England Lions v Australia A, Edgbaston, 3rd day

Kieswetter ton resurrects Lions

Paul Edwards at Edgbaston

August 16, 2012

Comments: 24 | Text size: A | A

England Lions 240 for 5 (Kieswetter 112*) trail Australia A 308 for 9 dec. (Harris 6-102) by 68 runs
Scorecard


Craig Kieswetter drives through the covers, July 11, 2011
Craig Kieswetter, seen here in his Somerset colours, brightened up the day with a marvellous century to rescue England Lions © PA Photos
Enlarge
Related Links

Is there a cleaner striker of a ball in English cricket than Craig Kieswetter? Those who watched him make 112 not out on the second day of the England Lions game against Australia A at Edgbaston might find it hard to believe so. Others, of course, might advance the claims of Matt Prior, but that is merely where Kieswetter's problems start if he wants to break into the Test side. Prior's keeping and his ability to bat in the longest format make him something of a mighty oak door barring Kieswetter's way into the dining-room where the world's best cricketers enjoy five-day feasts.

In the meantime, all he can do is bat in the gloriously dominant style he displayed to the pathetically small Birmingham crowd on Thursday afternoon. In company with the redoubtable Chris Woakes he shared an unbroken sixth-wicket partnership of 141 in 23 overs as Eoin Morgan's side recovered from 99 for 5 at four o'clock to finish just 68 runs shy of Australia A's first innings score when bad light ended play over an hour early. Indeed, rain and poor light meant that only 57 overs were possible on Thursday but the quality of the cricket on view made the reduction seem almost insignificant.

The excellence of Kieswetter's century was enhanced by the quality of the bowlers whom he ultimately took apart and by the situation of the game when he went in to bat. Replying to Australia's declaration on their overnight 308 for 9, England Lions were 46 for 3 as Kieswetter strode out to join Morgan. When the captain lost his off bail to Nathan Coulter-Nile seven runs later the home side were imperilled by embarrassment, even in a badly rain-affected game.

For the morning session was dominated by the tourists, although it comes as almost a disappointment to discover that Coulter-Nile is merely a Western Australian seamer. He sounds like the sort of character who wrestles tigers for a living and writes books with titles such as Twenty Years Down the Limpopo. In any event, he certainly explored the defensive techniques of some Lions yesterday morning and found them in distinctly under-developed territory. Of no one was this truer than Morgan, whose airy push into the off side was well beaten by Coulter-Nile's nip back off the seam.

he had also begun the clatter of wickets when he induced debutant Varun Chopra to top edge a pull to square leg, where Liam Davis caught the simplest of catches. The only player to bat with much poise in the first session was Joe Root, who hit three felicitous fours before he was caught down the leg side for 24 by wicketkeeper Tim Paine off Mitchell Johnson. That, though, was the second time in three innings that Root has fallen to Johnson in this fashion and it suggests a technical deficiency he must address if he is to make the most of his many talents.

Root's departure with the total on 30 was followed 25 minutes later by that of Samit Patel who was lbw for 2 when pushing half forward to Jackson Bird. All of which left the Lions' looking distinctly woebegone at lunch. It was probably fortuitous for the home side that heavy lunchtime rain delayed the restart by 80 minutes.

Initially, at least, Kieswetter was cautious as the three Australia A seamers continued to pose a threat in the afternoon session. His 46-run stand with Ben Stokes occupied nearly 17 overs, during which Stokes nearly ran himself out and the tourists made increasingly expert use of reverse swing. This latter stratagem was unintentionally kyboshed by Kieswetter straight driving a ball from offspinner Nathan Lyon into a puddle over the rope. The replacement ball did not help the trio of seamers half as much, even though Bird claimed Stokes' wicket when he was caught at the wicket pulling too early.

The rest of the day belonged to Kieswetter and also to Woakes, who once again made a valuable contribution to this short series. By the close, though, even his stylish 47 not out had been overshadowed by the Kieswetter's explosion of strokeplay after he had reached a relatively circumspect fifty off 80 balls. Unbeaten on 71 at tea, Kieswetter drove Bird for two fours and smote him over midwicket for six in the over after the resumption, all off the front foot. Then Coulter-Nile was driven for two boundaries off successive balls, before a flat-batted pull off Bird brought up Kieswetter's century off 116 balls, the second fifty coming up in 36 alarmingly violent deliveries.

The Australian attack's figures, which had looked so impressive at lunch, had taken on a more dismal aspect by the end of the day. Coulter-Nile's 19 overs cost 70 runs while Bird went for 65 in 16. Special treatment was reserved for Lyon on whom the pair of England Lions feasted, taking 47 runs off his eight overs. Some might label such behaviour nothing more than cricketing cannibalism, but it was still magnificent entertainment.

© ESPN Sports Media Ltd.

