England v Sri Lanka, 2nd Test, Lord's, 4th day June 6, 2011

England's bright response to a gloomy day

England recovered from a less-than-perfect performance on the third day to rattle through Sri Lanka's lower order and build a solid lead
33

If England were anxious, they hid it well today. If - as their bowling coach, David Saker, had suggested - their pacemen had been suffering from technical issues, they were quickly resolved by a freshened wicket and an encouraging desire to clean up their own mess. If the loss of Andrew Strauss to the second ball of the innings sent a wave of unease through the dressing-room, the old faithful alliance of Alastair Cook and Jonathan Trott quickly steadied the team's equilibrium.

And if Kevin Pietersen was on edge as Rangana Herath turned the screw in the closing overs, his survival to the close at least bought him the chance to plead his case in broad daylight tomorrow, and maybe even play his natural attacking game. With 98 overs to play with, a ballistic assault of the type every opponent knows is possible would leave plenty time for another remarkable finish to this match.

All in all for England, it was a bright response to a gloomy day at Lord's. There was plenty that could, and maybe would, have gone wrong, had the team not found a way to buck up its ideas, and fend off the threat of an awkward final day. Instead, by the close, it was Sri Lanka who were facing the prospect of another test of their resolve, thanks to an impressively rapid half-century from Jonathan Trott and a bowling performance that didn't come close to the magnificence of Cardiff, but was an exponential improvement on the wayward fare of the third morning.

"From the position we were in at the end of the second day, we've fought back in this game fantastically well," said Steven Finn, whose 4 for 108 enabled him to eclipse Ian Botham as England's youngest bowler to 50 Test wickets. "We're in a great position to push on tomorrow. We're not looking beyond that first hour, but we'll look to consolidate in the first hour and push on from there."

Finn's performance in particular had come in for scrutiny on Sunday, but his response this morning showed all the maturity that earned him an Ashes starting berth. His end-of-day talk of "processes" and "good areas" may have been cliché-speak beyond compare, but seeing as hitting a good length had been the nub of the problem in the early part of the innings, there wasn't much more that could be said.

"Sri Lanka's batsmen are allowed to play well, and Tillakaratne Dilshan played exceptionally well on a day when the ball didn't do anything at all," said Finn. "He scored 190 of 470-odd, so they relied on him quite heavily, but towards the latter stage of their innings we stuck to our guns well, and to take seven wickets in a session today reinforced the fact that when we put the ball in the right area, it does the talking."

When this England team gets on a roll, it can be incredibly hard to stop. From the moment of Dilshan's dismissal on Sunday evening, England claimed Sri Lanka's last eight wickets for 109, including seven for 85 in 22.5 overs today - numbers which aren't entirely dissimilar to the 10 for 82 in 24.4 that shocked both sides in Cardiff last week.

"When the pressure is on you certain things can go awry, and when the pressure's on the batsmen they can play poor shots," Finn added. "But we don't dwell on negatives, on things we've done badly. We can look back with smiley faces on what we have achieved so far, but we can look with great hunger and desire at what lies ahead for us. We know we've got the attack to test any Test team in the world.

"There's been a huge momentum shift in the game since the beginning of today. The Sri Lankan batsmen could have come out and could still be batting now and be in a great position. But for us to take seven wickets in that afternoon session and be 150 ahead with two down and some of the batsman we have, I think we're in a fantastic position."

It would take a bizarre set of circumstances for either side to lose from here - certainly, in Sri Lanka's case, there's surely no way they'll be caught napping in quite the same manner. But then again, not even the Sri Lankans themselves pretend that they don't have a soft underbelly. Their justified faith in the excellence of their top order allows them to pack their attack with five frontline options, and play to win at all times. It's an admirable attitude, but as witnessed last Monday, the down-side can be dramatic.

Nevertheless, when the first of those bowling options, Chanaka Welegedara, reawakened Strauss's doubts against left-arm quicks by scalping him in the opening over, it took a performance of stiff resolve in the fading light to guard against further damage. If anything, Alastair Cook's voracious appetite for run-harvesting has been sharpened by his loose pull on 96 in the first innings, as he buckled down for another 41-over stint and blunted the threat of the new ball.

