England v Sri Lanka, 5th ODI, Edgbaston June 4, 2014

Fine-tuning for Sri Lanka to peak at World Cup

Sri Lanka have the batting raw materials to launch a fine World Cup campaign but a little polishing may make a considerable difference in eight months' time
23

20 wins from 23 limited-overs matches. When Sri Lanka lost the ODI series to Pakistan in December last year, few may have envisioned such a rich start to 2014.

The win percentage of 87 may be somewhat blown out by results against a misfiring Bangladesh and two more victories against Associate sides, but Sri Lanka have wrestled through the tougher challenges as well. The spoils of the series win against England - significant because it came in early summer - will now join the regional and global titles already on display at Maitland Place.

There can only be minor complaints about Sri Lanka's ODI side, but in the months approaching a World Cup, even the grains of sand that can set entire limited-overs machine out of kilter, deserve thorough examination. Sri Lanka owe it to their soon-to-be-departing seniors to have the best possible combination figured out, and their strategy fine-tuned, before heading into the event. Their fire has carried them through global tournaments before, but too often it has not been enough to topple surging, collected opponents near the tournament's climax.

Sri Lanka's most conspicuous area of concern is the second openers' position. Tillakaratne Dilshan finished comfortably atop the run-scorers' list for the series, yet no Sri Lanka opening stand lasted longer than nine overs. Between them, Lahiru Thirimanne and Kusal Perera managed only 55 when opening, across the five matches.

Thirimanne and Kusal remain the frontrunners to partner Dilshan in Australia and New Zealand, but each of them present significant weaknesses. Thirimanne had been a revelation during the Asia Cup, but has yet to open convincingly outside Asia. James Anderson exposed a weakness outside off stump that plagues many young Sri Lanka batsmen, and though drop-in pitches in the Antipodes will offer less movement than the pitches he has played on in England, a left-handed opener who is shaky against away-swing does not provide much confidence in the age of two new balls.

Kusal's battles have been more universal. Explosive opening blows often suggest he has already come to terms with conditions and the bowling, but too often, he plays an aggressive stroke too many, to hand his wicket away. The power and panache in his cricket may resemble the virtues of Sanath Jayasuriya, but Kusal is yet to develop the judgement and self-awareness that sustained Jayasuriya's barrages. Kusal's rate of scoring means Sri Lanka take a significant leap in the match, every time he bats more than 12 overs, but he has not done so consistently against top opposition.

Sri Lanka have a third potential opener in their ranks, and on the surface, he may appear their best bet. Mahela Jayawardene averages 44.76 when he opens the innings, and he strikes at better than 90 per hundred balls. Not only is that an excellent opening average, it is 10 runs higher than he manages at his usual haunt at No. 4. Those figures worsen only slightly, when his 11 opening innings in Australia are considered. Sometimes shackled by responsibility in the middle order, the Jayawardene at the top of the innings is free, fluent and often effective. As Dilshan slows down year-by-year, Jayawardene may be an ideal opening foil. The two have batted profitably together before.

It would seem straightforward to open with the experienced men, and move Thirimanne and Kusal to Nos. 4 and 5, where they have batted before, but Sri Lanka are wary of top-loading their experience. If Dilshan, Jayawardene and Sangakkara depart early on a rough pitch, it is left to the relatively green middle order to stabilise the innings. Thirimanne has showed himself capable of playing long innings, but the remaining middle order men have not yet mastered the art of reassessing targets and shepherding chases. Angelo Mathews is an increasingly canny finisher, but has rarely been effective when he arrives at the crease early in the innings.

Other options include balancing the top order by moving Kumar Sangakkara to No. 4, and having Thirimanne bat at No. 3 - his favoured spot. But the selectors' hesitation to make that move is understandable. Sangakkara has been Sri Lanka's best batsman in the past 18 months, so why have him change? The same forces that compel Jayawardene to restrict his game at No. 4 may end up applying to Sangakkara as well.

Sri Lanka have plenty to ponder lower down too. Chief selector Sanath Jayasuriya has spoken of the value a fast-bowling allrounder like Thisara Perera can add in Australia, but in England, he was omitted in favour of batsman Ashan Priyanjan. The attack remained potent. Priyanjan has been promising so far, and if he plays at No. 7, Sri Lanka have more scope to make aggressive changes in the top order. Experimentation in upcoming home series against South Africa and Pakistan may help illustrate both players' strengths and weaknesses more clearly.

