England v India, third Investec Test, Ageas Bowl, 4th day

The woeful world of Pankaj Singh

Pankaj Singh greeted his most expensive analysis in Test history with the words 'That is cricket'. It was admirable acceptance from an impressive man of a record he did not deserve

Jarrod Kimber at the Ageas Bowl

July 30, 2014

Comments: 84 | Text size: A | A
Play
Pankaj's frustrating debut was summed up in a series of close shaves on day two


Pankaj Singh almost had Ian Bell leg before wicket, England v India, 3rd Investec Test, Ageas Bowl, 1st day, July 27, 2014
Pankaj Singh's appeals fell on deaf ears © Getty Images
Enlarge

Lawrence Booth, editor of Wisden, met Pankaj Singh in a lift. They talked about Pankaj's day, which turned into Pankaj's luck. It was exactly the sort of conversation you would expect from any bowler in the world when talking about a wicketless day. At the end, Pankaj left Booth with the words: "That is cricket".

****

There is a ball that Pankaj Singh bowled in the IPL that hit the pitch and cleared the keeper's head. That is a combination of pace and bounce. He also has swing. Lovely curling outswing that he can maintain even with an older ball. Then there is his offcutter. That makes him a bowler who can move the ball both ways, get bounce and bowl in the mid-80s mph.

His action is uncomplicated and rugged. His body seems to have been chipped from solid stone. His wrist position at release is good. He has got a smart bowling brain. He works with his captain on his fields. He works batsmen out. He bowls to plans. He is willing to do grunt work.

This is an international bowler. And for the last ten years he has been a domestic bowler. This Test may send him back there.

****

If you were playing Indian Quick Bowler Bingo, Pankaj would go close to completing your sheet. He played U-19 cricket for India, went to the MRF pace factory, was a quick bowler, became a slower swing bowler, played one ODI, toured Australia without bowling a ball and then went about playing some IPL.

Pankaj is not a good IPL bowler. He averages 33 with the ball; he goes at over 8 an over. When you YouTube an Indian bowler's name, you generally just find clips of them disappearing into riotous, crowds. Pankaj has a large selection of them. It's not his format. So there is no hype for him.

Between his tour of Australia and this tour, India have used roughly 43 million other fast bowlers. Despite the fact that year after year Pankaj is near the top of the wicket-takers list in first-class cricket. Despite the fact that he has helped Rajasthan win the Ranji Trophy. Despite the fact he is obviously just a really good cricketer.

His one ODI game was in the Zimbabwean Triangular series of 2010, which was a tournament so useless, relocated witnesses running from the mob could have sat openly in the stands and not been found. His first ball almost took the edge of Upal Tharanga. But he ended with no wickets that day as well. He disappeared off India's radar so completely that he might as well have been in a witness relocation programme.

****

Cricket Journalists ooze cynicism from every single pore of their being. It's the first thing you're asked about when you apply for the job. So it's rare that they get behind someone with match figures of 0 for 179. Usually that would invoke snide remarks, casual jokes and general chuckles. Something about Pankaj meant they didn't do that.

Cries of "Get Pankaj on", "Give Pankaj a bowl", "Come on Pankaj" were heard as Pankaj thudded around the outfield. Sure, they still laughed when he fell over fielding the simplest ball. But no one thought he deserved the worst figures ever by a debutant. No one thought he hadn't been unlucky. No one wanted the loveable lug to fail.

Even on Twitter where snark is king, people just seemed to feel sorry for him.

"@reverse_sweeper Please, someone give Pankaj a hug. Is there a backroom guy for that?"

"‪@SpiceBoxofEarth Would be a real shame if Pankaj Singh was judged on just his figures alone. This has been a very decent debut. "

"Yogesh ‏@YOGESHBOND The Oscar for making the unluckiest debut ever in tests goes to pankaj singh.. This guy needs a jaadu ki jhappi.. #UnluckyPankaj "

"Mark Pougatch ‏@markpougatch I'm not alone am I in really wanting Pankaj Singh to get a wicket?"

He is the MHMOTS (Most huggable man of the series).