However, it was the free-flowing Trott who really set the agenda, puncturing the off side with drives that scarcely registered, and clipping off the toes with customary nonchalance. It is a mark of his class that he never seems hurried, but on this occasion he most definitely got a move on, as demonstrated by the unexpectedly loose manner of his departure, playing all round a full ball in Herath's first over.

By that stage, however, the sting of the session had been drawn, even though Pietersen's latest trial by left-arm spin ensured the closing overs of the day remained compelling. Throughout it all, Finn sat in the hot-seat on the pavilion balcony - the designated nightwatchman in James Anderson's absence. "I had the pads on, the chest pad, thigh pad, the lot, two boxes. I was ready to go out there and do it if I had to," he said. "But thankfully the two guys out there held their positions and played well."

There's little point in second-guessing how the final day will pan out, given how extraordinary the first Test proved to be, but the confidence of a restored ascendancy will surely lift England's game while putting the squeeze back on Sri Lanka. "Hopefully it will stay overcast and there will be enough in the wicket," said Finn. "If we get a go at them tomorrow and put the ball in the right area, there will definitely be enough pressure on them, and enough doubt in their mind to hopefully spread some fear."

Andrew Miller is UK editor of ESPNcricinfo

Comments have now been closed for this article

  • HatsforBats on June 7, 2011, 15:17 GMT

    What an utterly ridiculous morning of cricket by England! They're 1-0 up in the series, Cook decides to bat for himself and a century (after "missing out" in the 1st inning), and Strauss declares to let SL chase 300+ on the final day! Pathetic! I don't care if Eng win, you can not expect to bowl the opposition out in a session every match. It's a poor morning of cricket from a team that wants to be no.1. Mind you I'm Australian and it's 1am so perhaps my vitriol isn't so warranted.

  • buncers on June 7, 2011, 13:50 GMT

    Firstly - is playing well in England that important anymore. Look at the homes of the test playing nations - mainly slow, dusty and dry conditions - England is the odd one out. Like Wimbledon in tennis.

    Sri-Lanka hardly ever come here - why bother to develop players for these conditions, when you hardly play here.

    Sangas, Mahela and Samo have failed here because they just don't play in these cold (for Lankans) damp, green (compared to sub-continent) wickets.

    I say to SL - don't play anymore tests here - much easier.

  • on June 7, 2011, 12:44 GMT

    @landl47,Now just as I thought a pathatic answer....do u think Englishman can even think of surviving in our own soil...well mate soryy the history dosn't tell it any where ?? well I think u must be dreaming to have conditions favouring England? save your thoughts...I know abot SL better than u do....

  • Lord.emsworth on June 7, 2011, 12:12 GMT

    Events at Cardiff throw everything open. However Dilshan being probabaly unable to open would mean any Sl chance of chasing a target is zero. An opener like the discarded Upul Tharanga may have made a decent stab at it. Sangakarra, Mahela, Sam are NOT in the same attacking mould like former players Aravinda De Silva,Jayasuriya, Kaluwitharne,Ranatunge, and others, and looking further back, Duleep Mendis, Roy Dias, etc. This SL team is very predictable. Toothless bowling and a very strong opening batsmen pair who easily put on a 100 to 200 stand (In Vain). The rest just bog down everything, pretty much toothless here too despite the wicketkeepers batting efforts... Thats it.. I'm afraid.

  • cric_leo on June 7, 2011, 11:32 GMT

    I think our remaining young guys in the squad ( in the bench) should get a chance to get overseas test experience in next match instead of sangakkara, mahela and samraweera. at least we can satisfy with ourselves, that our next generation cricketers get something rather than wining or drawing test series.

  • landl47 on June 7, 2011, 10:54 GMT

    @Manesha: Yes, England do need to visit Sri Lanka. I'm sure the batsmen, looking at this Sri Lanka attack, would love the chance.

  • on June 7, 2011, 9:51 GMT

    I feel sorry for dilshan effort but all and all SL is very poor in test cricket. There is a high chance of loosing this too... hope rain will save the day..