During their 2014 run, Sri Lanka have been bailed out by their attack on numerous occasions. They can be confident they have the batting raw materials to launch a fine World Cup campaign, but a little polishing and repositioning in the coming series may make a considerable difference in eight months' time.

Andrew Fidel Fernando is ESPNcricinfo's Sri Lanka correspondent. @andrewffernando

Comments have now been closed for this article

  • on June 10, 2014, 10:13 GMT

    Test Kausal silva in ODI, if it success others have to play only fireworks 25 overs....

  • Andrew-Silva on June 7, 2014, 17:17 GMT

    Unfortunately, the STRANGE way SL selection panel is overlooking the most valuable asset we have among young OPENERS; prove that there is some CALAMITY behind the seen. No fine tunning without him!

    It seems no one is brave enough even to mention the name of that unfortunate SL lad Upul Tharanga. Otherwise, who can forget a 29 yr Opener that contributed 5000+ runs for Sri Lanka, with 13 big Centuries + 28 Fifty plus scores in all major Test playing countries? Especially at a time, looking for an experienced opener to fill the abyss, created due to this lad's exclusion last year. This can't be anything to do with Cricket. Sanath & Marvan know his capabilities, better than anyone!

    Tharanga has the Record for the MOST CONSISTENT SL batting in ODIs, being the Fastest to score first 1000 & 2nd Fastest to score 5000 in 157 ODI, just 5 ODIs behind Marvan. Strange world! A guy (Upul) with the HIGHEST overall Batting Av 34.5 for a SL player in Eng/Aus/WI/SA/NZ has no place in National Side..??

  • on June 7, 2014, 11:29 GMT

    Upul Tharanga should open with dilshan.no doubt.And why sl fans face the reality?

  • cric1965 on June 7, 2014, 10:02 GMT

    Mahela should open in Australia with Dilshan and Chandimal should give number 4 and Thirimanna will be No 5 batsman. Mahela can score runs quickly if he bats top of the order like last world cup Sachin score heavily with Shewag at top of the order.

  • on June 6, 2014, 22:39 GMT

    andrew, dont agree with the part that Mathews didn't show he can play long innings. He showed it in tests anyway. Even in ODI's he played long enough innings when he got chances so early to come into crease. http://stats.espncricinfo.com/ci/engine/player/49764.html?class=2;template=results;type=batting

  • Lalindra2012 on June 5, 2014, 16:20 GMT

    I personally think Sri Lanka has a good team and should get the combinations right and definitely when you analyze Thirimanne's performances he is suited more in the middle order rather than opening, definitely Kusal should open because his presence top of the order and even if he scores 10 with a six and four it's highly effective and it gives some sort of impetus to the Sri Lankan Innings rather than going for a steady opener like Thirimanne. According to the pitch on the day, playing a spin bowling all rounder or a fast bowling all rounder should be decided by the Captain.

  • InternationalCricketFollower on June 5, 2014, 15:15 GMT

    Personally think Kaushal Silva should get a shot in the ODI side. He might perform better than Chandimal, Thirimanne and Kusal combined.

  • KingOwl on June 5, 2014, 10:42 GMT

    One other major thing that needs to be sorted out is Sachitra's bowling action. He is a key part of the bowling team for one day matches and there needs to be clarity that he is free to bowl.

  • MelbourneMiracle on June 5, 2014, 9:30 GMT

    Just think what I'm trying to say about a couple of statements in this article based on the recent ODI series against England.

    "Angelo Mathews is an increasingly canny finisher, but has rarely been effective when he arrives at the crease early in the innings."

    AD Mathews 5innings 131runs 32.75avg

    "Thirimanne has showed himself capable of playing long innings"

    HDRL Thirimanne 5innings 93runs 23.25avg

  • THEBEAST7 on June 5, 2014, 9:13 GMT

    Best bet is to send Mahela and Dilshan to open and Sanga in at 4. Thiri is the ideal number 3 like Asanka Gurusinghe. He may bat slow but others can bat around him. Hope Mendis, Sachithra, Malinga, Kula, Thisara and Herath finds form to defend low scores in Aussie and NZ. Kusal, Thirimanne will fail badly in NZ conditions. Kusal is good only in Asia. Thiri at least have the techniques to survive.

