the last 2 weeks and will probably miss the next 2 as championship games starting on Sundays and test on a Thursday/Friday means that any player who doesn't play in a test will be unable to turn out for their county instead.

I have noticed however that the Ageas Bowl test match vs India starts on a Sunday.

Posted by   on (June 7, 2014, 9:12 GMT)

As ever, George has hit the nail on the head. It amazes me that the marketing men continue to hold such sway over the decision makers. The experiment of the Welsh Dragons failure should have been enough to prove that rebranding for T20 doesn't work.

Posted by   on (June 7, 2014, 7:57 GMT)

The Birmingham experiment will be quietly ended for next year I bet

Posted by   on (June 6, 2014, 22:16 GMT)

Fantastic article. Couldn't agree more; especially with the pathetic prices.

Comments have now been closed for this article

TopTop
Email Feedback Print
Share
E-mail
Feedback
Print
George DobellClose
County Results
Kent v Gloucs at Canterbury - Sep 23-26, 2014
Gloucs won by 244 runs
Lancashire v Middlesex at Manchester - Sep 23-26, 2014
Match drawn
Northants v Sussex at Northampton - Sep 23-26, 2014
Match drawn
Yorkshire v Somerset at Leeds - Sep 23-26, 2014
Match drawn
Derbyshire v Leics at Derby - Sep 23-25, 2014
Derbyshire won by 408 runs
Essex v Worcs at Chelmsford - Sep 23-25, 2014
Essex won by an innings and 92 runs
Glamorgan v Hampshire at Cardiff - Sep 23-25, 2014
Hampshire won by 291 runs
Warwickshire v Durham at Birmingham - Sep 23-25, 2014
Warwickshire won by an innings and 13 runs
All recent results »
News | Features Last 3 days
News | Features Last 3 days