  • Jose on June 7, 2011, 9:38 GMT

    World's No.1 spinner is content with the wickets of Tailenders. Now he is threatened by the batsmen who can play spin well. However, England might pull-off a victory in this series due to SL's poor touring history.

  • gracegift on June 7, 2011, 8:33 GMT

    I'd like to see England give Sri Lanka 320 off 65 overs @ just under 5 runs per over, else Lanka will play for a draw. Yes, they could get bowled out in 20 overs, or 15, but you can't rely on a miracle every time. Who says Test cricket is boring?

  • Eugynne on June 7, 2011, 8:26 GMT

    Kumar, Mahela whaere is the spirit? it goes missing rather pathetically. An excellent duo who have always performed extremely high when it comes to tests or shorter version of the game. Now both of you look down & out! Both demonstrated magnificent batsmanship & leadership. I certainly don't believe that IPL still haunts them. It is a bad patch. That's it! Please don't inflate this loss of form into an issue. Kumar & Mahela! you are true gentlemen. No one has any doubt! But time is up come on guys! go for the kill. It is in your hands.'Never say die'

  • HatsforBats on June 7, 2011, 15:17 GMT

    What an utterly ridiculous morning of cricket by England! They're 1-0 up in the series, Cook decides to bat for himself and a century (after "missing out" in the 1st inning), and Strauss declares to let SL chase 300+ on the final day! Pathetic! I don't care if Eng win, you can not expect to bowl the opposition out in a session every match. It's a poor morning of cricket from a team that wants to be no.1. Mind you I'm Australian and it's 1am so perhaps my vitriol isn't so warranted.

  • buncers on June 7, 2011, 13:50 GMT

    Firstly - is playing well in England that important anymore. Look at the homes of the test playing nations - mainly slow, dusty and dry conditions - England is the odd one out. Like Wimbledon in tennis.

    Sri-Lanka hardly ever come here - why bother to develop players for these conditions, when you hardly play here.

    Sangas, Mahela and Samo have failed here because they just don't play in these cold (for Lankans) damp, green (compared to sub-continent) wickets.

    I say to SL - don't play anymore tests here - much easier.

  • on June 7, 2011, 12:44 GMT

    @landl47,Now just as I thought a pathatic answer....do u think Englishman can even think of surviving in our own soil...well mate soryy the history dosn't tell it any where ?? well I think u must be dreaming to have conditions favouring England? save your thoughts...I know abot SL better than u do....

  • Lord.emsworth on June 7, 2011, 12:12 GMT

    Events at Cardiff throw everything open. However Dilshan being probabaly unable to open would mean any Sl chance of chasing a target is zero. An opener like the discarded Upul Tharanga may have made a decent stab at it. Sangakarra, Mahela, Sam are NOT in the same attacking mould like former players Aravinda De Silva,Jayasuriya, Kaluwitharne,Ranatunge, and others, and looking further back, Duleep Mendis, Roy Dias, etc. This SL team is very predictable. Toothless bowling and a very strong opening batsmen pair who easily put on a 100 to 200 stand (In Vain). The rest just bog down everything, pretty much toothless here too despite the wicketkeepers batting efforts... Thats it.. I'm afraid.

  • cric_leo on June 7, 2011, 11:32 GMT

    I think our remaining young guys in the squad ( in the bench) should get a chance to get overseas test experience in next match instead of sangakkara, mahela and samraweera. at least we can satisfy with ourselves, that our next generation cricketers get something rather than wining or drawing test series.

  • landl47 on June 7, 2011, 10:54 GMT

    @Manesha: Yes, England do need to visit Sri Lanka. I'm sure the batsmen, looking at this Sri Lanka attack, would love the chance.

  • on June 7, 2011, 9:51 GMT

    I feel sorry for dilshan effort but all and all SL is very poor in test cricket. There is a high chance of loosing this too... hope rain will save the day..