****

A right arm bowler coming around the wicket to a left hand batsman that can take the ball away is quite a skill. Few can do it. Pankaj can. He angles the ball in, Cook pushes at it as it seams away. His pace and bounce ensure it carries to slip. But Jadeja doesn't take it.

Later Dhoni will try one of his leg slip traps to Ballance. To help make it work, Pankaj bowls the perfect inswinger on middle stump which Ballance gets enough bat on for it just to drop short of leg slip.

At the 80 over mark, Pankaj is promoted to new ball bowler status. Reward for being the best bowler of the day. Then he placed a ball on leg stump. Every single batsman in the world knew that meant it was slipping down leg. But it didn't slip down, it didn't even straighten, it came back towards middle. It was the ball swing bowlers wet dream over. It could not have been more perfect.

Pankaj appealed.

He appealed like he was trying to feed his family, his village, and every single person he had ever met. It was about as emotive as a human being could be. It was the closest any human being had ever been to making themselves explode. He wanted a wicket, he deserved a wicket, every single molecule that went into this impressive chunk of cricketer pleaded for a wicket.

Not out.

****

Rohit Sharma got a wicket with a ball that missed the bat. Moeen Ali got one from a half tracker. And Ravi Jadeja, the man who cost Pankaj a wicket, and perhaps India a Test, took one with a half tracker down the legside that if you received it in the nets you would catch it and throw it back.

****

Pankaj did not bowl overs full of the sweetest peaches at all times, he also bowled poorly. He couldn't group the ball together enough. He got tired. And when England attacked he didn't seem to have many answers.

The worst was Buttler. Buttler 'Bryce McGained' Pankaj. In five balls he took 20 runs. Pankaj probably won't remember much more than a front leg clearing and a bat flying through. But the 20 runs in that over in England's first innings was the 20 runs that helped him fly past Sohail Khan and Bryce McGain as the worst-ever bowling figures by a debutant in Test cricket history.

If he was unlucky not to get a wicket, then we need a new word to describe that achievement.

****

There are many small things to like about Pankaj. On day one, it was his nipples. Which were probably the best seam bowling nipples seen in England's South. He is also an unusually violent ball shiner. His throwing style is more like that of the local butcher playing a club game that a professional athlete. He doesn't stop balls in the field as much as runs along beside them. His shirt is often untucked. He is an older player who has earned his position through deeds. His running often makes it look like his shoulders are too big for him to stay upright. And he bats like a proper 1930s tailender.

Pankaj is part of a small club of cricketers who have been stumped facing a seamer with the keeper standing back. It happened because he wanted to sledge Ajit Agarkar for bouncing him. You have to commend him for standing up for himself against a senior player like Agarkar. You have to laugh at him for getting stumped while he did it.

When Pankaj was asked what he would do with a million dollars, he said he would build schools, improve infrastructure and find jobs for his village. In almost every way he is a thoroughly lovable big lump of lad who has spent years trying to make it.

****

There is brief excitement in the eyes of Pankaj as he sees another ball take the outside of Cook's bat. The ball flies in the air towards a well set double gully trap. Had Mohammed Shami bowled the ball, it could have probably nestled into the hands of one of them. But this is Pankaj, so the excitement quickly becomes pain, then acceptance.

For a few seconds, he stares in the direction of the ball, even though it has been returned. He waits for Dhoni to say something, but nothing comes. Then he turns, a turn so heavy you can hear it from 100 metres away, and he gingerly walks back to the umpire, Rod Tucker, who is smiling sympathetically. It is the smile of a man who spent 103 first-class matches bowling luckless spells. Tucker says something and gives his cap back.

Pankaj walks alone towards the boundary. None of his team mates go over, the time for encouragement has passed. They know he has probably bowled his last ball this match, and possibly the last of his entire Test career. He fields one more ball, and then walks off the ground to get some treatment. No one claps, no one pats him on the back, he just moves through the few spectators and support staff, three stairs at a time.

Just as he is about to disappear into the changeroom, he takes off his cap and slams it on his leg.

That is cricket.

Jarrod Kimber was 50% of the Two Chucks, and is the mind responsible for cricketwithballs.com

RSS Feeds: Jarrod Kimber

© ESPN Sports Media Ltd.

