| Series | Countries | Live Scores | Fixtures | Results | News |
Features
|
Photos | Video & Audio | Blogs | Statistics | Archive | Games | Mobile | ||||||||||||||||||||
|
March 23, 2013
India 266 for 8 (Vijay 57, Pujara 52, Lyon 5-94) lead Australia 262 (Siddle 51, Ashwin 5-57) by 4 runs
Scorecard and ball-by-ball details
![]()
|
|||
|
Related Links
Players/Officials:
Nathan Lyon
Matches:
India v Australia at Delhi
Series/Tournaments:
Australia tour of India
|
|||
Loosened up, aggressive, focused and familiar enough with the conditions, Australia are ready to give India a fright at home. The only trouble for the tourists is that the strongest demonstration of their readiness for the task has arrived with the Test series in its death throes. The captain, Michael Clarke, has already flown home.
Defending a middling 262 on a Delhi pitch that was always less than trustworthy, the stand-in leader Shane Watson marshalled his men handily as India slipped to 266 for 8 by the close. He benefited from a fine display by Nathan Lyon, who spun the ball sharply and landed it with greater consistency than he had managed all series. Peter Siddle, James Pattinson and Mitchell Johnson also contributed useful spells, while in the field the tourists were generally alert and often combative.
Fired initially by the refusal of a very adjacent lbw appeal by Lyon against Sachin Tendulkar, the Australians became decidedly feisty during MS Dhoni's evening stay. Having earlier given Virat Kohli a send-off from the team huddle, David Warner took exception when Dhoni ran down the middle of the pitch while taking a run, moving the umpires to ask Watson to calm his opening batsman down.
All this had the hollow ring of a team fighting back well after the final bell had been rung, but there was consolation to be had for Lyon and Watson, both having endured particularly difficult tours. Certainly the decision to leave Lyon out of the Hyderabad match now appears to be the single most baffling piece of selection for the tour. Australia's least effective portfolio was the over rate, which slinked along at little more than 12 overs an hour.
India stuttered mainly because their batsmen did not go on from starts for the first time all series. Cheteshwar Pujara, M Vijay, Tendulkar, Dhoni and Ravindra Jadeja all made starts but none went any further than 58, which was the sort of problem much more familiar to Australia over the preceding three Tests.
Smart stats |
Australia had commenced with the unfortunate news that Maxwell was still at the team hotel due to stomach trouble, but harboured hopes of stretching the total beyond 300. Siddle's half-century was a just reward for his defiance, but he was not to venture much further, playing inside the line to R Ashwin and losing off stump. Pattinson was last out, a thin edge granting Pragyan Ojha his 100th wicket in Tests.
The Australians had their fourth different new ball pairing of the series, Johnson and Pattinson charging in at the hosts, and after a few promising early deliveries Watson was witness to the familiar sight of Indian batsmen collecting facile runs. Pujara was beaten between bat and pad by one Pattinson delivery that pranced back at him while disturbing the surface, but his response to the next ball, a serene back foot drive, typified the confidence with which the openers played.
If Johnson's off cutter appeared likely to be the cause of some discomfort on the dry, turning pitch, his early use of it was characterised by runs given up via the gloves of Matthew Wade rather than any wickets. It was somewhat surprising that Lyon's entry was delayed until 19 overs had been bowled, more so when he immediately had the ball turning and bouncing while finding his best rhythm of the tour.
The century stand arrived soon after Lyon's introduction, via the unedifying sight of Johnson throwing airily beyond Wade for four overthrows. Having fended off several off breaks that spun back dangerously, Pujara played for turn to a ball tossed up with more over spin and had his off stump tilted back. Lyon went around the wicket to Kohli and celebrated raucously when he pinned the batsman in front with a ball very similar to that with which he could easily have also dismissed Tendulkar.
On resumption after tea Siddle gave up 10 runs to suggest India might zip clear, but he made amends with a swift bouncer that surprised Vijay and resulted in a simple chance to Wade off the glove. Ajinkya Rahane's first Test innings was nervy and brief, ending with a Lyon off break gloved straight to leg slip, and Dhoni had barely begun his customary counterattack when Tendulkar was again pinned in front by Lyon, and this time given out.
Dhoni's stay did not extend far beyond his exchange with Warner, a half-hearted pull shot picking out Watson at a square midwicket, and Jadeja failed to offer a shot to a delivery that appeared bound to flick off stump. It had been bowled by Maxwell, recovered from his bout of gastro.
India inched ahead, but Watson remained eager for wickets. Following a brief rest, Watson swung Lyon around to the other end for the final over, and he completed the day's Australian rehabilitation by pinning Ashwin for his deserved fifth. If only it wasn't the fourth Test.