  • Jose on June 7, 2011, 9:38 GMT

    World's No.1 spinner is content with the wickets of Tailenders. Now he is threatened by the batsmen who can play spin well. However, England might pull-off a victory in this series due to SL's poor touring history.

  • gracegift on June 7, 2011, 8:33 GMT

    I'd like to see England give Sri Lanka 320 off 65 overs @ just under 5 runs per over, else Lanka will play for a draw. Yes, they could get bowled out in 20 overs, or 15, but you can't rely on a miracle every time. Who says Test cricket is boring?

  • Eugynne on June 7, 2011, 8:26 GMT

    Kumar, Mahela whaere is the spirit? it goes missing rather pathetically. An excellent duo who have always performed extremely high when it comes to tests or shorter version of the game. Now both of you look down & out! Both demonstrated magnificent batsmanship & leadership. I certainly don't believe that IPL still haunts them. It is a bad patch. That's it! Please don't inflate this loss of form into an issue. Kumar & Mahela! you are true gentlemen. No one has any doubt! But time is up come on guys! go for the kill. It is in your hands.'Never say die'

  • Elliott_Tree on June 7, 2011, 8:14 GMT

    Re. 'England only take wickets in damp conditions': absolutely true if they bowl like they did on Day 2/3, not if they keep discipline and pressure (cf last Ashes, as Truemans_Ghost points out). Will be interesting to see how they go against Pakistan this Winter if it is hosted in Sri Lanka - subcontinent pitches, but without the massive Ashes hype and intensity.

  • Elliott_Tree on June 7, 2011, 7:54 GMT

    Mmmmm, the optimist in me is hoping for a cracking final day of a Test. Being English I'd naturally prefer to see purposeful batting, a competitive declaration and then some really intense bowling to force an Eng win. As a lover of Test cricket, though, it would be (almost) as good to see the SL bowlers turn it on, rattle Eng out and then watch the SL top order show their class as they try to hunt down the runs before the English 'Summer' closes in [almost like the inverse of watching Swan et al with one eye and the Adelaide rain radar maps with the other].

  • 5wombats on June 7, 2011, 7:47 GMT

    Sri Lanka are now completely out of this match - I can't see them taking 8 quick wickets in this morning to give themselves a gettable total. I can't see Strauss giving Sri Lanka a sniff on the declaration either. So; Cook to get yet another ton & KP, Bell, Morgan & Prior all have a whack. Declaration an hour after lunch with a lead of 350-380 leaving around 55 overs. Today Sri lanka lost 7 for 107 in 32 overs. Swann starting to have an impact now and pleasing to see Finn get his act together. England only needed 25 overs in Cardiff.... :-)

  • Truemans_Ghost on June 7, 2011, 7:35 GMT

    All these guys who are sayig England can only take wickets on damp England days seem to have forgotten the ashes very quickly. There also seems to be a suggestion that wickets in England somehow "don't count". They do.

  • on June 7, 2011, 7:20 GMT

    Drop Andrew Strauss for James taylor

  • nimal183 on June 7, 2011, 6:57 GMT

    Its funny that when the weather gets cold and cloudy only the England's great tall fast bowlers can take wickets. I think england need bad weather condition to win a test match even at home..How can they become a No 1 team in test cricket!!!!!!!!!!!!!

  • nimal183 on June 7, 2011, 6:38 GMT

    I think cricket should be played in the summer...

  • on June 7, 2011, 5:27 GMT

    @landl47 Yes-In other words you meant to say that Englishman can handle the swing well on their own English Conditions but in Subcontinent they are just utterly dissapointing..you better visit our part of the world where it's more sunny....

  • WaldermaltCricketer on June 7, 2011, 5:13 GMT

    Poor Sri Lankan team is making their way to another defeat. This is almost a game between Dilshan & great England Test team. Super Sri Lankan heroes ( Mahela & Sanga) are still thinking about IPL. Sanga was telling BIG BIG stories with the use of his very good English knowledge. But he did NOTHING to the team with the use of his brilliant skills of batting. Mahela didn't want to take any responsibility in the 1st inning as a senior player, he was in a hurry to go back pavilion since he came to bat. These two players almost showed their carelessness in the series so far. Poor Thilan Samaraweera who has NO SKILL, NO ABILITY to bat in fast tracks was struggling again in the first inning & scored 9 runs. I think we all should be happy about Thilan as a batsman can perform only at HOME has made 9 runs in Lords against great England fast bowlers. This all show that Dilshan will never be able to go a happy journey with players like Mahela, Sanga & Thilan. ENG will win the series 3-0.

