Bangladesh v Pakistan, World T20 2012, Group D, Pallekele September 25, 2012

Nazir takes Pakistan to Super Eights with super chase


Pakistan 178 for 2 (Nazir 72, Hafeez 45, Jamshed 29*) beat Bangladesh 175 for 6 (Shakib 84, Tamim 24, Arafat 3-25) by eight wickets
Scorecard and ball-by-ball details

Pakistan's celebrated bowling unit's rare off day put a latch on it, but their batsmen smashed through the qualification door by chasing down 176 - their highest successful chase - with eight balls to spare.

To progress in the tournament, Bangladesh needed to not only post their first win over Pakistan in 13 years, but win by at least 36 runs. On a true pitch, Shakib Al Hasan posted the highest score by a Bangladesh batsman to facilitate their second-highest total, but Imran Nazir whacked his way to the fastest fifty in this World T20 to calm down any nerves there might have been after the effort in the field.

It was also a night that will be remembered for shoddy short bowling on a flat track and shoddier catching by both sides. Sohail Tanvir put down one of the simplest catches ever put down in international cricket, Kamran Akmal let through a regulation take, but it was the drop by Abul Hasan, brought in to replace Elias Sunny, that proved decisive in the end. Had he held on, Nazir would have been gone on 1 and Shafiul Islam would have got off to a confident start with a first-ball wicket. Nazir ended up with 72.

It didn't help that the chance had come off a short delivery, which encouraged them to keep bowling short, and Nazir, often good with the horizontal bat, took full toll. In his second over, Shafiul kept bowling short and was carter for four, four and six. Another short ball that went for five wides made it 20 off the over, and Pakistan had had a head start at 43 for 0 after four overs. Clearly they were not going for just the qualification. The win was on their mind.

Mohammad Hafeez remained the calm man at other end, chipping and pushing runs as Nazir kept up his power hitting while getting at least one short ball every over. After Shakib put the brakes on with just four in the seventh over, Nazir stepped out of the crease to hit Abdur Razzak over mid-off to break the rhythm. That four took him to 42 off 18, and the fifty came when Shakib provided him with a long hop for six in the 10th over.

That even Shakib was making mistakes was sign enough. Relief arrived for Bangladesh when Nazir and Hafeez fell in one Hasan over, after which came a quiet five-run over, bringing the equation down to 45 needed off five overs. For the first time it seemed Pakistan might be conscious of that qualification mark - now nine runs away - but Nasir Jamshed quashed those thoughts with two of the finest shots, four through point and a flicked six over square leg, off the next two balls.

That was cue enough for Kamran to open up too, and the rest was just a stroll. Had you mentioned the word stroll in the first innings, though, Pakistan's coach Dav Whatmore would have given you a piece of his mind. For the most part, it was a stroll for Shakib, who capitalised on the brisk start provided by Mohammad Ashraful and Tamim Iqbal.

Shakib had the extra responsibility after playing a significant role in Tamim's run-out at 61 for 2 in the sixth over. He had himself raced away to 16 off 11 by then, took it easy for the next three overs, and then resumed the charge with two fours off Saeed Ajmal in the 10th over. When Tanvir dropped a dolly from Mushfiqur Rahim in the 13th over, Shakib had reached 42 off 30. He introduced a second wind to that innings now, hitting short deliveries from Yasir Arafat for four and six to bring up his fifty.

Another period of calm followed when Arafat and Shahid Afridi managed two wickets in five deliveries, but Kamran failed to make it three in eight when he dropped a sitter from Nasir Hossain. At 133 for 4 in the 16th over Shakib remained the main threat. He moved around the crease in the 18th over to pay with Umar Gul's length, scoping, flicking and cover-driving for fours. With 33 coming off the last three overs, Pakistan's travel agent might have had a look at Karachi fares, but Nazir put them back on their way to Colombo.

Sidharth Monga is an assistant editor at ESPNcricinfo

Comments have now been closed for this article

  • Dummy4 on September 27, 2012, 15:29 GMT

    Next match is quite tough.. i think Asad Shafiq, Abdul Razzaq and Raza Hasan should be include instead of Shoaib Malik , Sohail Tanvir and Umar Gul..

  • Dummy4 on September 27, 2012, 9:53 GMT

    Abdul Razzaq should be included instead of Sohail Tanvir. Sohail is a pathetic bowler and fielder. He can't control his line and length. Abdul Razzaq is a good hitter, better bowler and best fielder. My XI for next match. 1-) M. Hafeez 2-) Imran Nazir 3-) Nasir Jamshed 4-) Kamran Akmal 5-) Umar Akmal 6-) Shahid Afridi 7-) Abdul Razzaq 8-) Yasir Arafat 9-) Umar Gull 10-) Saeed Ajmal 11-) Raza Hassan

  • Muhammad on September 27, 2012, 8:12 GMT

    guys guys guys....noone gave this idea..but we need to remove sohail n bring in Raza Hasan.>! Not Razzaq..! his bowling is unpredictible these days

  • Abdul on September 27, 2012, 6:31 GMT

    I really don`t know why they have not given chance to Abdul Razak and Junaid Khan in group stage matches ? now as it seems that Gul and Tanvir are sound expensive how would they give other un used bowler to come and bowl in the tensed matches ? or the team management has decided to go with the same Eleven ? i think they should .

  • Jawwad on September 27, 2012, 5:46 GMT

    Relax guys. The grouping is based on the rankings. Let them all fight out and watch England prevail. I think that was the idea. Forget the finals. These group matches will be crackers. Out of these 4 will win it all. Good luck Pakistan.

  • Dummy4 on September 27, 2012, 5:01 GMT

    Grouping is very unfair.and razzaq should b in for tanveer and should bat at 5

  • Mahfuz on September 27, 2012, 4:06 GMT

    Lot of people are asking why all the group toppers are placed in same group. Answer is super eight groups are made as per original seeding. So A1 B2 C1 and D2 are grouped in one group and incidentally they are all group leader.

  • Shazia on September 26, 2012, 21:31 GMT

    I did some stats and here is my findings: Umar Gul (last 25 matches): 82.1 overs @8.36; 686 runs, 24 wickets @28.58 = Sohail Tanvir (last 25 matches) : 82.3 overs @7.2; 593 runs, 23 wickets @25.78 = Abdul Razzaq (last 25 matches) : 43 overs @6.7; 288 runs, 15 wickets @19.2...... AND.....Umar Gul (last 10 matches): 37 overs @8.08; 299 runs, 11 wickets @27.18 = Sohail Tanvir (last 10 matches) : 31.3 overs @7.3; 228 runs, 12 wickets @19= Abdul Razzaq (last 10 matches) : 14 overs @7.2; 101 runs, 6 wickets @16.83...... Can anyone help me understand why Abdul Razzaq is being ignored, specially when we all know his added ability with the bat? and also, why there is so much hype for Umar Gul, he has been pathetic in crunch matches specially.

  • Krishna on September 26, 2012, 21:17 GMT

    Being an Indian fan i always watch and appreciate Pak cricket(especially T20).Let this be a IND-PAk final.However is still believe the tournament is grouped on unfair basis.

  • John on September 26, 2012, 20:21 GMT

    @kumarcoolbuddy on (September 26 2012, 12:56 PM GMT) Sorry , are you talking about English fans , media or players?

  • No featured comments at the moment.