Posted by   on (August 6, 2014, 9:33 GMT)

What an article! Pankaj was indeed unlucky probably he will not play even today!

Posted by   on (August 5, 2014, 13:09 GMT)

One thing that the Indian selectors have to remember is that the great Shane Warne after 4 tests had career figures of 1 for 335. Pankaj bowled well but was ridiculously unlucky. They have to stick with this guy. giving him another test match at Old Trafford will instill some confidence to him that people are rooting for him and believe he can succeed at this level. He will turn that luck around given another match.

Posted by zzby on (August 1, 2014, 7:45 GMT)

Poor pankaj when he was young didnt got a chance now at this age bowling friendly outswingers@130 which are harmless atleast he should crank them up to 140-145 so he can get some sucess like ryan harris.

Posted by Rufus_Fuddleduck on (August 1, 2014, 3:43 GMT)

If life can be unfair, why not cricket? In an ideal world, he deserves a better deal - and those who dropped catches off his bowling deserve to be kept on bread and water for a few days. But then it's not an ideal world. No guarantees for this guy.

Posted by Temuzin on (July 31, 2014, 23:51 GMT)

I heard Dhoni was also praising Pankaj's bowling. This increases hopes that he will be selected again. This will be good for morale of Pankaj and he should use this opportunity to come back with greater efficiency.

Posted by TimeKiller on (July 31, 2014, 19:04 GMT)

The fact is Pankaj didn't get any wickets on debut. Time to move on. There are plenty of medium pacers like him India. Try everyone out at least once before coming back to Pankaj. Pankaj is slow inspite of the good build, and that is the problem.

Posted by gugu1234 on (July 31, 2014, 17:57 GMT)

It was very emotional and interesting written words about Pankaj Singh efforts in the first class cricket and his luck for not getting a single wicket after his first test match . I was amazed and surprised that why this player was not selected earlier . I am sure he will be given a chance again as Ishant Sharma has still not recovered from his injury . " That Is Cricket " are those words which makes him special that how much he understand and respect this game . He will show his class , just give him a chance for the remaining matches of this tour . I wish him all the best :)

Posted by   on (July 31, 2014, 17:41 GMT)

An article filled with sympathy. Pankaj Singh ought to be persisted with as almost no one came off with flying colors from this Test barring Rahane. You cannot drop anyone just after a Test and he needs to be given the full run of the remaining Tests. If thus assured he may feel encouraged, think normally (without any feeling of insecurity, 'one false step and I am out') and may do well. After it does not take much to outperform any Indian bowler on this tour!

Posted by Naikan on (July 31, 2014, 13:39 GMT)

Elsewhere I read about what Dhoni looks for in his bowling combination - swing (Bhuvi), skiddy (Shami) and bouncy (Ishant). This line of thought which discounts unique though processes has persisted more in Indian team selection- preventing SO Called SIMILAR bowlers from playing together & one can go back to Prasanna / Venkat time (both offspinners) to see the issue. So if this has held back Pankaj from getting a spot while the "blue" eyed boy (Ishant) was persisted for years-- then it is a sad statement on how the career of a promising bowler was scuttled. His lack of success in the test is also as much to do with poorer handling. Else which Captain would remove a bowler after 5 overs for just 5 runs (also beating batsmen a few times). Even in the first innings - the spells were too short to gain rhythm (crucial in a test) and missed out on field placements that allowed edged shots to escape. Pankaj and others like him can only get a fair chance if the test Captaincy changes.

Comments have now been closed for this article

TopTop
Email Feedback Print
Share
E-mail
Feedback
Print
Jarrod KimberClose
Tour Results
England v India at Birmingham - Sep 7, 2014
England won by 3 runs
England v India at Leeds - Sep 5, 2014
England won by 41 runs
England v India at Birmingham - Sep 2, 2014
India won by 9 wickets (with 117 balls remaining)
England v India at Nottingham - Aug 30, 2014
India won by 6 wickets (with 42 balls remaining)
England v India at Cardiff - Aug 27, 2014
India won by 133 runs (D/L method)
More results »
News | Features Last 3 days
News | Features Last 3 days