  • ranilranathunga on June 7, 2011, 5:08 GMT

    They say english bowlers are very good but they always want overcast and poor conditions to get wickets of a subcontinent team...even in thei own country own conditions they couldnt get the first wicket until 200 runs have been score....Is this bowling great?/?

  • cric_leo on June 7, 2011, 5:04 GMT

    what a poor performance from SL middle order. our best batsmen lost their class with IPL. @tharanga udagedara: you're absolutely right mate poor dilshan..... He should deserve far better than this.. with his effort. at the moment SL team is mess

  • tjsimonsen on June 7, 2011, 4:36 GMT

    Strauss' and his batsmen's first obligation is to make sure that England don't lose the match. THEN - and only then - should he think about setting SL a tricky target. England are 1 up in the series. It's not the time to gamble a series lead just to be fancy. That's not what the no 1 team would do - not that England are there yet.

  • Eugynne on June 7, 2011, 4:03 GMT

    My instinct says this match goes in favour of England, 'coz, the way England came back to take a slender lead of 7 runs. Look at the mental advantage! Now the lead is over 150! It is gonna be tough for the SL unless they put their heads down and settle for a draw unless otherwise any miracle that takes place. Nevertheless, Eng will bat on till they reach 280 - 320 at least? With Swann finds turn and Finn & Tremlett can swing, Eng has the definite edge. Thanks to both the teams for bringing respect and recognition to test cricket, after the IPL monster that threatened to gobble test cricket. Keep it up guys.

  • on June 7, 2011, 3:34 GMT

    Poor dilshan! I suppose he is the unluckiest captain in modern SL cricket. He doesn't have murali-vaas-malinga previlage. Additionally he has got two inept and stupid world class batsmen who even cannot catch the ball and still dreaming of IPL cheer girls. In this SL team only dilshan backing up the captain. It would be better if dilshan resign from the captaincy and leave the team anarchy.

  • chandau on June 7, 2011, 3:15 GMT

    Lets say England make another 130 in 28 overs in first session. That leaves SL 70 overs to make 280 and England 2 sessions to take 20 wickets. Or 150 in 38 overs asking SL to score 300 in 60 overs. C'mon guys show the world u deserve to be the #1 team !!!

  • denwarlo70 on June 7, 2011, 2:58 GMT

    Damn, why do I get this funny feeling we'll (Sri Lanka) be drubbed 3-0 already? Well, I thought Cardiff was just a flash in the pan for the POMS but Lord's is no different. It is almost a deja vu from Cardiff. I spoke very big about our batsmen and backed them to the hilt but seems they are letting us supporters down silly. But then again, all is not lost and cricket been the funny game it is, I've still got some faith in the team and let's see what happens.

  • landl47 on June 7, 2011, 2:20 GMT

    @cranaweera: So when it's overcast Sri Lanka lose 7 wickets for 107, whereas England score 149-2. In Cardiff, when it was gloomy and rainy England scored 491-5, and Sri Lanka were all out 82. In other words, England's batsmen can handle poor conditions much better than Sri Lanka's. I see what you mean.

  • hargreaves92 on June 7, 2011, 1:33 GMT

    @cranaweera You're clearly very wrong, England had worse conditions for their 1st innings (green pitch) whereas Lanka were able to bat in the sun on a day 2/3 Lord's rolled carpet. All this showed was that subcontinental batsmen struggle in English conditions when the ball swings whereas English batsmen are better equipped technically to deal with the moving ball.

  • TheDoctor394 on June 7, 2011, 1:20 GMT

    Two boxes?? What's wrong with Finn's anatomy?