Daniel Brettig is an assistant editor at ESPNcricinfo. He tweets here
© ESPN EMEA Ltd.
| ||||||
| Comments have now been closed for this article |
||||||
Assistant editor Daniel Brettig had been a journalist for eight years when he joined ESPNcricinfo, but his fascination with cricket dates back to the early 1990s, when his dad helped him sneak into the family lounge room to watch the end of day-night World Series matches well past bedtime. Unapologetically passionate about indie music and the South Australian Redbacks, Daniel's chief cricketing achievement was to dismiss Wisden Almanack editor Lawrence Booth in the 2010 Ashes press match in Perth - a rare Australian victory that summer.
Online Money Transfer, 3 easy steps
Confirmed exchange rates. Register now!
Buy Wisden 2013 & get a FREE Playfair
Available now at Cricshop
Australia v India in Australia - Aust wins, Aust v India in India - India wins. What we need for better entertainment and a better representation of cricket is a test series: Aust v India in Aust & India. Thats two tests each country, with the best team having to win the most matches in both countries. Australia and England are kinda doing it, but 10 tests straight is too much and they are being counted as seperate series. A better system would be to split tests into two tiers (1 to 6 and 7 to 12). Each country plays five series every two years with relegations at the end. Each series would have four tests (two in each country) with say five points for a win, two points for a draw and one point for first innings lead. This would bring interest to every test series where the strongest teams every two years would play each other, and teams like WI, NZ, Bang, Zimb, Ireland and Afganistan would play off for the chance to play against the top teams in the world.
I said at the start of indian innings that chopping the lineup will back-fire. Now india are in familiar territory.
Even after 3rd test the main difference in two teams was one stupendous innings/ partnership from india per game. Take that out and india had been making 200 odd runs for 8/9 wickets. A blistering Dhawan 100 or Dhoni 200 is once in 30 tests event and we had to look beyond it at team performance.
Even when people predicted 4-0, my contention was australia is not going down without fight; this is different than the treatment meted out to india year ago. With the one champion inning not happening, this is anyone's game now. This will also test indian bowling as first time australia's second innings will start with a chance to be aggressive. My money would be on a quickfire 80 from Warner/ Hughes putting the game beyond india.
4-0. Not yet, not without a fight. One word. Vindicated.
As I type, Lyon has just cleaned up the tail (7 for). I would be VERY tempted to open the batting with Maxwell & see if he can cash in on the new ball. Maybe get a quickfire 30+, which could really put India on the back foot. Oz need a minimum 200 to defend, prefer 250, anything over 150 should make it a cracker of a match. Hopefully NO MORE 100 RUN STANDS for the 1st or 2nd (or any) wicket PLEASE!!!!!!
Posted by mukesh_LOVE.cricket on (March 24, 2013, 4:09 GMT)@see the obvious : you have a problem with the way rahane got out ! come on man , give the guy a break , he was benched for so long and finally go ta chance to play that too on such a difficult wicket , he is understandably nervous. but i guess you don't find anything wrong with sachin surviving a 'plumb as it gets' lbw call when he was on 1 run !! also why is that everyone else in batting order can change their batting position for the team but not sachin ?? may be you should see the obvious as the name suggests :)
Posted by realfan on (March 24, 2013, 3:40 GMT)it will be very interesting to see the battle between kohli and warner, but unfortunately it wont last long as warner wont last long...... he is just sooooo frustrated this warner..... best view of this series is the scene that warner showing his frustration which he had kept in all the series.....
Posted byGuys have you noticed how the highlights anchor of Willow TV for the India vs Australia announces all events mainly Australian wickets before they happen. I just don't understand why he does this. It robs the highlights of the main excitement of wickets. Reminds me of the times when Dr. Narottam Puri used to start highlights by telling everything before hand. We used to scramble to mute the TV till he was done. God help us by drilling some sense into this man. I am sure he means well and is trying his best. But, frankly the quality is atrocious. Wish he just kept quiet. We can hear the regular commentators and figure out thing quite well without his incessant monologue.
Posted byThe big worry about the absence of some referral system is that players' reputation could often influence the umpires. Normal reviews are enough to eliminate howlers. Seems like somebody just fears them. And I wish disciplinarians showed much more anxiety about this than all that homework and stuff!
Posted by nshibu on (March 24, 2013, 2:29 GMT)India have a serious problem knocking over the tail enders. More than once the Australian tail have put 100+ runs in the series. Here the the last 3 put 126 runs together and that could well make a difference.
Posted by Johnny_129 on (March 24, 2013, 2:09 GMT)This Test will be decided by which team has more fight in them - India and Aus are both rebuilding their teams. In bygone years India has always lacked the fight but in recent times that has changed somewhat (not withstanding the series in Aus and Eng). This match will also see one of these teams grow an extra leg and kick on whereas the losing team will be back to soul-searching. It is essential that B Kumar, Ishant & Ojha get their heads down and give India a decent lead - a match deciding one. By this, I don't mean they should go into a shell and get in a defence mode - they need to attack in a controlled manner. If the three can contribute 15 runs each then that's GAME INDIA!!!
Posted by popcorn on (March 24, 2013, 2:02 GMT)Umpire Aleem Dar warns Perer Siddle for running on the pitch, but does not warn Dhoni - who ran down the pitch - twice. Sic.