South Zone v West Zone, Duleep Trophy, Chennai, 4th day October 6, 2013

South Zone into semis after first-innings win

ESPNcricinfo staff

South Zone 600 for 9 dec (Pandey 213, Aparajith 212) and 44 for 1 dec (Akshath 25*) drew with West Zone 287 (Bawne 115, Dhurv 53, Malolan 5-101)
Scorecard
South Zone won on first-innings lead

A century from Ankit Bawne and his 93-run seventh-wicket stand with Rakesh Dhurv helped West Zone draw their Duleep Trophy quarter-final match against South Zone in Chennai. South Zone, however, were awarded the match on the basis of a first-innings lead and will now meet Central Zone in the second semi-final in Chennai, starting October 10.

Having been batted out of the game over the first two days, and struggling at an overnight score of 155 for 6, West Zone looked in imminent danger of collapsing for a small total, thus giving South Zone the possibility of an outright win. However, Bawne and Dhurv dug in and added 98 runs in nearly 40.3 overs. Bawne brought up his seventh first-class hundred and Dhurv scored his 13th first-class fifty, before he was caught by Rohan Prem off left-arm spinner Aushik Srinivas.

His dismissal led to a flurry of wickets, as West Zone lost the remaining batsmen for just 41 runs. Offspinner Malolan Rangarajan completed his maiden five-wicket haul in first-class cricket, as West Zone were out for 287, in response to South Zone's mammoth first-innings total of 600. Bawne remained unbeaten on 115 off 337 balls and his innings included seven fours and a six. Dhurv's fifty, meanwhile, came off 107 balls and included six fours and a six.

With a 313-run lead and first-innings points in the bag, South Zone decided to bat again. They declared after being 44 for 1 before the match was drawn.

As a result of the first-innings win, South Zone will square off against Central Zone in the second semi-final on October 10.

Comments have now been closed for this article

  • CricketMaan on October 8, 2013, 13:47 GMT

    Ideally south zone (although i suport them) should have been penalized for playing out 2 days! Such contests are meaning less if you cannot complete 4 innings. The first innings must not be more than 90 overs while the second innings can be longer or unlimited till the end of the game. This will atleast keep some competitiveness and not make the game a mockery

  • arvindram on October 7, 2013, 11:17 GMT

    Batting 150 odd overs is not uncommon in the longer version of the game. I agree 5 days would be ideal for these games. If the bowling teams rely on batsmen error to get wickets then you will invariably end up with these kinds of games. I don't blame SZ for not enforcing a follow on... After being in the field for 130+ overs under the Madras sun, the fielders do need some respite.

  • jimbond on October 7, 2013, 5:58 GMT

    What is the point of having four day matches on tracks where any team needs two days to bowl another side out? Why not have five day matches for these? And shouldnt there be some other means of deciding the winner than the simplistic first innings lead? And why on earth did they not enforce the follow on?

  • CricketMaan on October 8, 2013, 13:47 GMT

    Ideally south zone (although i suport them) should have been penalized for playing out 2 days! Such contests are meaning less if you cannot complete 4 innings. The first innings must not be more than 90 overs while the second innings can be longer or unlimited till the end of the game. This will atleast keep some competitiveness and not make the game a mockery

  • arvindram on October 7, 2013, 11:17 GMT

    Batting 150 odd overs is not uncommon in the longer version of the game. I agree 5 days would be ideal for these games. If the bowling teams rely on batsmen error to get wickets then you will invariably end up with these kinds of games. I don't blame SZ for not enforcing a follow on... After being in the field for 130+ overs under the Madras sun, the fielders do need some respite.

  • jimbond on October 7, 2013, 5:58 GMT

    What is the point of having four day matches on tracks where any team needs two days to bowl another side out? Why not have five day matches for these? And shouldnt there be some other means of deciding the winner than the simplistic first innings lead? And why on earth did they not enforce the follow on?

  • No featured comments at the moment.

  • jimbond on October 7, 2013, 5:58 GMT

    What is the point of having four day matches on tracks where any team needs two days to bowl another side out? Why not have five day matches for these? And shouldnt there be some other means of deciding the winner than the simplistic first innings lead? And why on earth did they not enforce the follow on?

  • arvindram on October 7, 2013, 11:17 GMT

    Batting 150 odd overs is not uncommon in the longer version of the game. I agree 5 days would be ideal for these games. If the bowling teams rely on batsmen error to get wickets then you will invariably end up with these kinds of games. I don't blame SZ for not enforcing a follow on... After being in the field for 130+ overs under the Madras sun, the fielders do need some respite.

  • CricketMaan on October 8, 2013, 13:47 GMT

    Ideally south zone (although i suport them) should have been penalized for playing out 2 days! Such contests are meaning less if you cannot complete 4 innings. The first innings must not be more than 90 overs while the second innings can be longer or unlimited till the end of the game. This will atleast keep some competitiveness and not make the game a mockery