England v West Indies, 2nd Twenty20, The Oval September 25, 2011

West Indies stun England to level series


West Indies 113 for 5 (Samuels 35*, Patel 2-22) beat England 88 (Mathurin 3-9) by 25 runs
Scorecard and ball-by-ball details

Garey Mathurin, a previously unknown left-arm spinner from St Lucia, produced a remarkable spell of 3 for 9 in four overs as West Indies secured a shock 25-run victory in the second Twenty20 at The Oval. After being asked to bat first on a slow and low turner, they struggled to a total of 113 for 5 and looked set for a second heavy defeat in three days. But instead, they rallied supremely to bowl England out for 88 with more than three overs of their allocation to spare.

With England set to embark on a tour of India next week, and with the defence of their World Twenty20 crown taking place in Sri Lanka in 12 months' time, this was a match that will have caused a few jitters in the team thinktank. On the same pitch that proved receptive to spin in Friday's opening game, both teams stacked their side with slow bowlers, but it was England's new-look order that ultimately dealt with the conditions the worst.

England's innings began inauspiciously, as Mathurin's high action and appreciable turn gave Friday's matchwinner Alex Hales a strokeless start to his innings. He had managed just two runs from his first eight balls when Krishnar Santokie, another West Indian debutant, and this time one who hasn't played first-class cricket, bowled him with a beauty that nipped through his defences and into off stump.

Four balls later, Mathurin made his first big impression, as Craig Kieswetter - with two fours to his name - was so bamboozled by a slider that he stood his ground after being bowled, in the vain hope that the keeper had been the one to whip off the bails. Ravi Bopara was then spun out by a beauty in Mathurin's next over, and at 26 for 3 at the end of the Powerplay, the match was exquisitely in the balance.

Ben Stokes did his utmost to change the dynamic of the innings, as he greeted Devendra Bishoo with the most violent assault of the night - a six and two fours in the space of a first over that went for 17, but at the other end, Mathurin twirled away without anything being allowed to break his zone. Jonny Bairstow, the hero of the Cardiff ODI, might have been tempted to block out the final four balls of his spell, but instead he dropped to his knees for a sweep, and was bowled for 4.

Stokes continued to provide England with a boundary-finding option, but as had been the case in the West Indian innings, working the singles proved to be a problem, not least when the less-than-fleet-footed Samit Patel entered the fray. He was run out by a direct hit from gully as he belatedly set off for a leg bye and, one over later, Stokes responded to three dot balls in a row with a missed sweep that left him lbw for 31.

The arrival of Tim Bresnan at No. 8 was arguably the most encouraging sight for England at such a stage, but even his big-match experience couldn't rescue his side. He drove on the up to that man Mathurin at long-off to depart for 2 from 4, and instead it was the rookie alliance of Jos Buttler and Scott Borthwick who hauled England back from the depths of 60 for 7. With more pace on the ball now that the spinners' overs were running out, they added 23 in 17 balls before a brilliant shy from Darren Sammy at mid-on left Buttler stranded short of his crease, and England deep in the mire.

Another calamitous run-out followed one over later as England began to panic. Graeme Swann turned down a single to cover with Borthwick stranded at the wrong end of the pitch, and the captain hadn't scored from either of his two deliveries by the time England's No. 11, Jade Dernbach, was also sent on his way via a run-out. Earlier in the match, Swann had chosen not to bowl his full quota of overs to give his team-mates the practice. It was a quiet night for the noisiest man in the camp.

On a bad night for England full-stop, Borthwick's performance with the ball was undoubtedly the highlight. In a solitary over against Ireland last month, he conceded 13 runs in unfavourable conditions. Tonight he went for 15 in a full four-over quota, without conceding a single boundary. His maiden international wicket was a collector's item as well, a perfectly pitched googly that bamboozled Johnson Charles, West Indies' opener, and bowled him for 21.

After allowing West Indies to rattle to 42 for 0 in four overs against the seamers on Friday, Swann cannily chose to open with the spin of Patel. His first ball was swept for four by Charles, the last of his quota was nailed through the covers for another boundary, and in between whiles he was clubbed for six by Charles over long-on. But the remainder of his 21 deliveries conceded a grand total of six runs, as West Indies found no way to keep the strike rotating.