  • on June 10, 2014, 10:13 GMT

    Test Kausal silva in ODI, if it success others have to play only fireworks 25 overs....

  • Andrew-Silva on June 7, 2014, 17:17 GMT

    Unfortunately, the STRANGE way SL selection panel is overlooking the most valuable asset we have among young OPENERS; prove that there is some CALAMITY behind the seen. No fine tunning without him!

    It seems no one is brave enough even to mention the name of that unfortunate SL lad Upul Tharanga. Otherwise, who can forget a 29 yr Opener that contributed 5000+ runs for Sri Lanka, with 13 big Centuries + 28 Fifty plus scores in all major Test playing countries? Especially at a time, looking for an experienced opener to fill the abyss, created due to this lad's exclusion last year. This can't be anything to do with Cricket. Sanath & Marvan know his capabilities, better than anyone!

    Tharanga has the Record for the MOST CONSISTENT SL batting in ODIs, being the Fastest to score first 1000 & 2nd Fastest to score 5000 in 157 ODI, just 5 ODIs behind Marvan. Strange world! A guy (Upul) with the HIGHEST overall Batting Av 34.5 for a SL player in Eng/Aus/WI/SA/NZ has no place in National Side..??

  • on June 7, 2014, 11:29 GMT

    Upul Tharanga should open with dilshan.no doubt.And why sl fans face the reality?

  • cric1965 on June 7, 2014, 10:02 GMT

    Mahela should open in Australia with Dilshan and Chandimal should give number 4 and Thirimanna will be No 5 batsman. Mahela can score runs quickly if he bats top of the order like last world cup Sachin score heavily with Shewag at top of the order.

  • on June 6, 2014, 22:39 GMT

    andrew, dont agree with the part that Mathews didn't show he can play long innings. He showed it in tests anyway. Even in ODI's he played long enough innings when he got chances so early to come into crease. http://stats.espncricinfo.com/ci/engine/player/49764.html?class=2;template=results;type=batting

  • Lalindra2012 on June 5, 2014, 16:20 GMT

    I personally think Sri Lanka has a good team and should get the combinations right and definitely when you analyze Thirimanne's performances he is suited more in the middle order rather than opening, definitely Kusal should open because his presence top of the order and even if he scores 10 with a six and four it's highly effective and it gives some sort of impetus to the Sri Lankan Innings rather than going for a steady opener like Thirimanne. According to the pitch on the day, playing a spin bowling all rounder or a fast bowling all rounder should be decided by the Captain.

  • InternationalCricketFollower on June 5, 2014, 15:15 GMT

    Personally think Kaushal Silva should get a shot in the ODI side. He might perform better than Chandimal, Thirimanne and Kusal combined.

  • KingOwl on June 5, 2014, 10:42 GMT

    One other major thing that needs to be sorted out is Sachitra's bowling action. He is a key part of the bowling team for one day matches and there needs to be clarity that he is free to bowl.

  • MelbourneMiracle on June 5, 2014, 9:30 GMT

    Just think what I'm trying to say about a couple of statements in this article based on the recent ODI series against England.

    "Angelo Mathews is an increasingly canny finisher, but has rarely been effective when he arrives at the crease early in the innings."

    AD Mathews 5innings 131runs 32.75avg

    "Thirimanne has showed himself capable of playing long innings"

    HDRL Thirimanne 5innings 93runs 23.25avg

  • THEBEAST7 on June 5, 2014, 9:13 GMT

    Best bet is to send Mahela and Dilshan to open and Sanga in at 4. Thiri is the ideal number 3 like Asanka Gurusinghe. He may bat slow but others can bat around him. Hope Mendis, Sachithra, Malinga, Kula, Thisara and Herath finds form to defend low scores in Aussie and NZ. Kusal, Thirimanne will fail badly in NZ conditions. Kusal is good only in Asia. Thiri at least have the techniques to survive.

  • Udendra on June 5, 2014, 6:16 GMT

    Thirimanne averages best when batting at no. 3 or 5 in Australia. food for thought?