Posted by bumsonseats on (August 17, 2012, 19:35 GMT)

talikng about not a Australian A side. the ecb were asked to try an spread the selection of players from as many teams as possible so as not to incur the err of counties at this time of the season. so it may not be the best aussie A side but the lions could have also selected a stronger team. but the biggest disappointment was lyon who i saw at OT this from a guy touted as the best spinner in world cricket by some who was the worst on view inc a part time spinner into that group. but its the Aussies off season, well that was the reason during the odis against england so it must be true.

Posted by RednWhiteArmy on (August 17, 2012, 19:11 GMT)

You know your doing ok when the aussies start whinging their excuses in the awful, slack jawed way...England bribed the umpires, England doctored the pitch, England are selecting foreigners, England are controlling the weather, oh woe is me.

If england have broken a rule, file a complaint....if not, stop your whinging & while your at it knock that chip of your shoulders.

Posted by R_U_4_REAL_NICK on (August 17, 2012, 16:11 GMT)

@JG2704 (post on August 17 2012, 11:33 AM GMT): it's a good idea re. Kieswetter @ 6 for England. If neither of the two rookies currently playing now against SA perform (although as I type Jonny's on the verge of a 50...) I think Kieswetter's as a good a bet as any, plus he's tried and tested in a range of conditions and attacks. Good shout there.

Posted by JG2704 on (August 17, 2012, 15:37 GMT)

@jmcilhinney/ R_U_4_REAL_NICK - Could TBW be another alias - Similar posts and similar traits - Just a thought there?

Posted by Kidderwolf on (August 17, 2012, 11:36 GMT)

I suspect this game may have pushed Kieswetter into the touring test squads this winter as Prior's deputy and as an out and out batsman.

Certainly his keeping seems to have improved this year and the runs keep coming, and Steve Davies has such a poor season with the bat, that I expect Davies to lose out.

Posted by JG2704 on (August 17, 2012, 11:33 GMT)

I'm just wondering (and this might sound a bit kneejerk and forget the SA jibes) might Eng even have considered CK as number 6 batsman and play him just as a fielder? The reason I say this is although I prefer 5/1/5 they will NEVER do that while Strauss and Flower are there and CK is the sort of player who could as a batsman push the game forward and he has been in decent form lately and he is experienced in international cricket albeit at OD/T20 level. Also Woakes must be wondering what he has to do to get a senior call.

Posted by KeithMillersHair on (August 17, 2012, 10:22 GMT)

Harris, Hilfenhaus, Siddle, Patinson, Starc, Cummins, McDermott... All better bowlers than played in this game. Bird and Coulter-Nile are both promising but about 8th and 9th in line for a Test spot. And Johnson should never play again - enough said. This was not Australia's second best side, it was a hodge-podge of players who - aside for Cowan - are not in the Test side and not in the limited overs team (which currently has a training camp in Darwin) and not recovering from minor injuries. Still they should have done a lot better. No wins on tour is not good enough. Still, good experience for a couple of young kids who should play full international, McDermott (before he went home for training camp) and Joe Burns spring to mind.

Posted by R_U_4_REAL_NICK on (August 17, 2012, 10:19 GMT)

Silence again... @RandyOZ? No! @Jonesy2? No! They're both over on the England feeds, trolling away as usual... England fans on the other hand congratulating a great day's play, and only disappointed about the rain.

Posted by jezzastyles on (August 17, 2012, 8:54 GMT)

@jmcilhinney: You shouldn't take their posts seriously. Any unbiased and rational cricket follower, regardless of nationality, will acknowledge that England are a high-quality side, and they do have some good talent coming through their County system. Regardless of what RandyOZ thinks, the cupboards are nor bare. However, there's no need to fight fire with more fire. Let's just wait and see what happens in the next Ashes series. It's no use making comparisons based on current form or ODI form. It's even more pointless to make assumptions based on the form of the Australian-A side. The national test side has been performing strongly for the past 12-months, and whilst our batting department looks a little shakey, we are a much better side than the one that was soundly beaten by the Old Enemy 3-1 last time. I reckon it will be a very competitive series, but of course I want AUS to win. It looks as if the 3rd test is going to be a crackerjack of a game, may the best team win.

Posted by jmcilhinney on (August 17, 2012, 4:53 GMT)

@thebrotherswaugh on (August 17 2012, 02:01 AM GMT), regardless of where he's from, Aus A weren't good enough to get him out on this occasion. Maybe you ought to think a bit about that instead of trying to convince us you Aus A actually did deserve to win even though they didn't. The last bastion of the loser: I may have lost but you didn't deserve to win. You'll see that from RandyOZ quite a bit. I rest my case.

Comments have now been closed for this article

TopTop
Email Feedback Print
Share
E-mail
Feedback
Print
News | Features Last 3 days
News | Features Last 3 days