Even Marlon Samuels, the most renowned batsman on display, found it tough to raise his game in the circumstances. He struggled for timing initially and had made 11 from 20 balls before drilling his first boundary at the end of the 15th over, and though he lifted his game in the closing stages, a run-a-ball 35 appeared to have done little more than hoist the West Indies total into triple figures. That, however, proved to be decisive.

England's fielding, such a strong factor in their victory on Friday, was once again sharp, with Hales sliding round the deep midwicket boundary to cling onto a slog from Christopher Barnwell, before Borthwick at long-off swallowed a firm lofted drive off Sammy to give Bopara his fifth wicket of the series, and his first of the night. Dernbach was England's other wicket-taker, with an early lbw to remove Dwayne Smith, but at the end of a memorable summer, it was West Indies who were left to cavort around the outfield. Their season is only just beginning, but what a fillip this will be as they head off towards Dubai, Bangladesh and beyond.

Andrew Miller is UK editor of ESPNcricinfo

Comments have now been closed for this article

  • John on September 28, 2011, 6:44 GMT

    @Josey Taylor, so you're saying that the England players did handle the moment, played well and it was purely and simply great play by WI that won them the night. England played no part in their own downfall? That's great because it means that England have no issues to address and they can just carry on playing the same way. After all, that's what India are doing. They played well all summer and it was just the weather and injuries, not even the opposition, that led to their defeats.

  • Martin on September 27, 2011, 19:55 GMT

    @Josey Taylor - "rear end kicking"! Really? No - that was what happened in the first T20 between England and West Indies. 10 wickets and 5 overs to spare wasn't it? In a 20 over game!? Get a grip mate.

  • Mortimer on September 27, 2011, 18:12 GMT

    Well played WIndies. Please don't undo this in the next match.

  • Dummy4 on September 27, 2011, 16:50 GMT

    Swann, you complained that your boys could not handle the moment, that is a lie, you got your rear end kicked in.

  • Dummy4 on September 27, 2011, 16:36 GMT

    Not the first time Santokie has got the better of Hales http://hcpcl.play-cricket.com/scoreboard/scorecard.asp?id=10138283 Got him out first ball once too.

  • Robin on September 27, 2011, 12:46 GMT

    Friday's performance was so bad, that i was reluctant to watch Sunday's match and when the Windies were restricted to 113-5, i thought this would be over inside 10 overs, how wrong was i?...Credit to Sammy and the rookies for showing such belief and competitive fighting spirit, that proved with the new-look England side are capable of human errors, once a bit of pressure is put upon them. A minor consulation for Sammy's team and let's not forget that this is a makeshift side without the IPL mercaneries and T&T committed to the Champions League.

  • kumar on September 27, 2011, 12:44 GMT

    It is not god judge based on one match or one series. Let it be India or ENG. After all every game is psychological. I definitely don't mean to discourage ENG but Indian team and it's bad situation made easy victory for ENG. Till WI series India was playing good but all of a sudden may be it is India's bad luck or ENG's luck (ofcourse both the teams had good talent) everything went wrong. Ofcourse India couldn't use some good opportunities as well. By the way WI is not bad team. They have good fighting spirit.

  • Dummy4 on September 27, 2011, 11:57 GMT

    @5wombats.. Ya.. If outcome of a coin Toss is a 100% unpredictable, thn its a fact that England is very lucky to win it in all ODIs against India this season.. I am sure dat u r not naive enuf, not to understand this fact.. And obviously, England was helped a lot by weather, dew and D/L method in all their chases.. None can deny on that.. Oh.. Now I got it.. U seems to say that England would hv won even if u hv lost the toss and batted first.. Then, why didnt u try this in atleast a single match.. Ans is - Luck was in ur way and u want to make most of it.. And, you did.. NO big deal..

  • Martin on September 27, 2011, 8:35 GMT

    @Antriksh Saal - "England were lucky with the toss..." GARBAGE. Don't you mean; "india weren't good enough to beat England... all Summer"?

  • Chris on September 27, 2011, 8:17 GMT

    'there u go. Brilliant performance follwed by a pathetic one. Poms going Pak way? I hope not.' - I think that you will find it's a lot more than one brilliant performance, followed by a bad one. Facts are such an awkward inconvenience, aren't they?

  • No featured comments at the moment.