| Series | Countries | Live Scores | Fixtures | Results | News |
Features
|
Photos | Video & Audio | Blogs | Statistics | Archive | Games | Mobile | ||||||||||||||||||||
|
March 16, 2013
India 283 for 0 (Dhawan 185*, Vijay 83*) trail Australia 408 (Starc 99, Smith 92, Cowan 86, Warner 71, Ishant 3-72, Jadeja 3-77) by 125 runs
Scorecard and ball-by-ball details
![]()
|
|||
|
Related Links
Features : Dhawan the villain in another Australian horror show
Matches:
India v Australia at Mohali
Series/Tournaments:
Australia tour of India
|
|||
Shikhar Dhawan could possibly have been out before he had faced a ball in Test matches. The first delivery of the innings slipped out of Mitchell Starc's hand and landed on the stumps with the debutant out of his ground at the non-striker's end. There was no appeal, but if made it would have sent many running for the law book and coming back with varying interpretations of two laws: mankading and dead ball.
Dhawan, though, felt he was out, and took full advantage of what he felt was Australian generosity with a breathtaking century, its 85-ball duration the swiftest ever by a Test debutant. By the close he was still there on a commanding 185, looking utterly impassable while gathering runs with the kind of rare ease that invoked memories of Mark Waugh's debut against England at Adelaide Oval in 1991.*
Australia's tally of 408 had been swelled by Mitchell Starc's 99, but it was made to look laughably puny by how Dhawan set about his task in the company of the neat and tidy M Vijay. They formed a beautifully balanced union that did not take long to become plainly disdainful of the visiting bowlers, and by the close it was comfortably India's best opening stand against Australia.
On the way to what was also the highest total by an Indian debutant, Dhawan's stroke range was awe-inspiring, no fewer than 33 fours and two sixes streaming from his bat to all parts of the PCA ground. He was most savage through cover, piercing gaps no matter how many fielders Michael Clarke employed to patrol the region.
In doing so, Dhawan laid waste to a touring attack that should have been feeling quite haughty about prolonging Australia's innings on the third morning. The worst punishment was saved for Moises Henriques, Nathan Lyon and most of all Xavier Doherty, who in one over conceded an eye-popping 18, all to Dhawan's impudent blade.
Among the liberties taken in that over was a reverse sweep, conveying just how little Dhawan thought of the visiting spin bowlers. At the age of 27, Dhawan had been made to wait 81 first-class matches, 5679 runs and 16 centuries for this chance, coming in at the expense of Virender Sehwag. The flourish with which Dhawan took it was supreme, and indicated that India have not given up hope of forcing a victory over the remaining two days.
Vijay meanwhile constructed another innings entirely suitable to the occasion, settling in quietly and safely in Dhawan's slipstream but never becoming so tied down as to suggest the Australians had him covered. He too attacked the slow bowlers for a pair of sixes, and it was possible to imagine India have found an opening partnership to last for some time.
Clarke exhausted all of the bowling options except his own, though this is at least partly to spare his problematic back. At no point were his bowlers able to deliver spells consistent enough to create pressure, despite the fact that both Peter Siddle and Mitchell Starc extracted reverse swing and there was enough bounce and spin for Lyon, Doherty and Steven Smith.
Most of all Australia missed James Pattinson, their most dangerous bowler in the first two Tests and an absentee here for punitive disciplinary reasons. Mitchell Johnson, another suspended bowler, has enjoyed success on this ground in the past, and it is difficult to imagine Clarke not wondering who else he might have called upon had team management not chosen to rule out four players for failing to follow the instructions of management.
Only once did Dhawan give the ghost of a chance, a thick edge on 94 flying through the hands of Phillip Hughes in the gully from Peter Siddle's bowling.
The Australians might have had some inkling of how swiftly the runs might flow when India batted after watching their own tail wag furiously. Starc assembled a brave 99, Smith managed 92, and in all 157 runs were added for the final three wickets.