  • first_slip on June 5, 2014, 4:05 GMT

    Chandimal? you got to be Kidding, and not sure about Kulasekara ether. we need better death bowler with more pace (Lakmal or Eranga will be more potent in Australia and NZ). apart fro that herath and sena as spinners.

  • nickexplore on June 5, 2014, 2:44 GMT

    No mention in AFFs article of Upul Tharanga - are his days numbered? If so, a cavalier Kusal is still the best option. So explosive. He just needs to temper his aggression and learn to stay in for 10 overs plus more often. Then SL will be in the box seat to win any match. Kusal has 6 ODIs vs South Africa and Pakistan at home in July and August to practise.

  • D-Ascendant on June 5, 2014, 2:21 GMT

    Until the World Cup: 1) Dili, 2) MJ, 3) Sanga, 4) Chandimal 5) Thirimanna 6) Mathews. After the World Cup,when the 3 seniors retire, bring in Kusal to open full-time and move Thirimanna to No. 3. Priyanjan can slot in at No. 5. Clearly, SL have plenty for the future.

  • on June 5, 2014, 2:16 GMT

    In spite of a hard fought come from behind series win as correctly pointed out by Andrew SL need to further improve on certain aspects. MJ was not in the best of form. Even in the field his reflexes appears to be not what it was used to be. He played a good situation innings on Tuesday. But it will remain to be seen how he will succeed if he is to bat at No. 4 in a 300+ run chase. SL managed with 4 frontline bowlers. If others who will not generally bowl the full quota of overs can put in some useful overs this strategy will work. In 2015 WC, we may need to play an extra paceman instead of an extra spinner. Thisara could fill that spot but he needs to improve his bowling. Whether Sachitra can come out clean from the latest controversy if necessary re-modeling his action will also have an impact on the balance of the team. Chandimal should always be in the mix and we should try to slot him whenever possible. Dilshan's opening partner, we need to sort out for good soon.

  • on June 5, 2014, 1:09 GMT

    Best batting line up for me is Dilshan, Mahela, Sangakkara, Chandimal, Thirimanne, Mathew, Priyanjan, ................... They all fit into their favourite places.

  • YogifromNY on June 5, 2014, 0:46 GMT

    This SL side is indeed shaping up to be a leading contender during the upcoming WC. On current ODI form (and I stress 'current'), I would put SL, Aus, NZ and Ind as the four sides most favored to be in the semis. Interesting to see how the coming months shape up for all the sides.

  • NJ_De_Zoysa on June 5, 2014, 0:08 GMT

    My XI for the WC, considering recent form...

    1.Dilshan 2.Mahela 3.Sangakkara 4.Thirimanne 5.Priyanjan 6.Mathews 7.Thisara 8.Kulasekara 9.Senanayake 10.Herath 11.Malinga

  • on June 4, 2014, 19:03 GMT

    chandimal should bat at no 4..he is better than Ashan..mahela at 5 and thiri at 6..mathews at 7..we don`t need thisara for ODIs..Kusal and dili should open..also need to protect Sachithra

  • CricIndia208 on June 4, 2014, 18:34 GMT

    SL have peaked too early. They have anyways not done much, can only go downhill from here.

  • Anu-srilanka on June 4, 2014, 18:23 GMT

    How fast did we forget Tharanga. Guy is highly inconsistent , yeah true but probably has the best proven record to be the partner of Dilshan. I wish he had the same chances as they still giving to Chandimal after number of failures. One thing is for sure that Tharanga is highly underreated.

  • R_U_4_REAL_NICK on June 4, 2014, 17:26 GMT

    Sri Lanka are a great setup but I just hope they have the sense to keep Thirimanne down in the middle order where he belongs. I mean look at the just concluded series... game 5 (and last) to finally see sense and it was the only game he contributed.

  • on June 4, 2014, 17:04 GMT

    Andrew - Good points!! Perhaps worth mentioning that Chandimal should not be written off. His current worries within the ODI team are a result of his T20 nightmares and being moved around so much in the order. He was one of the best batsman in Australia the last time, specially when he was allowed to bat at #4. The risk-reward of Dilshan & Mahela opening would be favorable with an in-form Chandimal batting at #4, followed by a very mature Thirimanne at #5 and a confident Mathews at #6.