  • dsig3 on June 7, 2011, 1:15 GMT

    @Cranaweera, yeah right. It might have something to do with the bowling attack but you just stick to the weather mate.

  • KingOwl on June 6, 2011, 23:13 GMT

    As Finn says, if it is overcast anything can happen. The difference between these two teams is the weather.

  • HatsforBats on June 6, 2011, 22:56 GMT

    Good to see Trott forcing the pace. At 1-0 up in the series it would be great to see Strauss declare and give SL a target they could chase. It's what a no.1 side would do.

  • landl47 on June 6, 2011, 22:04 GMT

    If England can score at a decent rate tomorrow, declaring and leaving Sri Lanka to get 300 in 50 overs could make it very interesting. The wicket looks as though it might have some life in it on the fifth day and Sri Lanka has a very long tail. The difference between these two sides is that England was 22-3 and made 486; Sri Lanka was 207-0 and couldn't get a first innings lead. If there's no more rain, I think there's a good chance of a result tomorrow.

  • No featured comments at the moment.

  • landl47 on June 6, 2011, 22:04 GMT

    If England can score at a decent rate tomorrow, declaring and leaving Sri Lanka to get 300 in 50 overs could make it very interesting. The wicket looks as though it might have some life in it on the fifth day and Sri Lanka has a very long tail. The difference between these two sides is that England was 22-3 and made 486; Sri Lanka was 207-0 and couldn't get a first innings lead. If there's no more rain, I think there's a good chance of a result tomorrow.

  • HatsforBats on June 6, 2011, 22:56 GMT

    Good to see Trott forcing the pace. At 1-0 up in the series it would be great to see Strauss declare and give SL a target they could chase. It's what a no.1 side would do.

  • KingOwl on June 6, 2011, 23:13 GMT

    As Finn says, if it is overcast anything can happen. The difference between these two teams is the weather.

  • dsig3 on June 7, 2011, 1:15 GMT

    @Cranaweera, yeah right. It might have something to do with the bowling attack but you just stick to the weather mate.

  • TheDoctor394 on June 7, 2011, 1:20 GMT

    Two boxes?? What's wrong with Finn's anatomy?

  • hargreaves92 on June 7, 2011, 1:33 GMT

    @cranaweera You're clearly very wrong, England had worse conditions for their 1st innings (green pitch) whereas Lanka were able to bat in the sun on a day 2/3 Lord's rolled carpet. All this showed was that subcontinental batsmen struggle in English conditions when the ball swings whereas English batsmen are better equipped technically to deal with the moving ball.

  • landl47 on June 7, 2011, 2:20 GMT

    @cranaweera: So when it's overcast Sri Lanka lose 7 wickets for 107, whereas England score 149-2. In Cardiff, when it was gloomy and rainy England scored 491-5, and Sri Lanka were all out 82. In other words, England's batsmen can handle poor conditions much better than Sri Lanka's. I see what you mean.

  • denwarlo70 on June 7, 2011, 2:58 GMT

    Damn, why do I get this funny feeling we'll (Sri Lanka) be drubbed 3-0 already? Well, I thought Cardiff was just a flash in the pan for the POMS but Lord's is no different. It is almost a deja vu from Cardiff. I spoke very big about our batsmen and backed them to the hilt but seems they are letting us supporters down silly. But then again, all is not lost and cricket been the funny game it is, I've still got some faith in the team and let's see what happens.

  • chandau on June 7, 2011, 3:15 GMT

    Lets say England make another 130 in 28 overs in first session. That leaves SL 70 overs to make 280 and England 2 sessions to take 20 wickets. Or 150 in 38 overs asking SL to score 300 in 60 overs. C'mon guys show the world u deserve to be the #1 team !!!

  • on June 7, 2011, 3:34 GMT

    Poor dilshan! I suppose he is the unluckiest captain in modern SL cricket. He doesn't have murali-vaas-malinga previlage. Additionally he has got two inept and stupid world class batsmen who even cannot catch the ball and still dreaming of IPL cheer girls. In this SL team only dilshan backing up the captain. It would be better if dilshan resign from the captaincy and leave the team anarchy.