For most of his innings Starc played nervelessly, hitting with power and pushing through gaps with finesse, while also defending when necessary. But he tightened up noticeably with one run to get for a hundred, beaten twice outside off stump by Ishant Sharma then edging an attempted drive behind after MS Dhoni brought the field in.
In that moment Australia were denied their first centurion at No. 9 since Ray Lindwall in 1946-47, and a rare chance to feel a rush of shared jubilation on this tour. So even during a session in which India were dominated, the hosts still managed to deny the tourists a feeling of achievement.
Smith's innings reached a similarly flat conclusion after he had also played with great assurance at No. 5, demonstrating a steadier approach and straighter bat than he had shown in his earlier Test match appearances in 2010 and 2011. It was a chanceless innings, and took a practically perfect ball from Pragyan Ojha to dislodge him.
*07.00pm GMT, March 16: The copy has been updated after reviewing the laws of the game.
Daniel Brettig is an assistant editor at ESPNcricinfo. He tweets here
© ESPN EMEA Ltd.
| ||||||
| Comments have now been closed for this article |
||||||
Assistant editor Daniel Brettig had been a journalist for eight years when he joined ESPNcricinfo, but his fascination with cricket dates back to the early 1990s, when his dad helped him sneak into the family lounge room to watch the end of day-night World Series matches well past bedtime. Unapologetically passionate about indie music and the South Australian Redbacks, Daniel's chief cricketing achievement was to dismiss Wisden Almanack editor Lawrence Booth in the 2010 Ashes press match in Perth - a rare Australian victory that summer.
ICICI Bank M2I. Register Now and Get A Gift Offer.
Safe & simple online money transfer. Apply Now!
Buy Wisden 2013 & get a FREE Playfair
Available now at Cricshop
After a long long time, i felt like watching this game for the sheer joy of watching. People might call it indian track, lack of wicket taking bowlers ( if they think Siddle, Starc and Nathan Lyon are such) etc etc but on a debut an innings with no risky shots, no aerial shots, no hit and misses, no streaky shots, no dropped catches even the catch Hughes (kinda droped ) was not a catch at all but by australian standards that could have been converted but never the less it was an improbable catch to say, no stress and tension on his face, no one sided mastery, this guy almost played all shots in the book with technical precision and the way he founded gaps and bisected them was in itself a treat for eyes. I do agree it is just the beginning but let me tell you even if he fails( god forbid) all along his career this innings was one in a million and worth watching. Hope and pray he will blossom all through his career and prove himself in all parts of the cricket world.
I can only vouch since when I started watching from 1970's ... People may say easy batting track, weak opponent etc.. Well, all the past Indian batsmen got their chances like this (batting track and weak opponents) some time or other, right? In fact, the Gavaskars, Dravids and Tendulkars with their defensive mindset only made it look as difficult and only created fear in other batsmen's minds. Sehwag on the other hand played fantastic aggressive cricket, but then he was very non-technical (not moving his feet) and limited to mostly offside shots. But never I have seen an India batsman play with this natural class and technique and aggression, all around the ground. And he is a debutant of age 26? And he was never given chance all these years? Now my mindset is this. Indian youth has greater batsmen than Tendulkars, Gavaskars, Dravids and Sehwags, .. Thats how it is and thats how it should be. Selectors, please keep trying young bloods instead of keeping the old heros. Thanks.
My African childhood was punctuated by worldwide test cricket commentary on a crackling short-wave radio, my patient father explaing it's strange language. I still eagerly follow every test match, worldwide. Yesterday I ached for New Zealand, stopped 11 runs short of the follow on, for Steven Smith, stumped 8 runs shy of a maiden ton, & for Mitchell Starc, caught only a single run short of both a maiden & only the 16th test century by a no.9. Cricket can be cruel.
After 2 am I finally slept, as India began their reply, & this morning, before anything else, I eagerly checked the scorecard. My laughter woke the household. During my brief nap, Shikar Dhawan had changed the landscape, racing through the record book, & silencing his critics. Cricket is still generous.