    No doubt, at least statistically, Mahela is the best opener SL has. If the concern is about moving him from #4 where he is expected to provide stability and experience, then one way to look at the situation is to ask if Mahela at #4 has done significantly better than Chandimal at #4? The answer is NO.

  • No featured comments at the moment.

  • on June 4, 2014, 17:04 GMT

    Andrew - Good points!! Perhaps worth mentioning that Chandimal should not be written off. His current worries within the ODI team are a result of his T20 nightmares and being moved around so much in the order. He was one of the best batsman in Australia the last time, specially when he was allowed to bat at #4. The risk-reward of Dilshan & Mahela opening would be favorable with an in-form Chandimal batting at #4, followed by a very mature Thirimanne at #5 and a confident Mathews at #6.

    No doubt, at least statistically, Mahela is the best opener SL has. If the concern is about moving him from #4 where he is expected to provide stability and experience, then one way to look at the situation is to ask if Mahela at #4 has done significantly better than Chandimal at #4? The answer is NO.

  • R_U_4_REAL_NICK on June 4, 2014, 17:26 GMT

    Sri Lanka are a great setup but I just hope they have the sense to keep Thirimanne down in the middle order where he belongs. I mean look at the just concluded series... game 5 (and last) to finally see sense and it was the only game he contributed.

  • Anu-srilanka on June 4, 2014, 18:23 GMT

    How fast did we forget Tharanga. Guy is highly inconsistent , yeah true but probably has the best proven record to be the partner of Dilshan. I wish he had the same chances as they still giving to Chandimal after number of failures. One thing is for sure that Tharanga is highly underreated.

  • CricIndia208 on June 4, 2014, 18:34 GMT

    SL have peaked too early. They have anyways not done much, can only go downhill from here.

  • on June 4, 2014, 19:03 GMT

    chandimal should bat at no 4..he is better than Ashan..mahela at 5 and thiri at 6..mathews at 7..we don`t need thisara for ODIs..Kusal and dili should open..also need to protect Sachithra

  • NJ_De_Zoysa on June 5, 2014, 0:08 GMT

    My XI for the WC, considering recent form...

    1.Dilshan 2.Mahela 3.Sangakkara 4.Thirimanne 5.Priyanjan 6.Mathews 7.Thisara 8.Kulasekara 9.Senanayake 10.Herath 11.Malinga

  • YogifromNY on June 5, 2014, 0:46 GMT

    This SL side is indeed shaping up to be a leading contender during the upcoming WC. On current ODI form (and I stress 'current'), I would put SL, Aus, NZ and Ind as the four sides most favored to be in the semis. Interesting to see how the coming months shape up for all the sides.

  • on June 5, 2014, 1:09 GMT

    Best batting line up for me is Dilshan, Mahela, Sangakkara, Chandimal, Thirimanne, Mathew, Priyanjan, ................... They all fit into their favourite places.

  • on June 5, 2014, 2:16 GMT

    In spite of a hard fought come from behind series win as correctly pointed out by Andrew SL need to further improve on certain aspects. MJ was not in the best of form. Even in the field his reflexes appears to be not what it was used to be. He played a good situation innings on Tuesday. But it will remain to be seen how he will succeed if he is to bat at No. 4 in a 300+ run chase. SL managed with 4 frontline bowlers. If others who will not generally bowl the full quota of overs can put in some useful overs this strategy will work. In 2015 WC, we may need to play an extra paceman instead of an extra spinner. Thisara could fill that spot but he needs to improve his bowling. Whether Sachitra can come out clean from the latest controversy if necessary re-modeling his action will also have an impact on the balance of the team. Chandimal should always be in the mix and we should try to slot him whenever possible. Dilshan's opening partner, we need to sort out for good soon.

  • D-Ascendant on June 5, 2014, 2:21 GMT

    Until the World Cup: 1) Dili, 2) MJ, 3) Sanga, 4) Chandimal 5) Thirimanna 6) Mathews. After the World Cup,when the 3 seniors retire, bring in Kusal to open full-time and move Thirimanna to No. 3. Priyanjan can slot in at No. 5. Clearly, SL have plenty for the future.