Australia will sleep wearily, Sewag & Ghambir uneasily, & India expectantly. But, judging by his masterful & yet serene batting, Dhawan, even on the verge of greater history, will sleep like a lamb.
Viva test cricket.
By the look of it, this innings by Shikhar Dhawan will ensure that both Sehwag and Gambhir will not be able to get back into the Indian Test team for atleast an year. With Pujara taking on the role of the newer and faster version of 'the Wall' - Rahul Dravid - and Murali Vijay on the verge of back-to-back tons (167 in Test 2), clearly the top three slots are now filled... atleast for the next Test series. Infact, with the smashing success that the Indian team has been in this series, the remaining batting lineup - Tendulkar, Kohli, Dhoni, Jadeja - cannot be touched. Unfortunately for both Gambhir and Sehwag, the next test series (India-South Africa) is atleast 8 months off. Sehwag would've crossed 35 years of age, while Gambhir would be well above 32 years of age. I wonder if this is the end of the road for swashbuckling Sehwag. Gambhir has a chance now only if one of the current openers shoot themselves in the foot. Looks like the end of the most successful Indian opening pair...
At last, India has an opener who can start the innings boldly in all three formats of the game! Kudos Dhawan! It's sheer delight to watch a batsman make his debut in such an authoritarian manner. The fact that he hit classic shots without ever lofting a ball till his century, that too the fastest by a debutant speaks volumes of the caliber this guy has. The ease with which he stepped into the shoes of a great player is amazing! Now Sehwag's target is cut out. He can sharpen his skills and work hard for a comeback to the Indian side as a middle order batsman at No.6 ahead of Dhoni in test matches against South Africa. It would be a formidable FIRST SEVEN - Vijay, Dhawan, Pujara, Sachin, Kohli, Sehwag, Dhoni followed by Ashwin and Co. Now what Dhawan needs to do is just keep his cool and provide another left-right opening pair that can match or even surpass the legendary Gambhir-Sehwag combo. Good luck guys!
It was good to see a batsman playing strokes instead of hanging his bat out at balls outside the off stump.Also good to see the emphasis put on hitting the ball on the ground.Picking the gaps is also refreshing,done from either back foot or front foot.Rolling his hand over when hooking or pulling. This inning is played in India but the mechanics behind it could be played any where in the world.Beautiful!!!
@kitten I'm not sure I was being critical, I was just suggesting it's not something to get too excited about as it's another flat track. If he performs in another country I'll be impressed but having watch the full innings he's just a flat track bully.
Posted by@ Nampally .... I actually said that there should have been a spin camp for Cowan, Lyon and Wade after the 3rd Test against SL.
Please realise that India hasn't played Australia A yet.
As suggested earlier ... Step 1 - Agar and O'Keefe play 4th Test with Warne as Captain camped at mid on.
Posted by@ Moppa ..... your reference to me just blaming Clarke for selections is incorrect. Often list all selectors and ask them all to take a bow.Although, please correct me if I am wrong, I thought that Clarke had two votes. I typically single out Clarke only when refering to bad captaincy AND selection, where he is responsible for both.
What I was acknowledging is the complete disregard that Clarke has for the talent that our bowlers have with the bat .. Lyon, Pattinson, Siddle, Johnson, and Starc have all contributed valuable runs.
In Hyderabad, Clarke could have settled in ... Fortress Australia ... with Siddle, instead he fed him the strike on the first or second ball of the over until he got out. When Pattinson came to the crease Clarke threw his wicket away. He then should have declared immediately, giving Australia 6-7 overs instead of 3, or batted on. If you declare in this position why would you give pattinson only 2SL & a G. Why not 6 attacking fielders applying pressure.
Posted by JG2704 on (March 17, 2013, 8:41 GMT)@Greatest_Game on (March 16, 2013, 16:41 GMT) Thanks for that Mr Stats Guru.